Car makers call for planned easing of electricity costs to go further
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) called for the proposed relief on standing charges included in the Industrial Strategy published on Monday – which will apply to battery manufacturing – to be extended to automotive manufacturing.
It stated that UK automotive manufacturers pay more for electricity than anywhere else in Europe, and in excess of double the average.
This is partly because of energy taxes which are six times higher and added more than £200 million to manufacturers' bills last year, the SMMT said.
It stated: 'Rapid implementation of the reforms to industrial energy costs set out in the Industrial Strategy would cut the sector's electricity bill by a fifth, helping ease this structural disadvantage.'
The SMMT added that compared with other major economies, the UK has the highest business rates and is 'among the worst for the burden of government regulation'.
It called for the Government to 'recreate a competitive edge', declaring that 'the time now is for giant leaps'.
SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: 'We welcome the Government's Industrial Strategy, a 10-year plan which answers our call for a long-term commitment to automotive manufacturing.
'With action to reduce electricity costs, upskill workers and unlock finance, it lays the foundation on which we can build our future.
'We now need to see the strategy implemented and at pace, because competitors will move fast so our window of opportunity will not remain open for long.
'The prize, however, in terms of jobs, innovation and economic growth – green growth at that – is worth the investment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
25 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Government has been 'dangerously flat-footed' in its approach to recovering nearly £2 billion in estimated taxpayer losses from the Covid bounce back loan scheme, MPs have warned. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money. The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand. It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly. However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified. The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently. The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began. It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers. Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million. But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach. 'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said. 'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach. 'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.'
North Wales Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money. The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand. It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly. However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified. The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently. The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began. It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers. Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million. But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach. 'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said. 'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach. 'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.' The DBT has been approached for comment.
Leader Live
37 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money. The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand. It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly. However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified. The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently. The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began. It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers. Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million. But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach. 'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said. 'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach. 'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.' The DBT has been approached for comment.
