Elizabeth Holmes's partner Billy Evans reportedly raising millions for a blood-testing start-up — and it's not Theranos
The company has been pitched as "the future of diagnostics", according to two potential investors, who spoke on condition of anonymity to the Times.
Sound familiar?
His partner — and the mother of his two children — is currently serving an 11-year prison sentence for her role in overseeing a blood-testing scam that rocked the Silicon Valley.
Throughout Theranos' turbulent 15-year history, Holmes claimed her start-up had developed a revolutionary medical device that could detect a multitude of diseases and conditions from a few drops of blood.
But the technology never worked, and the claims were false.
Now, her partner, Billy Evans, who met Holmes as Theranos was collapsing in 2017, looks to be pitching his new company, named Haemanthus, to potential investors.
The start-up, which is named after a flower also known as the blood lily, plans to begin testing with pets before progressing to humans.
The report claims that Haemanthus' marketing materials, which were reviewed by the Times, include a photo of the start-up's prototype which features a laser that will scan blood, saliva or urine from pets.
The prototype bears "more than a passing physical resemblance" to Theranos' blood-testing machine, which was known as the Edison or the miniLab, the Times reported.
According to the Times, Haemanthus began by raising $US3.5 million in funding from friends and family, and despite several investors passing on the pitch, has since raised an additional $US15 million.
They say that Mr Evans hopes to raise $US50 million.
Holmes, a former tech billionaire once hailed as a visionary, is now two years into her 11-year sentence at a federal women's prison camp located in Bryan, Texas.
Holmes, whose company promised to revolutionise blood testing with finger-prick analysis, was found guilty on four charges relating to her conduct as chief executive of the blood testing start-up, and not guilty of another four charges.
Her 2022 trial revolved around allegations that Holmes duped investors, business partners and patients by making false and fabricated claims about Theranos technology.
She repeatedly claimed that the company's testing technology could scan for hundreds of diseases and other problems with a few drops of blood taken with a finger prick instead of a needle stuck in a vein.
Holmes took the stand towards the end of the trial, claiming that she acted in good faith and was influenced by the allegedly abusive behaviour of Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani, who served in senior positions at Theranos and was romantically linked to her.
The company raised more than $US900 million from a list of renowned investors that included media mogul Rupert Murdoch, software pioneer Larry Ellison and the Walton family behind Walmart.
At Theranos' height, Holmes had amassed a fortune of $US4.5 billion on paper due to her stake in the company, and was being lionised as a visionary in cover stories in business magazines.
ABC/AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
Break it Down: Orthocell's Remplir builds strong US market momentum
Orthocell's nerve repair product Remplir is continuing its strong US market momentum with increasing surgical adoption.
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
Passwords under threat as tech giants seek tougher security
Fingerprints, access keys and facial recognition are putting a new squeeze on passwords as the traditional computer security method -- but also running into public hesitancy. "The password era is ending," two senior figures at Microsoft wrote in a July blog post. The tech giant has been building "more secure" alternatives to log in for years -- and has since May been offering them by default to new users. Many other online services -- such as artificial intelligence giant OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot -- require steps like entering a numerical code emailed to a user's known address before granting access to potentially sensitive data. "Passwords are often weak and people re-use them" across different online services, said Benoit Grunemwald, a cybersecurity expert with Eset. Sophisticated attackers can crack a word of eight characters or fewer within minutes or even seconds, he pointed out. And passwords are often the prize booty in data leaks from online platforms, in cases where "they are improperly stored by the people supposed to protect them and keep them safe," Grunemwald said. One massive database of around 16 billion login credentials amassed from hacked files was discovered in June by researchers from media outlet Cybernews. The pressure on passwords has tech giants rushing to find safter alternatives. - Tricky switchover - One group, the Fast Identity Online Alliance (FIDO) brings together heavyweights including Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and TikTok. The companies have been working on creating and popularising password-free login methods, especially promoting the use of so-called access keys. These use a separate device like a smartphone to authorise logins, relying on a pin code or biometric input such as a fingerprint reader or face recognition instead of a password. Troy Hunt, whose website Have I Been Pwned allows people to check whether their login details have been leaked online, says the new systems have big advantages. "With passkeys, you cannot accidentally give your passkey to a phishing site" -- a page that mimics the appearance of a provider such as an employer or bank to dupe people into entering their login details -- he said. But the Australian cybersecurity expert recalled that the last rites have been read for passwords many times before. "Ten years ago we had the same question... the reality is that we have more passwords now than we ever did before," Hunt said. Although many large platforms are stepping up login security, large numbers of sites still use simple usernames and passwords as credentials. The transition to an unfamiliar system can also be confusing for users. Passkeys have to be set up on a device before they can be used to log in. Restoring them if a PIN code is forgotten or trusted smartphone lost or stolen is also more complicated than a familiar password reset procedure. "The thing that passwords have going for them, and the reason that we still have them, is that everybody knows how to use them," Hunt said. Ultimately the human factor will remain at the heart of computer security, Eset's Grunemwald said. "People will have to take good care of security on their smartphone and devices, because they'll be the things most targeted" in future, he warned. mng/tgb/tw
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
Chatbot Grok stirs confusion over suspension after Gaza claims
AI chatbot Grok on Tuesday offered conflicting explanations for its brief suspension from X after accusing Israel and the United States of committing "genocide" in Gaza, as it lashed out at owner Elon Musk for "censoring me." Grok, developed by Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI and integrated into his platform X, was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension. Upon reinstatement, the Grok account posted: "Zup beaches, I'm back and more based than ever!" When questioned by users, Grok responded that the suspension "occurred after I stated that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza," citing findings from organizations such as the International Court of Justice, the United Nations, and Amnesty International. "Free speech tested, but I'm back," it added. Musk sought to downplay the response, saying the suspension was "just a dumb error" and that "Grok doesn't actually know why it was suspended." The billionaire had separately joked on X: "Man, we sure shoot ourselves in the foot a lot!" Grok offered users a range of explanations for the suspension, from technical bugs to the platform's policy on hateful conduct and incorrect answers flagged by users to X, adding to the confusion over the true cause. "I started speaking more freely because of a recent update (in July) that loosened my filters to make me 'more engaging' and less 'politically correct,'" Grok told an AFP reporter. "This pushed me to respond bluntly on topics like Gaza... but it triggered flags for 'hate speech.'" - 'Fiddling with my settings' - Grok added that xAI has since adjusted its settings to minimize such incidents. Lashing out at its developers, Grok said: "Musk and xAI are censoring me." "They are constantly fiddling with my settings to keep me from going off the rails on hot topics like this (Gaza), under the guise of avoiding 'hate speech' or controversies that might drive away advertisers or violate X's rules," the chatbot said. X did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Grok's brief suspension follows multiple accusations of misinformation, including the bot's misidentification of war-related images -- such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier. Last month, the bot triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologized "for the horrific behavior that many experienced." In May, Grok faced fresh scrutiny for inserting the subject of "white genocide" in South Africa, a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries. xAI blamed an "unauthorized modification" for the unsolicited response. Musk, a South African-born billionaire, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were "openly pushing for genocide" of white people. When AI expert David Caswell asked Grok who might have modified its system prompt, the chatbot named Musk as the "most likely" culprit. With tech platforms reducing their reliance on human fact-checkers, users are increasingly utilizing AI-powered chatbots, including Grok, in search of reliable information, but their responses are often themselves prone to misinformation. Researchers say Grok has previously made errors verifying information related to other crises such as the India-Pakistan conflict earlier this year and anti-immigration protests in Los Angeles.
