logo
The Wheel of Misfortune will spin over Docklands again, and I'm excited

The Wheel of Misfortune will spin over Docklands again, and I'm excited

The news this week that Melbourne's much-maligned, mocked, and long-motionless giant ferris wheel will soon(-ish) turn again – following a complex $11 million deal with Swiss and American backers – has me in a spin.
The story spoke (sorry, can't resist) to me. But what did I feel, exactly? A mix of disbelief, doubt, disdain, maybe even dread? A lot of D words, which is appropriate given the oversized role the attraction (or distraction) plays in the life of Docklands.
The $100 million wheel opened in 2008, was shut down 40 days later when structural flaws were detected, reopened after extensive and expensive repairs (practically a rebuild) in 2013, and closed again in 2021, a victim of COVID and lack of interest.
You might say the wheel is symptomatic of Docklands itself. It should work, but it doesn't.
But for all that, one D word I don't apply to the Melbourne Star Observation Wheel – or M-SOW, as I prefer to think of it – is disaster.
Loading
Unlike most Melburnians, I have been on the wheel. I was gifted a spin with my family for a birthday some years ago. It was winter, it was night, the sky was clear, and we could see for miles: shipping containers as far as the eye could see in one direction; suburban sprawl to the Dandenongs in another; the stretch of the bay to Dromana to the south; the strange solitary highrise blip of the Broadmeadows Civic Plaza to the north. And, of course, the dense forest of towers of New Quay, the CBD and Southbank right up close.
People love to complain about the view, to insist the 120-metre-tall wheel is in the wrong spot, that it should be on the banks of the Yarra, at Birrarung Marr, perhaps, or by Polly Woodside, where its much smaller sibling, the 35-metre-high Skyline Melbourne, operates. But I'm not sure that I buy that.
What you see from M-SOW is Melbourne as it really is. A sprawl. A nice bay, with some lovely beaches. A cluster of hills in the distance, but not overly endowed with the geographical magnificence of Sydney, or the lush green and undulating topography of Brisbane.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Safety checks in quads on Bali
Safety checks in quads on Bali

West Australian

time15 hours ago

  • West Australian

Safety checks in quads on Bali

In November, an eight-year-old boy was airlifted to Perth in an induced coma after suffering a fractured skull during a quad bike accident in Bali. It wasn't a one-off. A quick online search shows headlines like 'Dangerous/unsafe/100 per cent chances of getting badly hurt', and 'One of our riders was trapped under a rolled ATV, a 500kg machine, with both an adult and my son pinned beneath it'. Nigel Mason, the fit 82-year-old Australian founder of Mason's Adventures in Bali, adds: 'There are more accidents than you hear about. Many of them are covered up. Quads are dangerous, full stop. Around 20 people get killed on them in Australia every year.' It may sound odd, then, to learn in addition to whitewater rafting, elephant feeding and mountain biking, Mason's Adventures offers 'jungle buggy' tours on which tourists tear through the jungle with abandon. But there's a huge difference, Nigel explains. 'We don't use ordinary ATVs,' he says. 'We have a fleet of Polaris dune buggies from the US that you sit in, not on top of, which means you have a lower centre of gravity and are less likely to roll over. And in case you do roll over, you're surrounded by a cage and wearing a seatbelt. We're the only company in Bali that has them. Plus we don't take people on roads or public tracks. 'We have a private 5km track that I spent three months gouging out of the jungle, and it has safety barriers and signs. And if you don't have a valid driver's licence, you can only go as a tandem passenger. 'People still flip from time to time but in eight years, the most serious accident we've had is a broken arm, and that only happened because they didn't follow instructions and put their arm outside the buggy as they tipped over.' All members of our group — a bunch of middle-aged blokes on holiday in Bali — wince as Nigel shows us video footage of that particularly painful incident and four or five other spills during a short safety briefing. Once that's out of the way we don helmets and buckle up in our buggies, which are now also equipped with safety nets that make it nearly impossible to thread an arm through. Still, I can't help feeling a little nervous as I turn the ignition key and 350cc of American muscle roars to life. But my reservations fly out of the window as I follow the other riders and our guide on to the track. Within a few minutes I'm drifting around corners and tearing down bumpy straights like a pro, high on adrenaline, wishing I could do this forever. After three crazy laps we return to base camp – a large bamboo building overlooking dreamy green rice fields in central Bali – order a round of beers, and compare notes. 'It's so easy. You go with it and let the machine do the work,' says Kim, a mate from Sweden. 'That was sound. Topnotch,' says Mathew, who hails from the UK. 'And I'll thank you for noticing that I came first across the finish line.' 'That's because you started at the front of the queue behind the guide,' says Dave from Canada. 'And there was no overtaking.' 'Would've, could've, should've. You could have overtaken me if you had any skills,' Mathew replies. And so the conversation progresses, with no party giving an inch over who was fastest and who got the highest air. There was, however, one thing we could all agree on: jungle buggies in Bali are good fun. + Dave Smith was a guest of Nigel Mason. Nigel did not influence this story, or read it before publication. fact file Jungle buggy adventures are $92 per person, including transfer from your hotel, a topnotch buffet lunch and insurance. Drivers must be 18 or over and have a valid driving licence. Tandem passengers must be 12 or over. See .

Remember when Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy's simple wedding gown changed bridal dress codes forever?
Remember when Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy's simple wedding gown changed bridal dress codes forever?

7NEWS

time16 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Remember when Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy's simple wedding gown changed bridal dress codes forever?

In 1996, Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy and John F. Kennedy Jr. got married outside a peeling white log cabin chapel on Cumberland Island, Georgia. With no paparazzi and no media present, it offered the pair a brief moment of normality before they re-emerged into the world as one of the most famous couples on the planet. Despite often being referred to as American royalty, Bessette-Kennedy didn't arrive to their big day in a frothy princess gown. Instead, she used the moment to set her own sartorial standard — by wearing a dress that upended traditional bridal trends and would continue to inspire for decades to come. Her simple white slip dress was made from silk and cut on the bias, with a scooping cowl neck as its only flourish. The look was finished with a silk tulle veil, crystal beaded Manolo Blahnik satin sandals and a pair of sheer elbow gloves. Her gown was designed by her friend, the fashion designer Narciso Rodriguez. To some, the decision was surprising. Bessette-Kennedy was a prominent publicist at Calvin Klein and an unofficial face of the brand on the New York circuit. And if Klein wasn't to design her gown, others wondered if it would be a rising star like John Galliano — a master of bias-cut slip dresses and then-creative director at Dior. 'For some reason she chose Narciso,' the author of 'CBK: Carolyn Bessette Kennedy: A Life in Fashion,' Sunita Kumar Nair said in a phone interview. 'I think the fact that she chose an unknown friend, as opposed to Calvin Klein, is just her all along: Championing her friends and wanting them to enjoy her new limelight.' Rodriguez was recruited to the task over drinks at The Odeon, a restaurant in the Tribeca neighborhood in New York City. It took him three months to design three versions of the wedding dress, which Bessette-Kennedy picked from. In an interview with the New York Times in 1996, Rodriguez called the final dress 'sensuous' — a direction he said he and Bessette-Kennedy were aligned on from the beginning. The dress, which Rodriguez ended up gifting, was reportedly worth around $40,000 at the time. 'I made that wedding dress with so much love for the person that I loved most in the whole world,' the designer told PBS in 2020. 'I never viewed it as a press event.' The understated, timeless column dress was fit for a small, laid-back wedding. But its simplicity soon sent reverberations through the wider bridal industry. 'There was a massive boom in this kind of very sleek silhouette,' said Nair. 'Everybody was like, 'I want to look like her.' Gone with the meringues.' Not long before, Janet Jackson had married fellow singer James DeBarge in a jacquard wedding gown with a full tiered skirt. Madonna's first wedding dress in 1985 featured several layers of gathered tulle, while in 1992 former First Lady Michelle Obama opted for a trailing floor-length duchess satin gown and dramatic sweetheart neckline. But it was the royal union of Princess Diana and then Prince Charles in 1981 that became the yardstick for wedding glamour. Diana's gown was defined by its many layers of opulence, from the bow-trimmed puffed sleeves to a 25-foot-long veil, which was hand-embellished with 10,000 micro pearls. Even in the '90s, many still looked to Diana's nuptials for fashion inspiration — including Mariah Carey, whose 1993 satin Vera Wang gown was modeled after the seminal dress — but Bessette-Kennedy wasn't one of them. 'It's interesting to think about Princess Diana, that was the wedding dress of the 20th century,' Rachel Tashjian, fashion critic at the Washington Post, told CNN. 'It was this woman coming out of this fairytale horse and carriage in an enormous, richly embellished dress that was all about indulging fantasy and fairytales of royal life.' By contrast, Bessette-Kennedy, whose marriage to JFK Jr. placed her firmly in America's political dynasty, made sure her gown had 'no embellishment, no ruffles, nothing,' she said. 'She's sort of saying, rather than embodying some past fantasy or fairytale fulfillment, 'I am going to do a clean slate, and look forward to the future,'' Tashjian added. 'It was the biggest indicator Carolyn gave of what was to come for the global public as the new Mrs. Kennedy,' agreed Nair. 'Apparently Princess Diana was very jealous of that wedding.' Ironically, Bessette-Kennedy's trend-rebuking dress became the blueprint for brides all over the world. Today, simple ivory slip dresses remain a popular style and are sold everywhere from Victoria Beckham and Max Mara to Reformation and Rixo. Alexandra Macon, a wedding editor at Vogue, said she 'very often' sees women reference the Narciso Rodriguez gown. 'When writing a wedding feature, it's not uncommon for a bride to tell me she emulated Carolyn's bridal look,' Macon wrote in an email to CNN. Even Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, was besotted with the dress. Just a few months before she met Prince Harry in 2016 (and experienced the tumult of joining a pre-existing dynasty first-hand) Markle told online women's magazine Glamour her 'favorite celebrity wedding dress' was none other than Carolyn Bessette-Kennedy's. 'Carolyn's was just done to absolute perfection,' said Nair. 'Thats why we're talking about it today, 25 years on.'

‘It paid in the end': The family that bankrolled AC/DC – and still owns their catalogue
‘It paid in the end': The family that bankrolled AC/DC – and still owns their catalogue

Sydney Morning Herald

timea day ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘It paid in the end': The family that bankrolled AC/DC – and still owns their catalogue

This story is part of the August 9 edition of Good Weekend. See all 13 stories. It's a 50-year showbiz relationship, as enduring as any of AC/DC's timeless hits, yet the bond between the band's founding brothers, Malcolm and Angus Young and the late music impresario, Ted Albert, who helped make them famous, seems destined to remain shrouded in mystery. Ahead of AC/DC's upcoming tour of Australia in November and December – the band sold 320,000 tickets on one day alone in June – the low-key, Sydney-based Albert family refuses, albeit politely, to discuss any of the Young brothers: neither Angus, now 70, nor Malcolm, who died in 2017, aged 64, nor their older brother, George, founder of The Easybeats, who died just three weeks before him at 70. This is despite the Youngs playing an intrinsic role in the Albert family's enormous impact on the Australian entertainment industry. Ted's great-grandfather, Swiss émigré Jacques Albert, went from selling watches and harmonicas in the 19th century to owning a media empire – originally called J Albert & Son, later becoming Albert Productions – that encompassed radio and television. Ultimately, it signed some of the biggest rock and pop acts to come out of Australia, including AC/DC in June 1974. Ted died young – of a heart attack in 1990 at the age of 53 – and in 2016 his family sold Albert Productions to the German music giant BMG. Despite exiting the recording industry, though, it retained ownership of its prize jewel: AC/DC's music catalogue, which includes, of course, everything the brothers ever wrote, including mega-hits T.N.T. (1975), Highway To Hell (1979) and You Shook Me All Night Long (1980). It ranks as one of the most valuable catalogues in the world, reported to be on par with that of British super-group Pink Floyd, which sold last year for $US400 million. The band's music still regularly features in movie soundtracks and commercials, generating substantial publishing fees. 'There's no doubt the AC/DC catalogue has been the Albert family's cash-cow for the past 50 years,' says music biographer Jeff Apter, who wrote Malcolm Young: The Man Who Made AC/DC. It's the gift that keeps on giving. Loading In 2010, journalist Jane Albert – Ted's niece – touched on the enduring relationship in her book House of Hits, revealing how Ted Albert bankrolled AC/DC for almost a decade before turning a profit. 'For him, it was a long-term investment,' Angus Young told her, 'but it paid in the end.' Today, the family's focus is the Ted Albert Foundation, which funds 'positive social outcomes through the power of music'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store