Free car parks in Somerset start charging based on emissions
Three free car parks have started charging drivers based on how polluting their vehicle is.The car parks in North East Somerset use vehicle information linked to number plates to determine fees between £1.20 and £1.80 for the third hour of parking, following two free hours.But traders near Radstock's Church Street and Waterloo Road car parks and Midsomer Norton's South Road car park are worried that footfall will decrease.Bath and North East Somerset Council's Mark Elliott previously said charging "would make it easier for shoppers to find parking by encouraging turnover of spaces".
The charges have proved controversial for the Somer Valley towns, where locals say there is not an air quality issue and they have to use cars to get around.Speaking last year about plans for the emissions-based charges, Elaine Cousins of model shop Signals on Midsomer Norton High Street, said: "My first thought was that it will kill the town and it still might."Emissions-based charges were introduced to all council car parks in Bath in 2023.The council had planned to use the proceeds of the fees to install CCTV and lighting in the Radstock and Midsomer Norton car parks as safety measures.But it has delayed these installations by a year, freeing up £210,000 for its 2025/26 budget.Mr Elliott, a Liberal Democrat, said that the CCTV and lighting costs would add "unfunded risk" to the budget – but added they could still be installed if resources are available.Independent councillor Shaun Hughes wants the Liberal Democrat-led council to go ahead with the installations, warning that its own reports had identified safety issues.He said: "Delaying investment into a car park that now charges our residents risks harming our economy by reducing trade and discouraging footfall."Mr Hughes tabled an amendment to reinstate the investment but it was voted down.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Anderson Cooper's enormous CNN salary revealed as news channel circles drain... and it's FIVE times more than Kaitlan Collins
Anderson Cooper collects $18 million-a-year from CNN, according to a new report. The longtime anchor's salary is roughly five times that of Chief White House Correspondent Kaitlan Collins, sources told Puck. Jake Tapper, 56, remains locked in a 'low-eight-figure multiyear deal', the report revealed. He is set to stay on the air as a result, Puck reported without offering a timeline. CNN's parent, Warner Bros Discovery, announced plans to split into two separate companies this week, leaving the network to lead a new debt-ridden firm centered around linear TV. The cable channel's seven and eight-figure signings are therefore set to be a thing of a past, said Puck's Dylan Byers, who previously worked at CNN. '[Tapper] is surely the last CNN talent who will ever come close to netting that kind of income,' the former NBC News media reporter added. Cooper, 58, is a mainstay, but his salary seems hard to justify, Byers reported, at a time where CNN's ratings are at an all-time low. That holds especially true when comparing it with Collin's. Sure to catch on to this is Gunnar Wiedenfels, the former WBD CFO and the new boss of the CNN-led company, whom Byers insisted will see CNN as an opportunity to 'maintain relatively similar profits at a mere fraction of the cost.' 'This is the beginning of the end,' Byers wrote of the network. 'With the industry in inexorable decline, ratings at a nadir, and younger audiences turning to YouTube and TikTok, [Wiedenfels] will inevitably look at CNN.' After Monday's WBD announcement frantic employees at CNN reached out to Byers to wonder about their fate. 'What does this mean for us?' asked one. 'Thoughts?!' a 'high-ranking' CNN insider asked in regard to CEO David Zaslav's plans to divide up the conglomerate. The decision came weeks after CNBC reported that WBD was mulling a separation of its linear networks from its studio and streaming assets, much like Comcast has done with MSNBC and CNBC. The move appeared to double-down on the company's recently re-rebranded HBO Max streaming service, while leaving CNN in the lurch. Joining it in its new digs are declining channels like TBS, Food Network, HGTV, and a now NBA-less TNT. However, the asset that has seemingly suffered the most during Zaslav's three-year-stint at the top is none other than CNN, which has beet hit with several rounds of layoffs within that span. He and Wiedenfels have managed to reduce Warner Bros Discovery's $55billion debt by some $21 billion in that same timeframe. For his efforts, Zaslav took home around $52 million last year, compensation shareholders last week symbolically voted to pull back in a clear show of frustration. Zaslav and Wiedenfels' cost-cutting campaign has done little to help the conglomerate's share price, which is down 7 percent year to date. Zaslav's pay package, meanwhile, was roughly 400 times the median pay of Warner Bros Discovery staffer which stands at $130,316. Less than five months ago, CNN laid off 200 workers from its struggling TV division that an insider told Daily Mail has become 'bloated' following Warner Bros' merger with Discovery in 2021. Four years later, the same firm is set to split, showing the challenges media conglomerates are facing as they look to adjust costly legacy assets to fit in an evolving media landscape. CNN CEO Mark Thompson's long-in-the works restructuring plan for the WBD asset sets to address this by putting emphasis on CNN's digital future rather than the cable news channel. This vision, for now, remains unrealized, and in a statement issued in January after administering the network's most recent round of layoffs, Thompson warned that future was unclear. 'This is a moment where the digital story feels like an existential question,' he said, emphasizing that that CNN is set to soon roll out a streaming service - one he said will feature its most well-known stars. 'If we do not follow the audiences to the new platforms with real conviction and scale, our future prospects will not be good,' he urged. Under his two-year tenure, CNN's ratings have dropped more than 20 percent - now behind even MSNBC. The network, for years, was the top dog in terms of cable news. That distinction is now held by Fox. Byers noted that in contrast to CNN, Fox runs on a relatively inexpensive model fueled by studio programs. CNN, which has several foreign bureaus and employs costly correspondents spends large amounts on newsgathering alone.
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Reeves ‘failed' to back English councils in spending review, MPs warn
The Treasury will pump an additional £3.4 billion per year into councils by 2028/29, compared with 2024/25, which combined with yearly council tax rises is set to boost their spending power by 3.1% in real terms. But Mr Forster warned that 'in the detail of the statement', the Government 'is only investing an extra 1.1% in local government next year and the year after'. The Liberal Democrat MP told the Commons he was 'very disappointed' with the Chancellor's statement and asked: 'What does the Chancellor say to councils across the country and to my constituents of Woking to justify that lack of investment?' Ms Reeves replied: 'Well, that's real-terms increases in spending every year, that this Labour Government are giving to local authorities. 'And that compares to the Conservative-Liberal Democrat administration from 2010 to 2015 that cut real spending by 2.9% every year, so I'm much happier to stand on my record as Chancellor than what the Liberal Democrats did when they had a chance of being in government.' Woking issued a section 114 notice two years ago, in June 2023, when it faced having to plug a £1.2 billion deficit. Billpayers in the Surrey borough faced a 9.99% council tax rise the following year. Mr Forster, who is a member of the Commons Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, told the PA news agency: 'In today's spending review, the Chancellor has failed to invest in local government – and she is refusing to acknowledge the harm this will cause. 'In my constituency of Woking, our local authority has already gone bankrupt, I fear more will soon follow. Following the former Conservative administration bankrupting Woking, we have seen public toilets close.' He called on the Government to 'support councils more'. The spending review which Ms Reeves fronted on Wednesday pledged 'wider reforms' which 'will ensure funding is effectively targeted, based on an updated assessment of need, and will consolidate funding to give local authorities greater flexibility to innovate'. Local government reorganisation will 'improve the join-up between local services, enabling councils to deliver services more efficiently', according to The Treasury. Conservative MP for Broxbourne Mr Cocking, who is also a member of the Commons committee, described the spending review as 'devastating'. He said: 'Councils that are going through local government reorganisation, where councils that have been run really well, are going to be potentially lumbered into new super-unitary councils, with councils that haven't managed their finances well'. Mr Cocking said that where authorities merge, 'you'll find that residents that have got sound council finances, have had good services, are now going to be subsidising areas that have made bad decisions', and added that the spending review failed to compensate for this. Surrey's district and county councils are set to merge, with new single-tier authorities taking on town hall functions, as part of the Government's push towards 'unitary' councils throughout England set out in last year's English Devolution White Paper.
Evening Standard
a day ago
- Evening Standard
Reeves ‘failed' to back English councils in spending review, MPs warn
'And that compares to the Conservative-Liberal Democrat administration from 2010 to 2015 that cut real spending by 2.9% every year, so I'm much happier to stand on my record as Chancellor than what the Liberal Democrats did when they had a chance of being in government.'
