logo
Encroachments, debris cleared from Lotus Lake in Nerul: NMMC to HC

Encroachments, debris cleared from Lotus Lake in Nerul: NMMC to HC

Hindustan Times30-04-2025

MUMBAI: The Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) on Tuesday informed the Bombay high court that it has cleared all encroachments and debris from Lotus Lake in Nerul and also installed fencing to prevent future encroachments or dumping.
On April 15, the court directed the NMMC to take suitable action to preserve the ecologically sensitive lake and submit a report following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Pradeep Patole, highlighting how encroachments and illegal activities posed a threat to the city's last remaining natural water body.
The PIL filed by advocate Pradeep Patole, highlighted that the high court had prohibited water chestnut farming within the water body to preserve the lake and its adjacent mangrove area. However, the residents allege that continued chestnut farming increased the threat of harming the water and the lotuses.
Advocate Tejesh Dande, representing NMMC, had agreed to comply with the directions of the court, saying the action report will be filed on or before April 29.
On Tuesday, the division bench observed that the NMCC has complied with the court's direction and removed all encroachments around the area. Noting the stand taken by the authorities, the court stated that the grievances of the petitioner have now been fully addressed. 'Therefore, no further order is required to be passed', it said while disposing off the PIL.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Navi Mumbai civic body identifies 527 buildings as ‘dangerous'
Navi Mumbai civic body identifies 527 buildings as ‘dangerous'

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

Navi Mumbai civic body identifies 527 buildings as ‘dangerous'

Following a survey of old and dilapidated buildings, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) identified 527 buildings as 'dangerous' and urged the residents to vacate. "Continued occupation of such structures poses significant risks, and the corporation will not be liable for any resulting incidents," said NMMC commissioner Kailas Shinde . An official said buildings that are more than 30 years old must complete structural inspections before Sept 30, and the reports be submitted to the assistant commissioner, ward officer, or assistant director of town planning department. Non-compliance attracts fine of Rs 25,000 or the annual property tax amount, whichever is higher.

Institute HC-led probe, not Dist Collector's investigation: LoP
Institute HC-led probe, not Dist Collector's investigation: LoP

Hans India

time3 days ago

  • Hans India

Institute HC-led probe, not Dist Collector's investigation: LoP

Bengaluru: Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar are directly responsible for the tragic stampede that occurred at Chinnaswamy Stadium and its surroundings. Opposition Leader R Ashoka demanded that a Special Investigation Team (SIT) led by a High Court judge probe the incident. Speaking at a press conference, he stated, 'We will not accept an investigation by the District Collector. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is being filed before the High Court Chief Justice. The investigation must be conducted under the supervision of a High Court judge, and a SIT should be formed for this purpose. The report must be submitted directly to the High Court. Justice must be delivered for all these deaths, and those responsible must be punished.' He criticised CM Siddaramaiah for evading responsibility by claiming it was a Cricket Association event and attempting to cover up his mistakes. Ashoka demanded that both CM Siddaramaiah and Dy CM D.K. Shivakumar take moral responsibility and resign. 'How can District Collectors, who work under the CM and report to him, conduct an impartial investigation? They were responsible for planning the event, finalizing its framework, and making preparations. It's impossible to believe they would honestly investigate the government's lapses and errors. Deceiving the public and causing deaths is bad enough—why are they now resorting to self-deception and adding to their sins? Only a judicial probe can deliver justice to innocent lives and their parents. The Congress government must not stoop to such pettiness even in the face of death,' he asserted. Attempt to reap the benefits of others' success While everyone claims the credit, people are questioning whose fault it is. The stampede at Chinnaswamy Stadium was a government-sponsored tragedy. This disaster occurred due to the Congress leaders' mistake of trying to capitalize on someone else's success. Ashoka alleged that their poor decisions led to the deaths of engineers, doctors, and children, reflecting the state government's administrative failures. 'Those who celebrated by lifting the cup and posing for photos didn't show up to carry the bodies of the innocent victims. Those who took selfies at the airport didn't visit the homes of the deceased to shed tears. Those who honoured cricketers with turbans and garlands didn't come to put soil on the graves of the dead. In this heartless government, the lives of ordinary people have no value,' he said. After an event at Vidhana Soudha, another program was organized at Chinnaswamy Stadium. The IPL chairman clarified that they had no information about the event's organization. The IPL chairman and KSCA are not at fault here. 'Then who brought the RCB team to Vidhana Soudha? The government must answer,' Ashoka demanded. Why were police deployed? After the match, police controlled the crowd of fans everywhere. By the time they finished, it was past midnight. The same police were redeployed for duty the next day. They reportedly refused to provide security for the event, but the government issued forceful instructions. The area is restricted due to the High Court's presence, yet people even climbed onto the court premises. 'The government showed utter foolishness in holding an event in such a place. Despite this, CM Siddaramaiah claims he didn't know so many people would gather. This shows a complete lack of common sense,' Ashoka lashed out.T he CM held a press conference to claim it wasn't his fault. The police department had no information about who was organizing the event, where to allow people, or where to place barricades. 'Even for small events, we arrange ambulances and doctors. For such a large crowd, more ambulances should have been provided,' he said. A person named Poornachandra died at 3:45 pm, a girl named Divya at 4:38 pm, and another person at 4:41 pm. People were trampled to death even before the event began. Ministers and their families were busy taking photos with cricketers. 'Innocent youth were sacrificed for the ministers' photo shoots. The event should have been canceled immediately upon learning of the deaths,' Ashoka said.

Madras HC bars quarrying, mining in Sivagalai archaeological site
Madras HC bars quarrying, mining in Sivagalai archaeological site

New Indian Express

time3 days ago

  • New Indian Express

Madras HC bars quarrying, mining in Sivagalai archaeological site

MADURAI: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has directed Thoothukudi district authorities to ensure that no mining or quarrying activities are carried out on land situated within the Sivagalai archaeological site until a final decision is made by the authority. A division bench of Justices S M Subramaniam and A D Maria Clete issued the order while disposing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition filed by D Muthuramalingam, challenging the permission granted to a private individual to quarry on the land. The permission was originally issued by the Assistant Director of Geology and Mining on November 22, 2024. During the hearing, the government counsel informed the court that the area had since been notified as an archaeological site and the quarry licence was suspended in December 2024. Taking this into account, the court instructed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority if he wished to further challenge the assistant director's decision. The judges emphasised that, until a final order is passed by the authorities, the land must be protected from any form of mining activity. However, they declined the petitioner's request to set a deadline for the district collector (appellate authority) to make a decision, citing the official's workload. In his petition, Muthuramalingam contended that the three-hectare land granted for quarrying lies close to the Sivagalai archaeological site and is rich in historical remains. He also noted that the proposed quarry site is surrounded by agricultural fields, three irrigation ponds, and a wildlife conservation area. He warned that quarry explosions could not only damage valuable archaeological artifacts but also pose serious risks to the local community and wildlife.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store