Tesla ordered to pay more than $US200m in Autopilot crash case
The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months.
The decision ends a four-year-long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial.
'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.'
The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident.
Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there.
'Today's verdict is wrong,' Teslas lawyers said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.'
The lawyers said Tesla plans to appeal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
4 hours ago
- The Australian
Elon Musk's Tesla ordered to pay $375m in Autopilot case
The jury found Tesla's system partly responsible for a crash in Key Largo that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, according to attorney Darren Jeffrey Rousso, a partner at the law firm that represented Angulo and Leon's family. The plaintiffs had alleged that Autopilot was to blame when driver George McGee's Tesla careened into a Chevrolet sport utility vehicle, killing Leon and injuring Angulo. The jury awarded $US200 million ($309m) in punitive damages, plus $US59 million in compensatory damages to Leon's family and $US70 million in damages to Angulo, according to court records. Since the jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla, whose CEO is billionaire Elon Musk, the compensatory damages will be reduced, Rousso said, with the total impact of the jury award totalling $US242 million after these reductions. 'Justice was done,' Rousso said. 'The jury heard all the evidence and came up with a fair and just verdict on behalf of our clients.' Tesla will appeal the decision, according to its defence attorneys. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeapordise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' Tesla said through its legal team. 'The evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator – which overrode Autopilot – as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road,' Tesla said. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash. This was never about Autopilot.' Read related topics: Elon Musk Motoring From Pakistan's 'Eighth Wonder' to Romania's serpentine masterpiece, these five roads push drivers to extreme limits where altitude sickness is just the beginning. The Weekend Australian Magazine Simon Davidson has been photographing Australia's classic and custom car scene with an artistic eye for decades. He especially loves to shoot burnouts.
ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
Tesla ordered to pay $375 million in fatal autopilot crash
Victims of a fatal 2019 crash caused by an autopilot failure in a Tesla Model S will receive $US243 million ($375 million) in damages after a jury found Elon Musk's electric vehicle company liable. Jurors in a Miami federal court on Friday, local time, awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon and her former boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, $US129 million in compensatory damages, plus $US200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Tesla was held liable for 33 per cent of the compensatory damages, or $US42.6 million. Jurors found the driver, George McGee, liable for 67 per cent, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. "Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries," he added. Tesla said it will appeal. "Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," the company said. Tesla shares fell 1.8 per cent on Friday, and are down 25 per cent this year. The plaintiffs had sought $US345 million in damages. Their lawyers said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without going to trial. In June, a judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss the Florida case. Experts said Friday's verdict may spur more lawsuits, and could make future settlements more costly. "It's a big deal," said Alex Lemann, a law professor at Marquette University. "This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgement in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its Autopilot technology." The verdict could also impede efforts by Mr Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles and robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. As Tesla's electric vehicle sales fall, much of its nearly $US1 trillion market value hinges on Mr Musk's ability to pivot the company into robotics and artificial intelligence. The trial concerned an April 25, 2019, incident where Mr McGee drove his 2019 Model S about 100 kilometres per hour through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. Mr McGee had reached down to pick up a cell phone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. Ms Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 23 metres to her death, while Mr Angulo suffered serious injuries. "We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash," said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. "The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software," he said. "That's a big deal." Tesla, in its statement, said Mr McGee was entirely at fault. "To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash," the company said. "This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility." Reuters
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Cheesed off: Swiss meltdown over Trump's ‘incomprehensible' tariff whack
London: Swiss companies are reeling from a shock move by US President Donald Trump to slap a 39 per cent tariff on their exports, stunning brand-name suppliers of luxury watches, jewellery, cheese and chocolate. Swiss chocolate makers have declared the move 'incomprehensible' and are warning it will hit them hard, as the changes flow through to higher prices for American customers. The biggest names in luxury watches, already suffering a slowdown in America after Trump's previous trade decisions, now confront extraordinary price hikes that could lead them to expand sales in other markets. Trump spared Australia from higher penalties in his sweeping trade decision on Thursday, leaving tariffs at 10 per cent for most Australian exports, but he singled out Switzerland with the biggest blow to any European country. At 39 per cent, the new rate is higher than the 31 per cent tariff the president proposed in April – and much worse than Swiss leaders expected. The decision puts the Swiss exporters at a grave disadvantage to competitors in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and other countries that will incur the 15 per cent tariff applied to the European Union. While Americans may have to pay steeper prices for Bally fashion made in Switzerland, they would incur a more modest price hike for a Dior item made in France or Armani product made in Italy. 'It is incomprehensible why Switzerland is affected by these tariffs, as reciprocity is out of the question,' industry group Chocosuisse said, repeating concerns it aired in April.
