Teenager Kriish Tyagi Only Indian In US Open Juniors
The Karnataka teen has had his own share of challenges. Firstly, he switched sports and took to swimming at the age of 10. The result, though, came in quick time because of 'dedication, improvisation and discipline. He is currently India No.1 in the junior category.
"Hitting with the players, being a part of that environment, made me feel like I belonged," he expressed. "I was a little nervous during my singles match at Wimbledon- the crowd and atmosphere, it's not something I was used to. But I took that reflection into my doubles and I felt much more confident."
"For the US Open, we skipped a few events to make time for physical, mental and skillful training. I feel more ready now," he said.
So what does he need to be successful in US Open?
"One key thing I want to bring to the US Open is strength, physical dominance and mental resilience during clutch points. That's where I believe I can grow," said Kriish.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliament Watch: Highlights of Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, Monday August 4
Monday (August 4, 2025) in Parliament was no better than the previous days. While the Rajya Sabha was adjourned early following the death of its member and former Jharkhand Chief Minister Shibu Soren. Meanwhile, the Lok Sabha attempted to function, but Opposition members did not stop protesting in the House. When it was reconvened at 2 p.m. following the morning chaos, officiating Chair Jagdambika Pal requested the members to allow a discussion on the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 which he said was brought by the government with the aim of bidding for the 2036 Olympics. The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, was introduced in the Lok Sabha on July 23 but the House was adjourned soon after and a discussion was not held. This Bill seeks to regulate the various sports administrators in India. It constitutes a National Sports Board (NSB) which will oversee all sports federations, including India's richest sports body – the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Two prominent sports body which have opposed the Bill are BCCI and Indian Olympic Association (IOA), citing curtailing of autonomy. According to the Bill, the National Sports Board or NSB will have power to recognise, suspend or cancel registrations of sports organisations. It will also collaborate with international and national sports bodies to ensure compliance with the international standards, protection of the rights of athletes and support personnel. The board can suspend or cancel recognition of a sports body if its international recognition is suspended/cancelled, if it violates any part of this Act, if it has failed to hold elections, publish its annual audited accounts for misused, misapplied, or misappropriated any public funds. No sports organisation will be recognised unless it is a registered society, an incorporated not-for-profit company or a registered trust. The Centre is empowered to appoint officers and employees to discharge NSB's functions. The Bill also says that any sports organisation seeking to use the word 'India' or 'Indian' or 'National' or any national insignia or symbols in any language in its registered name, operating name, logo, or otherwise must obtain a no-objection certification by the Centre. Not everyone is on board with the Bill, though. In October last year, Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President P.T. Usha had first raised concerns over the Bill citing government infringing on the IOA's independence. She had stated that the NSB may 'lead to a conflict between the government and international sports governance bodies, particularly the IOC, which has previously suspended many National Olympic committees for excessive governmental interference'. We wait and watch if the Lower House will hold a discussion on this Bill today. Follow live updates of August 5 proceedings in Parliament here. Until next time.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iga Swiatek swamps Elena Rybakina, to face Jasmine Paolini in Cincinnati final
Iga Swiatek (AFP Photo) CINCINNATI: Iga Swiatek reached the final of the ATP-WTA Cincinnati Open for the first time on Sunday, surging past Elena Rybakina 7-5, 6-3 to book a title clash with Jasmine Paolini. The six-time Grand Slam champion earned a Monday evening final against an opponent with nothing to lose after Paolini managed to "forget" a patch of bad form to claim a 6-3, 6-7 (2/7), 6-3 win over Russian Veronika Kudermetova. The 29-year-old, who was a two-time Grand Slam finalist in 2024, will bid for the fourth title of her career when she faces Swiatek, who is set to compete in her 13th final at the 1000 level as she closes in on a return to world number two. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! Swiatek, the reigning Wimbledon champion, recovered an early break in the opening set and powered away to beat 2022 All England winner Rybakina -- who had swept past world number one and defending champion Aryna Sabalenka in the quarter-finals. The former world number one from Poland now ranked third, had twice stalled at the semi-final stage at the pre-US Open event, but booked her title chance on her third opportunity. "It was a great match, and at the beginning, I was even surprised that I'm able to keep up with the pace, because we played so fast," Swiatek said. "I wanted to be there when Elena starts making mistakes. It's impossible to play such a good level throughout the whole match." Swiatek recovered from 3-5 down in the opening set, sweeping the last four games. She jumped to a 4-1 lead in the second, sandwiching a pair of love service games around a break of Rybakina's serve. But Kazakhstan's Rybakina made her work for it, fending off three break points in the sixth game and saving a pair of match points in the eighth before Swiatek closed it out a game later. "I was playing with intensity and quality," Swiatek said. "I feel good about my game right now and would not change anything." Swiatek has beaten Paolini in all five of their prior meetings with the Italian winning just one set. But Swiatek said she was prepared for a tough final against a player who beat world number two Coco Gauff in the quarter-finals. "Anyone who is there will have been playing well," she said. - 'Keep fighting' - Before her 6-0, 6-0 Wimbledon final win over Amanda Anisimova last month, Swiatek had been in a trophy drought with her last prior title coming in June 2024 at Roland Garros. Another victory on Monday would be a strong springboard into the US Open, where first-round play starts on August 24. Paolini looked headed to a straight-set victory but failed to serve out her match at 5-4 in the second set and admitted the lapse left her nervous. "The key was to forget, get back into the fight and stay in the present," Paolini said after wrapping up the win in two and a quarter hours. "I was fighting in the second set and all was fine. But I got nervous and thought I would lose the tiebreaker. "I came back onto court in the third set trying not to think about what had happened. You have to keep going." Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Shahid Afridi's ex-Pakistan teammate agrees with Irfan Pathan's no-filter 'badtameez aadmi' tag: 'No class and decency'
Former Pakistan spinner Danish Kaneria agreed with Irfan Pathan's assessment of Shahid Afridi. During a recent appearance on a podcast, Irfan Pathan opened up about his battles with Afridi and how he dismissed him on 11 occasions in international cricket. Irfan Pathan minced no words as he labelled the former Pakistan captain a 'badtameez aadmi (ill-mannered man).' Kaneria has always been vocal about his issues with Afridi, accusing the latter of being discriminatory towards him during their playing days. Irfan Pathan labelled Shahid Afridi as a "badtameez aadmi."(X Image) During his interview with Lallantop, Pathan revealed that he was involved in a heated altercation with Afridi on a plane during his 2006 tour of Pakistan. Pathan alleged that it was the former Pakistan all-rounder who started the interaction by messing around with his hair. However, Pathan didn't take kindly to this interaction as he was not friends with Afridi. The former Indian pacer, who was a youngster back then, did not hold back as he launched a scathing attack. 'The childish behaviour was actually his. He was not my friend. After that, Afridi said some abusive words to me. His seat was right next to mine,' said Pathan. "I said, "He (Afridi) has eaten dog meat, he has been barking for a long time" After that, Afridi couldn't say anything. Whatever he might have said, I would have just said, 'Look, he is barking again," he added. Also Read: Irfan Pathan's 'dog meat' retaliation silenced Shahid Afridi's 'barking' Danish Kaneria reacted to the viral video clip of the same, saying Afridi lacks 'class and decency' and he often resorts to personal attacks. 'Irfan bhai, you're absolutely right. He always resorts to personal attacks—be it on someone's family or their religion. Class and decency clearly aren't his strengths,' Kaneria wrote on X (formerly Twitter). History between Kaneria and Afridi There is no love lost between Danish Kaneria and Shahid Afridi. Some years back, Kaneria alleged that he had to face religious discrimination while playing for Pakistan. He claimed that some of his teammates were reluctant to eat with him because of his faith. He also alleged that Shahid Afridi, a senior member of the Pakistan dressing room, encouraged other players to ostracise him. However, Afridi denied all these allegations, calling Kaneria a 'liar' and trying to gain sympathy after being banned by the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) for involvement in a spot-fixing scandal in county cricket. Kaneria felt he was targetted by senior Pakistan players and was not given adequate support. On the other hand, Afridi accused Kaneria of not accepting his mistake and trying to gain sympathy.
