logo
Major Update For 1.9 Million Borrowers About Student Loan Forgiveness And Repayment Processing

Major Update For 1.9 Million Borrowers About Student Loan Forgiveness And Repayment Processing

Forbes28-04-2025

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 29: U.S. President Donald Trump greets Small Business Administration head ... More Linda McMahon during an event celebrating Women's History Month, in the East Room at the White House March 29, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by)
Nearly two million student loan borrowers remain stuck in repayment limbo, even as the U.S. Department of Education signals a new plan to address the massive backlog of Income-Driven Repayment applications. A recent court filing provided a significant update on how the Department will finally tackle this logjam and offers a timeline for status and data updates. For the 1.9 million borrowers waiting for their application to be processed, every month of delay is a month they cannot get an affordable payment plan or credit toward loan forgiveness, leaving them financially and emotionally in limbo.
In an April 25 court filing, which is part of an ongoing lawsuit by the American Federation of Teachers, the Education Department agreed to a series of status reports to publicly track its progress on processing backlogged IDR applications​ (the agreement is still subject to adoption by the court, but given that both sides were in agreement about the path forward, one would be inclined to believe it will be adopted). The first report is due May 15, 2025; subsequent updates will follow every 30 days. At least three monthly reports will be filed (up to six, absent further court order) to ensure transparency​ about how quickly servicers tackle the application backlog and hold the Department accountable as it works through it.
Each status report will include detailed data on the IDR processing backlog​, including:
The data the Education Department will provide will be instrumental in calculating the efficiency and throughput of loan servicers, at least directionally, in processing backlogged applications. This should give student loan borrowers visibility on the estimated time it could take for their specific application to be processed and quell the massive uncertainty over the processing timeline.
Another significant update is that the first status report in May will include a list of which types of past loan forbearances are eligible for PSLF buyback credit​. The Education Department has indicated that loan servicers will soon resume processing IDR applications that are on hold. In a sworn court declaration, an Acting Under Secretary of Education revealed that servicers had been directed to place borrowers into specific IDR plans as soon as possible, with an expected start date of May 10, 2025. This means that after a pause of over two months, borrowers' IDR requests should finally begin to be processed again in May, a critical first step in chipping away at the enormous IDR application backlog.
The IDR application backlog has real consequences for those seeking relief. Until processing resumes, affected borrowers cannot access the lower payments that IDR plans offer or make progress toward loan forgiveness. In effect, the logjam has created a severe student loan forgiveness delay for anyone relying on IDR or PSLF programs to cancel their debt after years of payments. Borrowers who reached the finish line for forgiveness have seen their discharges put on hold, and those working toward Public Service Loan Forgiveness have watched the clock stop on counting qualifying payments.
"Every day these applications go unprocessed deprives borrowers of critical time toward IDR and PSLF relief and financial stability,' Persis Yu, deputy executive director and managing counsel at the Student Borrower Protection Center,​ told me in an interview. In other words, each month of delay is one less month that counts toward the 120 payments required for PSLF or the 20- or 25-year clock for IDR loan forgiveness. These delays can cost borrowers thousands of dollars and extend their indebtedness by months or years. As interest accrues and anxiety builds, borrowers are left in an untenable position, stuck making higher payments than they should or in forbearance with no clear end in sight.
Borrowers and advocates should now mark their calendars for May 15 when the Department of Education will release the first IDR status report covering the month of April. This report and subsequent ones will highlight the IDR processing effort, showing whether the backlog of pending applications is finally shrinking​ and by how much. The IDR status report timeline will be one progress report on restoring the student loan system to standard functionality. Borrowers should pay close attention to these updates and see how many IDR applications are getting processed each month, as this will indicate how quickly relief is coming.
There are other encouraging signs on the horizon as well. The Education Department has hinted at new measures to streamline IDR enrollment. This week, officials announced in a press release plans to "launch an enhanced Income-Driven Repayment process, simplifying the time it takes to enroll in IDR plans and eliminating the need for borrowers to recertify their income every year," potentially by leveraging IRS data-sharing​.
If this enhancement works as described, it could significantly ease the forward IDR application process. Such improvements could also prevent a future IDR application backlog of this magnitude from ever building up again by making it faster and easier to process IDR requests.
Finally, borrowers should remember that the legal and oversight pressure remains. The AFT, the organization that took the Education Department to court, along with the SBPC, have indicated they will monitor the Department's progress closely and work on an information-sharing agreement to ensure the agency stays on track and continues to make progress against the application backlog​. Further legal action could resume if the backlog isn't reduced as promised or if Department of Education student loan updates show insufficient improvement. Conversely, if the Department meets its commitments, borrowers could soon see their IDR plans approved and counts toward forgiveness updated, which would be welcome news to many.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers
Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers

UPI

time14 minutes ago

  • UPI

Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers

President Donald Trump congratulates a cadet at the United States Military Academy graduation ceremony in Michie Stadium at West Point, New York, on May 24, and will review the Army's 250th birthday parade on June 14. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Army celebrates its 250th birthday on June 14th in the nation's capital, which coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, and will be marked by a parade that may include tanks, rocket launchers and more than 100 military vehicles. With the two birthdays occurring on the same day, the previously scheduled parade that was intended as a relatively small event at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., has grown in size and cost. Up to 300 soldiers and civilians, the U.S. Army Band and four cannons were initially slated to honor the Army's 250th birthday, with seating available for 120 attendees, The Washington Post reported. U.S. Army leaders last year sought a permit for the event, but Trump's election victory has changed its scope, while doubling as an unofficial celebration of the president's birthday. Axios reported the parade will live up to Trump's request for a showcase the U.S. miliatary's might, with dozens of tanks, rocket launchers, missiles and more than 100 other military aircraft and vehicles participating. About 6,600 Army troops will participate, and the Army is paying to house them in area hotels. The parade route has been moved to the northwest portion of Constitution Avenue and will include a flyover of F-22 fighter jets, World War II planes and Vietnam-era aircraft. The event is scheduled to start at 6:30 p.m. EDT at 23rd Street and continue along Constitution Avenue N.W. to 15th Street. Trump will review the parade on the Ellipse. The event has an estimated cost of nearly $45 million, including more than $10 million for road repairs after the heavy military equipment passes over. The parade's estimated cost has Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., skeptical about its benefits. "I would have recommended against the parade," Wicker told an interviewer on Thursday, but the Department of Defense wants to use it as a recruiting tool. "On the other hand, [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth] feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force," Wicker said. "So, we'll see."

Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.
Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.

Politico

time17 minutes ago

  • Politico

Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.

President Donald Trump's campaign against two of the planet's best-known universities is laying bare just how unprepared academia was to confront a hostile White House. Schools never imagined facing an administration so willing to exercise government power so quickly — targeting the research funding, tax-exempt status, foreign student enrollment and financial aid eligibility schools need to function. That's left them right where the president wants them. Even as Ivy League schools, research institutions, and college trade associations try to resist Trump's attacks in court, campus leaders are starting to accept they face only difficult choices: negotiate with the government, mount a painful legal and political fight — or simply try to stay out of sight. Groundbreaking scientific research, financial aid for lower-income students and soft power as an economic engine once shielded schools' access to federal funds. Trump has now transformed those financial lifelines into leverage. And the diversity and independence of U.S. colleges and universities — something they've seen as a source of strength and competition — is straining efforts to form a singular response to the president. 'Perhaps it's a failure of imagination on the part of universities,' said Lee Bollinger, the former president of Columbia University. 'It feels now like there has been a naïveté on the part of universities. There's been no planning for this kind of thing.' Schools are accustomed to tension with their faculty, governing boards, legislatures and governors. But punishments for resisting the Trump administration plumbed untested levels of severity this week when the president issued an executive order to bar foreign students from entering the country to study at Harvard University as his administration threatened Columbia's academic accreditation. Even though Project 2025 — The Heritage Foundation's roadmap for a second Trump administration — previewed some of the tactics the administration would use, many school leaders may have underestimated the president's determination. 'It just seemed inconceivable that we would be in this position of having massive amounts of federal funding withheld, threats to have legislation that attacks your tax status, and now these new issues with international students,' Bollinger said. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday night that blocked Trump's directive to restrict Harvard's access to international students. But the administration is brandishing its response to Harvard's resistance as a warning to other schools who might resist, as federal officials pressure schools to negotiate the terms of a truce over the administration's complaints about campus antisemitism, foreign government influence and its opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. 'We've held back funding from Columbia, we've also done the same thing with Harvard,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon told House lawmakers this past week. 'We are asking, as Columbia has done, to come to the table for negotiations,' she said, just hours before telling the school's accreditor it was violating federal anti-discrimination laws. 'We've also asked Harvard. Their answer was a lawsuit.' A Harvard spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. 'What we've seen so far when it comes to Harvard is the playbook for holding these radical schools accountable is way deeper than anyone anticipated or expected,' a senior White House official told POLITICO. 'You're starting to get to the bone, so to speak, of holding these people accountable,' said the official, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss White House strategy. 'Harvard knows they cannot endure this for long, they just can't. They're going to have to come to the table, and we'll always be there to meet them. But this was a test case of what to do.' The university described Trump's latest foreign student order this week as 'yet another illegal retaliatory step.' A federal judge in May blocked a separate administration attempt to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. Harvard is still locked in a legal fight over more than $2 billion in federal grants the White House blocked after the school refused to comply with demands to overhaul its admissions and disciplinary policies. Trump announced plans to cancel Harvard's tax-exempt status in early May, then later floated redistributing billions of dollars in university grants to trade schools. 'It is not our desire to bring these schools to their knees. The president reveres our higher educational facilities. He's a product of one,' the White House official said. 'But in order to hold these people accountable, we will be unrelenting in our enforcement of the law and hitting them where it hurts, which is their pocketbook.' Many institutions have chosen a more muted response following months of conflict, including major public institutions in states that have also grown reliant on the full-freight tuition paid by international students. 'Universities don't have as many degrees of freedom, at least in the public sector, as you might think they do,' said Teresa Sullivan, the former president of the University of Virginia. 'One reason they seem to be relatively slow to act is there's a certain disbelief — can this really be happening?' 'We seem to be in uncharted territory, at least in my experience,' Sullivan said. 'All of a sudden, the rules don't seem to apply. I think that's disconcerting. It shakes the ground beneath you, and you don't necessarily know what to do next.' Still, some higher education leaders are trying to confront the government. More than 650 campus officials have so far signed onto a joint statement that opposes 'the unprecedented government overreach and political interference now endangering American higher education.' Sullivan and a group of other former presidents used an op-ed in The Washington Post to argue the Trump administration's offensive 'won't be confined to Harvard University.' Trade associations including the American Council on Education, Association of American Universities, and Association of Public and Land-grant Universities have joined schools in a lawsuit to block some of Trump's research funding cuts. The Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a collective of school leaders, has also sued to challenge the Trump administration's attempts to target the legal status of thousands of foreign students. 'Your first obligation as president is you don't want to hurt the institution you represent,' Sullivan said of the relative silence coming from non-Ivy League institutions. 'These days it's hard to tell what hurts and what doesn't. I think that's the motive. The motive is not cowardice.' Schools still face a choice between negotiating with the government — and risk compromising on their principles — or inviting Trump's rage by putting up a fight. 'Every school has had an option to correct course and work with the administration, or stand firm in their violations of the law,' the administration official said. 'They have an option, they know very well what to do.' The real question, according to Bollinger, the former Columbia president, is how far the White House will go and how much resistance the schools are willing to put up. 'The power of government is so immense that if they want to destroy institutions, they can,' he said. 'What you do in that kind of environment is you stand on principle.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store