AOC hit with ethics violation after saying fiancé both is and isn't her ‘spouse' in government filings
In its July 2025 report, the ethics committee criticized Ocasio-Cortez for listing Roberts as her 'spouse' on federal documents that she filed before attending the 2021 Met Gala. Roberts and Ocasio-Cortez are not yet legally married.
'The Committee also found evidence that Representative Ocasio-Cortez listed Mr. Roberts as her 'spouse' on paperwork filed with the House relating to privately sponsored travel, although the two were not legally married at the time of the gifted travel,' the report states.
Similarly, the ethics panel stated that Roberts was listed as a spouse on the documents to attend the gala, but that he wasn't listed as a spouse in Ocasio-Cortez's financial filings, The Daily Mail noted. If he had been listed as a spouse, he would have been forced to disclose stock and other financial holdings.
'The Committee further notes that at the same time Representative Ocasio-Cortez was seeking to take advantage of exceptions to the Gift Rule only applicable to spouses and/or certain relatives, she was not disclosing Mr. Roberts's financial interests as is required of Members who are legally married,' the report adds.
Last month, Ocasio-Cortez was ordered to pay back thousands of dollars after the ethics panel determined that she had not been paying market rates in connection with her appearance at the Met Gala in 2021. The panel found that the 35-year-old had underpaid for her dress, which said 'tax the rich' across the back, as well as for jewelry and accessories.
In the July 2025 report, the committee states the investigation will be closed after Ocasio-Cortez has paid another $2,700 to vendors for clothing and accessories. The panel said the congresswoman has been cooperating with the investigation.
The committee also criticized that Met Gala organizer and Vogue editor Anna Wintour personally invited Ocasio-Cortez and Roberts to the event.
Ocasio-Cortez and Roberts met while they were both studying at Boston University and have been engaged since April 2022, The Mail noted.
A lawyer for Ocasio-Cortez, David Mitrani, argued in the filings that Roberts is not subject to the financial disclosure rules as he's 'not considered a spouse.'
The committee states that Roberts still enjoyed some of the benefits of being a spouse, such as receiving a spouse's congressional pin, which allowed him to access certain restricted parts of the congressional complex.
'Mr. Roberts and the Congresswoman have been together since 2014, and have lived together since 2016,' the committee states. 'Mr. Roberts has had a spouse pin since the Congresswoman entered Congress in 2019.'
'It is clear that the term 'spouse' – as utilized in this former rule and as seemingly accepted by the Committee by expanding 'spouse or dependent' to any guest – was intended to allow a Member of Congress to bring the individual that they've decided to share their lives with to a charity event, regardless of whether they had taken steps to bring the law or religion into their relationship,' it adds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dispute over a major port contract threatens Haiti's fragile political stability
The leader of Haiti's transitional presidential council claimed Wednesday that one of its communications employees was threatened and forced to publish a press release about a key contract involving the country's biggest port and two well-known members of its elite. The incident has deepened infighting within the council and further strained relations between Haiti's government and its private sector as a wealthy businessman prepares to take over the council's presidency on Thursday. Fritz Alphonse Jean, the council's current president, said in a statement that the Aug. 4 press release was published without his approval and despite his objections. He also said he was informed about pressure exerted by unidentified council members to dismiss another communications official who 'had refused to publish the note without his authorization.' Jean said a judge would determine whether to grant a 27-year lease to Caribbean Port Services instead of nine years as originally planned. 'Without this opinion, suspicions of corruption could further tarnish the (council's) credibility,' he said. Jean also demanded that Prime Minister Alix Didier Fils-Aimé provide the council with explanations previously requested regarding the lease of the Port-au-Prince International Port, located in an area long controlled by powerful gangs. The press release that Jean condemned states the council met with Philippe Coles, president of Caribbean Port Services, and Edouard Baussan, a wealthy businessman with strong ties to Haiti's most powerful politicians. The release claimed that the 'fruitful discussions, conducted in complete transparency,' found that 'all necessary clarifications have been provided' and that the contract between the government and the company is legal. Caribbean Port Services is a private maritime logistics company that operates the international port in partnership with Haiti's Port Authority. It handles about 80% of the port's cargo container volume, according to its website. On Thursday, Jean will step down as council president as part of a rotation. He recently told The Associated Press that starting on Aug. 7, Haiti's two executive branches will be controlled by its private sector. Bocchit Edmond, a former ambassador to the U.S., said a businessman taking leadership of the council is an opportunity for the private sector to prove itself. He also condemned Jean's statement on Wednesday. 'I'm against the public bashing of the private sector,' he said. 'It's not a good thing at all for the country, for its political stability.' However, Jean said that some private sector members 'were active operators of the chaos in which Haiti is currently engulfed.' Some of Haiti's wealthy elites and powerful politicians have long been accused of financing and arming dozens of gangs, which the United Nations has noted in its reports. Gangs now control 90% of the capital, Port-au-Prince, and continue to launch attacks in a bid to control more territory. Jean's announcement comes less than a week after U.S. officials announced they were aware of 'reported bribery attempts' aimed at destabilizing Haiti. In remarks to the AP, Jean called it 'a desperate and trivial effort to attract the sympathy of American congressmen and women, and the U.S. administration.' The council was created following the resignation of former Prime Minister Ariel Henry after gangs launched a series of attacks last year against critical government infrastructure. It is tasked with holding elections by February 2026. ___
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump threatens India with 50% tariffs for buying Russian oil
U.S. President Donald Trump 's had signed an executive order subjecting Indian imports to a 50% tariff due to its purchase of Russian oil. The order subjects Indian imports to an additional 25% in duties on top of an existing 25% tariff. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been urged by India's opposition parties and the general public to stand up to Trump, labelling the move as 'bullying'. Trump has been warned his latest tirade threatens to undo two decades of diplomatic progress, analysts and officials say, and could derail other areas of cooperation as domestic political pressures drive both sides to harden their stances. While India has emerged in recent years as a key partner for Washington in its strategic rivalry with China, its large U.S. trade surplus and close relations with Russia – which Trump is seeking to pressure into agreeing to a peace agreement with Ukraine – have made it a prime target in the Republican president's global tariff offensive. Trump's taunt that India could buy oil from arch enemy Pakistan has also not gone down well in New Delhi, said two Indian government sources. India has also rejected repeated claims by Trump that he used trade as a lever to end a recent military conflict between India and Pakistan. In an unusually sharp statement this week, India accused the U.S. of double standards in singling it out for Russian oil imports while continuing to buy Russian uranium hexafluoride, palladium and fertiliser. On Wednesday, it called the tariffs "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable," vowing to "take all actions necessary to protect its national interests." But New Delhi knows that any further escalation will hurt it in matters beyond trade, said the sources. Unlike China, India does not have leverage like supplies of rare earths to force Trump's hand to improve the terms of any trade deal, they said. In recent years, successive U.S. administrations, including Trump's first, carefully cultivated relations with India with an eye on it as a vital partner in long-term efforts to counter the growing might of China. But analysts say Trump's recent moves have plunged the relationship back to possibly its worst phase since the U.S. imposed sanctions on India for nuclear tests in 1998. "India is now in a trap: because of Trump's pressure, Modi will reduce India's oil purchases from Russia, but he cannot publicly admit to doing so for fear of looking like he's surrendering to Trump's blackmail," said Ashley Tellis at Washington's Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "We could be heading into a needless crisis that unravels a quarter century of hard-won gains with India." Indian state refiners have in recent days stopped buying Russian oil as discounts narrowed and pressure from Trump rose, Reuters has reported. New challenges for relations A more pressing challenge for India, analysts say, is the stark divergence between its priorities and Trump's political base on key issues such as work visas for tech professionals and offshoring of services. India has long been a major beneficiary of U.S. work visa programs and the outsourcing of software and business services, a sore point for Americans who have lost jobs to cheaper workers in India. Relations with India risk becoming a "football in American domestic politics," warned Evan Feigenbaum, a former senior State Department official under the Republican presidency of George W. Bush. "Issues that directly touch India are among the most partisan and explosive in Washington, including immigration and deportation, H1B visas for tech workers, offshoring and overseas manufacturing by U.S. companies, and technology sharing and co-innovation with foreigners," he wrote in a LinkedIn post. Since a 2008 deal to cooperate on civilian nuclear technology, the two countries have deepened intelligence sharing and defence cooperation and expanded interactions with Australia and Japan through the Quad grouping aimed at containing China's dominance in the Indo-Pacific. But fractures have appeared, despite Modi's rapport with Trump in his first term and then former President Joe Biden. Images in February of Indians deported by the U.S. on military planes, their hands and legs shackled, horrified the country just days before Modi went to see Trump seeking to stave off high tariffs. The relationship was also seriously tested in late 2023 when the U.S. said it had foiled a plot with Indian links to kill a Sikh separatist leader on U.S. soil. New Delhi has denied any official connection to the plot. "The Modi regime's credibility in the U.S. has gone down," said Sukh Deo Muni, a former Indian diplomat and a professor emeritus at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University. "And maybe there are people who think that India or Modi had to be brought back on track, if not taught a lesson. And if that trend continues, I'm quite worried that the challenge is quite powerful and strong for India to navigate." Strengthening ties with US rivals One Indian government source said India needs to gradually repair ties with the U.S. while engaging more with other nations that have faced the brunt of Trump tariffs and aid cuts, including the African Union and the BRICS bloc that includes Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa. India is already making some moves with Russia and China. Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to visit New Delhi this year and on Tuesday, Russia said the two countries had discussed further strengthening defence cooperation "in the form of a particularly privileged strategic partnership." India has also boosted engagement with China, a change after years of tensions following a deadly border clash in 2020. Modi is set to visit China soon for the first time since 2018. "Russia will attempt to exploit the rift between the U.S. and India by proposing the restoration of the Russia-India-China trilateral and new projects in defence," said analyst Aleksei Zakharov at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump slashed Medicaid — now he's got another health care crisis looming
President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are trying to sell the American public on their ' One Big, Beautiful Bill ' despite the fact many Americans, and even members in their own conference, worry about the cuts to Medicaid. Most voters do not trust Trump on health care and fear the significant cuts to Medicaid. Republicans already face hostile voters in their town halls when it comes to health care. But as if that were not a big enough problem, Trump and the Republicans face another looming crisis that could cause health care prices to spike. And it comes from an old political enemy: The Affordable Care Act, Barack Obama's signature health care law. 'I think there's going to be a lot of sticker shock of people who aren't following this debate in Congress and are going to be stunned by just how much their rates go up, because the premiums will increase substantially,' Jonathan Oberlander, a professor of social medicine at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, told The Independent. In 2022, then-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer brokered a deal with now former senator Joe Manchin for the Inflation Reduction Act. As part of the agreement, the bill extended an expansion of subsidies to the Affordable Care Act that initially passed under the American Rescue Plan Act, Joe Biden's signature piece of legislation to provide relief during the Covid-19 pandemic. Under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, people who might not have health insurance under their employer but are not eligible for Medicaid can purchase health care on state exchanges. If they earn an income below a certain threshold, they could be eligible for tax credits. 'They might not get employer-sponsored health care, but they're like realtors or entrepreneurs or small business owners or Uber drivers,' one former Capitol Hill aide who now works in health care told The Independent. 'These folks – going to the exchanges trying to purchase their health insurance, they're on the precipice of seeing a big cost of living increase.' The subsidies initially passed under the ARPA, and then later under the IRA, increased eligibility for people making up to 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Line. But they expire at the end of the calendar year. Oberlander said it could create a cost crisis. 'It's going to affect people in the sense that the pool will become smaller, and therefore, depending on who leaves, because it depends – the people are leaving healthier or sicker than the average, it can destabilize the pools to some extent.' he said. 'And people are going to read about it and see it, and they're going to feel it and they're going to pay it, and I think there would be a lot of anger.' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who will not seek re-election in 2026, said Republicans could extend the package, specifically in a year-end spending package. 'I've got to believe that that may become a discussion and the year end appropriations, at least some sort of a short term extension, so they can sort it out,' he told The Independent last week before recess. The government runs out of funding for the fiscal year at the end of September. Open enrollment for the health insurance marketplaces typically begins in November. But Democrats are not as confident. 'Here we are trying to fix all the things that they broke,' Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) told The Independent. 'You've got Republican senators introducing bills to undo the things that they just passed.' There's evidence this could have massive consequences for patients. In December 2024, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office warned that 2.2 million Americans could lose their health insurance by 2026 if the extended subsidies expired. It also warned that 3.7 million people could lose coverage by 2027. Still, some Republicans said that they do not want to make a fix. 'Obamacare is doing so much damage to our healthcare system, to our federal budget, I don't want to renew any part of it. quite honestly,' Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) told The Independent. 'We need to repair the damage done by Obamacare.' But Trump might not have a choice. Polling shows that health care is one of the few policies where voters still trust Democrats more than Republicans. 'This is not the same ACA that he ran against in 2016, it covers many more people, both through Medicaid and in the marketplace,' Oberlander said. 'It's much more popular than it was, and if his administration and congressional Republicans are seen as gutting the health insurance marketplaces and raising people's millions of people's premiums, that's bad politics, and it's bad politics at a time when he already has a fairly low approval rating.'
