Aussie exposes frustrating $7,691 hidden 'tax' hitting millions: 'It's tough'
An Australian worker has highlighted the difficulty of surviving the cost-of-living crisis as a single person. New research has found singles have even been locked out of property ownership in one capital city.
Brittany Salkeld has been single for three years and she said people like her are hit with the hidden tax many don't consider. The 37-year-old has been "overlooked" for rental properties and cops bigger bills to cover alone.
"I've been paying a singles tax for years and I really felt it when I recently had to move and found it challenging as a single person on a single income to get the place I wanted," the Melbourne resident told Yahoo Finance.
Single vs couple: Shock $200,000 Aussie property realisation ahead of $500 million blow out
Centrelink cash boost coming in weeks for millions of Australians
Aussie earning $300,000 a year without going to uni stuns: 'Didn't start until 35'
The digital marketer found the Melbourne rental market to be fiercely competitive.
She said it was frustrating to be overlooked by landlords, real estate agents, and lenders because she doesn't have a second income on her application.
New research from Compare the Market found that in Sydney single people would not be able to comfortably afford a mortgage in any of its 635 suburbs if earning the median income of $1416.
A single property owner would have to spend more than 30 per cent of their wages to get into the market, which would put them into mortgage stress.
"If I did want to buy a home, then I'd have to save up double than those in a relationship," Salkeld said.
"It's tough when an unexpected bill comes in and I have to manage my finances carefully when couples can split those bigger expenses."
Compare the Market's Chris Ford echoed Salkeld's sentiments."It's not just those mortgage repayments but insurances, rates, ongoing maintenance that might be required as well ... and an already stretched budget is really pushed to its limit," he said.
There are obvious expenses, like power bills, furnishing a home, a mortgage or strata fees that singles need to cover.
But there are also costs that aren't necessarily an everyday expense which need special consideration.
Like choosing a hotel with coupled up friends who can afford a more expensive venue as they will split a room or weighing up if you can afford the financial and emotional responsibility of getting a dog.
The differences highlight the nuance in how Australians from different walks of life are battling the cost-of-living crisis.
Salkeld has found ways to cut costs and tap into the collective through platonic relationships.
"I've been able to carpool with a colleague to save money on travel, so I have found support in friends," she said.
"It's the price I'm happy to pay to live alone and not settle for the wrong person."
The Australian Bureau of Statistics has estimated that 3.4 million to four million Aussies will be living by themselves by 2046, which is a 30 to 50 per cent increase compared to 2021.
iSelect collected data on singles and couples without children and found those on their own are forking out a lot more.
The data found that childless single people, otherwise known as SINKs (single income, no kids), on average pay 41 per cent more for common household bills, like rent, as they can not share with another person.
Single: $2,198 per month
Each member of couple: $1,558 per month
INKs save around $1,089 less every year compared to DINKs, according to the study.
iSelect found that finances were tighter for SINKs as they were more concerned about their finances compared to DINKs.
However, single people were less inclined to make cutbacks.
The research claimed couples were more likely to plan for big life decisions like starting a family or buying a house so they would be more willing to strip back their spending.
Those in relationships might also have to second-guess their spending even if they're not on a budget.
"When you're in a couple, these choices are no longer a solitary decision and suddenly you're checking the shared account to see if you can get that extra cocktail," iSelect said.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street Has a New Secret Code for Laughing Behind Donald Trump's Back
Wall Street traders have adopted a term to mock President Trump's flip-flopping trade policy. TACO, an acronym that stands for 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' was coined by Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong. It has since become a favorite among stockbrokers. Simply put, the tongue-in-cheek term describes how markets dip on President Trump's tariff threats, only to rebound when he inevitably reverses course. In the latest example, markets rallied earlier this week after Trump delayed the 50 percent tariff on the European Union that he had threatened just days earlier. In response to his relenting, the S&P 500 posted its biggest gain in weeks. Speaking on MSNBC Tuesday, Australian economist Justin Wolfers mocked Trump by saying this tariff policy 'nearly lasted one entire long weekend.' 'He was a little unlucky. There was Memorial Day, extended the weekend to three days, and you couldn't have a tariff policy last a full weekend. So, Friday's policy was reversed by Monday. And so, we get to analyze it today on Tuesday. And I think that's really symptomatic,' he said. Suggesting that Trump's word is worth very little in certain circumstances, including tariff threats, Wolfers used the example of Wall Street's new favorite acronym. 'In fact, on Wall Street right now, and it's one level funny and another level tragic. There's a trade called the TACO trade, T-A-C-O, Trump Always Chickens Out,' he said. Wolfers had said Trump's word now lacks 'credibility.' 'There was a time when the president opened his mouth, when you had to pay attention because you thought it meant something, that it was a shift in policy that other countries could rely on and respond to. That's no longer the case,' he said. Salomon Fiedler, an analyst from German bank Berenberg, is just one of many speculators who now say they are happy to wait it out when Trump makes a threat. 'Wild threats by Trump are not unusual,' he wrote in a note last month, when the president 'paused' the super-charged 'Liberation Day' duties he imposed on a slew of countries. 'Given the damage the U.S. would do to itself with this tariff, he will probably not follow through.' Trump paused the duties to allow his economic buffs to secure renewed deals with dozens of nations. So far, only the United Kingdom and China have inked any sort of agreement. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Homebuyer In Escrow On A $720K House Just Discovered The Insurance Is 'Astronomical.' Realtor Claimed Earlier That It Wouldn't Be An Issue
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A homebuyer in California thought they were on their way to closing on a $720,000 property in a semi-rural area. But after entering escrow, they were hit with a surprise: the insurance quote was between $14,000 and $17,000 per year. The buyer, who shared their story on Reddit, said they had asked about insurance earlier in the process but were told not to worry. "My realtor claimed it wouldn't be an issue," the person wrote. "Lesson learned, it takes 10 minutes to run a few quotes on a house before putting an offer." Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Invest Where It Hurts — And Help Millions Heal: The two quotes they received were 'astronomical,' $14,000 annually with a $20,000 deductible, or $17,000 annually for a $2,500 deductible. The only option available was California's Fair Access to Insurance Requirements Plan, which many homeowners in high-risk zones are forced to rely on due to the lack of private carriers. California homeowners and industry pros in the thread pointed to the growing wildfire risk, regulatory delays, and insurance companies pulling out of the state as major reasons for rising premiums. 'Semi-rural California = fire country,' one person wrote. Another said, 'Farmers [Insurance] here for 32 years without a single claim. Cancelled.' An insurance adjuster chimed in: 'This is the exact problem. Florida has the same problem in reverse where everyone accounts for the risk of storms. But because everyone just litigates and sues for any and everything it's not worth the risk.' Others criticized California regulators for blocking or delaying the use of catastrophe models that would allow insurers to price risks more accurately. "The risk is now too great to insure," one commenter wrote. Trending: This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to . Commenters were also critical of the role of real estate agents. "Stop trusting your realtor," one person said. "Their ultimate goal is to get paid fast and move on." Another warned, "Don't use your realtor's broker. The last two houses I bought, different realtors convinced me to call their engineer, their inspector, their engineer... all those people gave the realtor kickbacks and none had my interest in mind." One California broker advised buyers to exercise the insurance contingency clause in contracts. Others added that in many cases, simply being more than five miles from a fire station or not having a hydrant nearby can result in astronomical premiums or outright denial. The FAIR Plan also doesn't offer comprehensive coverage. "OP doesn't even realize that [it] is only partially insuring him or her. They will need additional policies to cover the gaps," one user wrote. Another said their friend had to abandon a home purchase in California once she realized she couldn't afford the insurance: "After 2 years of making offers, a friend finally got an offer accepted. She had to back out of the deal when she realized she would not be able to afford insurance."For many, this is now a core part of the buying process. One Redditor said, "Literally, every time we were looking at touring a house, I'd email the address to my insurance agent for a quick quote." Other states like Florida, Louisiana, and Colorado are facing similar problems. Some say they were quoted $9,000 to $15,000 annually for homes with minor risk factors. Buyers across the country are now urging others to do their own due diligence. That means getting insurance quotes early, asking sellers who they use, and avoiding agents who downplay the risk. . With over $1 million in dividends paid out last quarter and a growing selection of properties across various markets, Arrived offers an attractive alternative for investors seeking to build a diversified real estate portfolio. In October 2024, Arrived sold The Centennial, achieving a total return of 34.7% (11.2% average annual returns) for investors. Arrived aims to continue delivering similar value across our portfolio through careful market selection, attentive property management, and thoughtful timing in sales. Looking for fractional real estate investment opportunities? The features the latest article A Homebuyer In Escrow On A $720K House Just Discovered The Insurance Is 'Astronomical.' Realtor Claimed Earlier That It Wouldn't Be An Issue originally appeared on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Crypto's Shocking Transformation: How Bitcoin Volatility Plummeted From 400% To 80%
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Bitcoin's journey from digital experiment to mainstream investment has been marked by one defining characteristic: extreme price volatility. However, data from NYU Stern's Volatility Lab reveals a remarkable transformation in how dramatically Bitcoin's price swings, offering important lessons for today's investors. Between 2010 and 2017, Bitcoin experienced volatility that would make even the most seasoned traders nervous. During this period, annualized volatility frequently exceeded 200% and occasionally spiked above 400%. To put this in perspective, traditional stocks typically see volatility between 15-30% annually. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . This extreme volatility reflected Bitcoin's status as an unproven digital asset with minimal institutional backing. Small trading volumes meant that even modest buy or sell orders could trigger massive price swings. News events, regulatory announcements, or technical developments could send prices soaring or crashing within hours. The 2017 cryptocurrency bubble perfectly exemplified this era. Bitcoin's price rocketed from under $1,000 to nearly $20,000 before crashing back down, creating the kind of volatility that attracted speculators while terrifying traditional investors. Following the 2017-2018 market correction, something interesting began happening. Bitcoin's volatility started declining meaningfully. Between 2018 and 2020, volatility generally ranged between 50% and 150% – still extreme by traditional standards, but a significant improvement from the earlier chaos. This period coincided with several important developments: major companies began accepting Bitcoin payments, institutional investors started taking notice, and cryptocurrency exchanges became more sophisticated and regulated. These factors contributed to deeper liquidity and more stable price discovery. Current data shows Bitcoin's volatility has continued moderating, now typically ranging between 30%-80%. While this remains substantially higher than stocks or bonds, it represents a dramatic evolution from Bitcoin's early days. Recent analysis shows Bitcoin's average volatility sitting around 80%, with minimum levels reaching as low as 31%. This represents remarkable progress for an asset that once regularly experienced 300%-400% volatility. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. This volatility evolution carries several important implications. First, Bitcoin has become more accessible to risk-conscious investors who were previously deterred by extreme price swings. Institutions and retail investors alike can now consider Bitcoin allocation with more predictable risk parameters. However, 'more stable' doesn't mean 'stable.' An 80% volatility level means investors should still expect significant price movements. Bitcoin can easily gain or lose 20%-30% in a single week, making it unsuitable for investors who can't tolerate substantial short-term losses. The data also suggests this maturation trend may continue. As Bitcoin's market capitalization grows and institutional adoption increases, basic economics suggests volatility should continue declining gradually. For investors considering Bitcoin exposure, this volatility evolution suggests several strategies. Dollar-cost averaging becomes particularly attractive, as it helps smooth out price fluctuations over time. Position sizing remains critical – financial advisors typically recommend limiting Bitcoin exposure to 1%-5% of total portfolios. Risk management takes on heightened importance. Even with reduced volatility, Bitcoin remains far more volatile than traditional assets, requiring careful consideration of overall portfolio risk. Bitcoin's volatility journey from 400% to 80% represents one of the most significant developments in cryptocurrency history. While still volatile by traditional standards, this evolution reflects Bitcoin's gradual transition from speculative experiment to legitimate asset class. For investors, this trend suggests Bitcoin is becoming more investable while remaining distinctly different from traditional assets. Understanding this evolution helps investors make informed decisions about whether and how to include Bitcoin in their portfolios, recognizing both its progress and its continued unique risk profile. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article Crypto's Shocking Transformation: How Bitcoin Volatility Plummeted From 400% To 80% originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data