
New Zealand MP ejected from Parliament again over Gaza comments
Chlöe Swarbrick, the co-leader of the left-wing Green Party, was initially ordered to leave the chamber on Tuesday.
She had urged government MPs "with a spine" to endorse her proposal for New Zealand to impose sanctions on Israel over the conflict in Gaza.
Despite being handed a three-day ban, considered lengthy by New Zealand parliamentary standards, Ms Swarbrick returned the following day.
However, she was ejected once more for her continued refusal to apologise for the remark.
Her censure unfolded amid fraught scenes in the country's Parliament, where the government faced strong criticism for its reluctance to recognise an independent Palestinian state.
It came days after neighbouring Australia pledged to do so. France, Britain, and Canada are also anticipated to recognise a state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
'We are one of the very few countries in the world who so far refuse to acknowledge the absolute bare minimum,' Ms Swarbrick said.
What prompted the original ejection?
Ms Swarbrick was abruptly ejected from the debating chamber when she urged government politicians to join her in a proposal to sanction Israel, which currently would not have enough votes to pass into law.
'If we can find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,' Ms Swarbrick said, referring to other MPs.
'That is completely unacceptable to make that statement,' Speaker Gerry Brownlee interrupted.
'Withdraw it and apologise.'
The Green politician refused and Mr Brownlee told her to leave the debating chamber for the rest of the week.
'Happily,' Ms Swarbrick said.
The standoff resumed when Ms Swarbrick took her seat again on Wednesday, despite the ban, and Mr Brownlee asked again if she would apologise.
Ms Swarbrick declined and was ejected once more, yelling 'free Palestine' as she went.
Mr Brownlee took the serious step, rare in New Zealand's Parliament, of taking a vote to 'name' Ms Swarbrick for her misconduct, a ruling that means a legislator is formally suspended with their pay docked. The vote passed, with all government MPs endorsing it.
Opposition MPs claim double standards
The measure provoked fresh debate in Parliament about punishments for unruly behavior. Government lawmakers voted in June to enact unprecedented lengthy bans of opposition Māori Party MPs who performed a haka chant to protest a controversial vote.
On Wednesday, opposition politicians decried Ms Swarbrick's penalty as unusually severe, with Labour MP Willie Jackson highlighting his own ban of just 30 minutes for calling one of his colleagues a liar, before being allowed to resume his seat without an apology.
In another recent example, a government politician used an eye-watering expletive without censure, supporters of Ms Swarbrick said.
Several others had escaped punishment in recent years when using the word 'spineless' about their opponents. Opposition leader and former prime minister Chris Hipkins said it was unprecedented for an MP to be ejected from Parliament for a second day over the same offence.
Mr Brownlee, however, said he had drawn a line when Ms Swarbrick directed a personal insult at all 68 government lawmakers, including him.
'We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament,' he said. 'If we don't change the behaviour in here, nothing will change outside.'
Pressure grows to decide Palestinian statehood question
Meanwhile, the government continues to mull recognition of an independent Palestinian state.
On Wednesday, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon made his most strident rebuke yet of Benjamin Netanyahu, saying the Israel leader 'has lost the plot' on the 'human catastrophe' in Gaza.
'I think Netanyahu has gone way too far,' Mr Luxon told reporters.
'He is not listening to the international community and that is unacceptable.'
While senior New Zealand officials, including Mr Luxon, have said recognition of Palestine from their government was 'a matter of not if, but when', his Cabinet has yet to endorse a change of position.
A decision will be made in September after further consideration, Mr Luxon said on Monday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump and Putin set for Alaska showdown as sidelined Zelensky waits to discover Ukraine's fate: Live updates
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will have the eyes of the world on them today as they meet in Alaska for an historic summit that may facilitate the end of the three-year war between Russia and Ukraine. The American and Russian presidents are coming face-to-face for the first time in six years for talks on how to end the conflict in Eastern Europe although Ukraine's leader Volodymyr Zelensky is notably sidelined. Speaking in the Oval Office last night, Trump insisted Putin 'is not going to mess around with me' as he aims to resolve the war which he promised would end within 24 hours on his return to the White House. The world leaders will meet later today at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, the largest US military installation in Alaska, and a news conference could follow. 10:32 Trump and Putin set for historic Alaska summit Good morning and welcome to our live coverage on what is an historic day as Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin meet in Alaska for a high-stakes summit which may signal the outcome of the three-year war between Russia and Ukraine. After insisting he could bring a swift resolution to the conflict upon re-entering the White House in January this year, Trump will hope to secure a peace agreement with the Russian leader. But one notable absentee from today's talks in Anchorage is Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky who will be waiting nervously next to a phone tonight to hear the outcome.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The bumper pay rise given to 'undervalued' NSW firefighters is revealed
Thousands of firefighters have secured a lofty pay rise in a sign an industrial umpire is willing to favour workers in fiery labour disputes. NSW firefighters will receive a 14 per cent wage increase across three years, backdated to February 2024, the Industrial Relations Commission ruled. That was substantially above the nine per cent offered by the Labor government, which re-established the stand-alone commission in July 2024. 'The work of firefighters is currently significantly undervalued, due to historic or intrinsic factors,' the commission said. The Fire Brigade Employees' Union welcomed the decision as vindication firefighters' role extended to non-fire work, including search-and-rescue operations and road crash scenes. It had sought 17 per cent, claiming the state's almost 7000 firefighters 'had suffered wage suppression for a decade' under the previous coalition government. The deal includes a one-off bump of two per cent to account for cost-of-living pressures. Another one-off bump of three per cent recognises their competency in road crash rescue work, which the commission found was a 'core function'. Industrial relations expert Fiona MacDonald hoped the finding would discourage state governments from 'crying poor when it comes to ... pay increases for public sector workers'. 'If state governments genuinely consider pay claims, then unions won't need to go to the (commission),' the acting director of the Australia Institute's Centre for Future Work told AAP. But other analysts were not sure governments would change their tune about stretched finances or that unions could pencil in other wins. 'There is always a lottery element to any (commission) hearing,' University of Sydney professor John Buchanan said. 'Employers have argued that 'capacity to pay' is a key principle they believe should shape wage determination ... so I anticipate the NSW government, no matter what colour, will continue to use this argument.' He said unions would persist with collective bargaining and fall back on arbitration if that failed to deliver. Doctors, nurses and psychiatrists, who are all agitating for markedly higher pay from the government, are currently engaged in arbitration at the commission. Their respective unions have gone on strikes before, with psychiatrists threatening a mass exodus. Prof Buchanan said the 2.5 per cent wages cap by the previous coalition government created deep distortions in the labour market. One of the architects of that cap, shadow treasurer Damien Tudehope, criticised Labor for surrendering control of its budget. The commission had 'exercised its unshackled power' by rejecting the government's fiscal arguments, the opposition industrial relations spokesman said. Labor welcomed the commission's decision as delivering wage certainty for firefighters and recognising the work they did at road crash rescues. 'We were elected on a mandate to fix the recruitment and retention crisis in essential services and that is what we are doing,' Industrial Relations Minister Sophie Cotsis said.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
UN rights office says Israeli settlement plan breaks international law
Aug 15 (Reuters) - The U.N. human rights office said on Friday an Israeli plan to build to build thousands of new homes between an Israeli settlement in the West Bank and near East Jerusalem was illegal under international law, and would put nearby Palestinians at risk of forced eviction, which it described as a war crime. Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Thursday vowed to press on a long-delayed settlement project, saying the move would "bury" the idea of a Palestinian state. The U.N. rights office spokesperson said the plan would break the West Bank into isolated enclaves and that it was "a war crime for an occupying power to transfer its own civilian population into the territory it occupies". About 700,000 Israeli settlers live among 2.7 million Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Israel annexed East Jerusalem in 1980, a move not recognised by most countries, but has not formally extended sovereignty over the West Bank. Most world powers say settlement expansion erodes the viability of a two-state solution by breaking up territory the Palestinians seek as part of a future independent state. The two-state plan envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel, which captured all three territories in the 1967 Middle East war. Israel cites historical and biblical ties to the area and says the settlements provide strategic depth and security and that the West Bank is "disputed" not "occupied".