logo
Secure Logistics gets CCP approval to acquire Trax Online

Secure Logistics gets CCP approval to acquire Trax Online

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) on Wednesday approved the complete acquisition of Trax Online (Pvt.) Ltd. by Secure Logistics Group Ltd. under a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA).
According to a press statement, both parties had submitted a pre-merger application in line with the Competition Act, 2010. The CCP's review identified the relevant product market as courier and e-commerce logistics services in Pakistan.
CCP said that the deal is a conglomerate merger with no horizontal or vertical overlaps, and concluded that the transaction will not result in dominance or lessen competition in the relevant market.
Pakistan's SLGL secures transport services deal with Maersk
Secure Logistics Group Ltd. (SLGL) is a publicly listed company offering long-haul and medium-haul logistics, asset tracking, fleet management, and security services. In the quarter ending March 31, 2025, SLGL posted a profit of Rs160 million, translating into an earnings per share of Re0.59.
Meanwhile, Trax Online (Pvt.) Ltd. is a private company focused on warehousing and door-to-door delivery for e-commerce clients.
'The acquisition is expected to enhance operational synergies and support the growth of Pakistan's digital logistics ecosystem,' CCP stated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CCP fines fertilizer firms, FMPAC Rs375mn for price fixing
CCP fines fertilizer firms, FMPAC Rs375mn for price fixing

Business Recorder

time12 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

CCP fines fertilizer firms, FMPAC Rs375mn for price fixing

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has imposed penalties to the tune of Rs375 million on companies and an industry association for collusion in the fertilizer sector. According to a press statement released on Tuesday, the CCP took decisive action against anti-competitive conduct in the fertilizer sector, imposing a penalty of Rs50 million each on six major urea manufacturers. Moreover, the Fertilizer Manufacturers of Pakistan Advisory Council (FMPAC), a leading industry association, was fined Rs75 million. The CCP bench—comprising Dr Kabir Ahmed Sidhu and Salam Amin—concluded that six urea manufacturing companies, i.e. Fatima Fertilizer Limited, Fauji Fertilizer Company Limited, Fauji Fertilizer Bin Qasim Limited, Fatima Fertilizer Company Limited, Engro Fertilizer Company Limited and Agritech Limited in coordination with their trade association, FMPAC, 'under the guise of conducting an awareness campaign/advertisement, have effectively fixed the price of urea across the country'. IHC reserves verdict in fertiliser prices case 'Such conduct goes beyond the bounds of lawful information dissemination and enters into the realm of anti-competitive behaviour' in violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010. CCP said that despite claiming price independence, the manufacturers failed to justify their synchronised pricing strategy. 'The commission's investigation uncovered that the conduct not only distorted competition, but also harmed farmers across Pakistan, especially during the critical Rabi and Kharif season, by artificially influencing fertilizer prices and limiting market choice,' said CCP. The government body shared that the respondents' attempt to claim protection under the 'state action doctrine' was also rejected, asserting that no formal government directive or compulsion existed to justify their collusive behaviour. CCP noted that the respondents took advantage of a federal government directive regarding initiating an awareness campaign encouraging farmers regarding urea price and used it as a tool to fix the price in coordination among themselves and jointly announced the uniform price for the urea buyers/consumers. The bench also held that such 'actions, under the pretext of complying with government instructions, effectively undermined market forces and distorted competitive pricing mechanisms.' CCP shared 'with great concern' that despite significant variations in input costs, different economies of scale, size of the market, and different prices of gas, all respondents were charging an identical price for the size of the urea bag, i.e. Rs1,768 per bag. The bench also noted that 'in a market where each undertaking's production capacity and market share are matters of common knowledge, such a coordinated disclosure cannot be viewed as incidental or competitively benign. Rather, the joint announcement constitutes an overt manifestation of concerted conduct.' Moreover, repeated directions from the Fertilizer Review Committee (FRC) were given to the respondents to address their failure to manage supply imbalances. CCP informed that it had issued warnings to the fertilizer manufacturers and FMPAC in 2010, 2012 and 2014, 'which failed to produce any lasting change'.

The secret of China's success
The secret of China's success

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

The secret of China's success

A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.—Lao Tzu An opium-addicted nation that remained under occupation by six foreign powers is now the world's second largest economy. How China managed to transform itself from a weak and fragile country to a global power house needs to be understood in the light of the Lao Tzu's quote above. It was under Mao Zedong that mainland China emerged as an independent country in October 1949. The policy of 'great leap forward' from late 1950s to early 1960s focused on reforming the country from an agrarian to an industrial economy. Resilience, simplicity, efficiency, hard work, intelligence, integrity, commitment and dedication shaped China's road to modernisation which got an impetus during Mao's leadership and the 'open door policy' of Deng Xiaoping. Pulling 500 million people from below the poverty line by 1980s; focusing on industrialisation; augmenting exports; and planning to improve the quality of life of people shaped characteristics of the world's second most populous country. In the first decade of Communist China (1949-59), the Soviet Union was the principal backer of China. But following a rupture in their alliance and severance of assistance from Moscow, Beijing was on its own and succeeded in miraculously emerging as the world's second largest economy by 2015. The secret of China's incredible success against all odds has another dimension: maintaining peace with its neighbours. The last war which China fought was in January 1979, with Vietnam. Since then it has not been in an armed conflict with any of its neighbours. Following the 1989 visit to Beijing of Mikhail Gorbachev, the then Soviet leader, and the collapse of the USSR, the relations between China and Russia transformed into being partners instead of adversaries. China's border issues with India barring the October 1962 war remained under control. Another secret of China's success is its concentration on 'soft power' with focusing on trade, aid, investments, technology and diplomacy instead of 'hard power' in the form of military intervention and armed conflicts. The Chinese leadership knows that its military involvement will jeopardise its vision to emerge as the world's biggest economic power. China wants to have peace with its neighbours so that it can focus on its economic progress and development. China is not a perfect country and has its own fault lines like democracy, human rights, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjiang. For critics, the price paid by the people of China for their economic development and progress is democracy because Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is the only party to rule the country - something that negates fundamental principles of democracy like political pluralism and multiparty system. CCP believes China cannot afford western democracy, as under a multiparty system, it may not remain in power which will open a Pandora's box like what happened in the wake of Gorbachev's policy of reforms in the then USSR. The issues of Tibet and Xinjiang as well as alleged human rights violations cannot be dealt with if CCP loses its control over power. For how long CCP and its powerful People's Liberation Army (PLA) will be able to deal with the fault lines in China depends on how strong the current leadership is and how success it is in retaining its strides in education, infrastructure, technology, research and development, communication, transportation and manufacture of exportable items. China's secret of success against all odds is an interesting topic of discussion and needs to be analysed from three sides. 1) from an impoverished economy in 1949, China pursued a 'great leap forward' in 1960s and by following an open-door economy policy in late 1970s emerged as an economic power by 2000. Within a span of 21 years, China used its human resource to compete with other global economies. For instance, in 1979, China's foreign exchange reserves were around 1 billion dollars, per capita income was 270 dollars and GDP was 139 billion dollars. In 2025, China's foreign exchange reserves are 3.2 trillion dollars, per capita income is 25,000 dollars and GDP is 18.5 trillion dollars. If China maintains the pace of its economic progress and development, it will surpass the US as the world's biggest economy. China's miraculous turnaround in just 50 years is an example for other countries, particularly Pakistan, to follow. During 1960s and 1970s, Pakistan was ahead of China in terms of per capita income, economic growth rate and foreign exchange reserves. PIA was the only non-communist airline to fly to Communist China. But, after just 40 years, China is now far ahead of Pakistan. 2) Chinese leadership focused on domestic production instead of importing items. For decades, Chinese way of life was simple whereas Pakistan was an import-driven economy and relied on foreign loans. When China was able to emerge as a successful economy, only then it allowed imports of luxury items. The same policy was pursued by India too. Not an import-driven economy, India adopted a policy of self-reliance. The lesson Pakistan can learn from the Chinese success is: peace with neighbours; focus on exports; self-reliance; and investment in education, health, infrastructure development, housing and public transport to life the quality of life of the public. Planning, time management and efficiency are major characteristics of the Chinese leadership. The CCP has a zero tolerance for corruption and nepotism. 3) Maximum use of human and natural resources is another major reason behind China's success. Pakistan is the world's fifth most populous country whereas China is second from top. However, Chinese population is not a liability, it's an asset. When Communist China, despite its international isolation and the conflict with the then USSR, was able focus on human and social development, it worked wonders. Till late 1970s, China was not even a part of the Olympics, but now it is known for its best performances in global sports. All in all, it is the leadership that matters in the context of progress and development of a country.

CCP warns consumers against bogus housing schemes
CCP warns consumers against bogus housing schemes

Business Recorder

time2 days ago

  • Business Recorder

CCP warns consumers against bogus housing schemes

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has warned consumers that bogus housing schemes and deceptive marketing practices continue to harm growth in real estate sector. According to an order issued by the CCP against a housing society of Islamabad, the importance of responsible and accurate advertising in relation to real estate should not, in any circumstance, be undermined. The real estate market plays a vital role in the development of any country's economy as numbers of other associated sectors have close links with this sector. At the same time, the degree of regulation remains inadequate to the extent that bogus housing schemes and deceptive marketing practices continue to harm growth in this sector, ultimately causing a loss to the overall sustainability of Pakistan's economy. The Commission, at the outset, also bears in mind the specific circumstances of consumers that often fall victim to misleading claims in relation to real estate investments they may make. For the majority of the population in this country, it almost takes a lifetime of savings or obtaining credit or loans from banks to make an investment such as the acquisition of a plot to secure a more stable future. Such a transactional decision is a much more complicated and difficult one as compared to buying everyday household product from a supermarket. 'Therefore, we cannot stress enough, the higher burden placed on undertakings which operate in the real estate market, in relation to the accuracy of any claims or representations that they make in the course of their marketing campaigns, CCP order maintained.' In this case, the CCP Bench considered the seriousness of the infringement, particularly the nature of the deceptive marketing practices, effect on competitors and third parties, and Respondent's refusal to cooperate with the Commission for carrying out its investigations. The advertisement was disseminated widely through digital and print media. Accordingly, there is dire need to deter the Respondent and other such undertakings from committing such deceptive marketing practices in future in order to protect the market integrity and consumers' interests. The quantum of the penalty has been determined after taking into account all the relevant factors as enumerated in CCP, Fining Guidelines. Deceptive marketing and dissemination of false and misleading information appears to be the business strategy of housing scheme being advertised as another scheme of Islamabad as it started immediately after its incorporation and well before the promulgation of the PHATA Affordable Private Housing Scheme Rules 2020. Therefore, the CCP Bench hereby imposes a penalty of Rs 75,000,000/- (Seventy Five Million Rupees) upon the Respondent for violation of Section 10(2) (b) of the Act. The Bench also imposes a penalty of Rs 75,000,000/- (Seventy Five Million Rupees) upon the Respondent for violation of Section 10(2)(a) of the Competition Act. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store