logo
Trump's cuts to US-funded broadcasters a 'gift to autocracies', say media experts

Trump's cuts to US-funded broadcasters a 'gift to autocracies', say media experts

Euronews21-03-2025

ADVERTISEMENT
After US President Donald Trump announced cuts to Voice of America (VOA) and its sister broadcasters last Friday, state-run media outlets in autocratic countries like China and Russia were quick to celebrate.
The Global Times, a newspaper controlled by China's ruling communist party, rejoiced in the shuttering of VOA, calling it a 'lie factory' that had been 'discarded by its own government like a dirty rag'.
The reaction in Russia was similarly euphoric, with Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of the state-backed RT network, epitomising the mood in pro-Kremlin circles.
'We couldn't shut them down, unfortunately, but America did so itself,' she said.
Since their founding in the 1940s and 1950s, the US-funded VOA and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) have been seen by the West as beacons for the international free press.
Beamed into countries where independent journalism is often hard to find, the networks have delivered news to tens of millions of people in dozens of local languages each year.
But Trump's recent executive order, which aimed to stop American taxpayers from funding what he called 'radical propaganda', has put the future of such reporting in doubt.
More than 1,300 people were put on administrative leave at VOA over the weekend, while RFE/RL's grant agreement has been terminated, leaving it in financial uncertainty.
The funding cuts affected all outlets under the umbrella of the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM), including Radio and TV Martí, which report on Cuba, and Radio Free Asia.
Journalists work in Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's bureau in Moscow, Russia, on 27 January, 2021.
RFE/RL
As with the slashing of the country's foreign aid and development agency, USAID, some see the Trump administration's attack against USAGM outlets as an act of national self-harm which will diminish American soft power overseas.
Alsu Kurmasheva, a Russian-American journalist who works for RFE/RL's Tatar-Bashkir service, shares this view.
'This is similar to an own goal in football — it bothers me that we're handing a gift to autocracies. RFE/RL has always been incredibly important for American interests,' Kurmasheva told Euronews.
'We know the Kremlin is celebrating, we saw the glee all over their state-sponsored propaganda channels. The beneficiaries are autocrats who don't want their citizens to have access to independent news and information. Their survival depends on keeping their populations in the dark,' she added.
Kurmasheva, who was detained in Russia for nine months between 2023 and 2024 because of her reporting, said RFE/RL's greatest strength is the trust it has built up with its audiences over the past 75 years.
'They relied on us for news about Chernobyl, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and major events both domestic and global. They know we don't play games with the news.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Alsu Kurmasheva, an editor for the US-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, attends a court hearing in Kazan, Russia on 31 May, 2024.
AP Photo
Hundreds of messages and calls have poured in from concerned audience members since last Friday, said Kurmasheva, including people living under repressive regimes in Afghanistan, Bulgaria and Russia.
"The beneficiaries are autocrats who don't want their citizens to have access to independent news and information. Their survival depends on keeping their populations in the dark."
Alsu Kurmasheva, RFE/RL journalist
Liam Scott, a VOA press freedom reporter, who, like around 500 of his colleagues, found out on Sunday that his contract will be terminated at the end of March, is also worried about the consequences of Trump's executive order.
'I think it's noteworthy that state-run media in places like Russia and China have been really celebrating this move. And they've been doing that because VOA, RFE and Radio Free Asia are really good at delivering balanced coverage,' Scott told Euronews.
'I have concerns about what the potential demise of VOA and its sister outlets could mean for our audiences' access to independent news in places where it is hard to come by,' he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Americans may not be its intended audience, but they are still key stakeholders in its work, said Scott. 'Because VOA is a really key component of the US' soft power. We model what a free press looks like to the rest of the world,' he explained.
Gypsy Guillén Kaiser, the chief global affairs officer at the Committee for the Protection of Journalists (CPJ), a press freedom charity, said Trump's cuts would have severe repercussions for the millions of people whom USAGM outlets serve.
In closed media landscapes like in Myanmar, where war has been raging since a military coup in 2021, a dangerous gap would be left if accurate, uncensored information is withdrawn, Guillén Kaiser explained.
'You're creating a void that ultimately serves the needs of those interested in pursuing mis- and disinformation, while at the same time making journalists vulnerable,' she said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Ten people working for USAGM entities are currently in jail in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Myanmar, Russia and Vietnam, according to Reporters Without Borders, which is calling, along with the CPJ and others, for the Trump administration to reverse its decision.
'I have concerns about what the potential demise of VOA and its sister outlets could mean for our audiences' access to independent news in places where it is hard to come by,'
Liam Scott, VOA press freedom reporter
'What we are demanding at this point in time is that Congress reinstate the funding, which is legally mandated and cannot be politicised,' Guillén Kaiser said.
RFE/RL announced on Tuesday that it was suing the Trump administration over the withholding of funds allocated to the broadcaster by Congress.
Over in Europe, countries such as the Czech Republic, where RFE/RL has its headquarters, have raised the possibility of helping to fund the organisation.
ADVERTISEMENT
In an attempt to justify its actions against the USAGM's outlets, Trump and his allies not only claim VOA, RFE/RL and their partner broadcasters are biased against the Republican party, but also that their reporting benefits the US' enemies.
Kari Lake, a Trump ally who is currently serving as a senior adviser to the USAGM, recently derided the agency's news organisations for producing 'a product that often parrots the talking points of America's adversaries'.
This interpretation is hard to square with reality, according to Thomas Kent, the former president and CEO of RFE/RL.
'Any reasonable look at what the agencies are doing would very quickly reveal that we certainly report the US side of things,' he said. 'Adversaries like Russia and China must feel we are pretty pro-American or they wouldn't make such frantic efforts to block us.'
ADVERTISEMENT
'If these shutdowns go through, the US will be depriving itself unilaterally of some of the most powerful tools it has to communicate with foreign populations,' he stressed.
Kent recognises that improvements could be made.
'If you wanted to improve USAGM, you would have to start with a decision — which outside commentators have quarrelled over forever, as to what it's supposed to be,' he said, noting the tension over whether its services should primarily be seen as an objective news source or a tool of US government messaging.
Other things could also be assessed, including whether to merge Radio and TV Martí's reporting on Cuba with VOA's wider Latin American coverage, Kent said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Related
Trump cuts off funding for pro-democracy media outlets VOA and RFERL
Will the EU be able to save Radio Free Europe after Trump's funding cuts?
'These are the types of things that could legitimately be discussed by the administration with an eye to efficiency, cutting out waste and so forth. But you don't advance that by shutting everything down and firing everyone,' he said.
Kent noted that a major benefit of RFE/RL is that its news products are believed to reach 10% of the Russian population on a regular basis.
'Not everyone who listens to us is necessarily pro-American. People who have an open mind want to hear what we have to say,' he said.
'And that's our greatest goal. In Russia or any other country, it's the undecideds — the people who are looking for information from different sides — who make a difference in the direction a country ultimately goes.'
ADVERTISEMENT

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump unveils website for $5 million US residency visa
Trump unveils website for $5 million US residency visa

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Trump unveils website for $5 million US residency visa

"Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World," Trump wrote in a social media post. Trump unveiled the first such visa aboard Air Force One in April, holding a golden prototype that bore his face and promising the special permit would probably be available "in less than two weeks." The visas are not available yet, but the website announced Wednesday allows interested parties to submit their name, desired visa and email address under a header that says "The Trump Card is Coming." Trump previously said the new visa, a high-price version of the traditional green card, would bring in job creators and could be used to reduce the US national deficit. The announcement comes as deportation raids are being ramped up across the country, prompting protests, and as Trump's administration faces ongoing lawsuits and accusations of rights violations over its anti-immigration blitz. Trump has said the new card would be a route to highly prized US citizenship. He said in February that his administration hoped to sell "maybe a million" of the cards and did not rule out that Russian oligarchs may be eligible.

US-backed Gaza aid group accuse Hamas of attack on staff bus, at least five killed
US-backed Gaza aid group accuse Hamas of attack on staff bus, at least five killed

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

US-backed Gaza aid group accuse Hamas of attack on staff bus, at least five killed

The US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation on Wednesday accused militant group Hamas of attacking a bus carrying its staffers to an aid distribution center, saying at least five people were killed and multiple others injured. The group said in a statement that around 10 pm local time (1900 GMT) "a bus carrying more than two dozen members of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation team... were brutally attacked by Hamas." "We are still gathering facts, but what we know is devastating: there are at least five fatalities, multiple injuries, and fear that some of our team members may have been taken hostage," the statement read. 07:15 In an email to AFP the group said all the passengers on the bus were Palestinian and all were aid workers. They were en route to GHF's distribution center in the area west of Khan Younis. "We condemn this heinous and deliberate attack in the strongest possible terms," the group said in its statement. "These were aid workers. Humanitarians. Fathers, brothers, sons and friends, who were risking their lives every day to help others." An officially private effort with opaque funding and backed by Israel, GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel completely cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine. But GHF's first week of operations, in which it said it had distributed more than seven million meals' worth of food, has been marred by criticism. The Israeli military faces allegations of shooting into crowds of civilians rushing to pick up aid packages near GHF sites. Israeli authorities and the GHF -- which uses contracted US security -- denied any such incident took place. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the foundation over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives.

Australia 'confident' in US nuclear sub deal despite review
Australia 'confident' in US nuclear sub deal despite review

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Australia 'confident' in US nuclear sub deal despite review

The 2021 AUKUS deal joins Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States in a multi-decade effort to balance China's growing military might. It aims to arm Australia with a fleet of cutting-edge, nuclear-powered submarines from the United States and provides for cooperation in developing an array of warfare technologies. US President Donald Trump's administration has advised Australia and the United Kingdom that it is reviewing AUKUS, a spokesperson for the Australian Department of Defence confirmed Thursday. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he was "very confident" Australia would still get the American submarines. "I think the review that's been announced is not a surprise," he told public broadcaster ABC. "We've been aware of this for some time. We welcome it. It's something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do." Australia plans to acquire at least three Virginia Class submarines from the United States within 15 years, eventually manufacturing its own subs. 'Time to wake up' The US Navy has 24 Virginia-class vessels, which can carry cruise missiles, but American shipyards are struggling to meet production targets set at two new boats each year. Critics question why the United States would sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia without stocking its own military first. Marles said boosting the US production of US Virginia Class submarines was a challenge. "That's why we are working very closely with the United States on seeing that happen. But that is improving," he said. Government forecasts estimate the submarine programme alone could cost Australia up to US$235 billion over the next 30 years, a price tag that has contributed to criticism of the strategy. Australia should conduct its own review of AUKUS, said former conservative prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, noting that Britain and now the United States had each decided to re-examine the pact. "Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?" he posted on X. Former Labor Party prime minister Paul Keating, a vehement critic of AUKUS, said the US review might "save Australia from itself". Australia should carve its own security strategy "rather than being dragged along on the coat tails of a fading Atlantic empire", Keating said. "The review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: Why has Australia failed to do the same?" 'No Plan B' Any US review of AUKUS carries a risk, particularly since it is a Biden-era initiative, said Euan Graham, senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. But it is "fundamentally a good deal for the US", he said, with Australia already investing cash to boost American submarine production as part of the agreement. "I just do not think it is realistic for Australia, this far backed in, to have any prospect of withdrawing itself from AUKUS," Graham told AFP. "I don't think there is a Plan B that would meet requirements and I think it would shred Australia's reputation fundamentally in a way that would not be recoverable." © 2025 AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store