
Lawsuit: Guards video-recorded strip searches at Michigan's women's prison
Twenty Jane Does filed the civil lawsuit May 6 in Washtenaw County Circuit Court, with one of their attorneys, Todd Flood, telling the Free Press that he and his colleagues have more than 500 retained complainants in the case, with incidents occurring from January through March of this year.
The lawsuit names the governor, the director and deputy director of the Michigan Department of Corrections, and about three dozen employees, from corrections officers to the warden, at the Women's Huron Valley Correctional Facility. It seeks $500 million in damages.
It indicates the MDOC implemented a body-worn camera policy in January that allowed staff to wear active cameras at the women's prison, including during strip searches. Officials characterized the cameras being in "passing recording mode," but they still captured real-time images and data, according to the lawsuit.
"It's a clear violation of the law to videotape or take photographs of someone naked," Flood said, adding that while money was allotted for body cameras for prison guards "they did not allot money for video-cameras to commit illegal acts to videotape strip searches."
Messages were left for MDOC spokespersons.
In a news release, attorneys said MDOC officials failed to halt the privacy violations "despite multiple warnings about the policy's illegality from advocacy organizations and state legislators." Concerns started to be raised Feb. 17, with the lawsuit indicating "internal communications reveal that officials were fully aware of these legal concerns yet continued the practice for five more weeks."
The lawsuit indicates the policy changed March 24, with body cameras to be placed in "sleep mode" during routine strip searches, meaning no data, audio or video would be captured. But Flood said there are incidents of recording when women are naked still occurring when corrections officers go into bathrooms or showers.
"Even after the official policy change, corrections officers flagrantly continued to record women in states of undress, demonstrating the deeply entrenched culture of voyeurism and disregard for women's dignity," according to the lawsuit.
Flood said the plaintiffs are looking for "no invasion of privacy when a lady goes to the bathroom or when they're in a shower stall." They also seek destruction of all recordings made during the illegal period and mandatory training for MDOC staff, according to the lawsuit.
The prison, located near Ypsilanti, can house up to 2,006 women, according to the MDOC website. Flood said there are female and men corrections officers at the prison.
Prior to the implementation of body-worn cameras this year, the lawsuit indicates, strip search policies at the prison varied depending on the individual officer. Since the cameras' introduction, it indicates, officers began uniformly conducting strip searches in the "most invasive manner possible, claiming they need to perform searches 'by the book' now that they were being recorded."
Flood said of the more than 500 complainants, about 15 have been released from prison since his team's investigation began. He said also they received several phone calls from prison guards who did not believe this was something that should be done and they were being told to do it.
According to the lawsuit, the MDOC forced "hundreds of women — the vast majority of whom are rape survivors — to submit to video recording while completely nude during strip searches, while showering, while using toilets, and in other states of undress. This conduct constitutes a felony under Michigan law (MCL750.539j) and represents a brazen and calculated violation of fundamental constitutional rights to privacy, bodily integrity, and human dignity."
More: Detroit man says he needed mental health treatment as an inmate, but was punished instead
It indicates the impact has been "devastating," with many plaintiffs experiencing debilitating panic attacks and insomnia among other physical ailments. Several have withdrawn from visiting with family, resigned from prison jobs and left educational programs.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs sent a questionnaire, receiving responses from 319 women at the prison about their experiences, according to the lawsuit, with 83% reported being recorded during strip searches with body cameras. It indicates that 30% were recorded while showering and 38% while using the toilet.
"Women described being forced to endure the profound violation and humiliation of having their exposed bodies recorded, leaving them feeling sexually exploited by the very institution charged with their care," according to the lawsuit.
It indicates women were "forced to bend at the waist, spread their buttocks and expose their vaginal and anal cavities to live cameras worn by corrections officers."
According to the lawsuit, the body camera policy was to be uniform across all MDOC facilities, but officers at men's facilities "frequently exercised discretion to refuse wearing cameras during strip searches. By contrast, officers at WHV strictly enforced the policy, creating a two-tiered system that disproportionately subjected women to recorded strip searches."
It also indicates hundreds of women filed grievances challenging the policy, but officials failed to process the grievances, assign grievance numbers or provide appeal forms. The lawsuit detailed each plaintiffs' experiences as well as including emails about the policy and communications from advocates and legislators expressing concerns.
Contact Christina Hall: chall@freepress.com. Follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @challreporter.
Support local journalism. Subscribe to the Free Press.
Submit a letter to the editor at freep.com/letters.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Lawsuit: Strip searches video-recorded at Michigan women's prison

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DOD to offer new medal for personnel deployed to Southern Border
The Pentagon announced a new military decoration that will recognize service members stationed at the U.S.-Mexico border as part of the Trump administration's effort to bolster border security. A U.S. defense official confirmed to Military Times the veracity of a memorandum regarding the medal that began circulating online several days ago. 'Effective immediately, the Mexican Border Defense Medal (MBDM), is hereby established to recognize Service members deployed to the U.S. international border with Mexico for DoD support to United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP),' a memo uploaded to the Navy subreddit reads. Previously, service members collaborating with CBP were awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, but the Mexican Border Defense Medal will take its place, according to the memo. Military personnel qualify for the medal if they have been 'permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that deployed' in support of a military operation supporting CBP within 100 nautical miles of the U.S.-Mexico border after Jan. 20, 2025, when President Trump assumed office. After chase, US Navy, Coast Guard intercept 1,296 pounds of cocaine Military personnel must have operated within Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California or the adjacent U.S. waters out to 24 nautical miles, the memo said. Service members and veterans can apply to have their Armed Forces Service Medal swapped out with the Mexican Border Defense Medal, but they are not allowed to possess both at once. Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20 to deter the 'unlawful mass migration' of illegal aliens into the United States by deploying supplemental military personnel along the Southern Border, among other strategies. Over the last eight months, the administration has ramped up its border security mission. U.S. Northern Command established Joint Task Force-Southern Border on March 14, 2025, to lead immigration enforcement efforts. As of July 2, approximately 8,500 military personnel were attached to the task force. The administration has also deployed the U.S. Navy to intercept and halt the flow of illicit drugs into the country. On Aug. 11, U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer Sampson, along with the U.S. Coast Guard, intercepted 1,296 pounds of cocaine from a drug smuggling vessel. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
R.I. Ethics Commission wrestles with lawmaker's bid to rejoin list of attorneys hired by state
Rep. Jason Knight, a Barrington Democrat, sits before the Rhode Island Ethics Commission on Aug. 19, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Does a state lawmaker qualify as an independent contractor when hired by Rhode Island's court system to represent clients who can't otherwise rely on a public defender? That was the question that kept the Rhode Island Ethics Commission debating for more than 40 minutes as its members weighed Rep. Jason Knight's bid to rejoin the judiciary's roster of attorneys representing indigent clients. Commission staff say the state's ethics code clearly bars Knight from returning to the court's list because he's a lawmaker and thus an independent contractor that would be paid by the court. But the panel is now exploring whether there's a way to let him back without running afoul of its own 'revolving door' rule. Knight, a Barrington Democrat, had been on the list before his election to the Rhode Island House of Representatives in 2016. In 2019, he requested his name be removed because the rates the criminal courts paid were not high enough. 'The cases were basically practice killers,' he said in an interview after the ethics commission meeting. 'To do them correctly, you would have to set aside just about everything in your world and (as) criminal defense lawyers, we're solo outfits, you need to be thoughtful in what your two hands can do on any given day.' At the time, court-appointed lawyers were paid by the judiciary $90 an hour for representing clients facing Class 1 felony charges for crimes like rape, kidnapping and robbery. The rate was $60 an hour for Class 2 crimes such as breaking and entering, larceny, possession of a stolen motor vehicle and certain drug offenses. Lawyers representing someone accused of murder were paid $100 an hour. In April, the Rhode Island Supreme Court increased the range from $112 for most cases to $142 per hour for clients facing murder charges. Knight now says he wants to return to the court's rotating list as a way to gain some additional revenue as he 'thinks about what the future's going to bring.' 'I need to get back on the horse,' Knight told the Ethics Commission. There's just one problem: The state ethics code bars elected officials from taking state jobs until they've been out of the General Assembly for at least a year. That's the position staff attorney Lynn Radiches urged the commissioners to keep. 'Indigent clients do have a right to an attorney, they do not have a right to Mr. Knight as their attorney.' she said. 'I don't write the rules, but I've become pretty good at interpreting them.' Officials can work for the state if they held the position at the time of their election, but Radiches said because Knight withdrew from the court list in 2019 he is ineligible to return. But commissioners argue that just because Knight would be appointed by the court to a client does not mean he is necessarily working for the state. 'He is providing services, as an attorney, to his client — just like a private attorney would be,' said commissioner Frank Cenerini. 'And he, or any person providing indigent services, is still bound by the legal code of ethics.' That's not how John Marion, executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island and a longtime observer of the commission, sees it. 'The money is coming from the state of Rhode Island,' Marion said in an interview. 'That's the point of the rule.' Chairman Lauren E. Jones acknowledged that the court may cut Knight's checks, but said it's only in order to represent a third party. 'He's not representing the interest of his contractor,' Jones argued. The panel ultimately rejected its staff's advisory opinion but stopped short of ruling in Knight's favor. Instead, it directed staff to draft a new opinion on what legally defines an independent contractor in Rhode Island. Should the commission grant an exception for Knight, Marion warns it could set a dangerous precedent. 'If we start down that path, that only leads to a place where there is no enforceable code of ethics and that's not a good place,' Marion said. The new advisory opinion is expected to be complete by the time the panel reconvenes in September. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Community rallies around LA teen detained by Ice while walking dog
A southern California community is calling for the release of a high school student whom US immigration agents arrested earlier this month while he was walking his dog. Benjamin Marcelo Guerrero-Cruz was supposed to be starting his senior year of high school at Reseda charter high school this month. But just days after his 18th birthday, masked Ice agents detained him as he walking his dog in the Los Angeles neighborhood of Van Nuys in what his family described as a kidnapping. The agents allowed his dog to run loose, and treated Guerrero-Cruz like a criminal and joked while arresting him, his family said in a GoFundMe. 'He is more than just a student – he is a devoted son, a caring brother, a loyal friend, and a valued member of our community,' the family wrote, adding that he helps care for his younger brothers. 'He is a good student, with a kind heart, who has always stepped up for his family.' Educators and advocates are expected to hold a rally and press conference in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday afternoon to call for Guerrero-Cruz's release. A former teacher who recently visited the teen is expected to share an update, ABC7 reported. The arrest comes as Donald Trump's crackdown on immigrants continues to unfold across southern California, where thousands of people have been arrested this summer at workplaces, at stores and near schools. Related: Inside the neighborhood patrols watching for Ice: 'They thought they could scare us – but this is LA' Los Angeles Unified school district, which has nearly 800 schools across the county, has adopted new strategies to protect students and 'ensure that schools remain safe, supportive spaces for all children and families – regardless of immigration status'. 'Schools are safe spaces,' Alberto M Carvalho, the LAUSD superintendent, said in a statement. 'Immigration enforcement near schools disrupts learning and creates anxiety that can last far beyond the school day.' Carvalho has said he is in communication with Guerrero-Cruz's mother, who has alleged that the boy was being held with dozens of men, receiving water only once a day and insufficient food, in a space that doesn't have enough room for everyone to sit or lie at the same time. The teen was reportedly being held at a detention center in Adelanto, where people have reported filthy conditions and not having access to clean clothes and towels for days at a time. His sudden arrest has sparked outrage in his community. Fellow soccer players said it was 'heartbreaking to see him taken from us like this, and we'll truly miss not just the player, but the person he was'. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but told the Los Angeles Times that Guerrero-Cruz was being detained pending his 'removal' from the US. 'Benjamin Guerrero-Cruz, an illegal alien from Chile, overstayed his visa by more than two years, abusing the Visa Waiver Program under which he entered the United States, which required him to depart the United States on March 15, 2023,' the agency told the newspaper. Solve the daily Crossword