Billionaire baby daddy promises to split his $14 billion fortune among his 106 kids
Last year Russian-born billionaire Pavel Durov made headlines when he announced on Telegram, the messaging platform he co-created, that he's the biological father of no fewer than 106 children.
Pavel (40), who says he is unmarried and prefers to live alone, has six of his children who were fathered naturally with three different partners, and 100 who were conceived through his prolific sperm donations and live in 12 different countries.
The tech tycoon recently told French political magazine Le Point that he is going to leave his fortune, estimated at almost $14bn (R256bn) to all of his children.
'They are all my children and will all have the same rights. I don't want them to tear each other apart after my death,' he told Le Point.
He sees no difference whether his children came 'naturally' or 'from my sperm donations'.
Each child is set to receive $1.3bn (R23.9bn) when they gain access to their inheritance.
However, there's a slight catch – 'I decided my children wouldn't have access to my fortune until a period of 30 years has elapsed, starting from today,' he said last week.
He told the publication he wants his offspring to 'live like normal people, to build themselves up alone, to learn to trust themselves, to be able to create, not to be dependent on a bank account'.
Pavel first donated his sperm 15 years ago to help out a friend and then decided to donate more widely after learning there was 'a lack of high-quality donor material'.
'The clinic, where I started donating sperm 15 years ago to help a friend, told me more than 100 babies had been conceived this way in 12 countries,' he told Le Point.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Pavel Durov (@durov)
He decided to allocate his estate now because his 'work involves risks,' he said, apparently referring to the legal issues he faces over Telegram.
Last year French authorities charged him with allegedly being complicit in running a platform in which illegal activity – such as child sex abuse material, drug trade and fraud – could thrive.
He has denied the allegations, calling them 'absurd'.
'Just because criminals use our messaging service among many others doesn't make those who run it criminals,' he told the magazine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Northern Data AG (FRA:NB2) Shares Could Be 33% Above Their Intrinsic Value Estimate
Northern Data's estimated fair value is €19.16 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity Northern Data's €25.52 share price signals that it might be 33% overvalued Our fair value estimate is 56% lower than Northern Data's analyst price target of €43.20 Today we will run through one way of estimating the intrinsic value of Northern Data AG (FRA:NB2) by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today's value. One way to achieve this is by employing the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Models like these may appear beyond the comprehension of a lay person, but they're fairly easy to follow. We would caution that there are many ways of valuing a company and, like the DCF, each technique has advantages and disadvantages in certain scenarios. Anyone interested in learning a bit more about intrinsic value should have a read of the Simply Wall St analysis model. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. We are going to use a two-stage DCF model, which, as the name states, takes into account two stages of growth. The first stage is generally a higher growth period which levels off heading towards the terminal value, captured in the second 'steady growth' period. In the first stage we need to estimate the cash flows to the business over the next ten years. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years. Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we discount the value of these future cash flows to their estimated value in today's dollars: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Levered FCF (€, Millions) €112.3m €173.4m €123.4m €97.1m €82.9m €74.8m €69.9m €67.0m €65.3m €64.4m Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x3 Analyst x3 Analyst x1 Est @ -21.34% Est @ -14.56% Est @ -9.81% Est @ -6.49% Est @ -4.16% Est @ -2.53% Est @ -1.39% Present Value (€, Millions) Discounted @ 7.2% €105 €151 €100 €73.4 €58.5 €49.2 €42.9 €38.4 €34.9 €32.1 ("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = €685m We now need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all the future cash flows after this ten year period. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (1.3%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 7.2%. Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2034 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = €64m× (1 + 1.3%) ÷ (7.2%– 1.3%) = €1.1b Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= €1.1b÷ ( 1 + 7.2%)10= €545m The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is €1.2b. In the final step we divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of €25.5, the company appears reasonably expensive at the time of writing. Valuations are imprecise instruments though, rather like a telescope - move a few degrees and end up in a different galaxy. Do keep this in mind. The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. Part of investing is coming up with your own evaluation of a company's future performance, so try the calculation yourself and check your own assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Northern Data as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 7.2%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.376. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business. View our latest analysis for Northern Data Strength Debt is well covered by earnings. Weakness Expensive based on P/S ratio and estimated fair value. Shareholders have been diluted in the past year. Opportunity NB2's financial characteristics indicate limited near-term opportunities for shareholders. Threat Debt is not well covered by operating cash flow. Has less than 3 years of cash runway based on current free cash flow. Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it shouldn't be the only metric you look at when researching a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. Why is the intrinsic value lower than the current share price? For Northern Data, there are three fundamental factors you should look at: Risks: For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Northern Data (1 is potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here. Future Earnings: How does NB2's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart. Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing! PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every German stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With 30% ownership, LEM Holding SA (VTX:LEHN) insiders have a lot at stake
Significant insider control over LEM Holding implies vested interests in company growth The top 3 shareholders own 53% of the company Institutional ownership in LEM Holding is 24% Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of LEM Holding SA (VTX:LEHN) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 30% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of LEM Holding, beginning with the chart below. Check out our latest analysis for LEM Holding Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in LEM Holding. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at LEM Holding's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. LEM Holding is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Werner Weber, with ownership of 23%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 23% and 6.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Ueli Wampfler, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in LEM Holding SA. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CHF260m stake in this CHF871m business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. With a 23% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over LEM Holding. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 23%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for LEM Holding that you should be aware of. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
42 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
SNB Rate Seen Stuck at Zero This Year After Last Week's Cut
By and Harumi Ichikura Save The Swiss National Bank probably won't act this year on its threat of cutting borrowing costs to below zero, according to a majority of economists. In a Bloomberg survey of forecasters, only seven out of 16 reckon that the central bank will take its interest rate into negative territory at quarterly decisions either in September or December, with the remainder predicting no change.
