
Student Loan Update: How Republican Bill Would Impact Married Borrowers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Senate Republicans are eyeing a change to student loan payments that could have key implications for married couples.
Newsweek reached out to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) committee for comment via email on Friday.
Why It Matters
Senate Republicans unveiled the first public draft of the reconciliation bill this week after the House of Representatives passed President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill Act" last month.
The bill would reshape the federal student loan system and includes one change from the House bill that, if not adjusted, could lead to higher payments for married couples who have borrowed student loans.
What To Know
Under current repayment plans, married couples who file their taxes as married-filing-jointly can have their income-driven repayment (IDR) plans based on their own adjusted gross income (AGI), rather than their combine income. This means they are eligible for lower monthly payments on their federal student loans.
House Republicans' restructuring of the student loan payment system under the "Big Beautiful Bill Act" would extend that treatment for married couples under current payment plans as well as for future borrowers under the proposed Repayment Assistance Plan.
However, the Senate plan appears to omit the line of text that would allow married borrowers not filing jointly to base payments on their own AGI, Forbes reported on Friday.
The House bill reads: "The term 'adjusted gross income', when used with respect to a borrower, means the adjusted gross income (as such term is defined in section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) of the borrower (and the borrower's spouse, as applicable) for the most recent taxable year, except that, in the case of a married borrower who files a separate Federal income tax return, the term does not include the adjusted gross income of the borrower's spouse."
However, the Senate bill states: "The term 'adjusted gross income', when used with respect to a borrower, means the adjusted gross income (as such term is defined in section 62 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) of the borrower (and the borrower's spouse, as applicable) for the most recent taxable year,"
This could lead to higher payments, Forbes reported.
Forbes reported that borrowers under the new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) who have an AGI of $50,000 would pay about $208 per month under the House plan, which would allow them to file separately from their spouse. Under the Senate plan, if their spouse also makes $50,000, their payment could increase to $830 per month, regardless of how they file.
This would apply to individuals who begin borrowing student loans in July 2026. It wouldn't affect borrowers who are already on an income-based repayment plan, Forbes reported.
Earlier this year, a court filing from the Trump administration indicated they were supportive of reverting to earlier rules requiring spousal income to be counted in IDR plans but later clarified that was a mistake, reported Business Insider.
Student loan borrowers gather near the White House to urge the cancellation of student loan debt on May 12, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Student loan borrowers gather near the White House to urge the cancellation of student loan debt on May 12, 2022, in Washington, D.C.for We, The 45 Million
What People Are Saying
Alan Collinge, founder of Student Loan Justice, told Newsweek: "The Senate should be the adult in the room with this dangerous legislation, which really is a giveaway to the student loan industry and the colleges. Instead, we're seeing them go the other way. This will hurt the GOP badly, including with their own base. I hope the wiser Republicans in the Senate will stand up to this, and include—at a minimum—the return of standard bankruptcy rights to these loans."
He described the House bill as a "massive giveaway to both the colleges and the Department of Education and its contractors," noting that it would increase student loan borrowing "like nothing we've ever seen before."
"Limits for undergraduate borrowing will increase by nearly $20,000 per borrower. This provision, alone, would add hundreds of billions onto the debt that the freshman class of '26, and every class thereafter," he said.
Senator Bill Cassidy, the Louisiana Republican who leads the Senate HELP committee, wrote in a statement: "We need to fix our broken higher education system, so it prioritizes student success and ensures Americans have the skills to compete in a 21st century economy. President Trump and Senate Republicans are focused on delivering results for American families and this bill does just that. While Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college, Republicans are taking on the root causes of the student debt crisis to lower the cost of tuition and improve Americans' access to opportunities that set them up for success."
Sameer Gadkaree, president of The Institute for College Access & Success, wrote in a statement earlier this week: "The Senate reconciliation bill's higher education provisions would cause widespread harm to American families by making college more expensive, making student debt much harder to repay, unleashing an avalanche of student loan defaults, and rolling back basic protections for students who are defrauded by their college—all to fund tax cuts for the wealthy."
What Happens Next?
It's yet to be seen if the bill will pass in its current form or whether that measure could be amended throughout the legislative process.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The attacks in the Middle East could make it harder for the Fed to cut rates
President Donald Trump has repeatedly demanded the Federal Reserve slash interest rates. But Fed officials have stood pat, waiting to see how his administration's sweeping policy changes affect the economy first. Now there's another factor that could delay a rate cut: the conflict between Israel and Iran. On Friday, Israel struck at Iran's nuclear and military sites in an unprecedented attack that sent global oil prices surging. Investors and analysts fretted that a spiraling conflict could send inflation rising across the world, including in the United States. And that could give the Fed further pause at a two-day policy meeting next week. 'If this situation were to deepen further and oil prices were to stay durably higher, it would just add to the challenges that the Fed is already facing with the potential for tariffs to push up inflation,' Robert Sockin, senior global economist at Citigroup, told CNN. 'Fed officials have emphasized that they're not in a rush to cut rates because they don't know how the tariffs will exactly play through into the economy, but if you have even more upside risks to inflation, you're probably looking at an end-of-year rate cut only,' he added. Trump's policy shifts on everything from trade to immigration could all raise unemployment and jack up prices. And his frenetic back-and-forth on tariffs has made it complicated for forecasters to estimate with any confidence what the economy could look like in the future. Fed rate-setters have already said they want to see how Trump's changes pan out in the economy. With renewed Middle East tensions, that makes even more sense, experts told CNN. 'Monetary policy is not well-suited to deal with geopolitical shocks, but all this does mean that the Fed will be even more cautious,' said John Velis, Americas macro strategist at BNY Mellon. The Fed, for now, has time to wait before cutting rates again for one key reason: the resilience of the US labor market. In May, employers added a better-than-expected 139,000 jobs as the unemployment rate held steady at a low 4.2%, according to the Labor Department. First-time claims for unemployment benefits remain relatively low and job openings unexpectedly increased at the end of April, government figures show. In other words, Americans still have jobs — and the Fed can afford to wait. Instead, the Fed could cut if it sees the economy crumbling, even if oil prices are still high — what investors call a 'bad news' rate cut. 'We'll see how long oil prices remain elevated, which could lead to inflation at the headline level moving up if the conflict widens across the Middle East,' Jay Bryson, chief economist at Wells Fargo, said in an interview with CNN. 'But by the end of the summer, you'll likely see weaker job growth, and we know that there's going to be a number of federal employees who took a buyout rolling off payrolls by November, so you could even get a negative number by then,' he said. Investors are betting on a rate cut in October, according to futures. They'll get the Fed's own view soon enough: Officials will release a new set of projections next week. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Protest safety 101: How to protect yourself when exercising your First Amendment rights
Donald Trump will be facing the largest protests of his second presidency this weekend — at least, the largest protests of his second presidency so far. Over 2,000 No Kings protests are scheduled for June 14 to voice opposition to the Trump Administration's illegal actions, which organizers say include "defying our courts, deporting Americans, disappearing people off the streets, attacking our civil rights, and slashing our services." The rallies will also overlap with Trump's 79th birthday celebration, which is set to feature a military parade. If Trump continues down his path, backlash will only continue to grow. Several protests against his administration have already taken place within the few months he's been in office, and several more are already scheduled through movements like No Kings and 50501. Here are some tips to help protect your safety and privacy if you plan on attending any upcoming demonstrations. It's best to leave your phone at home during protests so your location cannot be tracked. You can also leave it on while you're away so it shows your location as your residence. If you need to bring your phone with you to a protest, be sure to turn it off to stop your GPS from tracking you, and to have a password or pin. Also be sure to turn off your biometrics — face ID and fingerprint — so law enforcement can't force you to unlock your phone without a warrant. U.S. courts have previously ruled that using biometrics to unlock phones does not violate the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination. However, police can't compel you to unlock your phone with a password or pin without a warrant. It's best to wear plain clothes without distinguishable symbols or patterns so that you cannot be as easily identified by law enforcement or in videos and pictures. You should also consider covering your tattoos for similar reasons. It is important that you do not wear makeup or contacts, as physicians stress that they can further irritate or damage your eyes if you come into contact with tear gas. Goggles or glasses are the best forms of eye protection. Accessories like masks and sunglasses can also help conceal your identity if you do not wish to be identified by police or online. You should also blur the faces of other protestors if you take pictures or videos, out of both respect for their privacy and caution for their safety. While Trump claimed recently on Truth Social that "MASKS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED to be worn at protests," no such law currently exists at a federal level. Some states have mask bans over a century old that were enacted in response to the Ku Klux Klan, but courts have issued varying rulings regarding their constitutionality. For example, California Code, Section 185 makes it illegal to wear a mask in order to avoid being identified while breaking the law, but this does not apply to actions protected under the First Amendment, such as protests. Before you leave for a protest, you should find an attorney you can call if you get arrested and write their phone number on your body in sharpie. That way, you'll have the number even if your possessions are taken, and the permanent marker will not come off as easily due to water or sweat. The National Lawyers Guild has protest support hotlines for chapters located in 35 states plus Washington D.C.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Trump wants to cut federal housing funds in half, and even Republicans are questioning it
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner kept repeating the same phrases to Congress in defense of President Donald Trump's proposal to cut the agency's budget by 51%. "It's time for a paradigm shift." "We have to refocus." "We want to be efficient and effective, not bloated and bureaucratic." Democrats on House and Senate appropriations subcommittees were outraged — and even some Republicans were skeptical. Turner was tasked with explaining what Trump's proposed $45 billion cut to HUD's funding would look like in practice. The agency would be among the hardest hit parts of the federal government under Trump's plan to eliminate $163 billion in federal spending. But the secretary offered little detail on plans for how his agency would continue serving millions of older, disabled, and low-income Americans, people struggling to recover from disasters like hurricanes and wildfires, and those experiencing homelessness. "The goal here is not to serve less Americans. The goal here is to serve Americans better," Turner said during his testimony before the House subcommittee on Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development on June 10. While Democratic lawmakers were particularly critical of Turner's approach and Trump's massive budget cut request, some Republicans also probed Turner for more detailed explanations he didn't provide. The hearings highlighted how the nation's major housing affordability challenges have become a bipartisan concern. "The federal government doesn't have all the answers, and the budget empowers collaboration with states and localities," HUD spokesperson Kasey Lovett told Business Insider. Few details, lots of frustration During the House hearing, Republican Rep. David Joyce asked Turner how HUD plans to continue helping victims of disasters, like flooding and fires, if the agency slashes funding for the Community Development Block Grant — Disaster Recovery program, as the budget proposes. The agency has long helped FEMA rebuild homes destroyed in natural disasters that lack sufficient insurance, as well as repair roads and bridges. In response, Turner insisted that HUD "will not allow disaster recovery and those that need assistance in disaster recovery to be lost on us" and that HUD is simply pursuing a "different way of distributing these funds." Joyce, who represents Northeast Ohio, wasn't satisfied. "Thank you, sir, that was a great answer, but it didn't demonstrate a plan. Do you have a plan?" the congressman responded. Turner ultimately conceded that the plan for supporting disaster victims "is forthcoming." Joyce ended the exchange by warning that the agency has a role to play. "The one thing I know is, you're right. Disasters come. All over the country, disasters come. And you need to be ready for them." Rep. Rutherford, a Florida Republican, pressed Turner on how states will help support homeownership in low-income communities when the president's budget proposes eliminating HUD's Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), a competitive grant program that Rutherford said has been successful in his district. "Everywhere that homeownership went up, violent crime went down," said Rutherford, a former sheriff. "How are we going to address this issue if we're doing away with SHOP?" Turner replied by saying that states can support homeownership programs if they see fit going forward, but didn't clarify where that funding would come from. Spokespeople for Rutherford and Joyce didn't immediately return BI's requests for comment. 'People will die' Democratic lawmakers expressed more direct frustration about the program cuts and lack of detail the secretary presented. "People will die," Rep. Mike Quigley, an Illinois Democrat, told Turner of HUD's proposed cuts to homelessness services, including the elimination of the Housing for Persons with AIDS program. "If you just want to say we've got to cut these things because that's our plan, I'd respect you a lot more than telling us that you care about people as you put them on the street." Turner replied that the agency isn't just cutting funding but is "going to be more effective and more efficient." "How?" Quigley asked. "It's a new paradigm. It's a new way to do things," Turner replied. During Turner's testimony before the Senate on June 11, Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz, who's made housing a key priority, urged Turner to reinstate a bipartisan program Schatz championed that incentivizes states and localities to cut red tape that hampers housing construction. "It's the most significant pro-housing deregulatory mechanism that we've passed," Schatz said. Turner didn't answer Schatz's question on the eliminated program, and simply said he's encouraging local leaders to find ways to cut regulations. But the president's budget isn't law. Government funding is set to run out in September, and Congress has the final say on what the federal budget looks like. The House hearing concluded with the chairwoman, Republican Rep. Stephanie Bice, suggesting that Turner hasn't had enough time in the few months he's been in office to nail down more specifics about where HUD funding will go and how programs will be reformed. "Is it safe to say that you have a framework for a plan that you want to move forward, but maybe not all of the nuts and bolts that you need to be able to present those details?" Bice asked Turner. "Yes, ma'am," Turner replied.