Maryland's Reed Rubinstein confirmed as State Department adviser in Trump administration
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday confirmed Reed D. Rubinstein of Maryland as the State Department's senior adviser.
Rubinstein was confirmed in a party-line vote, 52-46. No Democrats supported his nomination. Sens. Cory Booker and Lindsey Graham did not vote.
This will be Rubinstein's second time serving in Trump's administration. During Trump's first term, Rubinstein worked as a senior counselor in the Department of Agriculture, senior adviser of the Treasury Department, and general counsel of the Department of Education.
'The Department must champion core American interests and always put America and American citizens first,' Rubinstein wrote to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 'To that end, it has been tasked with defending American sovereignty and protecting the rule of law by enforcing our immigration laws.'
Rubenstein pledged to support the administration's policies of deporting immigrants and student visa holders 'who violate our laws, who preach or call for sectarian violence, for overthrowing or replacing the culture on which our constitutional Republic stands, or who provide advocacy, aid, or support for foreign terrorists such as the bestial perpetrators of the October 7 atrocities,' Rubinstein wrote in a statement to the Foreign Relations Committee.
Both Maryland Democratic senators opposed the nomination.
'The last thing we need as State Department legal adviser is someone who, in addition to having little to no foreign policy experience, has trafficked in conspiracy theories about the previous administration and maligned our teachers,' Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, told The Sun in a statement.
Sen. Angela Alsobrooks called Rubinstein a conspiracy theorist who 'is wholly unqualified to offer sage counsel and do the actual job,' she said in a statement. 'At a time when the United States is dealing with multiple international crises, this is a dangerous and unproductive appointment.'
Many of President Donald Trump's appointees have experienced tense exchanges during the confirmation process. Rubinstein was no different.
During the Foreign Relations committee hearing to consider his nomination, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the committee's ranking Democrat, asked Rubinstein if he would advise department officials to uphold federal laws should he be confirmed.
Rubinstein was silent for several seconds. Then he repeated the question back to Shaheen.
'It doesn't seem like a difficult question,' Shaheen said. Rubinstein chuckled before saying he committed to applying the law internally at the department and seeking outside counsel on more complex issues.
'The law is a conversation,' Rubinstein said, adding that it gets into 'a grey area' when it comes to separations of powers between the executive and legislative branches. 'Often, there isn't an absolutely clear answer.'
'Well, I will take that as a 'no,' actually,' Shaheen responded.
The pair also sparred over one of Rubinstein's previous social media posts that claimed that President Joe Biden's administration attempted to overthrow the Israeli government: 'Do you really believe that?' Shaheen said.
Rubinstein, who is Jewish, cited a Senate report released regarding activity during President Barack Obama's administration and emails he had obtained via Freedom of Information requests. Shaheen shot back, saying that she 'had heard these conspiracy theories before.'
As senior adviser, Rubinstein will advise Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump on the legality of their policy decisions. He will oversee roughly 300 State Department attorneys and staff.
Rubinstein currently serves as the senior vice president of the America First Legal Foundation. The group was co-founded by Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff. Miller has been integral in developing Trump's immigration policies and mandates.
_____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's travel ban could drive some African nations closer to America's adversaries
Donald Trump's travel ban, a purportedly security-focused measure largely targeting African nations and Muslim-majority countries, underscores his administration's ignorant and potentially destructive approach to a continent with growing global influence. In announcing the ban, Trump said it's meant to ensure the U.S. only allows people to enter who 'do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' Whereas the Biden administration took steps to ingratiate itself with African leaders and slough off some of the American paternalism that has driven some African nations closer to Russia and China in recent years, Trump's administration seems to have doubled down on an outmoded strategy of exploitation, conspiratorial brow-beating and ostracism. In just the first few months of Trump's second term, his administration has pressured African nations to permit Elon Musk's Starlink internet service to operate within their borders and has sought to use war-torn nations in Africa — including a country known for its human rights abuses — as landing spots for people booted from the U.S. as part of Trump's mass deportation plan. The president also personally turned the Oval Office into a screening room for bigoted conspiracy theories when he invited the president of South Africa to the White House and then bombarded him with false allegations of 'white genocide' being committed in his country. Needless to say, this hasn't helped the U.S. build on its rapport with African nations. And fundamentally, what that could mean for the U.S. is that a continent full of countries that American officials have pinpointed as crucial partners in our geopolitical strategies related to security and commerce could drift further toward our adversaries. That's certainly the vibe given off by the African Union Commission and its dozens of member states, which denounced Trump's travel ban and warned about its potential impacts. 'The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades. Africa and the United States share mutual interests in promoting peace, prosperity, and global cooperation,' the commission said in a statement, adding: 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned.' University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers identified one clear way that Trump's travel ban could harm the American economy. 'One obvious economic implication of the latest travel ban is that genuinely international conferences will no longer be held in the U.S.,' he wrote on X. And that may just be the tip of the iceberg. It's also true that the materials used to make batteries in everything from cutting-edge cars to phones and computers most often come from African mines. Which is to say: Trump's cold shoulder toward African nations could have dire consequences for America's future, particularly with regard to the economy and U.S. national security. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cartwright says he's not running for Congress
MOOSIC — Former Democratic Congressman Matt Cartwright won't run to regain the seat in the House of Representatives he lost last year to Republican Rob Bresnahan, the Luzerne County businessman now representing the 8th Congressional District in the GOP-controlled House. 'I've decided it's time to give it a rest,' Cartwright said Thursday after months of weighing whether to run again. 'I've worked 80-hour weeks for the last 12 years. It's time to give somebody else a chance to do this job.' Cartwright, who rose in Democratic leadership over his six terms in Congress, announced his decision not to run at a press conference held in the shadow of a new emergency services building under construction in Moosic — a facility he helped secure $3 million in federal funds to support. It's a decision that makes easier the path for other potential Democratic candidates who may seek to challenge Bresnahan in 2026, when Democrats hope voters discontented with Republican President Donald Trump and his GOP allies emerge as a blue wave that sweeps their party back into the House majority. Former Democratic Congressman Matt Cartwright announces he won't run to regain the seat in the House of Representatives he lost last year to Republican Rob Bresnahan. The former representative of the 8th Congressional District, accompanied by his wife Marion, made the announcement at Greenwood Hose Company on Thursday. (CHAD SEBRING/STAFF PHOTO) Bresnahan narrowly defeated Cartwright in November, earning 195,663 votes to the incumbent Democrat's 189,411 in the district that includes all of Lackawanna, Wayne and Pike counties and parts of Luzerne and Monroe counties. It was one of the most tightly contested and closely watched races in the country. As of late April, the independent and nonpartisan Cook Political Report's 2026 House race ratings listed Pennsylvania's 8th Congressional District as leaning Republican. Races that lean one way or another are considered competitive, but where one party, in this case the GOP, has an advantage. CPR had listed the 2024 Cartwright/Bresnahan race as one of 25 House toss-ups across the country, the most competitive races where either party had a good chance of winning. Who might ultimately run against Bresnahan next year remains unclear, and Cartwright did not endorse any potential candidates Thursday. But after noting his gratitude to the people of Northeast Pennsylvania for allowing him to represent them for 12 years and apologizing to anyone disappointed by his decision not to run, Cartwright said 'it's time to hand over the reins to new blood.' He also said he'll have more to say about that as time goes on. 'We're going to see how the process shakes itself out,' Cartwright said. 'One of the wonderful things about serving in this position is you get to know all of the politicians with a heartbeat in Northeastern Pennsylvania and I did, and I have to say we have a deep, deep bench on my side of the aisle. We have … what they call an embarrassment of riches. There are a lot of people who could step right into my shoes, and I'm sure you'll be hearing from them fairly shortly.' Sources told The Times-Tribune that Democratic state Rep. Bridget Kosierowski of Waverly Twp., Democratic Pittston Mayor Michael Lombardo and Democratic state Sen. Marty Flynn of Dunmore are considering potential runs. Democratic Lackawanna County Commissioner Bill Gaughan said Thursday he won't run. Democratic Scranton Mayor Paige Gebhardt Cognetti, who's seeking reelection this year, said 'I'm running for mayor of Scranton.' Efforts to reach Lombardo and Flynn were not immediately successful; Kosierowski responded to the newspaper's inquiry in a statement. 'As both a nurse and a state representative, I share the deep frustration so many in PA-08 are feeling about what's happening at the federal level,' she said. 'Congressman Cartwright has been a strong advocate for this region, and I'm grateful for his service. Right now, I'm focused on continuing to deliver for the people I represent, and as things evolve, I'll keep listening and considering where I can make the greatest impact.' Former Democratic Congressman Matt Cartwright announces he won't run to regain the seat in the House of Representatives he lost last year to Republican Rob Bresnahan. The former representative of the 8th Congressional District, accompanied by his wife Marion, made the announcement at Greenwood Hose Company on Thursday. (CHAD SEBRING/STAFF PHOTO) Cartwright spent some of Thursday's press conference reflecting on his impact, including as one of a dozen subcommittee chairs, colloquially called 'Cardinals,' of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. 'And that helped me bring a lot of tax dollars, our tax dollars, back home to work in our local economy — about $100 million on my own signature in the last four years,' he said, noting the federal funding for the Moosic emergency services building as an example. 'In our congressional office we placed a premium on working for economic development.' Cartwright also said 16 bills he wrote became law during his time in Congress, including bills that help veterans and military spouses. He mentioned the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, describing it as a legislative effort 'to remove a blot on our national integrity that came about from our government's poisoning hundreds of thousands of U.S. Marines, their families and the employees at Camp Lejeune with carcinogens in their drinking water.' He also expressed pride in his work as a chief elected advocate of restoring passenger rail service between Scranton and New York City, describing the Amtrak project as 'all systems go.' As proposed, the project would see Amtrak passenger trains run between Scranton and Manhattan's Penn Station with stops in Mount Pocono and East Stroudsburg, and Blairstown, Dover, Morristown, Montclair and Newark, N.J. An Amtrak study released in March 2023 found that restoring such a service would generate $84 million in new economic activity annually, creating jobs on both sides of the Pennsylvania/New Jersey border. Lackawanna County commissioners appointed Cartwright in January to a term on the Pennsylvania Northeast Regional Railroad Authority board, where he continues to advocate for the project. He also credited and thanked Bresnahan on Thursday for endorsing the Amtrak initiative. 'On the other hand some of his votes leave a lot to be desired and I don't want to go further into it today,' Cartwright said of his Republican successor. In a statement Thursday, the National Republican Congressional Committee said Bresnahan has accomplished more for Pennsylvania in five months than Cartwright did in more than a decade. 'Rep. Bresnahan is delivering, and Cartwright is sending a message to Democrats that this race is over before it starts,' the statement from NRCC spokeswoman Maureen O'Toole said. Cartwright's remarks Thursday included something of a soliloquy on politics where he suggested voters not simply vote for the change candidate, 'because half the time the change they offer is not for the better.' He also warned against voting for 'extremist candidates' offering simple solutions to complicated problems or for candidates 'who scapegoat the least of our brothers and sisters,' adding that 'targeting their lives is not going to fix yours.' 'Do your own research from reputable sources and vote for candidates that have concrete plans that will actually help you and the people you care about,' he said. 'Vote for leaders who will fight for things that really matter in your lives, like people's health care; like for police and first responders; like for fair pharmaceutical prices; for veterans' care; for seniors' benefits; for workers' rights; for civil rights; for voting rights, civil justice, clean air, clean water, tax fairness and sensible economic policies and for public education.' 'These are the things that I fought for for 12 years down in Washington, D.C.,' he said. 'I was proud to do it and I'm proud to say I went down swinging for these things.' Cartwright didn't rule out a potential run in future cycles after 2026. 'The door is open,' he said.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SC may have to come up with $100M or more for food assistance under federal GOP proposal
SC could face costs upwards of $100 million annually under proposed changes to the country's largest federal food assistance program. (File photo by Getty Images) Continuing to provide grocery assistance to more than half a million South Carolinians could cost the state upwards of $100 million annually under proposed changes to the federal program. For the last half-century, the federal government has fully funded benefits provided through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also known as food stamps. But Republicans' massive bill on taxes and spending, as passed by the U.S. House, would require states to pay a portion of those benefits starting in 2028, plus a greater share of what it costs to administer the program. While the U.S. Senate is likely to make changes to what's dubbed the 'big, beautiful bill,' advocates worry about major cuts to the 61-year program and what that would mean to the families who rely on it. U.S. House Republican plan would force states to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits 'I can't imagine the state is even closely prepared for all this,' said Sue Berkowitz, director of the Appleseed Legal Justice Center. If the House plan holds, the Palmetto State's total cost could triple, or in the worst-case scenario, increase elevenfold to $370 million. That's because it bases states' share of the cost on how well they distribute benefits correctly: States with an error rate of 6% or less would be responsible for paying 5%. Those with an error rate higher than 10% would have to pay one-quarter of the cost. And the latest data puts South Carolina in the latter category. In 2023, the state's error rate was a whopping 22.6%, the fourth-worst in the nation, overwhelmingly due to overpayments. State officials say that's an anomaly. Prior to the coronavirus pandemic, South Carolina's error rate was historically in the lowest category. That changed in 2022, when the state's error rate went to 9% amid changes to the SNAP program during the global pandemic. Then it shot up in 2023. After a re-training of staff, the state Department of Social Services expects a big drop in the 2024 error rate, which should be released next month. The chief budget writer of the South Carolina House said the state has the money to continue the program, as long as the error rate returns to pre-pandemic levels. Ways and Means Chairman Bruce Bannister pointed to hefty surpluses in tax collections in recent years as an example of the state's fiscal health. SC legislators get extra $1B to spend as budget negotiations begin The budget that takes effect July 1 includes $1.2 billion placed in reserves. About $500 million more is unspent and available following an update in revenue estimates last month. The question is whether funding for the food program will stand up against other budget priorities in the years to come, said Bannister, R-Greenville. Rep. Bill Herbkersman was less certain of South Carolina's ability to pay. The Bluffton Republican chaired the subcommittee that oversees the budget for South Carolina's child welfare and social services agency for many years. He does not think the state can guarantee it will have the funding every year to keep the program going on a recurring basis. In total, the federal government provides South Carolinians $1.3 billion in annual benefits for groceries, according to the latest figures. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, which heads the SNAP program, and the state split the $66 million bill for administrative costs. What frustrates Herbkersman the most are the overhead costs just to operate the program — three-quarters of which South Carolina will have to pay under the proposed changes. 'As a taxpayer, I'm incensed by that,' he said. As for payment errors, those can occur from miscalculations in a household's expenses and families struggling to provide the necessary documents updating their income in the case of a job change or loss, according to the USDA. According to state officials, the federal government calculates the error rate by checking a small sample of beneficiaries. DSS also has struggled to process applications for benefits within the 30-day window allowed under federal regulations. The USDA put the state on notice last year, both for timeliness and for not properly informing people of denied benefits. As millions wait on food stamp approvals, feds tell states to speed it up To address that, DSS started making much-needed upgrades to its technology. The agency has set aside about half of the $74 million it needs to replace equipment that's as much as five decades old. Those upgrades 'will significantly improve the state's ability to process applications in a timely manner,' according to an agency statement. But the fundamental issue is a rise in the need, according to DSS. South Carolina, like many other states, has seen the weekly application volume for SNAP benefits rise substantially — 7,000 applications for benefits each week on average, a nearly 50% increase over pre-COVID numbers. As of last September, one in nine South Carolinians were receiving SNAP benefits. More than half went to families with children, while more than one-third went to families with an elderly or disabled adult, according to the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Lee Patterson has seen that firsthand as Richland County Library's social work director who helps people fill out applications. She's not sure why more people are applying for aid, but she suspects it's closely tied to the rising cost of housing. 'The first bill people usually pay is the rent,' she said. 'When the price of housing goes up, then the ability to pay for food goes down.' Applicants who aren't elderly or disabled can deduct only $672 from their income when calculating whether they qualify for food benefits. Meanwhile, the median cost of rent and utilities in South Carolina is nearly double that, according to U.S. Census data. Patterson and her team have the experience to help smooth the way for people seeking aid. But for those applying on their own, especially for the first time, it can be tricky. For example, when it comes to proving income changes, applicants often have to go back to a former employer and ask for documentation that shows they no longer work for that company. Those employers don't always respond, and in some cases may have closed entirely, Patterson said. A second pain point for applicants can be waiting for a phone interview with DSS staff, which the federal government requires for benefits. South Carolina was allowed to waive those interviews during the pandemic, likely contributing to the state's increased error rate, but they resumed in July 2023. The call volume for these interviews is often high, and it's not uncommon for an applicant to wait on hold for an hour. The library has a phone available for applicants to use. If they don't get through, they may have to return multiple days in a row to complete their interview, Patterson said. Advocates expect changes to the U.S. House proposal, as several key Republicans in the Senate have publicly opposed shifting food benefit costs to states. Negotiations are expected to continue into next week, Politico reported, with the goal of passing the bill by July 4. The final plan remains to be seen. The executive director of Foodshare South Carolina is concerned about what might ultimately happen to other SNAP-related programs. Omme-Salma Rahemtullah said she relies heavily on the state-funded program known as Healthy Bucks, which provides additional money for SNAP recipients to purchase fruits and vegetables. They can use these benefits at farmers markets. Or they can get a box of produce worth $20 from Foodshare. Rahemtullah worries that if the state has to spend more on general SNAP benefits, there may be less available to keep Healthy Bucks operating. Healthy Bucks began as a pilot in six counties in 2014. It's since expanded to all 46 counties, according to the state Department of Social Services. In 2023, the Legislature provided an additional $5 million to the agency to further expand the program. Beyond upping the cost to states, the federal proposal also expands requirements for SNAP recipients. Under existing rules, people under 55 who can work — what the government calls 'able-bodied adults' — are limited to three months of food benefits over a three-year period unless they can prove they work, volunteer or attend job training at least 80 hours each month, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The proposal would expand those rules by a decade — to people under 65 and, for parents of school-age children, they would be exempt if their children are younger than 8, rather than 18. 'As less money comes into the state from the federal level, the state will have to find ways to make that up for a lot of things,' said Berkowitz, the Appleseed advocate. 'I just hope feeding people will be a priority.'
