logo
Is Apple getting ready to launch a PlayStation and Xbox competitor?

Is Apple getting ready to launch a PlayStation and Xbox competitor?

Yahoo7 days ago
The Apple TV is probably my favorite device that Apple makes. While the Apple TV app is in dire need of some basic improvements, the hardware box itself is a standout—especially compared to competitors like Amazon's Fire TV and Roku's streaming devices. This is largely thanks to the stellar Siri Remote, which makes navigating the device with your fingers or voice a cinch, and the powerful Apple silicon chip inside that makes the Apple TV's operating system, tvOS, run buttery smooth.
Other countries are stepping up after Trump pulled the U.S. out of the climate fight
Emotionally intelligent people use the 2-week rule to motivate themselves and reach their biggest goals
Exclusive: Google is indexing ChatGPT conversations, potentially exposing sensitive user data
However, when it comes to being a device meant to sit at the center of your living room as an all-encompassing entertainment hub, the Apple TV is lacking in one big department: gaming. The Apple TV is technically a gaming console, since it can play rudimentary games and supports third-party console controllers. But no one is likely to replace their PlayStation or Xbox with one any time soon, because the current Apple TV lacks the processing power to run console-quality games.
Yet perhaps that could be changing. Recently, I've noticed that Apple has been making moves that suggest the company may be on the cusp of turning the Apple TV into a full-blown PlayStation and Xbox competitor. Doing so would open up another potential billion-dollar revenue stream for the company.
The new Apple Games app is currently MIA from tvOS 26
At Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) this year, the company unveiled a new cross-device app called Apple Games. The app acts as a central hub and launcher for all the games you've ever bought on Apple's App Store or have access to via the company's Apple Arcade subscription service.
The Apple Games app also gives you quick access to game events and challenges, and helps you discover new games to play and see what games your friends are playing. In other words, the new Apple Games app is similar to the PlayStation 5 Game Hub and the Xbox Dashboard—the interfaces on the consoles that significantly differentiate the living room gaming experience from PCs.
Apple announced that Apple Games is coming to the iPhone, iPad, and Mac with iOS 26, iPadOS 26, and macOS 26 this fall. But the new app is conspicuously absent from the Apple TV's next operating system, tvOS 26, which also ships this fall. This is a notable omission, especially considering that Apple markets its Apple Arcade gaming service as a core feature of the Apple TV experience. It also offers thousands of mobile-level games through the tvOS App Store.
The more I think about the Apple Games omission from tvOS 26, the more it makes sense—if Apple is set to turn the Apple TV into a true gaming console but doesn't want anyone to know it yet.
The next Apple TV is rumored to have two key hardware improvements essential to top-line gaming consoles
Apple doesn't update the Apple TV as often as it does iPhones or even its iPads. Typically, years pass between Apple TV updates. The most recent Apple TV, the Apple TV 4K, was last updated in November 2022, nearly three years ago. That means it's ripe for an update this year.
Rumors suggest that a new Apple TV is indeed coming later this year and that it will feature two significant hardware upgrades—ones that would enable it to become a true gaming console.
The first is an updated chipset. The current Apple TV 4K features the Apple A15 Bionic chip, the same one found in the iPhone 13 from 2021. Most people expect the next Apple TV to get a significant upgrade—perhaps to the A18 or A18 Pro, found in the current iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro series, or perhaps even the unreleased A19 chip, which will go into this year's iPhone 17 series. It's also possible Apple could put the M1 or M2 chip, previously found in Macs and iPads, into the new Apple TV.
This jump from the A15 to the A18, A19, M1, or M2 would give the Apple TV the performance boost it needs to run AAA console games, such as the Resident Evil series from Capcom, which are currently capable of running (with controller support, no less) on the iPhone 15 Pro, thanks to its A17 Pro chip.
Another upgrade the next Apple TV is expected to get is a new Apple-designed Wi-Fi and Bluetooth chipset that will support the Wi-Fi 7 standard (via MacRumors). This standard offers lower latency and faster Wi-Fi speeds than the current Wi-Fi 6 standard—something critical for gaming consoles and the bandwidth-hungry games that stream to them. The leading games console, the PlayStation 5 Pro, currently offers Wi-Fi 7 support.
In other words, the hardware components Apple needs to turn the next Apple TV into a PlayStation and Xbox competitor are all in the pipeline. And, increasingly, so is something else the Apple TV would need to become a true gaming console: increasing commitment to Apple's platforms from major games studios.
More AAA games are hitting the Mac—and iPhone—than ever before
In the video game industry, the top games are known as AAA (triple-A) titles. These are the games with the most advanced graphics and the biggest budgets, and are frequently the highlights of the console gaming experience.
Historically, AAA game developers have shied away from releasing their major titles on the Mac (the Apple device with the hardware power most comparable to professional gaming consoles). But in the past year, that's changed a lot, thanks to Apple's move to make game development on the Mac easier and more cost-effective than ever, thanks to tools like the company's Game Porting Toolkit 3 and the hardware-accelerated graphics API, Metal 4, which makes graphics-intensive games look better on Mac and iPhone. Considering Apple devices are more popular than ever, game studios stand to financially benefit by bringing their biggest titles to Apple's platforms and their millions of users.
In July alone, two major AAA titles made their debut on the Mac: CD Projekt Red's Cyberpunk 2077: Ultimate and Deep Silver's Dead Island 2. Other major AAA titles have also been released on the Mac over the past few years, including Ubisoft's Assassin's Creed: Shadows and Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown, Remedy's Control Ultimate Edition, Kojima Productions' Death Stranding Director's Cut, Round 8 Studio's Lies of P, 11 Bit Studios' Frostpunk 2, and Capcom's Resident Evil series remastered editions. Additionally, more AAA titles are coming to the Mac this year, including IO Interactive's Hitman World of Assassination, InZOI Studio's InZOI, and Pearl Abyss' Crimson Desert.
Most of these games require an M1 series chip or later, found in the company's Apple Silicon Macs released since 2020. Some, like the Resident Evil series, can even run on the A17 Pro and later, first introduced in 2023. Apple's current A18 Pro is roughly equivalent to the M1 in terms of performance, and if Apple puts it, the M1 or M2, or the upcoming A19 Pro, inside the next Apple TV, as expected, there is no reason these AAA games that currently run on the Mac couldn't run on the new Apple TV. And if that happens, the Apple TV becomes a professional-level gaming console.
Turning the Apple TV into a gaming console makes sense for Apple's ecosystem and the company's bottom line
When Apple announced the upcoming Apple Games app for all its devices except the Apple TV, it stood out as a glaring hole in the company's lineup, especially since Apple Games is a natural fit for the Apple TV. But when you take in the odd omission, along with recent rumors that the next Apple TV is set to get powerful new CPU and wireless chipsets, and the flood of new AAA titles hitting the Mac and iPhone this year, things start to look a lot clearer.
Yet something else leads me to believe that Apple could be turning the Apple TV into a gaming console this year: the company's history of being unwilling to let software announcements spoil new hardware features.
In the past, Apple has withheld software announcements at WWDC to avoid revealing upcoming hardware improvements to its devices. The AAA titles available on the Mac appear in Apple Games on the macOS 26 beta. If Apple had previewed Apple Games on the tvOS 26 beta, Mac games that run on the new unreleased Apple TV, including these AAA titles, might have also shown there. That would spoil a major, as-yet-unannounced feature for the as-yet-unannounced Apple TV.
Of course, all this is just conjecture on my part. Still, all the signs seem to be pointing to Apple TV becoming a true gaming console. This would make a lot of business sense for Apple. At price points of $129 or $149, depending on whether you want more storage and an ethernet connection, the current Apple TV 4K is much more expensive than such competitors as the Roku Streaming Stick 4K ($49), the Roku Ultra ($99), and the Amazon Fire TV Stick 4K ($49).
However, if Apple gives the new Apple TV gaming console capabilities, the current $129/$149 price suddenly looks like a bargain. A triple-A gaming experience on the Apple TV would be a unique selling point that Roku or Amazon couldn't compete with.
It could also give Apple a major new revenue stream in the form of 30% App Store commissions on AAA titles sold through the tvOS App Store. As of 2024, the global AAA gaming market is valued at approximately $75 billion annually, according to a July 2025 Business Research Insights report. It's expected to grow to nearly $108 billion by 2033.
But most of all, a new Apple TV with console gaming capabilities would further solidify the device as the digital heart of the living room and smart home, giving users another reason to stay within Apple's ecosystem, both inside and outside the house—an ancillary benefit Apple likely finds invaluable.
This post originally appeared at fastcompany.comSubscribe to get the Fast Company newsletter: http://fastcompany.com/newsletters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman Ditches Her Friend's Birthday Lunch for Another Friend's ‘Last-Minute' Wedding. Now, She's Unsure If She Messed Up
Woman Ditches Her Friend's Birthday Lunch for Another Friend's ‘Last-Minute' Wedding. Now, She's Unsure If She Messed Up

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Ditches Her Friend's Birthday Lunch for Another Friend's ‘Last-Minute' Wedding. Now, She's Unsure If She Messed Up

'To me, a wedding (even a small one) carries more social weight than a recurring birthday lunch,' the woman wrote on RedditNEED TO KNOW A woman explained that she plans to ditch her friend's birthday party for another friend's last-minute wedding She said her friend, now upset, dislikes people 'who flake' The woman shared her story on Reddit, where opinions are divided over whether she mishandled the situationA woman said she's ditching a friend's birthday lunch for another friend's last-minute wedding, but she's not sure she's making the right decision. The 29-year-old woman detailed her story on Reddit's 'Am I the A------?' forum, where she said that her friend 'Sarah' invited her to an annual birthday lunch scheduled for the end of September. She explained that the lunch will be held in about a five-hour drive away from where she lives. The original poster (OP) went on to explain that she recently received an invitation from their mutual friend 'Katie' for a "very last-minute" wedding scheduled in the same city as the birthday party, just one week later. While the OP said Katie has been engaged for about 'three years,' she also said that the invite 'really came out of nowhere,' and so Katie said 'she understood if people couldn't make it.' And while the Reddit user said she RSVP'd 'yes' to the wedding, she now feels as though she's 'in a bind.' 'Whether I drive five hours or take multiple trains ($200), it's a long and expensive trip. Doing it once for Sarah's birthday was fine, but doing it again the next weekend for Katie's wedding is overwhelming,' she said. 'I'm also dealing with unexpected financial strain and bracing for loan repayment for my master's this fall.' The OP said that, because of this, she ultimately backed out of Sarah's birthday lunch — though she offered to celebrate with her another time. 'I'm just being realistic,' she continued. 'Two back-to-back weekends is a lot for someone coming from so far out of town.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. However, the OP said that 'Sarah didn't take that well,' and made it clear that she hoped all their friends would attend both events. The OP also said that Sarah 'distances herself from friends who flake,' and she's worried that she might be unfairly 'lumped into that category for setting a boundary.' 'To me, a wedding (even a small one) carries more social weight than a recurring birthday lunch [...], but I also get that Sarah made her plans first and that canceling after committing can sting,' she wrote. 'So, AITA [am I the a------]?' the woman asked at the end of her post. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! A number of Reddit users said that they thought the OP was in the wrong in this scenario — and that they understood why Sarah was upset. 'Sorry, but YTA [you're the a------] on this one. You honor the commitments you make. It isn't Sarah's fault that Katie didn't plan better for her wedding date.' 'YTA,' said someone else. 'You had already committed to Sarah. It doesn't matter that her birthday happens every year [...], you committed to go. Beyond that, it's super tacky to tell someone you will no longer attend their birthday because a new event is the next weekend.' Another person said, 'Ditching Sarah's long-planned event for Katie's (who even said she understands if people can't make it) last-minute event signals to Sarah that you don't value her friendship the same. You RSVP'd yes [and] that's a commitment. Sarah has every right to feel hurt.' One person, however, said that they think the real problem has more to do with Sarah and Katie's dynamic. 'NTA [not the a------],' they said. 'You all are in the same longtime friend group. Katie is finally getting married. But, Sarah didn't respond with a 'no problem, let's support Katie,' and Katie planned her wedding too close to Sarah's birthday. To an outsider, it seems like these two aren't very considerate of each other.' The same person continued, 'It sounds like you've faithfully attended Sarah's birthday celebrations in the past and want to make this one exception for a bigger life event. Your offer to meet up with Sarah after the wedding is a fair compromise on your part.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Which Is the Better Choice for Investing $10,000 Right Now: Nvidia or XRP (Ripple)?
Which Is the Better Choice for Investing $10,000 Right Now: Nvidia or XRP (Ripple)?

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Which Is the Better Choice for Investing $10,000 Right Now: Nvidia or XRP (Ripple)?

Key Points While Nvidia and XRP are completely different types of assets, there are some similarities. Nvidia has been the bigger winner historically. The growth prospects and valuation are much harder to pin down for XRP than for Nvidia. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Investing isn't like a boxing match where two competitors stand in opposite corners to fight it out. Or is it? The reality is that every investment opportunity competes against other alternatives for your hard-earned money. If there were an investing version of a boxing match, I think Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) and XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) (sometimes referred to as Ripple, the company that developed the digital asset) would be in the heavyweight category. Nvidia now reigns as the biggest company in the world based on market cap. XRP ranks as one of the hottest cryptocurrencies, with its price skyrocketing nearly 6 times higher over the last 12 months. Which is the better choice for investing $10,000 right now? Here's how Nvidia and XRP stack up against each other. Apples and oranges Comparing Nvidia and XRP is a lot like comparing apples and oranges. The differences between Nvidia and XRP are too numerous to count. The most important difference, though, is that they're completely different types of assets. Nvidia is a publicly traded company that makes graphics processing units (GPUs) used to power artificial intelligence (AI) and gaming applications. XRP is a digital token that's native to the XRP Ledger, a decentralized blockchain platform built for financial transactions. Another biggie is that Nvidia must adhere to regulations established by government agencies, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Ripple, the developer of XRP, is tangled in a lawsuit with the SEC over whether XRP should be regulated like a security. However, there are some similarities between Nvidia and XRP. Both assets have market caps (Nvidia's is around $4.3 trillion, while XRP's is around $175 billion). Both have been highly volatile in the past. Both have made some investors a lot of money. They also each provide utility, albeit in different ways. Scoring points In each round of a boxing match, the two fighters are scored, with the winner receiving 10 points and the loser receiving no more than nine points. We won't use the same scoring method with Nvidia and XRP, but they can be compared in several categories. Let's first address performance. Nvidia has delivered a cumulative gain of roughly 434,500% since its initial public offering in January 1999. XRP launched in 2012. The digital token's price has jumped around 20,000% since then. During the same period, by the way, Nvidia's share price soared by more than 35,600%. What about growth prospects? This one is more challenging. Nvidia has a clear tailwind from AI. Its GPUs remain very popular in training and deploying AI models. The company's revenue grew 69% year over year in the first quarter of 2025. Wall Street analysts expect Nvidia will deliver revenue growth of 48.5% in Q2. XRP's growth prospects, on the other hand, are more nebulous. How much the price of the digital token rises (or falls) depends on supply and demand. It's possible, though, that demand for XRP could increase if the SEC approves an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that focuses on the cryptocurrency. Crypto prediction platform Polymarket puts the odds of SEC approval at 86%. The final round is valuation. Again, this one is tough. Nvidia's shares trade at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 40.3. That's a steep multiple. However, the company's growth prospects make its valuation more palatable. It's impossible for all practical purposes to accurately determine what XRP's valuation should be. As with the cryptocurrency's growth prospects, everything hinges on supply and demand. A knockout winner Could XRP continue to soar? Absolutely. However, buying the digital token is more of a bet than an investment. There's certainly an element of risk with investing in Nvidia as well. Perhaps the company will stumble. Maybe rivals will develop better AI chips. But Nvidia is making products that enjoy strong demand and will likely continue to do so for years to come. I view Nvidia as a knockout winner in this match for investors seeking to put $10,000 to work. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Keith Speights has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia and XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Which Is the Better Choice for Investing $10,000 Right Now: Nvidia or XRP (Ripple)? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

NEWS OF THE WEEK: Jessica Biel reveals 'gross' habit of eating in the shower
NEWS OF THE WEEK: Jessica Biel reveals 'gross' habit of eating in the shower

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NEWS OF THE WEEK: Jessica Biel reveals 'gross' habit of eating in the shower

Back in 2016, The Better Sister actress sparked intrigue online when she posted a photo of an empty plate, fork, and cup of coffee sitting on the ledge of her shower via Instagram. "Yes. I eat in the shower," she wrote at the time. "I admit it.". And during a recent interview for Real Simple, Jessica was asked whether she still snacks amid her bathing routine. "Of course, if you're drinking coffee in the shower, you might as well have food in there, too," she laughed. "Sometimes I'll have cereal in the shower. Or yoghurt and fruit. I've even had a piece of quiche in there.".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store