Guilt-free shopping, calming art and cool games
Here are some suggestions for the weekend.
Where shopping meets giving
What if shopping could spark joy and create social good? At the Goodwill Store by Milal Foundation, it does just that.
With 42 locations nationwide, including one tucked into the basement of Woori Financial Group's headquarters in central Seoul, this network of donation-based shops offers more than just secondhand bargains — it invites you to be part of a meaningful mission.
You may walk in without knowing exactly what you'll find, but that's part of the charm. On any given day, shelves are full of surprises: a lightly used guitar or violin, a vintage sewing machine, wine glasses, ceramic bowls, sports gear or barely-worn sneakers. The inventory changes constantly, depending on what generous donors bring in. If you have clean, functional items to spare, you can drop them off at donation counters conveniently located at each store.
What makes Goodwill Stores especially impactful is the team behind the counter. Many of the employees are people with disabilities, gaining valuable work experience and building confidence in a supportive environment. Every purchase you make helps fund job training and social programs that promote inclusion and independence.
Goodwill Store Woori Financial Group Headquarters
51 Sogong-ro, Jung District, Seoul
Take a breather with tranquil paintings
If you are looking for a reprieve from city life, why not escape into the serene beauty of Alice Dalton Brown's paintings?
Located on the 6th floor of The Hyundai Seoul in Yeouido, Alt.1 is a multipurpose exhibition space that regularly hosts a range of shows. Currently, "In A Moment, Forever," a major solo exhibition of works by the renowned American painter, is being held.
Some 120 works, spanning from Brown's early pieces from 1957 to her latest works from 2025, are on show, along with over 40 sketches and props that offer deeper insight into her creative process.
Known for her meditative landscapes of everyday life, Brown was born in 1939 in Danville, Pennsylvania. She studied at Oberlin College and moved to New York in 1970, where she began building her international presence.
Her works are part of the permanent collections at prestigious institutions such as The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Admission is 20,000 won for adults, 15,000 won for teenagers and 12,000 won for children. The exhibition runs through Sept. 20.
The Hyundai Seoul Alt. 1
108 Yeouidaero, Yeongdengpo-gu, Seoul
Hide out at this cozy gaming lounge
With the relentless heat waves, heading outside this summer has become more of a hazard than a leisure option. Fortunately, there's a perfect indoor escape: a fully air-conditioned space designed for casual hangouts and immersive gaming sessions.
Whether you're going alone or spending time with friends, Lounge PlayStation Room offers access to PlayStation 4 Pro, PlayStation 5, and Nintendo Switch consoles — all connected to large screens for an elevated gaming experience.
Choose a sofa, pick a game and press start. You'll need to stick with your selected title for at least 30 minutes before switching. If you're not sure what to play, ask the manager — they're happy to recommend something beginner-friendly or a fan favorite.
The lounge also caters to co-op fans, with a library of popular multiplayer and couple-friendly games such as It Takes Two, Overcooked, Mario Party and Split Fiction.
Pricing is budget-friendly. 3,000 won gets you 50 minutes per person, with an additional charge of 100 won for every two minutes thereafter.
If you need fuel for your sessions, a selection of snacks, microwaveable meals and drinks is available on-site.
Open daily from 12 p.m. to 3 a.m., this gaming hideout is an ideal weekend retreat — especially when home feels a little too stuffy and the outside weather too hot.
12 Jandari-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul
gypark@heraldcorp.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
In India, Trump's tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods
NEW DELHI (Reuters) -- From McDonald's and Coca-Cola to Amazon and Apple, US-based multinationals are facing calls for a boycott in India as business executives and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's supporters stoke anti-American sentiment to protest against US tariffs. India, the world's most populous nation, is a key market for American brands that have rapidly expanded to target a growing base of affluent consumers, many of whom remain infatuated with international labels seen as symbols of moving up in life. India, for example, is the biggest market by users for Meta's WhatsApp and Domino's has more restaurants than any other brand in the country. Beverages like Pepsi and Coca-Cola often dominate store shelves, and people still queue up when a new Apple store opens or a Starbucks cafe doles out discounts. Although there was no immediate indication of sales being hit, there's a growing chorus both on social media and offline to buy local and ditch American products after Donald Trump imposed a 50 percent tariff on goods from India, rattling exporters and damaging ties between New Delhi and Washington. Manish Chowdhary, co-founder of India's Wow Skin Science, took to LinkedIn with a video message urging support for farmers and startups to make "Made in India" a "global obsession," and to learn from South Korea whose food and beauty products are famous worldwide. "We have lined up for products from thousands of miles away. We have proudly spent on brands that we don't own, while our own makers fight for attention in their own country," he said. Rahm Shastry, CEO of India's DriveU, which provides a car driver on call service, wrote on LinkedIn, "India should have its own home-grown Twitter/Google/YouTube/WhatsApp/FB -- like China has." To be fair, Indian retail companies give foreign brands like Starbucks stiff competition in the domestic market, but going global has been a challenge. Indian IT services firms, however, have become deeply entrenched in the global economy, with the likes of TCS and Infosys providing software solutions to clients world over. On Sunday, Modi made a "special appeal" for becoming self-reliant, telling a gathering in Bengaluru that Indian technology companies made products for the world but "now is the time for us to give more priority to India's needs." He did not name any company. Even as anti-American protests simmer, Tesla launched its second showroom in India in New Delhi, with Monday's opening attended by Indian commerce ministry officials and US embassy officials. The Swadeshi Jagran Manch group, which is linked to Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, took out small public rallies across India on Sunday, urging people to boycott American brands. "People are now looking at Indian products. It will take some time to fructify," Ashwani Mahajan, the group's co-convenor, told Reuters. "This is a call for nationalism, patriotism." He also shared with Reuters a table his group is circulating on WhatsApp, listing Indian brands of bath soaps, toothpaste and cold drinks that people could choose over foreign ones. On social media, one of the group's campaigns is a graphic titled "Boycott foreign food chains," with logos of McDonald's and many other restaurant brands. In Uttar Pradesh, Rajat Gupta, 37, who was dining at a McDonald's in Lucknow Monday, said he wasn't concerned about the tariff protests and simply enjoyed the 49-rupee ($0.55) coffee he considered good value for money.
Korea Herald
15 hours ago
- Korea Herald
'Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenues to US'
Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the US government 15 percent of revenue from sales to China of advanced computer chips like Nvidia's H20 that are used for artificial intelligence applications, a US official told Reuters on Sunday. US President Donald Trump's administration halted sales of H20 chips to China in April, but Nvidia last month announced the US said that it would allow the company to resume sales and it hoped to start deliveries soon. Another US official said on Friday that the Commerce Department had begun issuing licenses for the sale of H20 chips to China. When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15 percent of revenues to the US, a Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement, "We follow rules the US government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." The spokesperson added: "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide." AMD did not respond to a request for comment on the news, which was first reported by the Financial Times earlier on Sunday. The US Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China's Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China represents a significant market for both companies. Nvidia generated $17 billion in revenue from China in the fiscal year ending Jan. 26, representing 13 percent of total sales. AMD reported $6.2 billion in China revenue for 2024, accounting for 24 percent of total revenue. The Financial Times said the chipmakers agreed to the arrangement as a condition for obtaining the export licences for their semiconductors, including AMD's MI308 chips. The report said the Trump administration had yet to determine how to use the money. 'It's wild,' said Geoff Gertz, a senior fellow at Center for New American Security, an independent think tank in Washington. 'Either selling H20 chips to China is a national security risk, in which case we shouldn't be doing it to begin with, or it's not a national security risk, in which case, why are we putting this extra penalty on the sale?" US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month the planned resumption of sales of the AI chips was part of US negotiations with China to get rare earths and described the H20 as Nvidia's "fourth-best chip" in an interview with CNBC. Lutnick said it was in US interests to have Chinese companies using American technology, even if the most advanced was prohibited from export, so they continued to use an American "tech stack." The US official said the Trump administration did not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips was compromising US national security. The official did not know when the agreement would be implemented or exactly how, but said the administration would be in compliance with the law. Alasdair Phillips-Robins, who served as an adviser at the Commerce Department during former President Joe Biden's administration, criticized the move. 'If this reporting is accurate, it suggests the administration is trading away national security protections for revenue for the Treasury," Phillips-Robins said. (Reuters)
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Shifting trade rules
Decline of WTO ushers in bilateral leverage, challenging Korea's export-driven economy A quiet yet drastic shift is underway: After three decades of World Trade Organization-led multilateralism, the United States has openly declared the system unsustainable. Writing in the New York Times on Thursday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer portrayed the WTO as a faltering institution that compromised American industry while enabling China's state-driven economic model to thrive. This is why the world is now witnessing the so-called 'Trump Round,' a new global trade order built not on consensus but on tariffs and bilateral leverage. In Washington's narrative, the multilateral model was naive: It presumed all members would abide by rules they helped to write. Instead, a system meant to bind China into fair competition allowed it to expand market share through subsidies, export controls and opaque regulation. Years of dispute-settlement paralysis left the WTO without a functioning appellate mechanism, further eroding credibility. What has replaced it is a model of direct bargaining, with tariffs deployed both as penalty and negotiating instrument. This has significant implications for South Korea. Its post-1995 export success was built on WTO access guarantees and predictable dispute resolution. Now the playing field is tilting toward power-based negotiation. Under the emerging bilateral terms with the US, Korean exports face a 15 percent tariff, offset partly by market-access pledges in other sectors and by Korean commitments to invest in US infrastructure and advanced industries. This is not a symmetrical arrangement. Washington controls the main 'carrot' — access to the largest consumer market in the world — and the principal 'stick' of targeted tariffs. The absence of binding multilateral enforcement means concessions will depend less on legal rulings and more on political calculation in both capitals. South Korea's first task in this environment is strategic clarity. It cannot treat US market access as a permanent right; it is now a conditional privilege. Securing continued access will require not only diplomacy in Washington but a clear sense of the trade-offs that domestic industry can accept. The second task is diversification. WTO's decline removes the institutional ballast that once made trade with China, the EU and Southeast Asia relatively predictable. Seoul must deepen ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the EU, accelerate talks for joining a major Asia-Pacific free trade agreement known as the CPTPP, and pursue sector-specific agreements that spread risk. The aim is not to decouple from the US but to avoid being trapped in a single-track export dependence. Third, Korea must adapt its industrial strategy. Semiconductors remain its core export, but the risk profile has changed. In a rules-light order, sectors less exposed to punitive tariffs — such as green technologies, biotechnology and digital services — will be vital hedges. Industrial policy should now focus as much on resilience as on speed of growth. Lastly, Seoul should not surrender the principle of rules altogether. Even in a fragmented system, there is room for 'mini-lateral' or regional frameworks that preserve predictable norms. CPTPP accession, deeper engagement with the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, and targeted high-standards pacts could help anchor at least part of South Korea's trade in enforceable obligations. The end of the WTO era is not the end of trade. It is the end of a certain kind of trade — one where a medium-sized economy like South Korea could rely on codified rules and impartial arbitration to protect market access. The new model prizes leverage, and those without it must find substitutes in alliances, diversification and innovation. The quiet demise of the WTO should be seen not as a collapse but as a strategic pivot. South Korea's track record of adaptation — from rapid industrialization to digital innovation — demonstrates its resilience amid profound change. The critical question now is whether it can convert this loss of certainty into a competitive edge before others seize the opportunity to define the new rules unilaterally.
