Finding balance in addressing the housing crisis without sacrificing our way of life
Hidden Valley in the McCullough Range south of Henderson and east of I-80. (Photo: Kyle Roerink)
Arguing over how to use the land in Nevada has defined the political conversation for a long time, starting with statehood, running through the Cliven Bundy saga, and up to the present moment with the debate over what role public lands should play in addressing the housing crisis. The availability of thriving natural places is a blessing that we need to manage carefully to make sure Nevada stays a great place to live and work as we also work to expand affordable housing for working families.
It's important to add some context to the current push to liquidate these places for development.
The 'Sagebrush Rebellion' kicked off in Nevada nearly half a century ago by special interests that wanted to gain control over public property for their own commercial gain. It continued on through Mr. Bundy's challenge to public ownership of land he refused to pay to use. And unfortunately, it's rearing its ugly head again in the conversation, this time under the pretext of mass disposal of public lands to create affordable housing.
Modern day sagebrush rebels have seized on the affordability crisis to create a narrow private gain from public resources. One proposal in Congress from Utah Sen. Mike Lee, a longtime opponent of public ownership of public lands, would create the broad liquidation of public lands under the deceptive guise of creating more housing. That legislation doesn't mention the word 'affordable' once, meaning that it could be sold to anyone from politically-connected billionaires to wealthy real estate developers who want to create high end housing for the super-rich.
There are frankly no details available to confirm that the latest Trump administration is much better. As they have done with so many other initiatives, the administration issued a press release before the policy, so there's no telling if the ultimate use of this land will be for Tesla server farms or places Nevadans can afford to rent or buy.
Public lands are supposed to benefit the public. Period. That's why any sales for the purposes of housing should truly create affordable options for working people.
Fortunately, there are already tools in place that accomplish this goal. Regulations currently in place at the Bureau of Land Management require such lands to be sold only when it benefits the 'national interest' – exactly what's at stake in the campaign for affordable housing. A bill recently passed with bipartisan support to make some administrative U.S. Forest Service lands available for lease for the purposes of affordable housing.
These measures are a better path for Nevada and other states with fast-growing communities across the West, and they've already been used to create more affordable housing right in our backyard.
Public lands conservation is an important tool for managing growth. They provide essential services like clean water filtration and and air purification—services that benefit everyone, not just those who live near them. Surging ahead without protecting these important resources will not benefit anyone in the long-run.
As the conversation continues around how to tackle the housing crisis, we urge decision-makers to consider policies that are not just focused on short-term solutions but that also preserve our public lands for the long term. With Lake Mead sitting at only one third of capacity we can't throw the baby out with the bathwater (if you'll pardon the expression) through a wholesale liquidation of public lands that includes no guarantees to protect the public interest.
If public lands are truly to benefit the public, then we must make sure any that are sold or leased are guaranteed to be used for affordable housing. And we must ensure that some other lands are protected for their water resources and the quality of life they create for our families.
The majority of people in Nevada and around the West want a balanced approach to public lands management, not a return to the tired old fights of the past. Our leaders have a chance to chart a new path. Let's hope they hear us.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EXCLUSIVE: Should Musk Be Fired From Tesla After Trump Feud? 45% Say This In New Poll
The bad news for Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) and its shareholders continues in 2025, with a highly public feud between CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump adding to question marks like demand, brand damage, and robotaxis. A new survey shows whether investors are ready for Tesla to part ways with the dynamic CEO. What Happened: Tesla stock suffered its largest one-day market capitalization decline with a $152 billion drop after Musk's feud with Trump. The drop continues a highly volatile year for Tesla stock, with rises and falls related to Musk's push into politics and Trump's 2024 election win. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — While a close friendship between Trump and Musk was once viewed as a catalyst for Tesla's stock price to go up, it also led to drops, with Tesla suffering brand damage and seeing protests due to Musk's political push. A feud between Trump and Musk could send Tesla shares down even more in the future. Benzinga recently polled readers about the electric vehicle company's future. "The battle with Donald Trump could hurt Tesla's brand value and image even more as the company looks to recover from a rough year that saw protests and declining sales. Do you think Tesla's Board of Directors should replace Musk as CEO?" Benzinga asked. Here are the results: No: 45% Yes: 38% Don't Know/Not Sure: 17% The poll found a near majority aren't ready to see Tesla's Board of Directors move on from Musk with 45% saying No. While this was a near-majority, the answer of Yes followed close behind at 38%, with the remaining 17% of readers unsure of where they It's Important: A recent Wall Street Journal report suggested Tesla's board had discussed the possibility of moving on from Musk. Musk has indicated that his time in the White House is over, and he will be spending significant time helping to shape Tesla's future. This coincides with the launch of Robotaxis in Texas this month. The Tesla CEO has said he plans to be at Tesla for at least five more years, which would mean the Board of Directors would have to make a change to get rid of him. The board may be unwilling to get rid of the person who has meant so much to the company, even with recent controversy and high share price volatility. Prediction market currently has a 15% chance that Musk is out as the Tesla CEO In 2025. The odds hit 21% on June 5 as the feud with Trump escalated. On the prediction market Kalshi, there is a 14% chance that Musk will be out as the Tesla CEO this year. The odds hit 21% on June 6. Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends The study was conducted by Benzinga from June 5, 2025, through June 9, 2025. It included the responses of a diverse population of adults 18 or older. Opting into the survey was completely voluntary, with no incentives offered to potential respondents. The study reflects results from 212 adults. Image created using photos from Shutterstock. UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article EXCLUSIVE: Should Musk Be Fired From Tesla After Trump Feud? 45% Say This In New Poll originally appeared on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Mikie Sherrill captures the Democratic nomination for New Jersey governor
U.S. Rep. Mikie Sherrill won the Democratic primary and will run as her party's candidate for New Jersey governor this fall. Sherrill, 52, of Montclair, was first elected to Congress in 2018. She's also served as a pilot in the U.S. Navy and worked as a federal prosecutor. She built what was perceived to be a front-runner status through taking a fairly traditional approach to gathering support from county party chairs and county conventions. Vowing to serve as a foil to the Trump administration, Sherrill has leaned into her military experience during this campaign, going so far as to wear her Navy flight jacket in the video distributed to announce her candidacy. Though the race included a packed field and many expected a close race long into the night, Sherrill jumped out to an early lead and never looked back. The race was formally called at 8:39 p.m. when Sherrill had about a 60,000 vote lead. State Democratic Party Chair Leroy Jones congratulated Sherrill in a statement. Jones said that since Sherrill first ran for Congress in 2018, she has "brought New Jerseyans together across party lines and stood up against extremism at every turn. 'I want to congratulate every participant in our spirited Democratic primary on a hard-fought campaign, and thank them for contributing their vision on how best to move New Jersey forward," he said. "Jack Ciattarelli, on the other hand, is only in this to move himself forward — after losing this race twice already, it's clear he'll say or do anything to become governor of New Jersey." The packed field of six candidates included Newark Mayor Ras Baraka; Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop; former state Senate President Steve Sweeney; Sean Spiller, president of the New Jersey Education Association, the state teachers' union; Rep. Josh Gottheimer and Sherrill. While the race stayed close, polling did give Sherrill an edge throughout the spring as she racked up endorsements from political and activist organizations throughout the state. It was unclear just how much of a role those endorsements would have due to the new ballot without the traditional county-line design. The line traditionally gave candidates endorsed by the county party preferred ballot placement, and an edge in their efforts, but it was dismantled by a federal judge last year. Even without the line, county committees held their annual conventions, where in some cases endorsements are voted on while in others the endorsements are simply announced after discussions behind the scenes. Fulop did not participate in the county conventions and instead promoted his own slate of candidates for down ballot races. As of June 1, there were 6,574,692 registered voters in New Jersey, including 2,451,752 Democrats and 1,624,437 Republicans. That is 44,302 fewer Democrats and 60,666 more Republicans than at this time last year. Sherrill will face Republican nominee Jack Ciattarelli, the former assemblyman from Somerville. The nation will be watching the Garden State's general election unfold as a bellwether — New Jersey and Virginia are the only states holding elections for governor this year. Pundits are already portraying the two races as referendums on the second Trump administration's policies and agenda. Katie Sobko covers the New Jersey Statehouse. Email: sobko@ This article originally appeared on Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic Primary for NJ governor


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Democrat Mikie Sherrill wins nomination for New Jersey governor, faces Trump-backed Republican
Democrat Mikie Sherrill wins nomination for New Jersey governor, faces Trump-backed Republican Rep. Mikie Sherrill has won the Democratic nomination in New Jersey's high-stakes gubernatorial race. A former Navy pilot and federal prosecutor, the congresswoman had the edge coming into the state's June 10 primary. She beat five other Democratic candidates vying for the spot in the November general, including a fellow member of Congress, Rep. Josh Gottheimer, according to election calls made by the Washington Post and Associated Press. Sherrill was first elected to the House in 2018 and has fashioned a reputation as a moderate. Earlier this year, she began her fourth term representing a district in north New Jersey. Term-limited, current New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, will wrap up eight years in the governor's mansion after the end of this year. Sherrill looks to extend her party's hold on the state's top spot for another four. She will face Republican Jack Ciattarelli in the November general election. Ciattarelli has run for governor twice before, coming within three points of unseating Murphy in 2021. He came into Tuesday's GOP primary with President Donald Trump's endorsement and a sizable lead in recent polls.