logo
Trump Backlash Heightens Amid Jeanine Pirro Pick For Interim DC Attorney: 'Wine-Soaked Loudmouth'

Trump Backlash Heightens Amid Jeanine Pirro Pick For Interim DC Attorney: 'Wine-Soaked Loudmouth'

Jeanine Pirro Fox News YouTube Channel | Jeanine Pirro talks about her TV hosting tenure Fox News on YouTube / Screenshot Trump said Thursday that Pirro is 'incredibly qualified for this position'
Lindsey Graham agrees with Trump's pick for interim U.S. district attorney for D.C.
Many observers on X called out Trump for appointing someone 'unqualified' for the job
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday announced that he is appointing Judge Jeanine Pirro as the interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, and while the president's allies are celebrating the news, many users on Elon Musk-owned X are not so pleased about the selection.
Trump heaped praises on his latest pick, saying Pirro who co-hosts "The Five" on Fox News, "is incredibly qualified for this position, and is considered one of the top district attorneys in the history of the State of New York." Who is Jeanine Pirro?
Pirro joined Fox News and 2006 but before then, she was elected as a judge in New York's Westchester County Court in the early 1990s.
She is mostly known for a 2021 lawsuit by voting tech company Smartmatic USA wherein she and others at Fox News were accused of spreading false claims over the company's alleged involvement in rigging the 2020 presidential election.
Pirro has also authored several books, including Liars, Leakers, and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy.
Notably, Pirro isn't the first individual with ties to the conservative news outlet and political commentary TV channel that Trump has tapped into top roles in his administration.
One of his top picks from the channel is Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who co-hosted "Fox & Friends Weekend." X Users Blast Trump's Decision
On X, several known Trump allies have congratulated Pirro for getting selected for the crucial role.
Sen. Lindsey Graham from South Carolina said he is "beyond pleased" with the selection, saying Pirro is "exactly the right person at the right time to take on this responsibility."
Grand slam, home run, hat trick pick. I am beyond pleased with President Trump's decision to make Jeanine Pirro the interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia.
She is exactly the right person at the right time to take on this responsibility. She brings to the table… pic.twitter.com/PDziU22M35 — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) May 8, 2025
However, many others were outraged by the selection, including MainStreet.law Founder and Managing Partner Tristan Snell, who questioned how many more TV hosts Trump will place "in serious positions they're unqualified for."
BREAKING: Trump to name Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as interim US Attorney for DCAfter Senate rejected his last pick, Ed MartinHow many more TV hosts is Trump going to put in serious positions they're unqualified for?
THIS IS THE US GOVERNMENT — NOT THE CELEBRITY APPRENTICE — Tristan Snell (@TristanSnell) May 8, 2025
American singer-songwriter and activist Bill Madden said Trump's latest move is a sign he is "doubling down by giving serious consideration to unqualified and incompetent drunk" Pirro.
After hiring unqualified and incompetent drunk Pete Hegseth to be Defense Secretary, Trump's doubling down by giving serious consideration to unqualified and incompetent drunk Jeanine Pirro as US Attorney for DC. There has never been a more incompetent president than Trump, EVER. pic.twitter.com/l8zTJYIMtH — Bill Madden (@maddenifico) May 8, 2025
One user said the United States has now become "a banana republic," a term used by political scientists to describe a nation that's both politically and economically unstable.
If we weren't a banana republic before, we are now. Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for DC? She hasn't practiced law in 20 years. She's not a prosecutor—she's a wine-soaked loudmouth with a camera. This is obscene. pic.twitter.com/rMXJTKc8K5 — Russell Drew (@RussOnPolitics) May 8, 2025
The user added that aside from Pirro supposedly not having practiced law in over two decades, "she's not a prosecutor—she's a wine-soaked loudmouth with a camera."
Aside from the SmartmaticUSA lawsuit, Pirro is also known for a 2020 broadcast where she was accused of being drunk as she appeared to stumble over her words.
Political content creator Harry Sisson called Pirro a "lunatic who has consistently spread conspiracy theories on Fox," adding that her appointment "is disastrous for the United States."
Oh my… Trump just appointed Fox News host Jeanine Pirro to be the next interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. She is a lunatic who has consistently spread conspiracy theories on Fox. This is disastrous for the United States. pic.twitter.com/cZwbmjmsKR — Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) May 8, 2025
Trump has yet to address concerns over his latest selection.
© Copyright IBTimes 2024. All rights reserved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's DC intervention may be less likely in other cities – DW – 08/14/2025
Trump's DC intervention may be less likely in other cities – DW – 08/14/2025

DW

time9 minutes ago

  • DW

Trump's DC intervention may be less likely in other cities – DW – 08/14/2025

US President Donald Trump has sent the National Guard into Washington, may well have other major cities in his sights. But could he replicate his capital intervention elsewhere? The arrival of 800 US National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. at the direction of President Donald Trump has been framed as an "authoritarian push" by the mayor of the nation's capital. Trump cast his decision to involve the National Guard in Washington and put the city's police force under the supervision of Attorney General Pam Bondi and Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as a crime crackdown. He's calling the move a "Liberation Day" and claiming the city needed rescuing from "crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor." He's also named other cities, including New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Baltimore, as possible future targets if they don't address their own local crime issues. But federal data contradicts that claim, with statistics showing that violent crime is at a 30-year low. Critics say that based on this, there is no emergency that requires a military presence in the capital. "The numbers simply do not justify this measure," said Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser. So if crime has been going down in Washington, why the intervention? "It does look, if you look at the data, [like] crime is going down," said Laura Dickinson, a law professor at George Washington University, US. "City officials have not asked for help [from the president] so it really does seem at best questionable." "This is really problematic and contrary to our tradition in the United States, where we've been very cautious about using the military to do law enforcement functions," Dickinson added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In part, because he can. Washington, D.C. (which stands for District of Columbia) is not part of any US state and largely falls under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Under the 1973 Home Rule Act, presidents can take control of the DC police during emergencies for 30 days without congressional approval. And because it's a federal enclave, the president also commands the city's National Guard. Some US commentators have observed the move could be a political attempt to distract from ongoing controversy related to the Epstein Files and the release of jobs figures that showed a rise in unemployment. Trump's popularity in his flagship policy areas — in particular immigration — has also recently declined. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While Trump and his allies have pointed to city crime as justification for the move, his opponents inside and outside of congress say the action is designed to exact control over cities that do not support Congressional Black Caucus, which currently has no Republican members, also said the cities named by Trump as potential targets all have the common thread of being led by Black mayors, labelling the move a "blatantly racist and despicable power grab." The presidency has fewer powers outside of the nation's capital. The governors of the 50 US states preside over the National Guard within their own borders. It's a key distinction that William Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University, US, said would make it far more difficult for Trump to follow through on threats to extend interventions beyond the federal enclave of Washington, D.C. "It would be unwise, I think to generalize this example and apply it to other places in the United States," Banks told DW. "He can't go to Chicago or Philadelphia or New York City or Los Angeles and do the same thing. He simply doesn't have the authority." But what about in June, when he deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles? Banks said there are provisions for limited interventions to protect federal property and personnel, but Trump "was walking on very thin ice." "His argument was that they were needed to ensure that the protesters didn't destroy federal property or harm ICE and other immigration personnel who are on the ground there doing their job." While they can protect federal assets, military personnel are banned from being actively used in domestic policing by the Posse Comitatus Act. In California, a three-day trial investigating whether the deployment of the National Guard was in breach of this law, and potentially unconstitutional, has recently wrapped up, with a decision pending. Dickinson said the use of military forces by the federal government in American cities could also impact how these institutions are perceived by the public. "It could damage the credibility and respect that Americans have for the military and the National Guard," Dickinson told DW. "These are some of the few institutions in the United States that enjoy very broad bipartisan support." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Federal command of the DC police ends after 30 days, unless the Republican-controlled Congress approves an extension. The National Guard can remain active indefinitely. Despite alarms being raised by Trump's opponents, who are calling the move an authoritarian flex, Banks expects a return to the status quo is more likely, particularly when it comes to threats to other states. He said the United States' foundational history overthrowing the British military, and the norm that law enforcement should be maintained by civilian police, are crucial in understanding what Americans will accept in their communities. "Our situation is somewhat unique in the United States in not having any expectation of military involvement in law enforcement," Banks told DW. "We don't like military uniforms on our streets, we don't like men and women with guns patrolling our streets, it just rubs against the grain. "Posse Comitatus codifies that principle, but I think the norm is even more important and more fundamental."

Europe holds its breath as Trump meets Putin in Alaska – DW – 08/14/2025
Europe holds its breath as Trump meets Putin in Alaska – DW – 08/14/2025

DW

timean hour ago

  • DW

Europe holds its breath as Trump meets Putin in Alaska – DW – 08/14/2025

Europe hopes that Trump will threaten Putin with secondary sanctions if he doesn't agree to a ceasefire but dread a deal over their heads and against their interests. In a bid to influence the outcome of the meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, key European leaders got on a video call with the US president as Germany hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Berlin. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen posted on X that Europe, the US and NATO"strengthened the common ground for Ukraine," and will remain in close coordination. The EU's diplomatic intervention was aimed at impressing upon Trump the bloc's collective desire for peace, but also to brief him on the suspected motives of his Russian counterpart ― and warn against conceding Ukrainian territory in the talks. There was some hope that the European allies may have managed to convince Trump against selling out Ukrainian and European interests. Still, since they will remain far away while Trump and Putin hold closed-door talks, tensions over what may transpire remain palpable. During Wednesday's call, Ukraine and its European allies said they wanted a ceasefire before commencing any negotiations with Russia. Trump seems to have made a note of that, though it's not a precondition for him ― he believes a ceasefire "would be a show of goodwill from Russia," reported CNN. Even though Trump is meeting Putin without Zelenskyy in Alaska, he indicated there might be a trilateral meeting including the Ukrainian president soon. French President Emmanuel Macron said the trilateral could take place in a neutral country in Europe after the tete-a-tete in Alaska. Trump has said earlier swapping some territory may be necessary to end the war. But after speaking to the Europeans, he said no such concessions would be made without Zelenskyy at the table. And while Trump is still opposed to Ukraine joining NATO ― which Kyiv has long said was essential as a security guarantee, experts suggest the US may be more open to offering some other sort of assurance to deter future Russian aggression. "The nature of US security guarantees and practical contributions would be subject to further negotiations," Kristine Berzina, a Washington, D.C.-based senior fellow of the German Marshall Fund (GMF), told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ukraine and the EU also expect the US to ask Russia to pay part of the massive reconstruction bill as part of future negotiations. It is estimated to cost between $500 billion and $1 trillion to repair the damage caused by Russian bombings in Ukraine. Kyiv and its supporters argue a part of that should come from frozen Russian assets, about €200 billion of which are located in Belgium, predominantly in a bank called Euroclear. There is also a push for President Trump to ask for the return for thousands of Ukrainian children abducted by Russia, as well as Ukrainian prisoners of war. The bloc also hopes the US will tighten its screws and impose secondary sanctions on Russia if the Russian president refuses to hold fire. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Despite some relief after the call there are still fears that Putin may outwit Trump. Europe faces a difficult scenario if Putin convinces Trump to cut off weapons supply to Ukraine, even through European partners, and intelligence sharing, since Ukraine needs both US military equipment and reconnaissance. Another one of Europe's fears is that the US may withdraw its assets from the continent and make the alliance weaker. "Russia wants to push the US out of eastern Europe and assert military dominance. Putin could use this meeting to encourage the US to withdraw troops from Europe," said Rafael Loss, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). This is a worrying possibility since, "the US is already reviewing its global force posturing." "In that case first and foremost the Europeans would need to shore up their own defenses" in eastern European nations, Loss said. "US force reductions are anticipated, though the scale of the withdrawal is not yet clear," said Berzina of the GMF. "But of course, this process is happening at the same time as the Ukraine and Russia negotiations are taking shape. It will be tricky for the US to withdraw troops from Europe if it wants to signal to Russia that the US is deeply committed to European security." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Ukraine: Trump says deal would come at trilateral summit – DW – 08/14/2025
Ukraine: Trump says deal would come at trilateral summit – DW – 08/14/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

Ukraine: Trump says deal would come at trilateral summit – DW – 08/14/2025

US President Trump said he is hopeful Russia's Vladimir Putin is ready for a deal on Ukraine. The Kremlin has warned against expecting an major outcome of the Alaska summit. Follow DW for more. US President Donald Trump told Fox News on Thursday he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin would make a deal. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressed that while the Alaska summit might succeed in bringing a halt to the fighting in Ukraine, a long-term resolution to the war will need more time. The Kremlin has meanwhile warned of predicting the outcome of the summit. In London, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, as European leaders prepare a unified stance on Ukraine ahead of the President Donald Trump said on Thursday that any deals on ending the conflict between Ukraine and Russia will need to come after his Alaska summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin. Speaking to Fox News Radio one day ahead of the anticipated summit, the US president said a second meeting would also be attended by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal," Trump said. "And I don't want to use the word 'divvy' things up. But you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term, okay?" US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressed that while the Alaska summit might succeed in bringing a halt to the fighting in Ukraine, a long-term resolution to the war will need more time. "To achieve a peace, I think we all recognize that there'll have to be some conversation about security guarantees. There'll have to be some conversation about ... territorial disputes and claims, and what they're fighting over," Rubio told reporters at the State Department. The US top diplomat added that Trump hoped "to achieve some stoppage of fighting so that those conversations can happen." US President Donald Trump told Fox News on Thursday he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin would make a deal. "This meeting sets up the second meeting, but there is a 25% chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting," Trump told Fox News Radio. The US president said he suspected Moscow sought a meeting due to threats of additional US sanctions against it. Trump has given Russia more than one deadline to end the war, under the threat of increasing sanctions, before his meeting with Putin was scheduled. Despite promising to end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office, Trump's administration has attempted to play down the importance of the summit with Putin, saying on Tuesday it would be a "listening exercise for the president." The Kremlin warned on Thursday of predicting the outcome of US President Donald Trump's Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov was cited by Interfax as saying there were no plans to sign any documents following the summit. Peskov hailed Putin and Trump's "political will to resolve existing issues through dialogue," arguing that this sentiment was missing from the European side. When asked whether the summit would discuss a potential exchange of territories to settle the conflict, a suggestion floated by Trump and vehemently rejected by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Peskov said "issues related to the Ukrainian settlement will be discussed." Putin is due to be accompanied by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, presidential aide Yuri Ushakov, Defense Minister Andrei Belousov, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov and the president's special representative for foreign investment and economic cooperation, Kirill Dmitriev. A United Arab Emirates-mediated exchange of prisoners of war between Russia and Ukraine has secured the release of 168 POWs, the Gulf country's Foreign Ministry said on Thursday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had announced the exchange earlier, but said it led to the release of 84 prisoners of war (see below), apparently not including the released Russian POWs. The UAE ministry clarified 84 prisoners were exchanged from each side. This brings the total number of POWs exchanged as part of Emirati mediation to 4,349, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement carried by the state news agency. The ministry argued that the success of such mediation efforts was testament to "the strong and special nature of the UAE's relationship to Russia and Ukraine." Meta's WhatsApp messaging app has decried a Russian ban on its call service, while Moscow claimed the curbs were necessary to fight fraud and "terrorist" activities. On Wednesday, Moscow banned calls on WhatsApp and Telegram. Russia's Digital Ministry said calls would resume once "they start complying with Russian legislation." WhatsApp condemned the decision. "WhatsApp is private, end-to-end encrypted, and defies government attempts to violate people's right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people," a spokesperson for Meta-owned WhatsApp told the AFP news agency. Some 100 million of Russia's population of roughly 143.5 million are WhatsApp users. Telegram, which is owned by Russian entrepreneur Pavel Durov, said it "actively combats misuse of its platform, including calls for sabotage or violence, as well as fraud" and removes "millions of pieces of harmful content every day." Moscow has often claimed that Kyiv used Telegram to recruit people or commit acts of sabotage in Russia. Russia has recently launched some homegrown messaging apps, with less stringent privacy rules, that it hopes will take over foreign-owned ones. The US and Russian heads of state will have a "working breakfast" as part of their Alaska summit on Friday, the Kremlin said on Thursday. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will first sit down for a one-on-one meeting, "naturally with the participation of interpreters," Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters. Then, their two delegations will meet. Afterwards, talks will continue over a "working breakfast," Ushakov said, before the pair do a joint press conference. The summit is due to start Friday at 11:30 a.m., local time (1930 GMT/UTC). Germany said it will purchase $500 million (€428 million) in US-manufactured weapons for Ukraine in an effort to support Kyiv's defense against Russian invaders. Berlin, like other Ukrainian allies, will use NATO's PURL (Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List) mechanism to coordinate the purchase and delivery, according to statements from the Defense and Foreign ministries. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addressed the pledge in an X post Thursday, saying that Kyiv had secured $1.5 billion in financing from its European allies and calling PURL "a mechanism that truly strengthens our defense." According to NATO, PURL aid will include military equipment that cannot be produced by European manufacturers or can be delivered more quickly by the US than by European or Canadian allies. "I commend Germany for stepping up once again. This delivery will help Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression," said NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in a statement posted on X Thursday. "Germany is the largest European contributor of military aid to Ukraine, and today's announcement further underlines its commitment to help the Ukrainian people defend their freedom and sovereignty." Moscow and Kyiv exchanged 84 prisoners of war, including both military personnel and civilians, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced on Thursday. Ukrainians released include civilians held by Russia since 2014, 2016 and 2017, Zelenskyy said on X. He added that military personnel who were involved in defending Mariupol are also among those released. "I am grateful to everyone who helps us continue to free Ukrainian captives," Zelenskyy said, adding that almost all those released require "medical care and significant rehabilitation." The Ukrainian president thanked the UAE for its assistance in coordinating the exchange. "The bravery and effectiveness of our units on the frontline make it possible, among other things, to bring our people back home," Zelenskyy said, promising "more exchanges." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described his meeting in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer as "productive," adding that the two leaders would continue to coordinate positions. Zelenskyy said that the talks in London continued the conversations that started on Wednesday during a virtual meeting hosted by Germany. "We also discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killings and engage in genuine, substantive diplomacy," Zelenskyy wrote on X. The two leaders also discussed joint military cooperation, especially in light of Kyiv's fight against Russia's war, Zelenskyy said. Russian President Vladimir Putin has welcomed what he called "sincere efforts" by the US administration to end the Ukraine conflict. "I would like to tell you about the stage we are at with the current American administration, which, as everyone knows, is making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, end the crisis, and reach agreements of interest to all parties involved in this conflict," Putin said. He made the remarks during a meeting at the Kremlin with senior military and civilian officials a day before his scheduled summit with President Donald Trump. Putin said the discussions with the United States were aimed at creating "the long–term conditions of peace between our countries, in Europe, and in the world as a whole, if we reach agreements in the field of strategic offensive arms control in the next stages." Large areas of eastern and southern Ukraine were forcibly seized by the Russian army. Why do they matter to Russia? And could some be returned to Ukraine? Read the full story on the prospects of Russia agreeing to return occupied land to Ukraine. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss ways to end the war in Ukraine during their anticipated Alaska summit, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said on Thursday. "It is probably obvious to everyone that the central topic will be the resolution of the Ukraine crisis," Ushakov told reporters on Thursday. These will be held "one-on-one" between Putin and Trump, with only their interpreters in attendance, Ushakov said. Trump and Putin will also discuss the "huge untapped potential" for bilateral economic ties, the Kremlin aid added. The talks are scheduled to start at 11:30 am local time (1939 GMT). Putin and Trump will give a joint press conference following their meeting. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's meeting at Downing Street lasted a little over an hour. The pair shook hands and hugged as Zelenskyy departed. They did not speak to the media who were camping outside the prime minister's official residence. Their meeting came a day ahead of a summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Russian forces have intercepted and destroyed 44 Ukrainian drones overnight, the Defense Ministry said on Thursday, adding that nine were intercepted over the Volgograd region in the south. A downed drone hit in Volgograd, causing a fire and a leak at an oil refinery, Governor Andrey Bocharov said. "Firefighters quickly began extinguishing the fire. According to preliminary data, there were no casualties," Bocharov said on the Telegram. Drone attacks on the border region of Belgorod meanwhile injured at least three, the region's governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said on Telegram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store