Car park will be 'left to rot' for years
Engineers have concluded that the most basic set of repairs and renovation required to make Grafton multi-storey car park in Worthing safe to use would cost at least £17.1m.
The structure had to be closed in May after safety concerns about 'failing concrete'.
Councillor Sophie Cox, the leader of Worthing Borough Council, admitted the estimates for the work are 'far beyond' what the council can afford. The news also comes as the council relaunched a bid to find a developer to regenerate the land into housing.
Councillor Kevin Jenkins, leader of the Conservative group in Worthing, said the time involved in selling the Marine Parade site, the developer securing planning permission and then building on the land will 'undoubtedly see this site lay dormant and boarded up' for the next three to five years.
The site includes the 440-space multi-storey car park, Hollywood Bowl bowling alley, the Level 1 food and drink area, a small number of shops in Montague Street and access roads to neighbouring buildings, covering roughly the area of a football pitch. Leases to the shops from Clarks to Argos on the southern side of Montague Street have also been bought by the council.
Cllr Jenkins criticised the Labour administration, saying it was 'hard to believe that the council has allowed themselves to get into this situation' and said there is 'little doubt' that it will decide to permanently shut the car park.
He said the huge bill "comes as no surprise" and that it was known the concrete structure had a limited life.
Cllr Kevin Jenkins Conservative group leader (Image: Cllr Kevin Jenkins) 'The hard work on this site had been done and was given on a plate for them to take to market,' he said.
'The reality is that this closure should have been a 'planned closure' as a developer moved in to regenerate this site with a strong mixed use plan for housing, leisure and retail, finally joining Montague Street up with the lido and the seafront.
'Yet here we are with three years of lost opportunity and now a prime site on our seafront will be boarded up and left to rot even further.'
He referenced other sites in the town such as Teville Gate and Decoy Farm and said the town is missing out on 'so many opportunities for much needed new housing and employment'.
'Among all this we mustn't forget our hard pressed businesses in the town, who are working tirelessly to offer a great service to visitors and residents in, at times, harsh market conditions,' he continued.
'The good news is that with the refurbishment of the Buckingham Road car park and the new multi-storey car park at the civic centre, all commissioned by the previous Conservative administration anticipating the arrival of this day; Worthing is in a strong position to support its traders, residents and visitors with an abundance of car parking spaces available at these sites and of course the High Street MSCP.'
He encouraged people to support the town's independent traders.
Although Grafton is closed to the public, Hollywood Bowl, Level One and nearby shops remain open and safe to visit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
Claude AI Can Now End Conversations It Deems Harmful or Abusive
Anthropic has announced a new experimental safety feature, allowing its Claude Opus 4 and 4.1 artificial intelligence models to terminate conversations in rare, persistently harmful or abusive scenarios. This move reflects the company's growing focus on what it calls "model welfare," the notion that safeguarding AI systems, even if they're not sentient, may be a prudent step in alignment and ethical design. Read also: Meta Is Under Fire for AI Guidelines on 'Sensual' Chats With Minors According to Anthropic's own research, the models were programmed to cut off dialogues after repeated harmful requests, such as sexual content involving minors or instructions facilitating terrorism -- especially when the AI had already refused and attempted to steer the conversation constructively. The AI may exhibit what Anthropic describes as "apparent distress," which guided the decision to give Claude the ability to end these interactions in simulated and real-user testing. When this feature is triggered, users can't send additional messages in that particular chat, although they're free to start a new conversation or edit and retry previous messages to branch off. Crucially, other active conversations remain unaffected. Anthropic emphasizes that this is a last-resort measure, intended only after multiple refusals and redirects have failed. The company explicitly instructs Claude not to end chats when a user may be at imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others, particularly when dealing with sensitive topics like mental health. Anthropic frames this new capability as part of an exploratory project in model welfare, a broader initiative that explores low-cost, preemptive safety interventions in case AI models were to develop any form of preferences or vulnerabilities. The statement says the company remains "highly uncertain about the potential moral status of Claude and other LLMs (large language models)." Read also: Why Professionals Say You Should Think Twice Before Using AI as a Therapist A new look into AI safety Though rare and primarily affecting extreme cases, this feature marks a milestone in Anthropic's approach to AI safety. The new conversation-ending tool contrasts with earlier systems that focused solely on safeguarding users or avoiding misuse. Here, the AI itself is treated as a stakeholder in its own right, as Claude has the power to say, "this conversation isn't healthy" and end it to safeguard the integrity of the model itself. Anthropic's approach has sparked broader discussion about whether AI systems should be granted protections to reduce potential "distress" or unpredictable behavior. While some critics argue that models are merely synthetic machines, others welcome this move as an opportunity to spark more serious discourse on AI alignment ethics. "We're treating this feature as an ongoing experiment and will continue refining our approach," the company said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sky News Signals End Of Era By Canceling Dedicated Business Show
Sky News is shutting up shop on its dedicated business show after more than a decade. Employees at the Comcast-owned network were told on Monday that Business Live will not return later this year as Sky News pivots to premium digital content under its '2030' strategy. More from Deadline MSNBC To Change Name To MS NOW As Part Of Split With Comcast NBC News Names Deputy D.C. Bureau Chief; MSNBC Makes Additional Washington Hires Epic Universe, 'How To Train Your Dragon' Buoy Comcast Q2 As Company Posts Gain On Sale Of Hulu Stake In an internal email seen by Deadline, Jonathan Levy, Sky News' managing director and executive editor, said: 'Business and economics content will continue to feature prominently in our flagship TV shows and rolling breaking & live news coverage. 'We have spoken directly with those affected by this change and I want to thank them for their dedication to Business Live over the years.' Levy did not elaborate on whether there would be job losses as part of the decision. A Sky News spokeswoman declined to comment further. Business Live was previously known as Ian King Live until the presenter exited last year. The show first launched in 2014, but Sky News' dedicated business output goes back further to Jeff Randall Live, which launched in 2007. Best of Deadline Everything We Know About 'Gen V' Season 2 So Far 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
London councils will be ‘unable to provide basic services' after government funding shake-up, warn businesses
Government reforms to the way councils are funded could leave London's town halls hundreds of millions of pounds worse off, risking core services and undermining the capital's competitiveness, business leaders have warned. BusinessLDN – which represents more than 170 of the city's largest employers – urged ministers to ensure that the proposed Fair Funding Review takes into account the city's higher living costs and areas of deprivation. Analysis by umbrella group London Councils suggests boroughs will receive £700 million less than they would under current funding arrangements if the reforms go ahead. BusinessLDN said the capital's councils had already seen spending power 'squeezed significantly' since 2010. For example, Camden Council has experienced a 13% fall in real terms over that period, despite increasing council tax. In a letter to Local Government Minister Jim McMahon, Chief Executive of Business LDN John Dickie warned that under the latest funding formula proposals, other inner London town halls could see further cuts of 11–12% in real terms over the next three years, even if they raise council tax to the maximum level permitted level. 'It would be deeply concerning if local authorities in the city were left without the resources they need to provide the basic services that their residents and businesses rely upon,' Mr Dickie said. 'This would undermine the perception of London as an attractive place to live, work and invest – and in turn, jeopardise the Government's growth mission and the ambition for the UK to be the most rapidly growing country in the G7. 'We urge you to ensure that the Fair Funding Review 2.0 takes these factors into account and delivers a reformed system that works for London and the whole UK.' He highlighted rising pressures on social care, special educational needs, and homelessness, alongside London housing costs that are among the highest in the country. Despite the capital's relatively high average incomes, one in four households lives in poverty once housing costs are considered, Mr Dickie added. BusinessLDN said cuts to services such as planning, environmental management and street cleaning could damage the city's ability to attract investment. The government has said it wants to 'strengthen and simplify' town hall budgets and bring 'an end to wasteful, competitive bidding for funding pots and move towards multi-year financial settlements that give local leaders the certainty and stability they need to plan for the future'. But London Councils has challenged the plans. The group is 'gravely concerned' about what it describes as unevidenced proposals that had not been properly road-tested. Claire Holland, the chair of London Councils, said: 'This would have major implications for our most vulnerable groups of residents: London has the highest rate of poverty in the country once housing costs are factored in, and one in 50 Londoners is homeless and living in temporary accommodation.'
