logo
New York State lawmakers respond to redistricting issue in Texas

New York State lawmakers respond to redistricting issue in Texas

Yahoo06-08-2025
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — New York State lawmakers are responding as Democratic lawmakers in Texas are facing civil arrest warrants for fleeing the state to block a vote that could redraw the state's electoral map in favor of Republicans.
The proposed congressional map is expected to grant Republicans an advantage in five additional districts, shifting the political balance in the state.
Many of these Texas lawmakers have stated that they will remain out of state until the special legislative session concludes, asserting that they are defending the integrity of American voting rights. President Donald Trump has weighed in on the matter, supporting the GOP's stance and saying Republicans deserve five more congressional seats.
In New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul has also commented on the ongoing redistricting debate in Texas. Hochul suggested that New York could be next to modify its redistricting laws. Speaking at a state capital news conference on Tuesday, the governor strongly defended Texas Democrats' actions, condemning the Republican push to redraw electoral maps as creating 'a war' against the political opposition.
'This will have implications not just in Texas, but for our entire nation and its future,' Hochul said.
On Monday, six Texas Democrats fled to Albany to block the Texan Republican effort. These lawmakers have labeled the Republican push as a 'dangerous power grab,' with Hochul saying, 'Republicans know they'll lose the elections, but to subvert the will of the people, they're hell-bent on rigging the system.'
Currently, Republicans hold a narrow advantage in the U.S. House of Representatives with 219 seats compared to the Democrats' 212. With four upcoming vacancies, a shift in control is still possible.
Shawn Donahue, a political science professor at the University at Buffalo, noted that the situation in Texas is unusual.
'There was no court that threw out these district lines in Texas, and in fact, Republicans had actually been the ones that had drawn the districts for 2022 and 2024,' Donahue said.
Like Texas, New York lawmakers have the power to redraw both state and congressional districts every 10 years following the decennial census. Hochul has raised the possibility of initiating redistricting sooner, which has sparked reactions from state lawmakers across the aisle.
Democratic Congressman Tim Kennedy spoke out against Republican efforts in Texas, calling it 'fighting fire with fire.'
'It's not allowing the people of Texas to take away the representation here in New York,' he said.
However, Republican Congressman Nick Langworthy strongly disagreed.
'She can't do that before the midterm elections. That's all political posturing,' Langworthy said. 'I don't believe the voters of New York will stand for it. They stopped her last time she tried to meddle with these affairs.'
Kennedy, however, continues to argue that the Republican strategy in Texas is part of a larger, troubling trend.
'A total attack on democracy,' he said. 'What Republicans are doing midway through this decade is they're trying to change the lines to benefit the politicians rather than the people.'
In response to the ongoing debate, an amendment to the New York State Constitution has been introduced. The amendment would allow mid-decade congressional redistricting, but only if other states first make similar changes to their maps.
Donahue said the amendment process is, 'a fairly straightforward process to amend the Constitution in New York. It's just not a quick process. You have to have two separately elected state legislatures approve identical language for a constitutional amendment that would eventually go to the voters.'
If the amendment passes, the earliest it could take effect would be for the 2028 elections.
Latest Local News
New York State lawmakers respond to redistricting issue in Texas
1199SEIU, Niagara Falls Memorial Medical Center reach 3-year tentative agreement
'GLOW With Your Hands' connects students to potential career paths
Fredonia man sentenced for selling drugs leading to fatal overdose
Everything you need to know about the Erie County Fair
Dillon Morello is a reporter from Pittsburgh who has been part of the News 4 team since September of 2023. See more of his work here and follow him on Twitter.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Swiss see risk of tariffs increasing cost of U.S. F-35A jets
Swiss see risk of tariffs increasing cost of U.S. F-35A jets

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Swiss see risk of tariffs increasing cost of U.S. F-35A jets

(Reuters) -Switzerland remains committed to buying Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II fighter jets from the United States despite an unclear total cost of procurement in part due to the impact of U.S. tariffs, the government said on Wednesday. The Swiss government reaffirmed its commitment to buying the jets a week after the United States imposed some of its highest tariff rates worldwide on Switzerland due to the size of the U.S. trade deficit with the European country. The price of the jets would ultimately depend on inflation in the United States, global commodity prices "and other factors such as price increases due to the tariffs imposed by the USA worldwide," the government said in a statement. Bern chose the F-35A as its next-generation fighter plane in 2021 for what it considered a fixed price of around 6 billion Swiss francs ($7.47 billion) for 36 jets. The U.S. has since said that sum was a misunderstanding. Talks with the United States to avert the total sum from potentially increasing by $650 million to $1.3 billion showed it was impossible for Switzerland to assert a fixed price, the Swiss government said. ($1 = 0.8028 Swiss francs) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives
Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives

Billionaire Mark Cuban has been speaking out on social media, arguing that wealthy people should get targeted incentives to help others, while critics are asking why similar incentives aren't offered to the working class. Cuban's Incentives For The Rich Cuban recently argued on Bluesky that policy decisions have ripple effects, warning, "Think the 60% of Americans with stocks or retirement funds will like it when their savings crash? The layoffs when companies close and investment slows down considerably?" Cuban, who has long said he is fine with raising his own income taxes, proposed lowering corporate taxes for companies paying at least $25 per hour or giving employees stock at the same percentage as the CEO. "Bottom up incentives work. Dems never innovate. They bitch," he wrote. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can That drew sharp criticism. One person replied, "It's always been funny how the rich need to be incentivized but the working class needs to be disciplined." The comment ratioed what Cuban wrote, meaning it received more engagement than Cuban's original post. They also questioned why Cuban would make this case so soon after a large corporate tax cut was passed, calling it tone-deaf, adding that many companies work to push wages as low as possible, undermining his claims about innovation. Defending Trump's Semiconductor Tax Structure Cuban also recently posted on X about a Trump policy imposing what he called a "billionaire's tax" on semiconductor sales to China from the most valuable company in the world, Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA). He credited Trump for using business leverage to get companies to pay, something he said progressives have failed to do. Trending: These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – "POTUS is more progressive when it comes to taxation than anyone in the progressive wing of the Dems has ever been. The Dems should be celebrating just how progressive it is. The irony," Cuban wrote. While he disagrees with Trump on tariffs and most non-business issues, he called the move "the ultimate wealth tax" because it diluted all shareholders by 15% upfront. Cuban estimated the measure will result in Nvidia paying about $4 billion per year, connected to roughly $25 billion in high-margin revenue. He stressed that while it won't fix the deficit, it shows how targeting what wealthy companies need can result in significant tax revenue. Cuban's comments tie together a recurring theme in his public statements: using incentives to drive behavior. Whether it's corporate tax breaks for companies that pay higher wages, leveraging business needs to generate revenue from billionaires, or teaching his children to earn their own way, Cuban repeatedly comes back to the idea that motivation should come through opportunity rather than punishment. Still, the pushback shows that many people believe those same incentives should apply to working-class Americans, not just the wealthy. Read Next: Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. Imagn Images Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? NVIDIA (NVDA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Mark Cuban Says Rich People Should Get Incentives To Help Others, But Gets Asked Why The Working Class Only Gets Discipline, Not Incentives originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio

Pentagon plans ‘reaction force' for ‘domestic civil disturbance: Report
Pentagon plans ‘reaction force' for ‘domestic civil disturbance: Report

American Military News

time24 minutes ago

  • American Military News

Pentagon plans ‘reaction force' for ‘domestic civil disturbance: Report

A new report claims that President Donald Trump's administration is developing plans to potentially create a 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force' of 600 U.S. National Guard troops that could be quickly deployed in the event of civil unrest. According to internal Pentagon documents obtained by The Washington Post, the Trump administration's 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force' plan would involve roughly 600 National Guard troops being ready to deploy at all times. The outlet noted that the National Guard troops would be separated into two groups of 300 troops at military bases in Arizona and Alabama and would be ready to deploy in as little as one hour. The Washington Post reported that while the Pentagon documents have been marked as predecisional, the documents contain comprehensive plans and discussions regarding the potential implications of the creation of a National Guard 'reaction force.' According to The Washington Post, the plans have been compiled by the National Guard and have time stamps from late July and early August. READ MORE: Trump deploys Nat'l Guard in DC, takes federal control of DC police Fox News reported that the Trump administration's reported plans for a National Guard 'reaction force' would require the president to use Title 32, which would allow Trump to bypass normal restrictions regarding the use of the military for domestic purposes and would authorize National Guard troops to use certain law enforcement powers. The Washington Post reported that it is not yet clear whether the plans for the 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force' have been reviewed by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. In a statement obtained by The Washington Post, Kingsley Wilson, a Pentagon spokesperson, said, 'The Department of Defense is a planning organization and routinely reviews how the department would respond to a variety of contingencies across the globe. We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise.' The Pentagon's potential plans for a 'reaction force' come after Trump has deployed the National Guard multiple times in response to domestic issues. In response to June's anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) riots in Los Angeles, the president deployed thousands of National Guard members and U.S. Marines to maintain order in the city and provide protection for ICE officials and government property. According to Fox News, Trump also deployed 800 D.C. National Guard troops on Monday as part of his plan to federalize Washington, D.C., and crack down on surging crime in the nation's capital.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store