logo
Bombshell testimony about deadly mushroom lunch leftovers at Erin Patterson's murder trial

Bombshell testimony about deadly mushroom lunch leftovers at Erin Patterson's murder trial

7NEWS14-05-2025

Waste workers found a food dehydrator had been dumped at a tip by a woman in the days after a poisonous mushroom lunch was served, a triple-murder trial has been told.
Video of a woman getting out of a red car and pulling a black dehydrator from the boot before she placed it in an e-waste bin inside a green shed was shown to the jury in Erin Patterson's trial on Wednesday.
WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Bombshell testimony at Erin Patterson murder trial.
Prosecutors claim Patterson disposed of the food dehydrator, which they allege contained death cap mushroom traces, after she served a poisoned beef Wellington to four former in-laws on July 29, 2023.
The 50-year-old mother of two has pleaded not guilty to three murder charges over the lunch, which led to the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Heather Wilkinson, 66.
Patterson claims the poisoning was unintentional and a terrible accident.
Koonwarra Transfer Station operations manager Darren Canty told the jury police contacted him on August 4 about a person who had attended the waste facility two days earlier.
'As a result of that inquiry, I looked at the video footage that we had from that day and made a copy of that footage and passed it on,' he said.
After the footage was played to the court in Morwell, regional Victoria, the jury was shown a photo of the black Sunbeam food dehydrator.
Mr Canty said the woman paid by EFTPOS for the e-waste disposal before she left.
Intensive care specialist Andrew Bersten was the next witness called on Wednesday, with the jury told he had been sent Patterson's medical records from her presentation at hospital after the lunch.
This included ambulance records that showed Patterson had experienced 'five loose bowel actions' between 10am and 11.50am on July 31.
'She was somewhat dehydrated and therefore I thought it was consistent with a diarrhoeal illness,' he said.
Beef Wellington leftovers examined
Earlier, the first scientist to test the beef Wellington remains said she did not find evidence of death cap mushrooms after examining the food with a microscope.
Mycologist Camille Truong was working on-call for the Victorian Poisons Information Centre on July 31 when she received a call from Monash Hospital toxicology registrar Laura Muldoon.
Four patients had been hospitalised after consuming a meal that contained mushrooms and Dr Muldoon asked for her help to identify the mushrooms, Dr Truong told the jury.
Dr Muldoon arranged to deliver the sample to the Royal Botanic Gardens national herbarium for the scientist to analyse. It arrived about 5pm but Dr Truong said she left work early that day.
A colleague brought the beef Wellington sample to Dr Truong's home, where she analysed it on her bench under a microscope.
She did not find any death cap mushroom pieces and put the remains into her fridge overnight, Dr Truong told the jury.
The next day she took the sample to the Royal Botanic Gardens where she re-examined it and again found the remnants did not contain death cap mushrooms.
'The mushroom I identified is called a field mushroom ... this is the typical mushrooms that you find in a supermarket,' Dr Truong said.
'That is the only mushroom that I found in this food item.'
Defence barrister Sophie Stafford earlier discussed a coronial report about a woman who died in May 2024 after making herself a meal out of mushrooms picked from her garden.
The elderly woman died from death cap mushroom poisoning, the jury was told.
Mushroom expert Thomas May said Victoria's Department of Health had contacted him about the recommendations, which included that more public health messaging was needed on the dangers of consuming wild mushrooms.
The trial before Justice Christopher Beale continues on Thursday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends
Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

West Australian

time19 hours ago

  • West Australian

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

Disagree. Disagree. Disagree. Those were Erin Patterson's responses to the prosecution's final three questions in her murder trial. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC rounded out her marathon cross-examination on Thursday with three suggestions: that Patterson deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms in 2023, deliberately included them in the beef Wellington she served her former in-laws and did so intending to kill them. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the murders of her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, his aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, and the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. She denies deliberately poisoning her lunch guests on July 29, 2023 when she served them meals that included death cap mushrooms. Patterson was accused of more lies on her eighth and final day in the witness box at the Supreme Court in Morwell in regional Victoria. The 50-year-old was asked about her evidence that she dehydrated dried mushrooms she had bought from an Asian grocer before adding them to the beef Wellingtons. She agreed she never said this to anyone at the time and didn't mention putting the fungi into the dehydrator when she earlier admitted adding them to the lunch. "I suggest this is another lie you made up on the spot," Dr Rogers said, accusing Patterson of hedging her bets to try to make it sound like there were multiple possible sources for the death cap mushrooms. "Incorrect," the accused killer responded. The prosecutor also suggested Patterson lied about taking diarrhoea treatment following the lunch after the 50-year-old earlier claimed one reason she went to hospital was because she thought they would have something stronger. Patterson agreed she did not tell medical staff at the hospital she had taken the medication, maintaining no one asked. "If you were looking for something stronger, you would've told medical staff you had already taken Imodium and it didn't work," Dr Rogers said. "I don't agree," Patterson responded. She was also questioned about her evidence that she had to stop by the side of a road and go to the toilet in the bushes while driving her son to a flying lesson, something the boy denied during his testimony. "I suggest he did not recall you stopping by the bushes on the side of the road because it did not happen ... I suggest this is another lie you told the jury about how you managed the trip to Tyabb," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson said. The mother-of-two said she had served her children reheated beef Wellington with the mushroom and pastry scraped off while she had a bowl of cereal the night after the deadly lunch. But Dr Rogers referred to her children's evidence, in which they suggested their mother had the same meal of leftovers the night after the fatal lunch. One of Patterson's children said she "ate the same as us", but Patterson told the court they were incorrect and denied eating the leftover food. She also denied that she "deliberately concealed" one of her phones, referred to at the trial as phone A, from police when they searched her house. Patterson said she switched from phone A to another, referred to as phone B, because the former was "not cutting it anymore". But the prosecution pointed to records that showed regular use from a SIM card in phone A until days after the mushroom lunch. Patterson said she conducted a factory reset of phone B because she wanted to use it and that was the phone she gave police. "I suggest to you that there was nothing wrong with phone A and this is another lie," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson responded. Under defence barrister Colin Mandy SC's re-examination, Patterson became emotional as she talked about her daughter's ballet lessons and son's flying lesson. With all evidence in the trial concluded, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors about discussions they could expect before dismissing them for the day.

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends
Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

Perth Now

time19 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Mushroom cook's triple denial as trial grilling ends

Disagree. Disagree. Disagree. Those were Erin Patterson's responses to the prosecution's final three questions in her murder trial. Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC rounded out her marathon cross-examination on Thursday with three suggestions: that Patterson deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms in 2023, deliberately included them in the beef Wellington she served her former in-laws and did so intending to kill them. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the murders of her estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, his aunt Heather Wilkinson, 66, and the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. She denies deliberately poisoning her lunch guests on July 29, 2023 when she served them meals that included death cap mushrooms. Patterson was accused of more lies on her eighth and final day in the witness box at the Supreme Court in Morwell in regional Victoria. The 50-year-old was asked about her evidence that she dehydrated dried mushrooms she had bought from an Asian grocer before adding them to the beef Wellingtons. She agreed she never said this to anyone at the time and didn't mention putting the fungi into the dehydrator when she earlier admitted adding them to the lunch. "I suggest this is another lie you made up on the spot," Dr Rogers said, accusing Patterson of hedging her bets to try to make it sound like there were multiple possible sources for the death cap mushrooms. "Incorrect," the accused killer responded. The prosecutor also suggested Patterson lied about taking diarrhoea treatment following the lunch after the 50-year-old earlier claimed one reason she went to hospital was because she thought they would have something stronger. Patterson agreed she did not tell medical staff at the hospital she had taken the medication, maintaining no one asked. "If you were looking for something stronger, you would've told medical staff you had already taken Imodium and it didn't work," Dr Rogers said. "I don't agree," Patterson responded. She was also questioned about her evidence that she had to stop by the side of a road and go to the toilet in the bushes while driving her son to a flying lesson, something the boy denied during his testimony. "I suggest he did not recall you stopping by the bushes on the side of the road because it did not happen ... I suggest this is another lie you told the jury about how you managed the trip to Tyabb," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson said. The mother-of-two said she had served her children reheated beef Wellington with the mushroom and pastry scraped off while she had a bowl of cereal the night after the deadly lunch. But Dr Rogers referred to her children's evidence, in which they suggested their mother had the same meal of leftovers the night after the fatal lunch. One of Patterson's children said she "ate the same as us", but Patterson told the court they were incorrect and denied eating the leftover food. She also denied that she "deliberately concealed" one of her phones, referred to at the trial as phone A, from police when they searched her house. Patterson said she switched from phone A to another, referred to as phone B, because the former was "not cutting it anymore". But the prosecution pointed to records that showed regular use from a SIM card in phone A until days after the mushroom lunch. Patterson said she conducted a factory reset of phone B because she wanted to use it and that was the phone she gave police. "I suggest to you that there was nothing wrong with phone A and this is another lie," Dr Rogers said. "Disagree," Patterson responded. Under defence barrister Colin Mandy SC's re-examination, Patterson became emotional as she talked about her daughter's ballet lessons and son's flying lesson. With all evidence in the trial concluded, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors about discussions they could expect before dismissing them for the day.

Mushroom cook denies ‘wild goose chase' claim
Mushroom cook denies ‘wild goose chase' claim

Perth Now

timea day ago

  • Perth Now

Mushroom cook denies ‘wild goose chase' claim

Alleged triple-murderer Erin Patterson has denied she led health authorities on a 'wild goose chase' as they probed the mushroom poisoning of her four lunch guests. Ms Patterson returned to the witness box at her Supreme Court trial in Morwell this week for her second week of giving evidence. The 50-year-old is facing trial after pleading not guilty to the murder of three of her husband's family members and the attempted murder of a fourth. Simon Patterson's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and aunt, Heather Wilkinson, died after eating a meal at Ms Patterson's home on July 29, 2023, in the country Victorian town of Leongatha. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty, telling the jury she did not intend to harm anyone. Brooke Grebert-Craig. Credit: Supplied Heather's husband, Ian Wilkinson survived after spending about a month and a half in hospital. Prosecutors allege Ms Patterson deliberately poisoned the guests with death cap mushrooms while her defence argues it was a tragic accident. Giving evidence last week, Ms Patterson maintained she used dried mushrooms in the deadly lunch which she had bought from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's east in about April 2023. She told the court she initially planned to use them in a pasta dish, but decided they would be too overpowering and stored them in a Tupperware container in her pantry. She said she now believes she may have added foraged wild mushrooms to that container. Ms Patterson's estranged husband Simon Patterson. NewsWire / David Geraghty Credit: News Corp Australia Facing questions from Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC on Wednesday, Ms Patterson was asked if she was worried about them being too strong for the beef Wellington. 'No, I didn't think that. I thought it was the perfect dish for them,' she responded. Dr Rogers went on to probe the exchange Ms Patterson had with Department of Health officer Sally Ann Atkinson about the Asian grocer. Dr Nanette Rogers is leading the prosecution for the Crown. NewsWire/Ian Currie Credit: News Corp Australia Ms Atkinson gave evidence she communicated with Ms Patterson over several days in earlier August amid a public health probe into the poisoning. Text messages and calls between the pair showed the public health officer attempting to narrow down the location of the store. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'very familiar' with the area, owning a home in Mount Waverley and having previously worked for Monash City Council. The accused woman disputed this, but did say she was familiar with the adjoining areas of Glen Waverley, Oakleigh and Clayton. Dr Rogers suggested Ms Patterson was 'deliberately vague' about the location of the Asian grocer because it was a lie. 'Incorrect,' Ms Patterson responded. 'I was doing my best to remember when it happened, but I think I was clear at all times that I didn't have a memory of the actual purchase.' The trial, now in its seventh week, continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store