FactFind: What do we know about Catherine Connolly's visit to Syria in 2018?
The trip, which involved visits to areas controlled by the since-toppled Assad regime as a civil war still raged across Syria, has been cited as a potential source of controversy.
Irish-Syrian are reported to have urged the Labour Party not to back Connolly's attempt to get on the ballot, the Irish Times
reported today
.
While facts about the trip had been scant, Connolly answered questions from reporters about the trip at her campaign launch on Wednesday.
What exactly did she say, does it tally with what we had already known, and why does it have the potential to become controversial?
The facts
Connolly went to Syria in June 2018, along with TDs Clare Daly, Mick Wallace, and Maureen O'Sullivan.
Images of the politicians were posted on the social media channels of Syrian organisations and news outlets on 27 June that year.
These images indicated that they visited the city of Aleppo, as well as the ruins of Yarmouk, a Palestinian refugee camp in Damascus that was destroyed during the civil war.
Both those areas were controlled by the Assad regime during the time of the delegation's visit.
Bashar al-Assad subsequently
fled to Russia
in late 2024, collapsing the Syrian government and ending his family's 50-year rule over the country.
The new Syrian government, run by a coalition of rebels led by Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), has promised a new
constitution and elections
, though their first months of rule have been
marred by violence
.
Speaking in the Dáil
in July 2018, Mick Wallace said that 'a group of Independents 4 Change travelled to Syria last week'.
(Connolly and O'Sullivan were in a technical group with Independents 4 Change, though were not members of the political party).
Daly then confirmed 'we spent the past week with some of our colleagues in Syria'.
Both TDs mentioned the visit to Aleppo, though neither mentioned Connolly by name. Nor was Connolly mentioned by name in Syrian social media posts, though she can be seen in photos taken at Aleppo.
Catherine Connolly, Clare Daly, and Mick Wallace in Aleppo in 2018.
In
an interview
with the Dublin Gazette published on 12 July, Daly is described as visiting Syria with 'other Independent TDs – Mick Wallace, Maureen O'Sullivan and Catherine Connolly – along with around 15 other people, including some who had been involved in the Irish Palestine Solidarity campaign'.
Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Connolly confirmed that she was one of four TDs who went on the trip, along with 'a number of community activists'.
Who was involved
Although the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign is frequently mentioned in news reports referencing the trip, it did not officially have any involvement.
In a statement to
The Journal
, the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign said: 'The Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC) did not organise, endorse, or participate in, any trip to Syria and has no specific knowledge regarding the trip in question.
'The IPSC does not arrange fact-finding delegations to any states, nor does it engage in trips sponsored by states or quasi-state actors. We were not contacted or invited on this, or any other trip to Syria, and we have never had any contact with the former or current Syrian governments, nor with anyone acting on behalf of either.'
In an email to
The Journal
, a spokesperson for the campaign also clarified that they were unsure if any IPSC members took part in a private capacity.
They noted that people sometimes say they are part of 'the 'Irish Palestine solidarity campaign' or whatever, when what they actually mean is they're part of the wider Palestine solidarity movement in Ireland'.
A spokesperson for Connolly said that the trip had been coordinated by a number of pro-Palestinian activists.
Advertisement
During her speech in the Dáil in July 2018, Daly indicated that the TDs all paid for themselves (none had declared the trip as a gift in their declaration of interests for that year).
'For the record, we paid for ourselves, went where we liked and talked to whom we liked,' Daly said.
On Wednesday, Connolly also stated that she had funded her own trip.
Motivations
Given her lack of public comments on the trip, it had until this week been unclear exactly what Connolly's motivations for going were.
However, she did make comments on a previous trip to Syria taken by Daly and Wallace's in 2017.
Speaking against sanctions on Syria in the Dáil
in December 2017
, Connolly mentioned that previous trip taken to Syria by Daly and Wallace.
'I thank Deputies Wallace and Daly and the small number of others who accompanied them to Syria and saw for themselves the circumstances on the ground. Perhaps the Minister will listen to them. There is no propaganda here,' Connolly said.
'It is following a visit to Syria and a tremendous amount of research that we stand here tonight to say we do not support the sanctions.'
The EU lifted all economic sanctions against Syria
in May 2025
after the fall of the Assad government.
However, Connolly on Wednesday clarified that she went on the 2018 trip 'for the purpose of fact-finding' and initially attempted to visit a refugee camp outside Beirut in Lebanon, though had been unsuccessful.
Connolly said that during the trip she met 'no member of [the Syrian] government', and confirmed she had been at the refugee camp in Damascus, as well as Aleppo.
'We met the chamber of commerce,' she said. 'We had a meeting with Unicef. We went into a convent and met a nun.'
She summarised, 'On no occasion had I anything to do with the government, nor did I utter one word of support for Assad.'
A spokesperson said Connolly has had no contact with the Assad regime since.
Christina Finn
/ X (Formerly Twitter)
Controversy
There is some controversy over the trip, as certain groups have argued that visiting areas in Syria under the Assad regime could be stage-managed propaganda.
Daly denied that this was the case in her Dáil speech.
What we know
Photos published on Syrian social media accounts show Daly and Wallace being shown around the Yarmouk refugee camp by men dressed in military fatigues.
A spokesperson for Connolly said that these were members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine – General Command (PFLP-GP), which fought on the side of Assad during the civil war. The PFLP is now, and
was in 2018
, designated a terrorist organisation by the EU.
The Irish tour group was also shown around Aleppo by the pro-Assad commentator Fares Al-Shehabi, who was described as the head of the city's chamber of commerce.
Al-Shehabi, who appears in photos with Connolly, had been
put under sanctions
by the EU for supporting the Assad regime.
The
year before
the Irish delegation's visit, he posted on social media that a seven-year-old who said Assad was committing a Holocaust should die. He would later go on to say that anti-Assad journalists
should be raped
.
Speaking in the Dáil
the week after the trip, Daly called for the government to issue a visa to Al-Shehabi 'so that he might come to Ireland as a businessman and Sunni Muslim who believes in secular values and talk about what has happened in Syria'.
A spokesperson for Connolly said that the tour and its itinerary were arranged by a travel agency that had been active in Syria for decades. Meeting with Al-Shehabi was 'not an endorsement', a spokesperson said, and Connolly 'wasn't entirely aware of who he was' at the time.
The spokesperson also said that, before, Connolly only had a idea of what a refugee camp was, but the trip 'opened her eyes to the reality of displacement.'
Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new
FactCheck Knowledge Bank
for guides and toolkits
The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it
here
. For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide
here
. You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks
here
.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions.
We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support.
Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Almost 600 people dead in Syria as US refuses to back Israel over strikes
SYRIAN TROOPS HAVE pulled out of the southern province Druze heartland of Sweida on the orders of the Islamist-led government, following days of deadly clashes and strikes by Israel that killed nearly 600 people, according to a war monitor. The southern province has been gripped by deadly sectarian bloodshed since Sunday , with hundreds reportedly killed in clashes pitting Druze fighters against Sunni Bedouin tribes and the army and its allies. A US State Department spokesperson said that Washington 'did not support' the Israeli strikes on Syria – the country has been trying to establish fresh relations with the new Syrian government. The city of Sweida was desolate as of yesterday, AFP correspondents on the ground reported, with shops looted, homes burnt and bodies in the streets. 'What I saw of the city looked as if it had just emerged from a flood or a natural disaster,' Hanadi Obeid, a 39-year-old doctor, told AFP. Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa said in a televised speech that community leaders would resume control over security in Sweida 'based on the supreme national interest', after the deployment of government troops on Tuesday fuelled the intercommunal bloodshed and prompted Israeli military intervention. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that 594 people had been killed in clashes in Sweida province since Sunday. The UN's humanitarian agency, OCHA, said that 'nearly 2,000 families have been displaced' by the violence across the province. Who are the Druze? The Druze community are an Arabic-speaking religious minority who primarily have communities in Syria, Lebanon and in the occupied Golan Heights. Israel, which views the Druze as a loyal minority who often serve in the military, claimed it's trying to protect the community from the new Syrian government in Damascus. While Israel has presented itself as a defender of the group, its actions have also been viewed as a pretext for pursuing its own military goal of keeping Syrian government forces away from the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. In Syria, the Druze have been divided over how to deal with the country's new leaders, with some advocating for integrating into the new system while others have remained suspicious of the authorities in Damascus and pushed for an autonomous Druze region. A map showing the border area between the Golan and Southern Syria. Israel had hammered government troops with air strikes during their brief deployment in Sweida and also struck targets in and around the capital Damascus, including the military headquarters, warning that its attacks would intensify until the government pulled back. Advertisement The Observatory reported that three people were killed in Damascus by the Israeli strikes. Syria's state-run news agency SANA later reported the first Israeli attack on the area since government forces withdrew, with strikes on the outskirts of Sweida. The Syrian presidency meanwhile accused Druze fighters in Sweida of violating the ceasefire that led to the withdrawal of government forces. In a statement, the presidency accused 'outlaw forces' of violating the agreement through 'horrific violence' against civilians. The presidency also warned against 'continued blatant Israeli interference in Syria's internal affairs, which only leads to further chaos and destruction and further complicates the regional situation'. US mediation The Syrian president also hit out at Israel's military intervention, saying that it would have pushed 'matters to a large-scale escalation, except for the effective intervention of American, Arab and Turkish mediation, which saved the region from an unknown fate'. The United States — a close ally of Israel that has been trying to reboot its relationship with Syria — said late Wednesday that an agreement had been reached to restore calm in the area, urging 'all parties to deliver on the commitments they have made'. A US State Department spokesperson said that Washington 'did not support (the) recent Israeli strikes'. Foreign ministers from 11 countries in the region, including the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, affirmed their support for the Syrian government in a joint statement released by the United Arab Emirates' foreign ministry on Thursday. They strongly condemned the Israeli attacks, describing them as a 'blatant violation of international law and a flagrant assault on Syria's sovereignty', the statement said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday that the ceasefire was a result of his country's 'powerful action'. Israel, which has its own Druze community, has presented itself as a defender of the group, although some analysts say that is a pretext for pursuing its own military goal of keeping Syrian government forces away from the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Dozens of Druze gathered in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights on Thursday, hoping to catch a glimpse of relatives on the Syrian-held side who might try to cross the barbed-wire frontier. Qamar Abu Saleh, a 36-year-old educator, said that some people 'opened the fence and entered, and people from Syria also started crossing here'. 'It was like a dream, and we still can't believe it happened.' © Agence France-Presse
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Occupied Territories Bill: Irish voters grow more cautious, poll shows
Voters have become more cautious on the Occupied Territories Bill in recent months, with almost half of all voters now favouring either not passing the Bill or investigating the possible consequences for Ireland before passing it. Just one-fifth of voters (20 per cent) say the Bill should be passed quickly, with a further 14 per cent saying its scope should be expanded and it should be passed quickly. About 38 per cent of people, however, say the Government 'should investigate possible consequences for Ireland before passing the Bill', while a further 10 per cent are opposed to passing the Bill at all. The Bill, which is being discussed by the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee and is due before the Dáil in the autumn, would ban trade in goods with the occupied Palestinian territories. READ MORE Pro-Palestine activists and Opposition parties want the Government to include a ban on trade in services – which Ministers have said they are open to examining. However, the Bill has been fiercely criticised as anti-Semitic by the Israeli government, by US politicians and by representatives of Jewish groups in Ireland, not least because it singles out Israel among participants in many global conflicts. There is significant nervousness in Government about the possible economic consequences of passing the legislation. There is also strong support, however, for the Palestinians and a sense that Ireland is taking a leading role in the EU in advocating on their behalf. Today's poll suggests that the public has shifted towards a more cautious position. When the subject was raised in the last Irish Times poll in April, a small majority of those who expressed a view said the Government should introduce the Bill as soon as possible, outnumbering those who favoured either pausing or dropping it altogether. Today's poll shows the balance has shifted. The 'net pass' number – including those who want the Bill passed as it is now or with the inclusion of services – is 34 per cent; the 'net don't pass' number – including those who want to wait and consider the consequences and those who want to drop it altogether – is 48 per cent. [ Taoiseach rejects US politicians' claims that Occupied Territories Bill is 'diplomatic intoxication' Opens in new window ] The poll was conducted among a representative sample of adults aged 18 years and upwards across 120 sampling points throughout all constituencies. The Irish Times/Ipsos B & A series is conducted through face-to-face sampling; personal in-home interviewing took place on July 14th and 15th. The number of interviews conducted was 1,200. The accuracy is estimated at plus or minus 2.8 per cent. Meanwhile, head of employers' group Ibec , Danny McCoy, citing concerns about the consequences for business, said the Bill was 'hypocritical'. 'We're not talking about millions here,' he declared. 'This is not about actually helping in any material way. It's symbolism and moral positioning, and so on. However, with moral positions, you can also reveal hypocrisy.' Ireland's stand on Israel is 'well intentioned', he said, but it is 'causing us significant damage. Quantifying it is really difficult, but we know it is going to have consequences'. [ Irish Times poll: Shift in public mood noted on Occupied Territories Bill Opens in new window ] The head of Amnesty International has urged Ireland to resist 'bullying' from the US and pass the Bill, which she said would be a 'precedent', in the autumn. After meetings with Taoiseach Micheál Martin, President Michael D Higgins and Attorney General Rossa Fanning, Agnes Callamard told The Irish Times she believed the Government's assessment was that the costs would be 'minimal' . 'I felt that there was a prudent recognition that the cost could be handled,' Ms Callamard said. 'That it is not something that will be a determining factor.'
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘Labour wants me out' – Diane Abbott suspended for second time for repeating racism claim on Jewish, Irish and Traveller communities
The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said the Labour leadership 'wants me out' and that her comments in a BBC interview released this week were 'factually correct'. It comes a day after Keir Starmer stripped the whip from four Labour MPs for persistent breaches of discipline. Ms Abbott, the longest-serving female MP in the Commons, lost the whip and had a lengthy stint sitting as an independent after she suggested in 2023 that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. She apologised for those remarks at the time and was eventually readmitted to the party just in time to stand as a Labour candidate in the 2024 general election. But in a BBC interview released this week, she said she did not regret the incident. 'Diane Abbott has been administratively suspended from the Labour Party, pending an investigation. We cannot comment further while this investigation is ongoing,' a Labour spokesperson said. Ms Abbott posted a clip of her BBC interview after news of her suspension emerged. She did not respond to a request for comment, but gave a statement to BBC Newsnight. 'It is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out. 'My comments in the interview with James Naughtie were factually correct, as any fair-minded person would accept,' she said. The original comments in 2023 were in a letter to The Observer newspaper, and she withdrew the remarks the same day and apologised 'for any anguish caused'. In the interview with BBC Radio 4's Reflections programme, she was asked whether she looked back on the incident with regret. 'No, not at all,' she said. 'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know. 'You don't know unless you stop to speak to them or you're in a meeting with them. 'But if you see a black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're black. There are different types of racism.' She added: 'I just think that it's silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was asked if she was disappointed by the comments. 'I was. There's no place for antisemitism in the Labour Party, and obviously the Labour Party has processes for that,' she told The Guardian newspaper. 'Diane had reflected on how she'd put that article together, and said that 'was not supposed to be the version', and now to double down and say 'Well, actually I didn't mean that. I actually meant what I originally said', I think is a real challenge.' Ms Abbott entered Parliament in 1987 and holds the honorary title of Mother of the House. Her suspension comes in the same week that Keir Starmer carried out a purge of troublesome backbenchers in a bid to assert authority over the party. Rachael Maskell, who spearheaded plans to halt the Government's welfare reforms, had the whip suspended alongside Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff. Party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion.
