'Very tense, very scary': Calgary couple visiting Kashmir caught in crossfire
Social Sharing
Syed Arshid Hussain and his wife travelled to Pakistan-administered Kashmir to visit his 85-year-old mother, who lives there, just about a week before the current escalation began between India and Pakistan.
The Calgary couple is staying in a village about 20 kilometres from the Line of Control — the de facto border between Indian and Pakistani-run Kashmir — where Hussain said he could still hear cross-border firing, despite the ceasefire deal between the two nuclear-armed nations.
"We can hear the firing and it's very tense, very scary," he told the Calgary Eyeopener on Monday. "I don't know when it can escalate again, the way it is going."
The recent escalation between India and Pakistan has left dozens dead and injured on both sides of the border — the majority of them in Kashmir.
While the ceasefire seems largely to be holding across the two countries for now, Hafsa Kanjwal, an associate professor of South Asian history at Lafayette College in Pennsylvania, warns the deal does not necessarily equate to peace for the Kashmiri people.
"I am, of course, relieved that a broader regional escalation has been prevented with a ceasefire as such. But in the Kashmir region, there's never really a ceasefire," she said.
"Kashmir continues to always be at the receiving end of violence."
Kashmir the 'flashpoint' of India-Pakistan conflict
Over the four days of back-and-forth strikes between India and Pakistan, Hussain said he and his family have been bracing themselves as missiles and drones fly across the night sky and explosions are heard not so far away.
Hussain, who is the president of the Kashmir Canada Association of Calgary, has advocated for peace in the region for years.
India and Pakistan's dispute over Kashmir has spanned nearly eight decades, dating back to 1947, when India became independent from the British and the partition began to establish the state of Pakistan.
"Kashmiris were promised a plebiscite or some sort of referendum [to decide their own future] back in the late '40s, and up until now that hasn't happened. And Kashmiris have tried to push that right to self-determination using peaceful means, sometimes using armed means," Kanjwal explained.
"There is both a sense of fatigue, exhaustion in Kashmir, [and] the feeling that the whole world only pays attention to the region when things become volatile between India and Pakistan."
"The Kashmir issue is the flashpoint between these two nuclear countries," Hussain said.
"And if that issue is not resolved, I don't see any ceasefire or any negotiation that will bring peace in this part of the world."
The pathway to peace
Riyaz Khawaja, a Calgarian who is originally from Srinagar, a city in the Indian-administered side of Kashmir, visits his parents back home frequently. He said the whole back-and-forth has been a major stress for the entire valley.
"There was a lot of panic everywhere," Khawaja said. "They announced the ceasefire [so] there's a bit of relief on everyone and hope that the ceasefire commitment stays on both sides and the peace will return."
The ceasefire, first announced Saturday by U.S. President Donald Trump on Truth Social, breaks from the usual tradition of international actors staying out — at least publicly — of India and Pakistan's affairs, according to Kanjwal.
In a later post, Trump said, "I will work with you both to see if, after a thousand years, a solution can be arrived at, concerning Kashmir."
While the dispute has not played out over a "thousand years," Kanjwal clarified, the move by Trump to help negotiate a resolution has "inadvertently" internationalized the conflict in a way it hasn't been in the past.
Whatever may come of this development, Kanjwal said the pathway to lasting peace will need India and Pakistan to demilitarize the region and make space for Kashmiris to have a voice at the negotiating table.
Both Khawaja and Hussain, from opposite sides of the Line of Control, said they felt the same way — that the Kashmiri people need to be included.
Coming home to Calgary
Hussain told the Eyeopener his children in Canada are very concerned for him and his wife, calling every half-hour to check on them.
The couple were originally scheduled to return to Canada this week, but now he says he's waiting on his airline to rebook him.
Since the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, both Indian and Pakistani airspace has been shut down for periods of time.
But even when he does get a flight out of the region, coming home to Canada won't be the breath of relief it should be for Hussain. His elderly mother will be left behind.
"It's very stressful because when I see my almost 86-year-old mother, seeing her after three years and now I just like … I don't know how to decide to leave her in a situation like this and then go back to Canada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
41 minutes ago
- CBC
'We are very nimble': Calgary mayor keeps door open to G7 white hatting
With a little more than a week to go before world leaders arrive in Kananaskis, Alta., for the G7 summit, Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek said she is ready to continue the city's white hat ceremony tradition if logistics allow. "We are happy to white hat any of the dignitaries that are coming to town," Gondek said in an interview Friday. "We have been patient as the government has been figuring out their plans, and as dignitaries are determining how they will be traveling in and through our city." On Wednesday, a Tourism Calgary spokesperson said that "given the complexity around security and the event, at this time, there are no plans for our team to conduct a white hat ceremony for G7." Alberta's ministry of tourism and sport also said it's not planning a ceremony for the G7. Federal organizers with the G7 haven't responded to requests for comment. The Smithbilt cowboy hat has long been presented to visitors as a symbol of the city's hospitality. In 2002, then-Calgary mayor Dave Bronconnier greeted G8 leaders on the Calgary airport tarmac, including former U.S. president George W. Bush and former French president Jacques Chirac. Gondek emphasized the significance of the gesture. "We are known for our hospitality and our volunteerism and our ability to make people feel so welcome when they visit our city," Gondek said. "It's a really good symbol of who we are." Unclear which leaders will travel through Calgary While there's currently no ceremony planned, Gondek confirmed she is scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Mark Carney and said she's awaiting further guidance from officials. "We are very nimble and responsive to whatever the situation may be. And if there's an opportunity to do something bigger and more formal, obviously we will be engaging with any partners that we can," she said. Asked if she would be open to white hatting all G7 leaders, including U.S. President Donald Trump amid ongoing trade tensions, Gondek said any such plans would depend on travel logistics and who actually passes through Calgary. "I can't deal in hypotheticals, but as opportunities come up, we'll definitely evaluate them," she said. The G7 summit in Kananaskis is set to run from June 15 to 17 and has been referred to by officials as one of the most complex domestic security operations a country can undertake, with thousands of personnel deployed across the region. Gondek said the city has been working closely with the Calgary Police Service to ensure any traffic detours that need to be put into place are being done as quickly as possible. She also noted the airport tunnel's closure from June 15 to 18. "We are advising all employees, all travelers, anyone going to businesses in that vicinity that you won't have access to the tunnel," she said. "There's [also] a lot of motorcade drills that are happening in the city right now. So it's best to give yourself a little bit of extra time." Officials from the United States, France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and Canada, as well as the European Union, are scheduled to attend this year's summit.
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Letters to the editor, June 7: ‘The AI revolution needs thoughtful regulation'
Re 'In its bid to rescue Afghans, Ottawa is fracturing their families' (Opinion, May 31): I can only imagine the relentlessly pounding and debilitating terror one must feel while anxiously awaiting safe passage out of Pakistan. I cannot understand why the Canadian immigration system is unable or, I shudder to think, unwilling to fix its flaw and expedite family unification on Canadian soil, given that many of these Afghans were indispensable allies for Canadians stationed in Afghanistan during the war. Perhaps a few terse pointers from Mark Carney could do the trick. Elsewhere, nearly 60 Afghan women's rights defenders have also been hiding in Pakistan ('Afghan women activists in Pakistan fear deportation as country cracks down on refugees' – April 22). Surely the Canadian government can do something to help these courageous women escape the awaiting brutality of both the Pakistani police and the Taliban. L.H. MacKenzie Vancouver Re 'A real reform mandate for the first federal AI minister' (Editorial, May 31): The artificial intelligence revolution needs thoughtful regulation. Another important AI-specific element of Evan Solomon's mandate letter should be policies to promote deployment of digital technologies by Canadian business to reskill and upskill our workforce, and to develop new products and services. Canada lags many countries, especially the United States, with the digital economy previously estimated by the Bank of Canada to account for as little as 5.5 per cent of GDP. Moreover, research shows that Canada faces serious digital skill shortages that are impacting labour supply, business efficiencies and growth. In the Industrial Revolution, it was the deployment of the steam engine that spurred economic growth through innovations worldwide. We should keep in mind that in the past, shared prosperity emerged only when technological advances were made to work for everyone. Which brings us back to the importance of sound regulation. Paul Jenkins Ottawa Re 'How to win a trade war: Canada, Trump and a delicate dance in asymmetric warfare' (Report on Business, May 31): 'Play defence: Reform our corporate tax regime.' One thing I am almost certain of in life is that corporate tax experts will never say such taxes are too low; they are always too high. The result is a race to the bottom, where less and less government revenue comes from corporate taxes. Where that process ends is obvious to me. How about approaching the issue from a different perspective: Who benefits from government spending? Canada has a track record of providing a safe, law-abiding environment within which corporations and their shareholders can have confidence that business can prosper. Should not the beneficiaries of programs requiring government expenditures to create that environment (defence spending being an example) pay their fair share of the costs? If for no other reason than to reverse income disparities between the very rich and the very poor, corporate taxes should not be cut any further. Peter Love Toronto Re 'How a Montreal family, a Baghdad embassy and the French government became entwined in a legal drama' (May 30): I would like to add another piece to your fascinating story on the Lawee family home being used as the French embassy in Baghdad. In the summer of 1981, I led a 10-person team in Baghdad for the initial research phase of Canadian architect Arthur Erickson's master plan for a 3.5-kilometre stretch of the Tigris riverfront and adjacent inland areas. Our team members were responsible for the detailed inventory and assessment of all 1,400 buildings within the Abu Nuwas Conservation/Development Project. They recalled one morning sitting in the office of our client, the chief architect of Baghdad, when it somehow came out that the French embassy was slated for demolition that day. When they hastily pointed out that the building had been earmarked in our report as heritage to be saved, our client picked up the phone, then and there, and the destruction was halted. Alan Bell Vancouver Re 'The perils of keeping identity hidden from kids conceived by sperm donors' (Opinion, May 31): Contributor Aviva Coopersmith details her bumpy conception story and the excruciatingly slow pace that donor-conceived persons in Canada and the greater world endure to maybe, possibly, someday gain greater access to their genetic past so they can fully own their present and future. My heart goes out to Ms. Coopersmith. I am the dad of a perfect two-year-old donor-conceived girl. I often lie awake at night worrying that my daughter will grow up with similar worries and wonderings. This is why I joined the board of Donor Conception Canada, a non-profit that helps people grappling with donor conception, be they prospective parents, active parents, donors or donor-conceived persons. We are all in this together. Joshua Levy Montreal Re 'Cattle have roamed Cambridge's city centre for hundreds of years. GPS is keeping the tradition going' (June 4): Very charming tradition. However, one minor – major? – problem has not been mentioned. I am talking about the rather copious amounts of 'pasture pastry' from each of the lovely beasts. How does the city deal with it: Cow diapers? Udder underwear? Just asking. Baily Seshagiri Ottawa Re 'I no longer knew how to find God, so nature became my church' (First Person, June 5): In a COVID-19 world, some have not returned to church. However, as rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel wrote, 'faith is faithfulness.' Authentic worship is a discipline, an exercise. It is not only about what we receive, it is about what we give. As the essay-writer acknowledges, there is no similar community in communing with nature. I used to say that the church would always be there when people choose to return to it. Not any more. Many congregations struggle to survive. When people do not attend their local church, they often do not support it. If she chooses to go back to church one day, I hope it is there for her. Keith McKee Reverend London, Ont. I appreciate the essay-writer's awakening to the world around her in nature. I call nature God's first scripture. The parallels between outdoor sanctuary and wooden pews and stained glass are true: They are spaces to inspire, to inhale the spirit. I don't go to church to meet God; God is everywhere. I go to meet others along the way, and am determined to create a space where we are awakened, comforted, tear-soaked and then sent outdoors to nature ready to bring love to feed the lost and lonely creatures of the world. For me, there is a call to engage and transform the world, one goldfinch or silver-haired human at a time. John Pentland Reverend Hillhurst United Church; Calgary .................................................................................................................................. Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@
CBC
5 hours ago
- CBC
Indigenous business leaders support push to build major projects — but want 'terms that work for us'
Social Sharing Indigenous business leaders gathered outside Calgary this week for an energy industry conference say they're not opposed to building major projects quickly — in fact, they're all for it. But as Ontario and B.C. pass bills criticized by First Nations in those provinces for trampling on their rights in the service of fast-tracking infrastructure, they warn that Canada risks backsliding into a more contentious relationship with Indigenous communities that will ultimately delay projects further. "Broadly speaking, are First Nations or Indigenous communities opposed to development? Absolutely not. Are we opposed to resource projects? Absolutely not. Energy generation? Absolutely not. We want to participate on terms that work for us," said John Rowinski, CEO of the Zhooniya Makak Limited Partnership with Hiawatha First Nation, who is from the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte near Belleville, Ont. "Frankly, they would likely find much less opposition to these projects if they showed a willingness to talk in advance as opposed to after the fact," he said in an interview. WATCH | Why Ontario's Bill 5 has sparked opposition: Ontario passes Bill 5 despite opposition from First Nations, environmental groups 2 days ago Duration 2:39 Doug Ford's government has passed the controversial Bill 5 that aims to speed up mining projects and other developments in areas deemed to have economic importance. As CBC's Lorenda Reddekopp reports, the move has sparked outrage among First Nations and environmental groups. Amid an increasingly tumultuous trade relationship with the U.S., politicians at both the federal and provincial levels have been scrambling to show they can get major projects built quickly and boost the country's economy. But recent bills passed in Ontario and B.C. aimed at speeding up major projects have already been subject to significant criticism from First Nations. In both provinces, the legislation includes an aim to fast-track projects that could include critical mineral mines and has been met with concern from First Nations that it could trample over their rights. In Ontario, Premier Doug Ford has said he will consult with First Nations over the coming months, while in B.C., Infrastructure Minister Bowinn Ma said she will "work to come back together" and heal any rifts that have been created. The federal Liberal government also tabled a bill Friday that pledges to advance national interest projects, in part by speeding up approvals from five years to two. The Assembly of First Nations, which met with Prime Minister Mark Carney on Thursday, has previously said that while it supports efforts to protect Canada from geopolitical uncertainty, it had concerns that draft legislation could " violate many collective rights of First Nations." In a statement, a spokesperson for the federal government said the proposed act recognizes that Indigenous consultation and partnership are key to building projects in the national interest. "To that end, Section 35 rights are constitutionally protected. There is no possibility of any government overriding those rights. This legislation acknowledges that and considers Indigenous consultation and partnership as integral," said Gabriel Brunet, a spokesperson for Dominic LeBlanc, who is the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade and intergovernmental affairs. Pro-development, to a point Business leaders gathered in Alberta this week say they agree with the urgency of getting projects built and diversifying trade away from the U.S. "I see Canada as one of the richest countries in the world with our resources, we just need to get it to market," said Karen Ogen, CEO of the First Nations Natural Gas Alliance and former elected chief of the Wet'suwet'en First Nation in B.C., speaking on the sidelines of the Indigenous Cleaner Energy Forum on Tsuut'ina Nation, just west of Calgary. Until this point, Ogen said Canada had been making progress in how capital projects are built in partnership with First Nations, with more and more communities participating through an equity stake. She pointed to the in-development Cedar LNG project off the coast of B.C., a collaboration between Calgary-based Pembina Pipeline Corp. and the Haisla First Nation. "That's a showcase for the rest of Canada, for the rest of B.C., that this is how projects get built." WATCH | First Indigenous-owned natural gas export facility in the world approved in B.C.: B.C. approves first Indigenous-owned LNG project in Canada 2 years ago Duration 1:57 Another positive step, Ogen said, is the Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program, which facilitates access to capital for Indigenous communities and was recently doubled from $5 billion to $10 billion. But Ogen said the bills out of Ontario and B.C. are a move in the wrong direction, and that First Nations won't be afraid to push back. "If there's going to be opposition and blockades, so be it, the government has to listen," said Ogen, who noted the federal bill does seem to include Indigenous people, but that she hopes this inclusion is meaningful. Steven Vaivada, CEO of Scout Engineering and a member of the Kainai First Nation in southern Alberta, agrees. He said that while Canada certainly needs more development, governments could end up undermining their own plans if they try to rush projects forward without including First Nations. "Indigenous opposition occurs when rights and title and the duty to consult and free, prior and informed consent are not incorporated into these discussions and legislation that's put forward," he said in an interview. In the long run, Glenn Hudson, former Chief of Peguis First Nation in Manitoba, said collaboration with First Nations will also help ensure projects are built with sufficient environmental protection. "That in itself will also protect the settlers of this country in terms of their sustainability going forward," Hudson, who is also CEO of Sovereign Energy Projects, told CBC News. As global demand for electricity ramps up, Rowinski, with the Zhooniya Makak Limited Partnership, said there's plenty of opportunity for Canada — but dialogue between different levels of government and First Nations is critical. "We're very fractured as a nation right now," he said. "We've got a history that we can learn from, so it's time to sit down, roll up our sleeves and work together to build on from that history so the future is that much better."
