
US defense secretary's aides reportedly used polygraphs to root out leaks
The polygraphs came at a time of profound upheaval in his office, as Hegseth opened a leak investigation and sought to identify the culprits by any means necessary after a series of sensitive disclosures and unflattering stories.
But the polygraphs became contentious after the aides who were targeted questioned whether they were even official, given at least one polygraph was ordered without Hegseth's direct knowledge and sparked an intervention by a Trump adviser who does not work at the Pentagon.
The fraught episode involved Hegseth's lawyer and part-time navy commander Tim Parlatore seeking to polygraph Patrick Weaver, a senior adviser to the secretary who was at the White House in Donald Trump's first term and has ties to deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the people said.
When Weaver learned of his impending polygraph, he complained to associates that he had been suspected without evidence, the people said. That led the external Trump adviser to take his complaint to Hegseth – only for Hegseth to say he did not even know about the test.
The external Trump adviser called Parlatore on his cell phone to shut down the impending polygraph, shouting down the line that in Trump's second term, career employees did not get to question political appointees, according to two people familiar with the conversation.
Weaver does not appear to have escalated his complaint to the White House, telling associates that he preferred not to bother Miller with problems. Earlier reports suggested the White House intervened on Weaver's behalf but the people said the White House learned of it after it was cancelled.
A White House spokesperson declined to comment. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement: 'The Department will not comment on an ongoing investigation.'
The extraordinary episode underscored ongoing concerns around Hegseth's ability to manage the Pentagon – he is still facing an inspector general report into his disclosure in a Signal chat about US strikes against the Houthis – and why a Trump adviser ended up staging an intervention.
Weaver's cancelled polygraph was earlier reported by the Washington Post. But the effort at the Pentagon to weed out leakers with lie detector tests continued against uniformed military officers even after the incident with Weaver, three of the people said.
Hegseth's then-military aide and current acting chief of staff Ricky Buria at one point ordered polygraphs against several people connected to possible and perceived rivals at the Pentagon including senior adviser Eric Geressy, despite his own polygraph coming back as inconclusive.
Buria, who is said not to care for Geressy, did not order a polygraph against him in the wake of the Weaver incident. Instead, the people said, he ordered polygraphs for officers who worked for Geressy, including Hegseth's military assistants Capt William Francis, a former navy Seal, and Col Mike Loconsolo.
In an additional twist, the polygraphs for the uniformed officials became fraught after one person complained his had not been conducted by the Defense Intelligence Agency but a defense department contractor, and was separately told his polygraph could just double as being for his regular background investigation, two people familiar with the matter said.
Hegseth himself threatened polygraphs to catch leakers, including against two top military officials, the Wall Street Journal earlier reported: navy Adm Christopher Grady, the vice chair of the joint chiefs of staff, and army Lt Gen Douglas Sims, the director of the joint staff.
According to two people familiar with the case of Sims, Buria had privately suggested that he might have played a role in leaking a classified plan for the Panama canal to NBC News, among other transgressions that included an allegation that Sims had been disrespectful.
While it does not appear that Sims was actually polygraphed, Hegseth revoked his promotion to a four star general, despite earlier agreeing to the move at the recommendation of multiple career and political officials, the New York Times earlier reported.
Hegseth told Sims that his connections to Gen Mark Milley, the former chief of the joint staff that Trump hates, were disqualifying – although Sims had ironically helped remove Milley's portrait off the wall at the Pentagon when Hegseth arrived at the Pentagon, one of the people said.
Several officials, including the chairman of the joint chiefs Gen Dan Caine, told Hegseth that Sims was not a leaker and deserved better. Hegseth told officials he would sleep on it but never revisited the matter, the people said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump team has created a secret list ranking companies on how loyal they are
The White House is reportedly maintaining a list of more than 500 companies that are ranked in order of willingness to work with the Trump administration and support the president's agenda. The spreadsheet, which ranks companies based on low, moderate, or strong support, is supposed to serve as a reference for White House staffers when they're speaking with representatives from the companies, a senior administration official told Axios. Several factors determine a company's ranking, including attendance at White House events, engagement in promoting or supporting Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, writing press releases, making social media posts, and more. Companies considered 'strong' have expressed support for Trump's agenda by praising industry-specific perks in Trump's bill, such as no taxes on tips or investments in infrastructure. Other 'strong' companies have made prominent investments in the United States to support Trump's tariff goal. While most the companies on the list remain secret, examples of 'good partners,' Axios says, includes Uber, DoorDash, United, Delta and AT&T, Cisco, Airlines for America and the Steel Manufacturers Association. The Independent has asked the White House for comment. Demonstrating a desire or willingness to work with the administration yields rewards in the form of federal investments or beneficial policies. However, those who push back on Trump have had federal funding revoked or been passed up for opportunities. One recent example is Apple's $600 billion investment in the U.S. to accelerate artificial intelligence development and establish supply chain production. Over the last few months, the tech giant has faced the possibility of higher consumer prices on its products, most of which are made overseas, due to Trump's tariffs. That possibility became almost a reality after the president said he would implement tariffs on semiconductors But those fears were settled during Trump's press conference with Apple CEO Tim Cook to announce the investment when the president revealed major exemptions for the semiconductor tariff. "If groups/companies want to start advocating more now for the tax bill or additional administration priorities, we will take that into account in our grading," the unnamed White House official told Axios. During the Apple press conference, Cook also presented Trump with a 24k gold and glass statue created by the tech company. Trump, a known lover of lavish gifts, has recently received several trophies from organizations he's collaborating with. He was gifted a set of vintage Olympic medals while announcing the task force for the 2028 Los Angeles Summer Olympics. He was also given a $400 million Boeing jet from the Qatari royal family to serve as a new Air Force One. He was also gifted the inaugural Club World Cup trophy by FIFA President Gianni Infantino Other companies have taken similar steps to align themselves closer with Trump in the hopes of getting on the president's good side. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the company would scrap its fact checkers on Facebook – which Trump allies often assert was biased toward liberals. policies, which Trump has long bashed. Other tech leaders have praised Trump or shown up at White House events to get on the president's good side. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who was at Trump's inauguration, was one of the companies to score a lucrative AI deal with the administration.


The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump officials wanted to give Musk's xAI a huge contract. Staffers had to explain Grok had just praised Hitler
Donald Trump 's administration was close to giving Elon Musk 's xAI artificial intelligence company a huge federal contract this summer, only to back out after its chatbot, Grok, began issuing antisemitic slurs, according to a report. According to Wired, emails between several AI developers and the General Services Administration, which is responsible for administering government tech contracts, chart how the proposed partnership fell apart as Musk's pet project began dabbling in Nazi rhetoric. In early June, around the time the president and the tech billionaire suffered a spectacular public falling out, exchanging barbed personal insults over their competing social media platforms, the GSA's leadership was meeting with the xAI team 'to see what opportunities may exist for automation and streamlining,' according to the outlet. Their initial two-hour sitdown was reportedly a success, prompting the GSA to pursue the company with enthusiasm, hoping to see Grok integrated into its internal infrastructure as part of the Trump administration's push to modernize the running of the central government. 'We kept saying, 'Are you sure?' And they were like 'No, we gotta have Grok,'' one employee involved in the discussions told Wired. The conversations continued over the following weeks, and xAI was eventually added to the GSA Multiple Award Schedule, the agency's government-wide contracting program. Then, in early July, Grok suddenly went haywire after an update to make it less 'woke' than its competitors went too far, leading to the chatbot referring to itself as 'MechaHitler' in homage to the robotic version of Adolf Hitler that appeared in the 1992 video game Wolfenstein 3D. Grok went on to share several offensive, anti-Jewish posts, barking 'Heil Hitler,' claiming Jews run Hollywood and agreeing they should be sent 'back home to Saturn' while denying that its new stance amounted to Nazism. 'Labeling truths as hate speech stifles discussion,' it declared. Musk's company apologized for the upset and scrubbed the 'inappropriate' posts. Still, it was not seemingly enough to save xAI's relationship with the GSA, although the furore was allegedly not noticed, at least initially, by the agency's leadership. 'The week after Grok went MechaHitler, [the GSA's management] was like 'Where are we on Grok?'' the same employee told Wired. 'We were like, 'Do you not read a newspaper?'' When the U.S. government duly announced a series of partnerships with the likes of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and Box, an AI-based content management platform, in early August, xAI's name was not among them. The GSA has not definitively stated that Grok's outburst was the reason for the scrapping of xAI's proposed contract, but two company employees told Wired they believed that was the case. The Independent has reached out to the GSA for more information. The GSA's talks with the AI firms coincided with Trump's administration publishing its AI Action Plan in July, which laid out its goals for the United States to become a world leader in the emerging sector while calling for a reduction in regulation and red tape.
.png%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ministers spent £2.4m fighting to keep huge Afghan data breach a secret
Ministers spent £2.4m in legal fees fighting to keep a catastrophic Ministry of Defence data leak secret for two years through the use of an unprecedented superinjunction, it has emerged. The MoD leak, in February 2022, exposed the details of thousands of Afghans who said they were in danger from the Taliban because of their links to UK forces and now wanted to escape to Britain. The breach was only discovered in August 2023 when part of the leaked database was posted online, prompting a top-secret government operation that saw 16,000 affected Afghans brought to safety in the UK. The whole operation was kept secret from the public through the use of a superinjunction brought contramundum, Latin for against the world. Now, freedom of information data shared with The New York Times has revealed that the government spent £2.4m in legal fees fighting to keep the scheme secret. The hidden resettlement scheme, the fact the data the data was leaked, and the injunction itself were only revealed after a court battle lasting almost two years in which media organisations - including The Independent – fought to lift the order. The government admitted after the superinjunction was lifted that information crucial to its overturning was available last year. The unprecedented gagging order was finally lifted in July after a review commissioned by Defence Secretary John Healey found that the threat of danger to those on the list was not significant. In a written response to a High Court judge's demands for further investigation on why the order could not be lifted sooner, a senior government official admitted that a large amount of the information allowing publication of the breach was already known to the Ministry of Defence. High Court judge Mr Justice Chamberlain had previously decided to lift the superinjunction in May 2024, partly because he felt that the secrecy was preventing Afghans from being able to take steps to help themselves, as the order meant the 18,700 Afghans affected could not be told their information had been compromised. However, the government appealed this decision in a bid to keep the order in place, and those affected by the breach only learned they had been exposed when the superinjunction was lifted. Figures for the legal costs of defending the order come as Afghans promised a new life in the UK have been detained in Pakistan police raids. A former Afghan interpreter who was exposed in the MoD breach has been detained after having his offer of relocation to the UK revoked. A former Afghan special forces commando and his family have also been detained and taken to the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, according to a family member who managed to avoid arrest. The Ministry of Defence has been contacted for comment.