UK intelligence estimates 6,000 N. Korean casualties in Russia's Kursk region
More than 6,000 North Korean soldiers are believed to have been injured or killed while fighting in Russia's Kursk region in support of Moscow's war on Ukraine, according to estimates by British intelligence.
This underscores North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's role as a key ally of President Vladimir Putin in a war now in its fourth year.
The number amounts to more than half of the 11,000 North Korean troops initially deployed to the Kursk region, the UK Defence Ministry said in a post on the X social media platform.
'Significant DPRK casualty rates have almost certainly been sustained primarily through large, highly attritional dismounted assaults,' the statement said. DPRK stands for the North's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Bloomberg was unable to independently verify the figures. Neither Russia nor Ukraine provides official figures for the number of combat casualties. North Korea acknowledged for the first time in April that it deployed troops to support Russia but didn't confirm the number of soldiers dispatched or the level of casualties.
The estimate comes as Mr Putin and Mr Kim are set to mark this week the first anniversary of their mutual defense treaty that revived a deal dating back to the Cold War. Mr Kim has since become a crucial source of missiles, munitions and even foot soldiers for Russia's war.
In a meeting with a top security aide to Mr Putin, Mr Sergei Shoigu, in Pyongyang earlier in June, Mr Kim said North Korea will 'unconditionally support' Russia and 'its foreign policies in all the crucial international political issues.' It marked Mr Shoigu's second North Korea visit in less than three months. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Ship signal jamming in Persian Gulf worsens as clashes widen
[SINGAPORE] Navigation signals from more than 900 vessels in the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf went awry over the weekend, creating confusion in the shipping chokepoint as the fighting between Iran and Israel intensified. Starboard Maritime Intelligence and Bloomberg data showed vessels sailing impossibly straight lines in the region, zig-zagging across the water, or appearing onshore. The glitches – which have affected oil tankers, cargo ships, tugs and fishing boats among others since Jun 13 – increase reliance on radars, compasses and eyesight, boosting the likelihood of collisions. The Joint Maritime Information Center, an international naval task force monitoring the area, warned on Jun 15 that there are instances of 'extreme jamming' of signals from the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas. However, the JMIC said there were no indications of a potential blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which handles more than a quarter of the world's oil trade. The UK Maritime Trade Operations echoed the concerns on Monday (Jun 16), adding that the interference was intensifying across the Gulf and affecting how ships are reporting their positions on automated systems. 'This is not a good place and not a good time to have navigation systems that can't show exactly where you are,' said Mark Douglas, a maritime domain analyst at Starboard. 'While a closing of the Strait seems unlikely, this kind of widespread jamming does cause uncertainty for anyone operating in the area.' On Sunday, the Front Tyne, a very-large crude carrier that's operated by Frontline, entered the Strait of Hormuz. Shortly afterwards, its signal showed it sailing north towards Bandar Abbas, zig-zagging south into the gulf, hovering onshore, and finally heading towards Saudi Arabia. The Elandra Willow, a medium-range tanker owned by Vitol Group, also displayed erratic movements – nearing Bandar Abbas on her way out of the Gulf. The Pegasus, a Suezmax operated by Pantheon Tankers Management, has been displaying locations on the Iranian mainland since Monday morning. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Frontline, Vitol and Pantheon did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Strait of Hormuz is the gateway to the Persian Gulf, where major oil-producing nations including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait and Iran load up tankers with crude and send them out via Hormuz to their end buyers. After Israel launched airstrikes against Iran last week, concerns that the Islamic Republic would block the chokepoint intensified. Several tanker owners have suspended sending their ships into the Persian Gulf, according to shipbrokers. Forward freight agreements for a Middle East-to-Asia benchmark journey in July, essentially bets on the future cost of moving oil on that route, gained about 12 per cent on Friday. Analysts have expressed reservations on whether Iran would shut down Hormuz, given its reliance on income from oil shipments, especially to China. Blocking exports from other producers could also provoke a reaction from the US and its allies. Disruptions are therefore a likelier option, said Anoop Singh, global head of shipping research at Oil Brokerage Hormuz is 'Iran's ultimate bargaining chip. And such chips remain in the bag unless a worst-case scenario presents itself,' he said in a note on Sunday. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
IAEA chief says no further damage at Iranian enrichment facilities
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi looks on, on the day of an exceptional meeting of the agency's Board of Governors to discuss Israel's strike on Iran that have hit nuclear targets including the Natanz nuclear complex, at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, Austria, June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Elisabeth Mandl VIENNA - U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi provided an update on Monday on the situation at Iran's nuclear facilities after Israel launched military strikes and said there was no sign of further damage at the Natanz or Fordow enrichment sites. Grossi and the International Atomic Energy Agency he heads had previously reported that the smallest of Iran's three enrichment plants, an above-ground pilot plant at the sprawling Natanz nuclear complex, had been destroyed. While there was no sign of a physical attack on the bigger underground enrichment plant at Natanz, its power supply was destroyed, which may have damaged the uranium-enriching centrifuges there. No damage was seen at the Fordow plant dug into a mountain. "There has been no additional damage at the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant site since the Friday attack, which destroyed the above-ground part of the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant," Grossi said in a statement to an exceptional meeting of his agency's 35-nation Board of Governors. Having said over the weekend that Israeli strikes damaged four buildings at the Isfahan nuclear facilities including the uranium conversion facility that processes "yellowcake" uranium into uranium hexafluoride, the feedstock for centrifuges, so it can be enriched, he elaborated on the damage there. "At the Esfahan nuclear site, four buildings were damaged in Friday's attack: the central chemical laboratory, a uranium conversion plant, the Tehran reactor fuel manufacturing plant, and the UF4 (uranium tetrafluoride) to EU metal processing facility, which was under construction," he said. "The (International Atomic Energy) Agency is and will remain present in Iran. Safeguards inspections in Iran will continue as soon as safety conditions allow, as is required under Iran's NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) safeguards obligations," he added. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran says Parliament is preparing Bill to leave nuclear non-proliferation treaty
Iran's state media said that no decision on quitting the treaty had yet been made by Parliament. PHOTO: REUTERS DUBAI – Iranian parliamentarians are preparing a Bill that could push Tehran towards exiting the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), the Foreign Ministry said on June 16, while reiterating Tehran's official stance against developing nuclear weapons. 'In the light of recent developments, we will take an appropriate decision. Government has to enforce Parliament Bills, but such a proposal is just being prepared, and we will coordinate in the later stages with Parliament,' the ministry's spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said, when asked at a press conference about Tehran potentially leaving the NPT. The NPT, which Iran ratified in 1970, guarantees countries the right to pursue civilian nuclear power in return for requiring them to forgo atomic weapons and cooperate with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Israel began bombing Iran last week, saying Tehran was on the verge of building a nuclear bomb. Iran has always said its nuclear programme is peaceful, although the IAEA declared last week that Tehran was in violation of its NPT obligations. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated on June 16 that nuclear weapons were against a religious edict by the country's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The Iranian state media said no decision on quitting the NPT had yet been made by Parliament, while a parliamentarian said the proposal was at the initial stages of the legal process. Mr Baghaei said developments such as Israel's attack 'naturally affect the strategic decisions of the state', noting that Israel's attack had followed the IAEA resolution, which he suggested was to blame. 'Those voting for the resolution prepared the ground for the attack,' Mr Baghaei said. Israel, which never joined the NPT, is widely assumed by regional governments to possess nuclear weapons, although it does not confirm or deny this. 'The Zionist regime is the only possessor of weapons of mass destruction in the region,' Mr Baghaei said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
