Bihar: CBI secures four-day remand of NEET paper leak mastermind
Patna: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday secured four days' custody of Sanjeev Mukhiya, the alleged mastermind behind the NEET paper leak and several other examination scandals in Bihar.
While the agency had sought a seven-day remand to interrogate Mukhiya, the court approved only four days. Mukhiya, who is currently lodged in Beur Jail, was produced before the court after the completion of a prior two-day remand granted to the Economic Offences Unit (EOU).
During EOU's interrogation, Sanjeev Mukhiya reportedly made several shocking revelations, including his ambition to use the proceeds and influence of leaked exams to elevate his wife to a prominent political position.
Mukhiya evaded arrest for nearly 11 months, despite a Rs 3 lakh bounty placed against him. He was finally arrested on April 24 during a raid by Patna Police at an apartment in Danapur, Patna, following a tip-off.
CBI investigators are now preparing to grill Mukhiya with specific questions related to the NEET paper leak, as they attempt to uncover the larger nexus of organised examination fraud.
Officials believe that more arrests and significant disclosures could follow in the coming days. Mukhiya is believed to have orchestrated multiple high-profile leaks beyond NEET, making him one of the most wanted figures in India's exam corruption cases.
This development comes amid growing public and political outcry over the sanctity of national-level entrance exams and the need for stringent reforms to prevent such leaks in the future.
Sanjeev Mukhiya is believed to have leaked the NEET UG 2024 question paper before the exam held on May 5, 2024.
Investigations revealed that students were charged up to Rs 40 lakh each and made to memorise answers at a private school in Patna.
Mukhiya was allegedly running an organised gang in Bihar to leak the question paper. His son, along with a number of relatives and youths of Nalanda, were involved in the question paper leak scam.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Tech YouTuber slams Flipkart after getting used MacBook Pro in sealed box: ‘This isn't a mistake, it's negligence'
Devanshu Dhandhal, a tech YouTuber, recently shared how he had an unpleasant experience with Flipkart, where he was scammed by a seller not once but twice. Revealing details of the incident, Dhandhal called out the seller, who has allegedly been scamming customers since 2023. Dhandhal said it all began when he ordered a MacBook Pro worth Rs 2.6 lakh from Flipkart. However, he reportedly received an old and used model in a sealed Apple box. He requested a replacement and unboxed the laptop at the EKart office, and was shocked to receive an old MacBook again, he said. 'I immediately requested a replacement, and this time I unboxed the product at the EKart office under CCTV, and again the MacBook had smudges and marks so basically not new (second unboxing video attached below). 2 times. 2 wrong deliveries,' he wrote on X. Dhandhal said he reached out to customer support, which initiated a return and offered him compensation of Rs 13,000 and Rs 18,000 when he rejected the offer. 'After a discussion with customer care they started a return and then after 2 days they called me and offered me a compensation of 13K which I rejected, then 18K I rejected again and finally they offered me 10% which I rejected again,' he shared. The YouTuber claimed that Flipkart rejected the return after the negotiation. 'And after all this negotiation they rejected the return. So I called them again and I asked for 10% compensation as it was a lot of hassle by talking to them. And moreover, I was able to clean the marks but the laptop was not new in the first place,' Dhandhal said. He also claimed that the seller has been scamming customers for years. 'Users on LinkedIn, Reddit, YouTube, and X have posted about the same seller since 2023,' he wrote. See the post here: I just got scammed on @Flipkart — not once, but TWICE. So I ordered a ₹2.6 lakh MacBook Pro and got a used, old model inside a sealed Apple box. We filmed the entire open box delivery, you can see that in first attached video. I immediately requested a replacement, and this… — Devanshu Dhandhal (@mrtechpedia) June 8, 2025 Tagging Flipkart, Dhandhal said, '…this isn't a mistake, it's negligence. You are enabling fraud through your platform.' Soon after the post came to light, Flipkart issued an apology and promised to look into the matter. 'We'd never want you to get anything but what you ordered and are extremely sorry about this instance. We want to sort this out for you. Please help us with your order details securely, so we can look into this. Awaiting your response,' the company responded.
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
In a first, Centre caps MGNREGS spend at 60% for first six months of FY 2025-26
For the first time, the government has capped spending under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) at 60 per cent of its annual allocation for the first half of the financial year 2025–26, The Indian Express has learnt. Until now, the rural jobs guarantee scheme has operated as a demand-driven programme with no such spending limit. It is learnt that the Ministry of Finance has informed the Ministry of Rural Development that c will now be brought under the Monthly/Quarterly Expenditure Plan (MEP/QEP), a spending control mechanism from which it had been exempt so far. The Finance Ministry introduced the MEP/QEP in 2017 to help ministries manage cash flow and avoid unnecessary borrowing. MGNREGS remained outside its scope until now, with the Rural Development Ministry arguing that the scheme's demand-driven nature made fixed spending caps unworkable. But at the start of the 2025–26 financial year, the Finance Ministry is learnt to have directed the MoRD to include MGNREGS under the MEP/QEP framework as well. It is learnt that the Rural Development Ministry (MoRD) had submitted its MEP/QEP for MGNREGS to the Budget Division of the Finance Ministry, proposing a higher spending limit for the first two quarters of 2025–26. However, the Finance Ministry did not agree. After multiple rounds of communication between the two ministries, the Finance Ministry informed MoRD on May 29 that it could spend up to 60 per cent of MGNREGS's annual outlay—Rs 86,000 crore—in the first half of the financial year, 'considering the urgent need of expenditure to be incurred during [the] first half.' This means that only Rs 51,600 crore will be available for the scheme until the end of September. Although a 60 per cent spending cap may not have made a difference in most years—given that first-half spending has typically ranged between 50 and 60 per cent (53.5 per cent in 2024–25, 60.51 per cent in 2023–24, 54.29 per cent in 2022–23, 60.83 per cent in 2021–22, and 53.79 per cent in 2020–21)—officials told The Indian Express that it could impact employment generation under the rural job guarantee scheme this year, due to a significant carryover of pending liabilities worth Rs 21,000 crore from the previous financial year. According to government sources, a significant portion of this year's MGNREGS allocation will go towards clearing pending liabilities from the previous financial year, limiting the scope for generating the targeted number of persondays. The term 'persondays' refers to the total number of days of work performed by individuals under the scheme. For 2025–26, the Rural Development Ministry has approved a labour budget of 198.86 crore persondays. Of this, 67.11 per cent—or 133.45 crore persondays — are projected to be created in the first half of the financial year. As of June 8, 2025, the Centre has released Rs 24,485 crore, which is 28.47 per cent of MGNREGS's total allocation of Rs 86,000 crore for the year. Finance Ministry officials are also learnt to have raised questions about the pending liabilities from the previous year. Citing provisions of the MGNREGA Act, 2005—which mandate that wages must be paid within 15 days—they questioned how dues of over Rs 21,000 crore were still pending for the last fortnight (March 15–31) of the 2024–25 financial year. Launched in 200 of the country's most backward rural districts in 2006–07, MGNREGS was expanded to 130 more districts in 2007–08 and rolled out nationwide in 2008–09. The scheme saw a surge in demand during 2020–21, when a record 7.55 crore rural families accessed work under it amid the Covid-19 outbreak. It became a key safety net for migrant workers returning to their villages during the lockdown. Since then, the number of families employed under the scheme has steadily declined—7.25 crore in 2021–22, 6.18 crore in 2022–23, 5.99 crore in 2023–24, and 5.79 crore in 2024–25. These figures do not include beneficiaries from West Bengal, where the scheme has been suspended since March 2022. Harikishan Sharma, Senior Assistant Editor at The Indian Express' National Bureau, specializes in reporting on governance, policy, and data. He covers the Prime Minister's Office and pivotal central ministries, such as the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare, Ministry of Cooperation, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Rural Development, and Ministry of Jal Shakti. His work primarily revolves around reporting and policy analysis. In addition to this, he authors a weekly column titled "STATE-ISTICALLY SPEAKING," which is prominently featured on The Indian Express website. In this column, he immerses readers in narratives deeply rooted in socio-economic, political, and electoral data, providing insightful perspectives on these critical aspects of governance and society. ... Read More
India Today
41 minutes ago
- India Today
ED attaches assets worth Rs 100 crore held by dummy owners in Muda case
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has provisionally attached 92 immovable properties with an estimated market value of Rs 100 crore in connection with the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam. The attachment was carried out on June 9 under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), to the ED, the properties in question include Muda sites that are registered in the names of housing cooperative societies and individuals who are alleged to be front persons or cummies for influential individuals, including officials of the enforcement action stems from an investigation initiated on the basis of a First Information Report (FIR) registered by the Lokayukta Police in Mysuru. The FIR was filed under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Among those named in the FIR is Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, along with others. The ED's investigation has uncovered what it describes as a large-scale scam involving the allotment of Muda sites. The agency claims that statutory provisions and government orders or guidelines were flouted to carry out fraudulent allotments. It further stated that the role of former Muda commissioners, including GT Dinesh Kumar, has emerged as central to the illegal allocation of compensation sites to individuals and entities who were ineligible. The investigation is
