As college enrollment declines, interest in these majors is growing for the 2024-25 school year
For the past decade, college enrollment has steadily declined; at the same time, students' career aspirations have undergone a dramatic transformation. Long considered the gateway to financial stability, a college degree is no longer viewed as the only—or even the best—path to success.
Freshman enrollment fell 5% this fall compared to last year, according to data released in October 2024 by the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. This decline particularly concerns working-class adults and rural students, who are already underrepresented in higher education. In a 2023 study, researchers from the University of Massachusetts and the University of Memphis showed that an average of 1 in 10 students in the U.S. live in "education deserts," regions with no colleges or universities or just one community college. Combined with a lack of institutions nearby that match students' credentials, these regions turn into "match deserts," leaving few higher education opportunities to choose from.
Meanwhile, the overall number of young adults pursuing short-term credentials is growing, with enrollment in certificate programs increasing by over 7%.
Additionally, more young people are turning to skilled trades as blue-collar work gains new respectability and appeal. The growing demand for skilled trade workers reflects shifting priorities in the U.S. labor market and challenges traditional assumptions about higher education.
The 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law increased investment in federal public transportation programs while rising real estate redevelopment has created a surge in demand for tradespeople. Industries like construction and manufacturing report significant workforce shortages, with job openings in areas like welding and construction labor reaching record highs. Meanwhile, the rise of automation and artificial intelligence is reshaping demand for traditional white-collar jobs, such as those in tech and computer science, reflected in lower enrollment trends for certain majors.
Moreover, the looming "enrollment cliff" has become a growing challenge for colleges and universities, as Dick Startz—professor of economics at the University of California, Santa Barbara—described in a Brookings Institution article. This drop, largely tied to a decline in birth rates following the 2008 recession, means fewer young adults will reach college age in the coming years. For many institutions, this shrinking pool of prospective students raises serious concerns about the future. In some states, a drastic drop in enrollment may put schools at risk of closure; in others, college programs or funding may be altogether eliminated.
The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated decreasing enrollment, as online learning gained traction and fewer students opted for traditional, on-campus experiences. To adapt, colleges have been exploring new strategies, like recruiting international students and adult learners, as well as developing flexible, innovative programs—both online and in person. However, many institutions, especially smaller ones, face significant challenges in navigating the shifting landscape of higher education.
Scholarship Institute examined data compiled by the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center to see which undergraduate programs are gaining and waning in popularity. Data represents the change in enrollment in the top 20 majors from fall 2022 to fall 2024.
While college enrollment has slowed, Eric Greenberg—president of the New York-based consulting firm Greenberg Educational Group—insists that professional and science, technology, engineering, and math fields still dominate. Compared to last year, these fields showed gains mainly because of the higher earning potential of STEM graduates. Academic trends often mirror shifts and priorities in public life and societal issues, such as the surge in physics majors during the Cold War. Each shift tells a story, revealing how students navigate an uncertain future.
Increased interest in computer and information sciences reflects the ongoing demand for tech-savvy professionals. However, the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center notes the growth in computer science college programs has plateaued compared to previous years, potentially signaling market saturation or a reevaluation of tech job stability amid widespread layoffs in the sector.
Multi-interdisciplinary studies and engineering have also seen substantial growth. This may point to students gravitating toward flexible, integrative skills that apply to emerging industries. Engineering, in particular, remains a cornerstone for addressing global infrastructure challenges and climate change, reflecting a long-term focus on problem-solving professions.
The steady growth in business, marketing, and management majors highlights the enduring importance of entrepreneurial and leadership skills in a rapidly evolving economy. As industries adapt to technological advancements and global competition, students are drawn to fields that equip them with versatile, in-demand expertise.
Programs in social services and public administration are gaining traction. These fields align with pressing issues like social justice, sustainability, and crisis management, which are of major significance to today's youth.
Declines in traditional humanities majors point to skepticism about their return on investment, driven by economic pressures, uncertainties, and ballooning student loan debt. Students and their families increasingly hesitate to invest in fields with less clear career trajectories.
Liberal arts and English literature programs have experienced steep enrollment drops, reflecting their weaker earning potential than STEM and business fields. According to the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, graduates in STEM and business majors earn a median salary of $60,000 to $65,000 within five years of graduation, significantly higher than the $40,000 median for humanities graduates.
Universities have begun responding to students' fluctuating career choices by integrating practical skills into liberal arts curricula, such as those in digital humanities or interdisciplinary programs. However, these changes may not be competitive enough in an era when students increasingly prioritize financial stability.
Similarly, interest in security and protective services has declined. They may not align with the broader aspirations of younger generations, who often prioritize social impact and environmental sustainability in their career choices and potential income. Jobs in the security industry can offer a sense of meaning, but they are also physically demanding, sometimes dangerous, and often involve long, irregular hours. They may also offer low pay and repetitive tasks.
Declining enrollment in teaching programs also highlights systemic issues in the country's education. Teachers often face lower pay, rising workloads, and limited support from public officials, leading to burnout and a nationwide teacher shortage. Without significant reform, these challenges risk further eroding interest in the profession, potentially eroding the broader educational landscape.
Careers, however, are rarely straightforward, and no matter how much one charts their course in advance, they are likely to shift with the winds of the time.
Story editing by Alizah Salario. Additional editing by Kelly Glass. Copy editing by Sofía Jarrín. Photo selection by Ania Antecka.
This story was produced by ScholarshipInstitute.org and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Carnival's Big Growth Spurt Over?
Carnival's cruise business was shut down during the coronavirus pandemic. It has experienced strong growth since the world got used to living with COVID-19. Carnival expects to have another good year in 2025, but next year's comparisons might be less impressive. 10 stocks we like better than Carnival Corp. › Carnival (NYSE: CCL) went from a full stop to full speed ahead, and the result was, as you might expect, a dramatic improvement in its business performance. But what happens now that the cruise line is at the top of its game? Here's what's happened and why 2026 could be a much less impressive year for Carnival. Carnival operates nine branded cruise lines, including its namesake brand. It is one of the largest cruise ship owners and operators on the planet. Cruise lines have two main sources of revenue. The first is the fares passengers pay to get on the boat. The second is the spending they do while on the ship. The cruise ships Carnival operates are like floating resorts. You pay for a room, and then you pay for all the other stuff you want to do. Some food and entertainment are included in the cruise cost, but plenty of add-ons are available. That said, Carnival doesn't see a dime of income if its ships aren't running. And that's exactly what happened during the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic. Cruise ship passengers are always at some risk of catching contagious diseases, but the risks presented by COVID-19 were so extreme that governments shut down the industry. The last few years have seen impressive business performance from Carnival because of that shutdown. The chart above shows the trailing-12-month revenues and earnings per share for Carnival. It tells the story pretty clearly. Revenues fell to zero and then recovered. Earnings fell deep into the red and then recovered. In fact, the inflation coming out of the pandemic has actually helped out here because the cost of other vacations, such as trips to amusement parks, have increased to the point where cruises look like a relative bargain. At this point, Carnival's 2025 cruises are fairly well booked, so this should be another decent year. But two problems are likely to start showing up more clearly in 2026. First, the rebound from zero revenue seems to have largely played out. Further improvement will require continued strong execution. For example, revenue rose to a record level in the first quarter of 2025. But the year-over-year rise was dramatically smaller than in the first quarter of 2024. The boom years are likely over, and continuing to move the needle will be much harder from here. Second, Carnival added a significant number of new ships leading up to 2024. More ships mean more ability to increase revenue. And new ships often bring renewed interest from customers, too. Between 2025 and 2028, there won't be nearly as many new ships, so this growth lever won't be as powerful. Price increases (for both the cruise and onboard spending) will still improve the top line of the income statement, but they may keep some customers away. There is a silver lining in all of this, however. Carnival took on debt after the pandemic. Buying ships is costly, and so is paying to maintain a business that isn't generating any revenue. The pullback on new ships will allow the company to more quickly reduce its leverage. That is a good thing, and falling interest costs should help the company's bottom line. That said, Carnival's top line in 2026 could be far less exciting than it has been recently. And emotional investors may see that as a big negative, even as Carnival works to improve its balance sheet. If you own Carnival or are looking at the stock, remember that the growth coming out of the pandemic was an anomaly. Before you buy stock in Carnival Corp., consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Carnival Corp. wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Carnival Corp. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Carnival's Big Growth Spurt Over? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Red Lobster's 36-year-old CEO started as a Goldman Sachs intern. He reveals 3 bold moves he's cooking up for the seafood chain's comeback
Red Lobster CEO Damola Adamolekun came from a private equity and finance background, breaking into the restaurant industry through a successful deal he navigated. The former P.F. Chang's CEO outlined the changes he's enacting to save the beleaguered seafood chain from bankruptcy and to make it the beloved brand it once was. Damola Adamolekun reached the pinnacle of restaurant leadership in a somewhat unconditional way. Although the Red Lobster CEO waited tables back in high school, his first big career move was landing an internship with global investment bank Goldman Sachs at age 19. At the time, Adamolekun was a student athlete at Brown University, where he studied economics and political science. He continued to work as an analyst with Goldman Sachs following graduation for a couple of years, then moved on to become a private equity associate with TPG Capital, where he worked until 2015. But Adamolekun's big break came while he was a partner at hedge fund Paulson & Co., which now operates as a family office. In 2019, Paulson purchased Asian-inspired restaurant chain P.F. Chang's in a $700 million deal. Adamolekun said during a podcast episode of The Breakfast Club that he was the one who pitched the idea to buy P.F. Chang's to the firm. 'I thought we could do a lot of new things with it. We could add delivery, we could remodel the restaurants. We could make it more interesting,' Adamolekun said. The deal was successful—until the pandemic hit, wiping out restaurant and retail businesses. The P.F. Chang's CEO even stepped down during COVID, and Adamolekun had to 'rescue the situation,' he said. And with that, Adamolekun stepped in as CEO, officially charting his path to become a revered restaurant executive. The P.F. Chang's deal 'ended up being a really good deal, but not without a lot of blood, sweat, and tears for a few years,' Adamolekun said. He masterminded a plan to remodel the chain's restaurants and revamp the menu—and is largely using the same playbook as CEO of Red Lobster. Adamolekun, 36, took over as CEO of Red Lobster in September, as the seafood chain was crawling from the ashes of bankruptcy. He has a three-pillar roadmap for reviving Red Lobster, particularly in the aftermath of its endless-shrimp debacle. One of the biggest mistakes Red Lobster made was its endless-shrimp promotion. Because guests took advantage of the bonkers deal by consuming pound after pound of shrimp, the seafood chain ended up losing millions of dollars. So, needless to say, Adamolekun is steering clear of any future bottomless-shrimp promotions in the future. Instead, he's focused on revamping the seafood chain's menu. 'There's a lot of chain restaurants, [but] there's only one that serves lobster and crab the way we do,' Adamolekun told The Breakfast Club. The seafood chain is leaning into that differentiator, and one new crab dish has become Adamolekun's favorite. Adamolekun's master plan for reinvigorating Red Lobster includes remodeling the chain's 545 restaurants. But remodeling at that scale takes time—and money. For now, Adamolekun has implemented small changes, like changing up the music diners listen to while at the restaurant. 'We fix the things we can fix quickly,' he said during the podcast. 'The music is better.' The restaurant chain has also printed market prices for lobsters on table liners, and will continue to implement 'small things you can do now.' 'But comprehensively there needs to be a remodel…and that's something that we'll do in the future, I think,' Adamolekun said. Another cost-effective way the restaurant chain is making incremental improvements is through service and hospitality changes. Service workers are expected to greet guests more quickly and be more attentive. And Red Lobster has already seen tangible improvements from service changes. The restaurant chain tracks a sentiment score, which is a net positive versus negative sentiment, Adamolekun explained, or what people are saying is good versus bad at Red Lobster. The sentiment score was only 30 when he first took over, but last month it had doubled to 60, Adamolekun said during the podcast. 'When you go to Red Lobster next, you'll see it's going to feel different,' Adamolekun told The Breakfast Club. A version of this story originally published on on February 26, 2025. This story was originally featured on


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Doug Ford calls out municipalities as housing money goes unspent
Ontario is having trouble giving money away for housing, but challenging times are making it hard to get. As Premier Doug Ford presented Toronto with a $67.2 million cheque to help build new homes amid a shortage that has pushed prices higher, his housing minister lamented more municipalities aren't meeting the housing targets entitling them to cash. 'We're going to hand out some nice 'building faster fund' cheques, not as many and for as much this year as we did last year,' Rob Flack said Friday at city hall with Mayor Olivia Chow. Toronto broke ground on 21,000 new homes last year, 88 per cent of its target. 'That's why we have the big cheque,' said Chow, who noted 'building is slowing' because of high interest rates, and higher costs that mean 'builders just can't afford to build.' The $1.2 billion housing fund was established in 2023 to provide financial incentives for municipalities over three years to build homes. It's intended to pay for infrastructure like water lines, sewers, roads and sidewalks. Money is paid as a reward to municipalities reaching 80 per cent of the target set out by the province. Ford promised in 2022 to build 1.5 million new homes by 2031 but the province is at half the pace needed to reach that number in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the challenging business conditions that followed. While an average of 150,000 new homes a year is needed over the decade, the Progressive Conservative government's spring budget projected housing starts will fall this year to 71,800 — down from 74,600 in 2024. To spur construction, Ford's PCs passed Bill 17, the Protect Ontario By Building Faster and Smarter Act, which streamlines the approval process and fees for homebuilders, allows municipalities to reduce development charges on developers and delays payment until new homes are occupied instead of when a building permit is issued. As well, the legislation given royal assent this week extends the power to grant minister's zoning orders that override municipal bylaws, raising concerns among critics about preferential treatment for some builders. Ford repeated his calls for the Bank of Canada to lower interest rates and said economic uncertainty caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs isn't helping the housing business. 'People are nervous if they're going to have a job or not.' Ford also pointed the finger at mayors of some municipalities he did not name, but who he said 'absolutely refuse to build.' 'We are going to work with the ones that want to build,' the premier added. 'They're going to get the money. The other ones aren't.' The premier reiterated that he would like to axe the provincial portion of the 13 per cent HST on new homes and has asked Prime Minister Mark Carney to scrap the federal portion. 'We just have to get everyone on the same page,' Ford said.