£1.2m contract to wind and maintain clocks around Edinburgh
Some 27 public clocks are in place around the Capital, with some well-known ones at Haymarket, the end of Cowgate and Morningside.
The city is seeking providers to take on the task for the next two years, with responsibilities also including the winding and maintenance of 25 clocks in the City Chambers complex.
The contract would also set out terms for future contracts between providers and six other Scottish councils.
Labour councillor and Culture and Communities Committee convener Margaret Graham said: 'The city's public clocks are as much part of its heritage and character as the architecture.
'They are sorely missed when in storage as the Tollcross clock is at present. It's essential that we ensure they are well maintained and this contract framework is about achieving that.'
It is understood that the contract is not likely to cover the refurbishment and reinstatement of three currently out-of-service clocks.
Those clocks, at Portobello Town Hall, Tollcross and Fountainbridge are currently in storage.
Edinburgh Council removed the clock at Tollcross in 2022 over 'health and safety concerns'.
It came as cracks were discovered at the base of the clock, despite it being 'properly maintained'.
And the Portobello clock was taken down from the Baptist church there in 2003 for repairs, but has stayed down for over two decades for a variety of reasons.
These include a historic dispute over ownership between the council and the Portobello Baptist Church.
Both insisted for years that the clock belonged to the other party, but extensive archival research concluded in 2019 found it belonged to the council.
However, since this discovery, the clock has not been restored to its position. As of 2012, the estimated cost for repairs was close to £100,000.
The city's clocks are often more than timepieces. The clock at Haymarket serves as part of a war memorial commemorating Hearts players who died in the first World War.
By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Live
10 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
The 35 surnames that could mean you are related to the royal family
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Many of us are keen to delve into our family tree, uncovering our roots and potential relatives. The era of laboriously trawling through heritage archives and census data is a thing of the past, thanks to various online platforms like MyHeritage that have made this task straightforward and accessible. Currently, MyHeritage is offering a 14-day free trial, allowing folks to map out their family tree, discover new kin and explore billions of historical records. They've even compiled a list of 35 surnames that could possibly suggest a connection to royalty. The firm proposes that certain last names have historically been linked with the aristocracy and could strongly hint at a Royal bloodline. READ MORE - Jet2 'sorry' as mum and kids 'traumatised' at being refused to flight home READ MORE - Motorist gets petty revenge on 'entitled' neighbour who kept parking on their drive If users bear one of these 35 surnames, they might be in for a surprise when they start digging into their family history. While possessing these surnames doesn't assure a Royal connection, it provides a brilliant starting point for those intrigued by their ancestry, reports the Mirror. To learn more, individuals simply need to head over to MyHeritage and start constructing their family tree using the platform's tools that enable users to input names, dates, photos and stories to share with potential relatives, before delving into historical archives filled with census data, birth and death certificates, as well as marriage records. MyHeritage also offers DNA testing services, giving customers insights into their ethnic heritage and linking them up with family members. For those seeking alternatives, Ancestry is another DNA service on offer, providing genetic analysis from £79 to help users connect with kin and delve into their familial origins. 23andMe is also in the mix, offering DNA tests that include ancestral breakdowns and personalised health insights, with prices starting at £89. Here's the exhaustive roll call of 35 surnames that might hint at a distant connection to royalty: Windsor: The current British royal family's surname since 1917. Tudor: The Welsh dynasty that produced monarchs like Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. Stuart: A Scottish house that ruled England and Scotland in the 16th and 17th centuries. Plantagenet: A royal house that provided England with monarchs from Henry II to Richard III. Capet: The dynasty that ruled France from 987 to 1328. Bourbon: A European royal house that ruled France, Spain, and other territories. Habsburg: A prominent royal house of Europe, known for ruling the Holy Roman Empire. Hanover: The British royal house from George I to Queen Victoria. Valois: A cadet branch of the Capetian dynasty that ruled France. Lancaster: A branch of the Plantagenet dynasty, known for its role in the Wars of the Roses. York: Another Plantagenet branch, also central to the Wars of the Roses. Bruce: A Scottish royal house, with Robert the Bruce being a notable king. de Valois: A French royal house that produced several kings. de Medici: An influential Italian family that produced royalty and popes. Savoy: A royal family that once ruled parts of Italy and France. Orange-Nassau: The Dutch royal family. Oldenburg: A European royal house that includes the current Danish royal family. Glucksburg: A branch of the House of Oldenburg, associated with Danish and Norwegian royalty. Romanov: The last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. Baskerville: A noble family name with historical ties to English aristocracy. Darcy: A surname associated with medieval nobility and landowners in England and Ireland. Neville: A powerful English noble family with significant influence during the medieval period. Percy: An aristocratic English family known for their role in British history. Astley: A noble surname linked to the English peerage. Capell: A distinguished English family with historical ties to the aristocracy. Howard: A prominent aristocratic family in the UK, holding the title of Dukes of Norfolk. Seymour: The family of Jane Seymour, third wife of Henry VIII, with ties to the Dukedom of Somerset. Grey: Associated with Lady Jane Grey, England's nine-day queen. FitzAlan: A powerful medieval family, former Earls of Arundel. Courtenay: A noble family with connections to English and French royalty. Manners: The surname of the Dukes of Rutland, a high-ranking noble family. Russell: Connected to the Dukes of Bedford, an influential aristocratic lineage. Cavendish: The surname of the Dukes of Devonshire, a powerful British noble family. Talbot: A noble family holding the Earldom of Shrewsbury. Spencer: The family name of Princess Diana, tying it to the modern British royal family. MyHeritage has earned a commendable 4-star rating on Trustpilot. A pleased customer shared: "Immediate accurate statistics of my immediate family members." Another user praised the platform, saying: "Regular updates of discoveries, positive results. This site is not just about the money, it is about genuine results for the family history researcher." A different user expressed satisfaction with the site's usability: "My family history has expanded and the format is easily understood. Changes are quick and easy. Thank you,". Yet, the service didn't hit the mark for everyone, as one individual reported: "I don't fully understand it. I can't find a user guide, difficult to navigate, Help Center does not always understand my problems." Conversely, another budding genealogist recounted their positive experience: "Finding related families and information relating to individuals has been a wonderful experience. MyHeritage has made it even easier to trace ancestors and verify relations." The DNA tests and platform can be found on the MyHeritage website.
Scotsman
12 hours ago
- Scotsman
Calls to stop wind farm in public forest home to Scottish wildcats rejected by Supreme Court
Claims have been made the wildcats in the forest are hybrids - a result of wildcats interbreeding with domestic or feral cats. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Calls to stop more turbines in a forest with a population of wild cats have been rejected by the courts for a third time. Wildcat Haven, an organisation dedicated to conserving wildcats in the UK, has been fighting against plans for a second wind farm at the Clashindarroch Forest, near Huntly. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The development was granted consent by Scottish ministers in 2023. The campaign group, a community interest company, first lodged a petition calling for a judicial review into the decision to approve the wind farm. This was rejected by the Court of Session, twice. The proposed wind farm has been controversial with the local community and wildcat campaigners Wildcat Haven then lodged a third appeal with the Supreme Court which was rejected this week. The courts said the applicant did not raise an arguable point of law in its appeal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Wildcat Haven claims there are 13 wildcats living in the forest which is one of, if not the largest forest in Aberdeenshire. It is also known for its cross-country skiing trails and the Huntly Nordic Ski Club. Today only a few wildcats remain in remote parts of Scotland, though it has been claimed none are believed to be 'pure-bred' – numbers are so low that some experts have concluded the species is 'functionally extinct' in the wild Vattenfall, the developer, already has an existing wind farm in the forest. The Swedish company claims the wildcats recorded in its survey work and that of Forestry Land and Scotland and Scottish Wildcat Action have been identified as hybrids - a result of wildcats interbreeding with domestic or feral cats. Wildcat Haven disputed this claim, with director of the organisation Paul O'Donoghue describing the company's findings as 'truly shocking.' He said the new 14-turbine development would be 'a disaster' for the wildcats, arguing research has shown such developments threaten the species. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mr O'Donoghue added: 'We have been fighting for seven years. The forest is still there, the wildcats are still there and we are prepared to fight for another seven years and longer, to protect those precious wildcat and their beautiful forest home.' Matt Bacon, Vattenfall's UK head of onshore wind market development, said: 'The Supreme Court decision marks the fourth time this matter has been before the courts, and the consent has been upheld at every level of the UK judicial system.'
The National
15 hours ago
- The National
Scots should be telling the stories of our culture and traditions
I'm a tradition bearer and I recently watched an event at the Scottish Storytelling Centre focused on traditional Scottish folktales. The performance was polished, comedic and theatrical (and I'm sure many enjoyed it) but something didn't sit right. The lead storytellers were from England, yet the stories being told were deeply Scottish. If I went to a folklore centre in England, I'd expect to hear English voices telling English stories. That's cultural authenticity. READ MORE: 'The perfect stage': Kelpies to host first outdoor evening ceilidh When Scottish storytellers who have dedicated their lives to keeping traditions alive – often learning directly from communities, elders and oral sources – are passed over in favour of those who have only recently discovered the tradition, through books or academia, it starts to feel less like cultural celebration and more like cultural opportunity. We rely on the likes of Tracs (Traditional Arts and Culture Scotland), funded by the Scottish Government, to help protect and promote our living heritage, especially after generations of damage caused by centralised London rule. So much of our culture, language and oral tradition has been eroded. Spaces for renewal and revival are vital. But what does it say when our stories are so often performed by those not rooted in that heritage? I've noticed the same pattern elsewhere, too. A storyteller in residence appointed by the National Museum of Scotland and the host of the National Library's Teatime Tales podcast both appear to be from England. That in itself is not the issue. But when the same handful of individuals are repeatedly given platforms to tell Scottish stories while many incredible Scottish storytellers with deep roots in Highland and Lowland tradition are overlooked, it raises serious questions. Many now market themselves as traditional storytellers, yet often change the way the stories are told. They add flourishes, theatrical gestures, even alter the structure and meaning, often to make them more entertaining for a modern audience. That may be engaging for some but when it comes to inherited cultural material, that approach can cross a line. It stops being preservation and starts to look a lot like performance. In some cases, it edges into appropriation. READ MORE: Record number of young Scots headed to university after exam results I love to see people learn about and embrace Scottish culture, whether from England, Wales, Bahrain, or Peru. But cultural heritage is about lived experience, lineage and community connection. Around the world, we respect that. You wouldn't expect a first-generation Canadian to become the official storyteller of Native American traditions, not because they can't appreciate or love those stories, but because inherited traditions carry weight, responsibility and cultural authority. Why is it so controversial to say the same about Scotland? Why should someone who's just moved up from Little Codling-on-the-Wold and read a few books be given a national platform to tell Scottish folktales over tradition bearers such as the late, great Sheila Stewart or Duncan Williamson, whose families carried the tradition for generations through memory, song and speech? I'm not suggesting this is malicious but I think we need to ask whether decisions about who gets the platform are being made for the right reasons. Is there a kind of closed circle forming where connections, familiarity, and funding have more influence than authenticity or cultural grounding? Across our cultural institutions – museums, heritage bodies, arts organisation or libraries – many of the leadership roles are held by people who aren't from Scotland. When almost all of those in charge of shaping how Scotland's culture is preserved and presented come from outside the culture itself, it's worth asking what's being lost in the process. I've also noticed a tendency for people in the arts to describe themselves as 'Scotland-based'. READ MORE: Royal Edinburgh Military Tattoo issues statement to fans after show cancellation I don't believe anyone should be made to feel unwelcome. If you've lived here long enough to truly live the tradition, to absorb it through community, language, and experience, and you carry that with care and respect, then great. But when it comes to public leadership, funding, and representation of Scottish culture – especially in institutions specifically funded to protect it – that space should be led by people who aren't just 'based here' but carry the story in their bones. We've spent generations fighting to reclaim our voice in language, story, music and art. We mustn't hand it over to those with no deep, lived connection to them, just because they have the right contacts, know how to fill in a funding form, or perform well in front of an audience.
