Adoor Gopalakrishnan courts controversy at Kerala Film Policy Conclave, Minister counters him
'The government is providing ₹1.5 crore for filmmakers from the SC/ST communities to make films. I told the Chief Minister that the government is paving the way for corruption through this, but nothing has changed. The intent behind the project is good, but they should be given at least three months of intensive training to make films. All the filmmakers who have made films under this project have complaints about it. They should be made aware that these are public funds. The amount should be reduced to ₹50 lakh. This money is not meant to make commercial films,' said Mr. Gopalakrishnan.
Regarding a similar project for women filmmakers, he said that 'just because one is a woman, the government should not be giving money to make films.' They should also be provided training. They should know all the difficulties involved in making a film, he said.
Mr. Cherian in his speech disagreed with Mr. Gopalakrishnan and said that even ₹1.5 crore was insufficient to make quality films these days, as most of the filmmakers under the project struggled due to funding issues.
'A rare opportunity'
'In the 98 years of Malayalam cinema's history, those from the SC/ST communities have not got a mainstream opportunity. This funding project is one of the best decisions this government has taken, because of which many new filmmakers from these communities were able to come forward. They were selected by a committee of experts through an intensive screening process,' he said.
Mr. Gopalakrishnan's comments invited loud disapproval from a section of the audience, especially singer Pushpavathy. Later, speaking to the media, she said that Mr. Gopalakrishnan was attempting to torpedo a project to promote filmmakers from marginalised communities. 'People from the SC/ST communities have experienced oppression for centuries. Our forefathers have experienced slave-like conditions. It has just been decades since we started getting proper education. Any attempt to torpedo such projects has to be opposed. The government has clearly rejected his remarks,' she said.
On IFFK
Mr. Gopalakrishnan demanded that the delegate fee for the International Film Festival of Kerala (IFFK) be raised to ensure that only those who were really interested in cinema got in. Recounting an event from the past, he said that 'a group of labourers from the Chala market barged into the theatre just to watch the adult content.'
He also criticised the 2023 protest movement by the students of the K.R. Narayanan National Institute of Visual Science and Arts demanding the resignation of the institute's director Shankar Mohan for alleged caste discrimination, which also led to Mr. Gopalakrishnan's resignation as the institute's chairperson. He claimed that the institute was primed for take-off during his tenure, but no one knows the state of the institute now. Countering him, Mr. Cherian said that the institution was functioning effectively.
The Minister also countered poet and filmmaker Sreekumaran Thampy's claim that nothing happened after the K. Hema Committee report was published. 'It is because the Hema committee report that this conclave is happening,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC questions UP govt on Bankey Bihari temple ordinance
The Supreme Court on Monday told the Uttar Pradesh government that it acted in a 'clandestine' manner and with 'tearing hurry' in bringing an ordinance to take over Mathura's Bankey Bihari temple. SC questions UP govt on Bankey Bihari ordinance The court proposed having an interim administrative committee headed by a former high court judge to manage the day-to-day affairs of the temple and propose steps for its holistic development aimed at promoting religious tourism and granted a day's time for the state and the temple management to respond with suggestions. On May 26, the UP government brought an ordinance titled 'Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025' which allowed administrative takeover of the temple by a state-run trust that was given power to manage even the temple funds. The ordinance came after a May 15 judgment of the top court allowing the UP government to utilise temple funds to acquire 5 acres of land for a corridor development project around the premises. The ordinance has since been challenged before the Allahabad high court. The top court on Monday heard a petition filed by the Management Committee Of Thakur Shree Bankey Bihari Ji Maharaj Temple challenging the ordinance and the May 15 judgment that was passed without hearing the Shebaits or the Bankey Bihari temple committee. A bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said, 'What was the tearing hurry for bringing the ordinance? If the state wanted to carry out development, what stops you from getting the land as per law.' The temple committee represented by senior advocate Shyam Divan and advocate Tanvi Dubey pointed out that Bankey Bihari Mandir is a private temple and is being administered as per a 1939 court decree by the Sewayat Goswami community for over 500 years. Divan said that prior to the ordinance, the temple used to be managed by a committee having four members of the Goswami community and three non-Goswami individuals. A public interest litigation for better management of the temple is pending before the Allahabad high court since 2022 and despite the temple committee being very much an active stakeholder, there was no public notice by the state about the bringing of an ordinance and no circumstance necessitated its promulgation. Additional solicitor general (ASG) KM Nataraj appearing for the state said that the land on which the temple is situated is public land and the law does not recognise any management committee of the temple. By bringing the ordinance, he said the state aimed for the development of the temple and ensuring that funds are utilised for the betterment of pilgrims. He further pointed out that in the past there were incidents of stampede and to ensure there is more space for pilgrims, the state had benefited from the May 15 order to develop the corridor around the temple. The bench said, 'Whether it is private land or not can be adjudicated by courts. You were required to issue a public notice as you were aware about the pending litigation by warring groups. But we are sorry to say, the state coming to court in a clandestine manner and not giving them an opportunity to be heard, we do not expect this from the state.' The court said it was inclined to recall the May 15 order and suggest a retired high court judge or even a senior retired district court judge to head the interim management committee for running the day-to-day affairs of the temple. The court proposed that the committee may be allowed to utilise part of the temple funds for this purpose as it said, 'Temple funds should be utilised for the benefit of pilgrims coming to the temple and not to be pocketed by private persons.' Divan said that the temple committee will not stand in the way of the court's order as what is proposed is an interim arrangement instead of the state trust under the ordinance which completely divests the Goswami community of the temple management and places it in the hands of state officials. The court told the ASG that even without acquiring the land, the state is bound to provide basic amenities in religious places, pointing to the example put in place at the Golden Temple where the state persuaded people living near the religious place to shift out to ensure planned development of the area around the temple. 'While the ordinance can be tested by the high court, we can ask the interim management committee that we propose to appoint to work on the holistic development of these temples. Today, religious tourism has a lot of potential as it generates employment. We should encourage it,' the bench said. The court pointed out how facilities in other places of pilgrimage such as Shirdi in Maharashtra and Tirupati in Andhra Pradesh have developed due to the influx of religious tourists. The court was informed that several temples in the area are heritage structures and need to be preserved with utmost care. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appearing for another set of petitioners associated with nearby temples said that the Supreme Court's May 15 judgment needs to be recalled before a solution can be found to the administration of the temples. The bench said that once the judge-headed committee is in place, the collector can be part of the committee along with associating the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and architects. The ordinance brought by the state government creates a statutory trust having full authority to manage and administer all affairs of the temple and comprising 18 members, of which 7 are ex-officio government officers. The remaining trustees are appointed at the discretion of the state government with only two representatives of the Sewayat Goswami community to be appointed by the state.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Justice Nagamohan Das submits report, proposes 6.6% internal quota for SC (Left)
Bengaluru: The Justice HN Nagmohan Das Committee on internal reservation among Scheduled Castes (SCs) submitted its final report to the govt Monday, marking a key step in the state's move to rationalise SC quotas based on empirical report, which contains six major recommendations, was formally received by chief minister Siddaramaiah and will be placed before the cabinet on Thursday for further consideration. Sources say the report recommends an allocation of 6.5% for SC (Left), 5.5% for SC (Right), 4% for 'untouchables', and 1% for other nomadic Das told TOI that since there was no reliable data on SC sub-castes, the commission undertook a fresh state-wide survey. This data forms the basis of the panel's recommendations."The govt agreed to our interim recommendation of having a fresh SC survey which was held between May 5 to July 6," Justice Das said. "The survey was conducted across 27.2 lakh families and just over 1 crore people. We have done our job and the govt is vested with our report to take further action."He also pointed out that his earlier report had suggested raising the overall SC quota in Karnataka from 15% to 17%, and this premise has also influenced the internal reservation framework recommended now."The 30-year-long struggle of communities seeking internal reservation came to a head when the Supreme Court on Aug 1, 2024 said providing internal reservation is permissible under the Constitution," Justice Das response to the Supreme Court's ruling, the Siddaramaiah govt, in Jan, formed a single-member commission headed by Justice Das. An interim report was submitted on March 27. The idea of internal reservation had also found traction during the previous BJP govt, which in Oct 2022, had proposed a similar matrix — 6% for SC (Left), 5.5% for SC (Right), 4.5% for 'touchables', and 1% for smaller final report submitted on Monday spans 1,766 pages and includes the panel's findings, the survey data, and supporting appendices.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Local body polls: SC nod for 27% OBC quota, 2017 ward boundaries
Mumbai: Paving the way for local body elections in the state with a 27% quota for OBCs, Supreme Court on Monday confirmed its May 6 directions on OBC reservation in these elections and also ruled that the 2017 ward formations will apply. It directed the State Election Commission to issue the notification for the local body polls within four weeks. Hearing a petition challenging the ward restructuring of the Ausa municipal council in Latur district and demanding that it be reverted to the pre-March 2022 structure, the top court affirmed that it is the exclusive prerogative of the state govt to define ward boundaries, reports Clara Lewis. The SC on Monday dismissed pleas seeking to revert to the earlier ward demarcations (as decided by the Maha Vikas Aghadi, which had increased the number of wards in municipal corporations and district councils based on the projected population), making it clear that the local body elections will be conducted based on the revised boundaries as approved by the state govt. It also rejected another petition challenging the 27% OBC electoral reservation in local bodies, confirming its earlier stance that elections could be held with the OBC quota in place. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai CM Devendra Fadnavis said the apex court has accepted suggestions of the state govt on both ward boundaries and OBC reservation. "The petition sought that the ward formation done in 2022 by the Maha Vikas Aghadi govt be implemented for the elections. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo However, our govt already scrapped the decision. We said ward formation would follow the 2017 format, which has been accepted by the court," he said. The CM also said the SC had confirmed its earlier directions on OBC reservation. "The OBC reservation will apply in all districts," he said. In an earlier hearing, the SC had expressed displeasure over the long delay in conducting local body elections, even questioning the intent of the State Election Commission. It had on May 6 directed the commission to complete the polls within four months. Earlier, Fadnavis said the local body elections will be held in phases: the zilla parishad elections in one phase, the nagar parishad and nagar panchayat elections in the second, and the municipal corporation elections in the third. The entire election process is expected to be completed by the year-end. State minister and NCP politician Chhagan Bhujbal hailed the SC order. "The top court's decision removes significant hurdles in the implementation of OBC reservation in local self-governance bodies," he said. Bhujbal further said, "The ruling has reinforced that the elections would proceed based on the newly notified ward/constituency boundaries and reaffirms that the elections would proceed as per the May 2025 order, ensuring that the 27% reservation for OBCs remains intact." The BMC House's term ended in March 2022. Since then, the municipal chief as administrator has been overseeing functioning of the corporation. Elections have been pending in 29 corporations, 248 municipal councils, 42 nagar panchayats, 32 zilla parishads and 336 panchayat samitis. Initially, local body polls were delayed on account of Covid lockdown. Then, court cases regarding OBC quota and number of wards added to the inordinate delay.
