logo
Think And Lead Outside-In To Counter Groupthink And Insular Cultures

Think And Lead Outside-In To Counter Groupthink And Insular Cultures

Forbes26-05-2025

Groupthink
Insular cultures produce groupthink, don't evolve as fast as others, and thus pose an existential threat to organizations. Instead, think and lead from the outside-in to ensure your culture and organization continue to evolve and thrive.
Irving Janis explained that groupthink happens when group pressures and a drive for unanimity suppress dissent and critical evaluation. One example is the disastrous decision to launch the space shuttle Challenger, reenacted for this video.
As I wrote earlier, culture is the collective character of the individuals in an organization. Organizations are made up of individuals, each with their own character. The way they behave together, relate to each other, the attitudes and values they share, and the environment they create is the organization's culture.
In his recent book, 'On Character: Choices that Define a Life,' Stan McChrystal argues that character is a personal choice made up of a combination of convictions and discipline. In his words, 'Convictions set the direction of our intentions, but discipline provides the impetus to move' – especially when the choices are hard. For example, 'When our belonging to a group is on the line, many of us will say or do things we otherwise wouldn't.'
He then told me that, 'In working on our book on Risk, we studied the Bay of Pigs and Janis' conclusions about Groupthink. Most of us have seen it many times and I'd add that the pressures of a hierarchical structure (like the White House, Army, or many Corporations) makes it easy to fall into – a huge trap.'
Thus, groupthink behavior happens in organizations with cultures with a bias to work with people just like us (importance of being accepted by the group,) and a responsive/avoid basic failure attitude (as opposed to openness to making intelligent failures while learning through experiments.)
As Janis puts it, these organizations and groups tend to:
The ultimate issue is Darwinian.
Those focused on being accepted by the group and afraid to experiment are, almost by definition, not responsive to changes, not evolving, and not going to survive as others evolve to serve customers better.
Outside-in thinking is closely related to outside-in leadership. Outside-in leaders know that the true measure of success is not in the organizations, infrastructure or people they attract and develop, but in what those organizations, infrastructure and people get done for others. They start by thinking about those others and the conditions they face.
This should play out differently depending upon the core focus of your organization. If your organization is focused on:
Get to the ground truth
Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and U.S. Secretary of State, Colin Powell, described the need for leaders to know 'ground truth.' This is unvarnished, unfiltered truth about the harsh reality. Powell got his from chaplains, sergeants major, inspectors general, and normal soldiers.
Get your ground truth from data, facts, and first-line supervisors. They are close enough to the front lines to know the truth, one step back so they can see the forest and not just the trees, and far enough away from you not to be afraid of you.
Get it from your customers (service-focused,) outside innovators (design), suppliers (production,) and others solving similar problems (delivery/distribution.)
Seed dissent
Make sure your groups have people that will dissent – and protect them. These could be people that play Devil's advocate or, like Shakespeare's fools, challenge ideas and thinking.
Conduct double skip-level lunches
Identify the top-box, highest-rated performers three levels below you. Set up one-on-one lunches with them. Read their reviews just before each lunch. Greet them and say, 'I've read your review. You're doing amazing things. I'd love to learn more about what you're doing.'
Just that. Then listen. They'll feel great. You'll learn what good is. They'll tell you the truth about what they think. The people three levels down aren't part of your 'group' and, like front line supervisors, are too far away from you to be afraid.
Click here for a categorized list of my Forbes articles (of which this is #946)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asking Eric: Grandparents want to keep in touch with estranged granddaughter
Asking Eric: Grandparents want to keep in touch with estranged granddaughter

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Asking Eric: Grandparents want to keep in touch with estranged granddaughter

Dear Eric: My husband and I have been estranged from our 17-year-old granddaughter for eight years. We were loving, supportive grandparents but after the mother of our granddaughter broke up with our son, the father, she stopped our granddaughter from seeing us as well. For eight years, I have tried to keep contact with our granddaughter with gifts and cards on her birthday, Christmas and other times. I do not receive a response of any kind from her. We believe her mother forbids her from contacting us. My question is should I continue to send cards and gifts to her? I'm ready to stop. I don't want her to forget us but I'm very tired of attempting to reach out to her with no response. — Estranged Gramma Gramma: Eight years is a long time to go with no response. I'm sorry; I know that's hard. If you're ready to stop — or modify this practice — I think it's OK to do so. Sending cards and gifts hasn't had the desired effect thus far and if it's just contributing to your grief and sense of loss, it might be best to take a pause. Consider, however, that your granddaughter is about to be a legal adult and therefore will be able to make different choices about who gets to contact her. And also consider that the gifts may have had a positive impact on her, even if they didn't result in a closer relationship with you. There are a lot of unknowns. As such, don't feel obligated to keep up a tradition that's wearing you down. You might, for instance, take a few years off, and then reach out with a letter asking if she's open to reconnecting. You'll have to respect whatever she chooses, but there are other paths forward. They'll just take a little more time. Dear Eric: I have been dating my girlfriend for one and a half years now, and we have a really strong relationship. I care about her a lot, and our relationship means a lot to me. However, recently our relationship has been missing the spark it used to have, and it just isn't as exciting anymore (although I still very much enjoy spending time with my partner and our relationship is fine). Additionally, I have started finding someone at work attractive and have found myself looking at them a lot and trying to be around them often. I have already told my partner that I find this person attractive, but I said it didn't amount to much (sort of like thinking a movie star is attractive) and so my partner was not too upset. However, I feel very guilty about my feelings of attraction and am worried that it could be a sign my girlfriend may not actually be right for me. I'm hesitant to just break up with my current partner and begin talking to the person I'm attracted to as I feel it would hurt her greatly and I also don't want to lose such a good relationship. Furthermore, I haven't spent much time with this co-worker whom I'm attracted to, and don't wish to spend any time with them as it feels like cheating. So, I don't know much about their personality, and they could end up being someone that I actually dislike. Is it a bad idea to throw away a perfectly good relationship just for a 'crush?' Is it immoral to have these feelings and stay with my partner? Are these feelings a sign that maybe our relationship isn't meant to be? — Confused Lover Confused: Bad idea? Yes. Immoral? No. A sign? Reply hazy, ask again. Your relationship with your girlfriend is changing, as is natural. Things won't always have the sizzle and spark of your early attraction. That can be jarring, but it's often an opportunity for you both to reinvest in the relationship, to make some adjustments, and to light new sparks. Relationships aren't ever static. Try to communicate openly about what you miss, what you're hoping for, and ways — big and small — that you can keep building the relationship. I don't know what the inside of this crush looks like. But I know that it's often easier to look at something that's new and mostly unknown and start to construct an idealized narrative. It's easier to imagine that everything will be perfect with some other person — without even really knowing that person — than to accept that 'perfect' with the person we do know takes work. Most of the time, a crush is just a crush. If you want to get to know your co-worker outside of the office and see if reality matches your imagination, that's fine (presuming she also wants to get to know you). But I think your first step should be spending some time working on your relationship with your partner. (Send questions to R. Eric Thomas at eric@ or P.O. Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at 2025 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store