Jute industry urges textiles ministry to rescind packaging dilution approval for FCI, state agencies
The Indian Jute Mills Association (IJMA) also sought West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's intervention against the dilution.
Kolkata, Apr 23 (PTI) An association of jute mill owners has appealed to Union Textiles Minister Giriraj Singh to withdraw approvals for packaging dilution, granted to Food Corporation of India (FCI), Haryana and Madhya Pradesh procurement agencies, for the rabi marketing season (RMS) 2025-26.
In a letter dated April 22 to the textile minister, IJMA highlighted that the dilution approvals violate mandatory jute packaging notifications and severely impact the livelihoods of 40 lakh jute farmers and 3.5 lakh industrial workers.
The millers' association argued that the FCI and the state procurement agencies (SPAs) had failed to adhere to supply plans, with '100 per cent default in indents' for November 2024, leading to last-minute order bunching—over 4 lakh bales in February and 5 lakh in March 2025.
IJMA also emphasised that jute mills have already supplied 96 per cent of orders for FCI and SPAs, with remaining deliveries set for completion by April 30, 2025.
Despite this, the FCI and Haryana have floated tenders for 1.02 lakh synthetic (HDPE/PP) bags, undermining jute demand, the IJMA chairman claimed.
As of now, only 50,000 jute bales are scheduled for May 2025, leaving the industry with surplus capacity, the IJMA letter pointed out.
Demands of the FCI and the state procurement agencies (SPAs) can easily be met within this supply plan, ensuring full utilisation of jute mills and protecting workers' livelihoods, it said.
Approving synthetic bags is unnecessary and harms the jute sector, the letter noted.
'We would, hence, request that approval for dilution being awarded to FCI and SPAs in the present instance be rescinded forthwith,' Gupta said in the letter.
Dilutions, in future, also need to be awarded only if they are strictly in consonance with the provisions of the Act and notifications so as to not jeopardise the interests of the industry, raw jute farmers and workmen, he added. PTI BSM BDC
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
82.5% rise in Bengal firms since 2011: Union govt data
1 2 Kolkata: The number of companies registered in Bengal has gone up 82.5% between 2011 and 2025, according to data from the Union ministry of corporate affairs. In 2011, there were 1,37,156 companies registered in the state. On March 31 this year, number of companies registered in the state stood at 2,50,343. The numbers were part of a reply by Harsh Malhotra, minister of state in the corporate affairs ministry, in response to a question by Trinamool's Mathurapur MP Bapi Haldar. According to the reply, companies with registered offices in Bengal in 2010 stood at 1,21,496. This rose to 1,37,156 the next year. Between 2019, when this number was 2,00,626, and 2020 (the Covid year), the number rose to 2,06,305. As of 31 March 2021, despite Covid constraints, it stood at 2,13,504. By 2022, this number climbed to 2,21,873, and then to 2,50,343 in 2025. The minister shared in an annexure that in 2020-21, 7,197 companies were incorporated in Bengal while 306 left. In 2021-22, 8,365 companies were incorporated and 273 left. In 2022-23, the numbers stood at 7,978 and 270, respectively, and the comparative figures in 2023-24 stood at 8,683 and 371. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Learn More - How Donating Sperm May Boost Your Income SpellRock Undo In 2024-2025, this stood at 8,353 and 366, and this year, till 31 July, 3,464 companies were incorporated and 156 left Bengal. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata | Gold Rates Today in Kolkata | Silver Rates Today in Kolkata These numbers go against the narrative of industrial flight from Bengal. State industry minister Shashi Panja, in a statement on X, said, "A bitter pill for BJP to swallow! For years, they've run a one-sided smear campaign painting Bengal as 'industry-averse.' But now, data from their own ministry blows their lies to pieces." "In the last six years (up to 31 July 2025), 44,040 companies were incorporated in Bengal, while only 1,742 companies shifted their registered offices out of the state. Under CM Mamata Banerjee, Bengal has witnessed a wave of development the BJP can't match. So, they resort to peddling lies, half-truths, and propaganda to hide their own miserable record," it added. BJP's Amit Malviya, citing the numbers, on X wrote: "Registering an office is not the same as running a thriving industry. The real story is written in boarded-up factories, fleeing companies, collapsing investor confidence, and Bengal's plunge from industrial pride to economic cautionary tale under Mamata Banerjee." 'In last six years (up to 31 July 2025), 44,040 companies were incorporated in Bengal, while only 1,742 companies shifted their registered offices out of the state,' said Shashi Panja Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Business Standard
8 hours ago
- Business Standard
Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals receives LoA worth Rs 49 cr from MSEDCL
Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals has received a Letter of Empanelment from Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (MSEDCL), for design, manufacture, supply, transport, installation, testing and commissioning of Off-grid DC Solar Photovoltaic Water Pumping System (SPWPS) of 3 HP, 5 HP, & 7.5 HP capacity at identified farmer's site in District of Maharashtra, including complete system warranty, its repair and maintenance and Remote Monitoring System (RMS) for 5 years under Mangel Tyala Saur Krushi Pump Yojana/ PM Kusum Scheme B scheme". The value of the contract is Rs 49 crore.
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
Mint Explainer: Understanding the proposals under the new Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code amendment bill
Finance and corporate affairs minister Nirmala Sitharaman tabled the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday. The proposed amendments aim to reduce resolution delays, maximise value for all stakeholders, and improve governance of all processes under the IBC. They propose to focus on the creditor-initiated insolvency resolution process which involves creditors settling insolvency matters out of court, thereby reducing the burden of cases on insolvency tribunals. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will only have to approve the resolution plans, thus reducing the timelines under the IBC. Mint takes a closer look at the amendments. Why was the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) introduced in 2016? The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, one of India's new legal laws, was introduced in 2016 to deal with insolvent companies and individuals that could not repay their debt, which sometimes ran into hundreds of crores. A year later, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was entrusted with legal powers to initiate proceedings to recover loans that had become non-performing assets (NPA). It was then that the central bank made public a list of 12 companies which defaulted on huge loans. Interestingly, those companies were called the 'dirty dozen'. This list included big companies such as Bhushan Steel, Essar Steel, Jaypee Infratech, Jyoti Structures, Bhushan Power, and Amtek Auto. The aim was to resolve stressed assets in a time-bound manner while also improving the economy's financial position. What are the key changes proposed in the IBC (Amendment) Act, 2025? Under the amendments, the government has proposed creditor-initiated insolvency resolution process (CIIRP), group insolvency, cross-border insolvency and pre-packaged insolvency for companies, among others. These amendments will help in smooth admission, resolution and liquidation. 'The proposed amendments do promise to cure the current maladies, including treatment of statutory charges, and provide for newer solutions like pre-packaged insolvencies, group insolvencies, cross-border insolvencies," said Soumitra Majumdar, partner, JSA Advocates & Solicitors. 'The current sub-committee should undertake wider public consultations for ironing out the remaining creases through the benefit of experience." Why is there a need for a voluntary group insolvency? A new chapter has been included in the Bill to empower the central government to create rules for coordinated or consolidated insolvency proceedings for group companies. Group insolvency is a process in which a cluster of related companies—typically part of the same corporate structure—jointly enter insolvency proceedings, often when the group as a whole is unable to meet its financial obligations. The primary goal is to preserve the overall value of the group's assets while reducing the total cost of the corporate insolvency resolution. A notable example is the Videocon Group case, the first instance of group insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). In 2021, the State Bank of India (SBI) approached the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking substantive consolidation of 15 Videocon entities into a single resolution process. This case became a reference point for similar matters. In the Axis Bank Ltd vs Lavasa Corp Ltd case in 2021, the NCLT combined the insolvency proceedings of the Lavasa group to avoid losses that could result from fragmented resolutions. The tribunal also recognised that the financial health of the subsidiaries was closely tied to the outcome of the parent company's insolvency. What does the Bill state regarding cross-border insolvency? Essentially, when an insolvent company has credit and/or debtors in more than one jurisdiction i.e. in many different countries, that situation can be referred to as 'cross border insolvency' or 'international insolvency'. The Bill proposed a basic structure, for which the rules will be detailed later. The purpose of such insolvency is to enable lenders to manage the assets of financially distressed companies beyond specific geographies. This would ensure that India, with the help of other countries, gets access to bring overseas assets of the debtor within the ambit of insolvency. What is the creditor-initiated insolvency process and why is it important? The creditor-initiated insolvency resolution process allows lenders to settle insolvency proceedings out of court, wherein they only have to obtain regulator approval for the resolution plan from the NCLT. The concept of CIIRP gains importance as it puts the creditors on an important pedestal in the resolution process. 'Creditors can initiate the process without the court's intervention. CIIRP gives additional comfort to the promoters to make genuine efforts to revive the company without losing control since the promoters continue to run the company," said Siddharth Srivasata, Partner Khaitan & Co. He added that NCLT has the power to convert the CIIRP to a regular insolvency proceedings in certain situations, for example if the corporate debtor has failed to assist the resolution professional or no resolution plan is approved by the lenders. "In my view, CIIRP is likely to find more traction as compared to pre-packaged insolvency and therefore is a major step in rebuilding the confidence of stakeholders in the IBC." The pre-packaged insolvency resolution process (PPIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, provides a streamlined framework for resolving insolvency, particularly for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). These entities frequently struggle with financial pressures stemming from market volatility, limited capital, and operational hurdles. PPIRP provides a quicker and more affordable route for insolvent MSMEs. Designed as a promoter in a control framework, it enables MSMEs to restructure their debts while continuing to manage their operations, delivering faster outcomes than conventional insolvency proceedings. Why is the withdrawal of insolvency applications under Section 12A of the IBC expected to become challenging under the new amendment? Section 12A of IBC allows the withdrawal of an insolvency application against a debt-laden company only with the approval of 90% of the voting share of the committee of creditors. This threshold is often hard to achieve since inter-creditor conflicts arise, making the withdrawal process difficult. When the new amendments are implemented, the withdrawal may become even more complex because it will not be allowed after the formation of the committee of creditors
