logo
Man found guilty of beating top chef Mussie Imnetu to death then leaving him to go clubbing

Man found guilty of beating top chef Mussie Imnetu to death then leaving him to go clubbing

Independent20-02-2025

A man has been found guilty of beating a top chef near Notting Hill Carnival and leaving him dying in the street to go clubbing.
Omar Wilson, 32, repeatedly punched and kicked Mussie Imnetu during an altercation outside Dr Power restaurant in Queensway, west London, on 26 August last year.
Mr Imnetu, 41, who had worked under chefs Gordon Ramsay and Marcus Wareing, died later in hospital.
During his Old Bailey trial, Wilson claimed he acted in self-defence, telling jurors: 'I just regret that somebody's life was taken while I was trying to defend mine.'
A jury deliberated for 22 hours and 34 minutes to find him guilty of the chef's murder by a majority of 10 to two on Thursday.
Scotland Yard Detective Chief Inspector Brian Howie, who led the investigation, said: 'Our thoughts very much remain with Mussie's family and friends in Dubai, Sweden and London, who had to relive the last traumatic moments of his life during the trial after Wilson refused to take responsibility for his actions.
'Mussie was a loving husband, father, son and a respected chef. He was in London for a few days to help train his colleagues and went out that evening to enjoy the post-Notting Hill Carnival atmosphere, where tragically he was violently assaulted.'
The jury had been shown graphic CCTV footage showing Wilson approaching Mr Imnetu and headbutting him.
About a minute later, Wilson punched Mr Imnetu five times in the head, causing him to fall to the ground.
Wilson continued to punch Mr Imnetu repeatedly while he was on his hands and knees, then kicked him in the head.
Prosecutor Jacob Hallam KC had said: 'The defendant had, by that point, struck him to his head more than a dozen times. Mr Imnetu had struck the defendant not once.
'At the end of that altercation, Mr Imnetu was dying on the ground and the defendant left and went clubbing in the Ministry of Sound.'
As nearby police moved to help Mr Imnetu, Wilson walked away having dropped his sunglasses and keys at the scene.
Mr Imnetu, who worked at The Arts Club, a private member's establishment, was taken to hospital and died four days later without regaining consciousness, jurors heard.
In the aftermath of the attack, Wilson told an associate he 'crossed the line'.
In a message, he admitted: 'There's a monster in me, man, and it's just like sometimes it comes out.
'And I think I've messed up now, I've messed up, everything's finished.'
Asked how the carnival was going, he replied: 'Can't lie. I did the hands ting (sic) and I think it's a manslaughter,' jurors heard.
Following his arrest on August 28, Wilson told police he had struck the victim in 'self-defence'.
He claimed Mr Imnetu was behaving erratically, harassing girls, and had a bottle.
On being shown CCTV of Mr Imnetu being assaulted on the ground, Wilson said it 'seems excessive now' and watching it was 'f****** disgusting', jurors were told.
Giving evidence in his trial, Wilson claimed he hit Mr Imnetu because he felt 'trapped' and 'scared' and believed that the chef was holding a smashed bottle, although that turned out not to be the case.
Asked what he would have done differently with the benefit of hindsight, Wilson said: 'The thing that always haunts me the most was the police were so close and I didn't know at the time.'
Wilson, of Napier Road, Leytonstone, east London, was remanded into custody and will be sentenced by Judge Philip Katz on Friday February 28.
Samantha Yelland, of the Crown Prosecution Service, said: 'Our thoughts remain with Mussie Imnetu's devastated family and friends who loved him dearly, as well as those who had to witness the shocking attack that evening.
'Omar Wilson's savage violence ultimately took the life of a much-loved man, and the Crown Prosecution Service was determined that he should face justice.
'The evidence in this case was overwhelming, with high-quality CCTV footage showing Wilson attacking the victim.
'While Wilson tried to claim his actions were in self-defence, the evidence clearly showed that he was the only person acting violently.
'I hope today's verdict – which will see Wilson put behind bars for the murder – provides some comfort to those who now have to live a life without Mussie.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Neighbourhoods where people are most likely to be mugged, carjacked or robbed
Neighbourhoods where people are most likely to be mugged, carjacked or robbed

Daily Mirror

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Neighbourhoods where people are most likely to be mugged, carjacked or robbed

The neighbourhoods and town centres where people are most likely to be mugged, carjacked or threatened and forced to hand over mobile phones have been revealed by a new crime map. A new interactive crime map has revealed the neighbourhoods in Britain where you're most likely to be mugged, carjacked or robbed, according to police data. Last year, police recorded more than 80,000 crimes of robbery in England and Wales. That is any crime where an offender uses force or the threat of force in order to steal. It can include mugging (where someone is attacked and robbed on the street), robbery by intimidation (making someone think violence or force will be used to steal from them), carjacking (using force to steal a vehicle), an armed robbery or a bank robbery. ‌ ‌ It is a more serious offence than simple theft and can leave victims suffering psychological harm, even triggering long-term mental health issues such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The maximum sentence is life imprisonment. As with most crime types, robberies are more likely to take place in busy town and city centres than in residential neighbourhoods. Last year, outside central London - where tourists are far more likely to be targeted than anywhere else - Leeds City Centre witnessed the highest number of robberies with 365, the equivalent of one per day. Next was the North Central & Dartmouth Circus (287) and Central (262) districts of Birmingham city centre. You can see how crime rates compare near you using our interactive map. Crime rates - the number of crimes in each area for every 1,000 people living there - allow for a fairer comparison of the likelihood of being robbed in places with widely different population sizes. However, in some busy city centres, the results may be skewed by the number of visitors. After Leeds City Centre and districts within Birmingham's city centre, the risk of a robbery was greatest in Central Bradford. There were 133 robberies last year in Central Bradford, a rate of 20 crimes for every 1,000 people, or one robbery for every 50 residents. Next was Bristol's City Centre & Harbourside neighbourhood (17 robberies per 1,000 residents), Leicester City Centre (16 per 1,000 people), Central Blackpool (14), and Nottingham City Centre & Trent Bridge (14). ‌ However, robbery is far more likely in London than anywhere else in England and Wales. The 32 local authority areas with the highest rates of robbery are all boroughs of London. Of neighbourhood areas, robberies were most common in Fitzrovia West & Soho, a total of 1,285 last year. That's the equivalent of a robbery every seven hours, or at least three each day. Figures are available for every one of more than 7,000 neighbourhoods in England and Wales apart from areas covered by Greater Manchester Police, as the force has not supplied crime data for last year. Crime figures are available for neighbourhoods with between 7,000 and 10,000 residents, which the government designates as Middle Super Output Areas (MSOAs). The statistics do not include crimes reported at train stations, as British Transport Police record them.

Met officer in VIP abuse scandal has gross misconduct charges dropped
Met officer in VIP abuse scandal has gross misconduct charges dropped

Telegraph

time2 days ago

  • Telegraph

Met officer in VIP abuse scandal has gross misconduct charges dropped

The senior police officer who led Scotland Yard's VIP child abuse inquiry has had gross misconduct charges against him dropped. Steve Rodhouse, a former assistant commissioner at the Metropolitan Police, had been due to face a disciplinary hearing over his handling of aspects of Operation Midland. He had been accused of breaching professional standards and making dishonest statements while leading the operation. Mr Rodhouse, who is currently the director general of operations at the National Crime Agency, was the only officer to face disciplinary proceedings as a result of Operation Midland, which saw several high-profile figures investigated over false allegations of child abuse. On Thursday, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) announced that it was dropping the charges. A spokesman for the watchdog said the decision had been taken after a large volume of relevant material was unexpectedly disclosed by the Met. The decision means not a single officer has been held to account for the blunders that led to innocent people, including high-ranking military personnel and former ministers and MPs, being investigated over malicious child sex allegations. Operation Midland was launched in 2014 after fantasist Carl Beech went to police claiming he had been raped and abused by a VIP paedophile ring in the 1980s. He told police that well-known figures, including Sir Edward Heath, the former prime minister; Lord Brittan, the former Home Secretary; Lord Bramall, the former head of the Army; and Harvey Proctor, the former Tory MP, had raped and even murdered children. The Met spent 18 months investigating the claims, even raiding the homes of some of those falsely accused, before shutting it down without making a single arrest. In July 2019, Beech was jailed for 18 years after being found guilty of perverting the course of justice and fraud. Two other men, known as Witness A and Witness B, were alleged to have also come forward during Operation Midland to corroborate Beech's lies with false allegations, but they were never charged. The claims against Mr Rodhouse centred on comments he made in the media about the honesty of Witnesses A and B, and subsequent remarks he made to Sir Richard Henriques, the former High Court judge who was carrying out an independent review into the handling of Operation Midland. Following an IOPC investigation, the watchdog concluded that Mr Rodhouse had a case to answer and should attend a disciplinary hearing. But that decision has been reversed following the late disclosure of a cache of material from Scotland Yard. Harvey Proctor, who is the only living Operation Midland victim, described the decision to drop the charges as 'appalling'. An IOPC spokesman said there was no evidence within the material that there was any 'inappropriate motivation' in Mr Roadhouse's comments. The spokesman said: 'There was, however, substantial evidence to indicate the comments made to the media were the result of collaboration between senior Met officers and staff and that there had been appropriate considerations, including a desire not to discourage victims of historic sex offences coming forward.' Amanda Rowe, director of the IOPC, said: 'It is highly regrettable for all concerned that material we requested three years ago during our investigation, and we believed had not been retained due to the Met's retention policy, has only recently been discovered and disclosed. 'Police forces have a legal obligation to provide information to the IOPC when we request it. However, we acknowledge that we could have taken further steps during the investigation to seek additional assurance from the Met that relevant email material was definitely unavailable. 'We apologise to all of those affected and we are working with the force to establish exactly how and why this situation has occurred, and to reduce the risk of it happening again. 'Today's announcement does not change our finding that by failing to follow Sir Richard's recommendation in his review to investigate the witnesses, the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. 'During our investigation, we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force.' Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were 'ill-founded and incorrect'. In a statement, he added: 'I am pleased that the IOPC has finally recognised that I acted with honesty, integrity and care throughout a difficult investigation. 'I welcome the IOPC's apology, but I have yet to receive an adequate explanation as to how this debacle occurred. 'I recognise that senior police officers must be held accountable for their actions, and that public complaints must be properly considered. 'However, if police officers are to willingly take on complex and challenging investigations, they must have the confidence that any complaints made about their conduct will be competently investigated in a balanced and timely fashion. That was not the case here. 'Vital evidence was not considered despite it being readily available and repeatedly requested. 'I am grateful for all of the support that I have received, and I now look forward to resuming my career investigating and prosecuting serious criminals.'

Car ended up like this after dangerous driver tried to flee from police
Car ended up like this after dangerous driver tried to flee from police

North Wales Live

time2 days ago

  • North Wales Live

Car ended up like this after dangerous driver tried to flee from police

Dashcam footage has captured the moment a dangerous driver left a stolen car hanging upside down during a bid to escape from police. Hasnain Ahmad and an accomplice were in a blue Skoda which had been taken from a Flintshire auction site. Ahmad later drove the Skoda into Cheshire and onto the M56 motorway before a collision which left the Skoda badly damaged. Ahmad, who was 17 at the time and is now 18, had no licence. He admitted a string of motoring offences - but was not charged with stealing the car himself - and a judge at Mold Crown Court said it was fortunate he hadn't been killed. A judge gave him nine months' detention in a young offenders institute but suspended the term for two years. You can sign up for all the latest court stories here Prosecutor Myles Wilson said the Skoda car had been taken from the Queensferry auction site. It was a Skoda Kamiq worth £17,400. It was believed to have been taken by another man. But later on October 22 last year Cheshire Police started following it on the M56 motorway with Ahmad at the wheel. Another man was in a Volvo on false plates driving with him in convoy, said Mr Wilson. Ahmad turned off the motorway at Hapsford then onto a single track road called Hog Lane. As he was being hemmed by a police car Ahmad started to drive away reaching 80mph on the 30mph road as the police car chased him. Police car dashcam footage played in court showed part of a three-minute pursuit. The defendant turned onto an A road - the A56 - speeding and narrowly missing members of the public in Helsby. Eventually, he crashed. Mr Wilson said Ahmad tested positive for cannabis. He had cannabis and a cannabis grinder with him. The judge His Honour Simon Mills branded the driving "horrific". He told defence counsel Euros Jones that if his client had been 18 at the time of the offences he would have gone straight into a young offenders' institute today. The judge said: "This is a really serious piece of dangerous very fortunate in that we still have this young man with us in court to face the music today." He asked Ahmad, of Frobisher Court, Manchester: "What on earth were you doing mixing cannabis with driving a motor vehicle?" He said he had a choice to obey the law in future or risk committing more serious offences with "disastrous" consequences. He gave him the suspended term in a YOI for dangerous driving and an identical, concurrent term for aggravated vehicle taking, both suspended for two years. He must do 200 hours of unpaid work and 20 days of rehabilitation activity. He was disqualified from driving for two years. Then he must take an extended test to get a driving licence. There were no separate penalties for driving with no insurance or without a licence, or possession of cannabis.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store