Money Problem: 'Wickes fitted the wrong kitchen' v 'Your reader ordered the wrong kitchen'
We had our kitchen redone with Wickes - there were a number of issues, but the main one was that they sent the wrong worktop. I didn't realise after it had been installed. They are claiming this is the one we picked out in the showroom.
Tina
Our cost of living specialist Megan Harwood-Baynes tackles this one...
You told me when you went to pick out your kitchen, there was a particular quartz worktop on display that you fell in love with.
Not knowing the specific name, you pointed it out to the designer, who ordered it.
When it arrived, although it was similar, you had a nagging feeling it wasn't quite right, so you went back to the showroom and realised the wrong worktop had been installed.
Other issues you told me about in the process included:
Being quoted a bathroom and kitchen £8,000 more expensive than your budget;
A top-of-the-range microwave oven was ordered that you did not ask for;
The height of the oven was too low - this was adjusted by the fitter - but this made the microwave too big for the remaining gap;
You were told you would get a refund for the microwave only once the financing for the kitchen began;
Conflicting messages about using the finance option when you wanted to pay cash;
The hob protection plate was not installed, so now the cutlery drawer gets too hot when cooking.
You filed an initial complaint with Wickes about this, but were told: "There appears to be a discrepancy between your recollection of the specific worktop ordered and the details recorded by the design consultant during the design process."
More from this series:
'BA went back on refund promise'
'Dud car dealer won't give my money back'
'My husband is freelance and in hospital'
You told me: "All I want is my worktop changed to the one I chose and my microwave refunded, but no one is listening."
I reached out to Wickes, who said they were sorry to hear about your experience.
They said: "Our customer relations team has conducted a thorough review of the matter and concludes that Wickes followed all due processes to ensure the order was correct. Our customer relations team has been in direct contact with Ms Edwards to explain our findings, and as a gesture of goodwill, we have offered a discount on the work surface."
You told me they had offered you a 25% discount on the work surface, but you are unhappy with this because you said you didn't want it in the first place.
But they also said they are looking into how the hob protection plate can be correctly fitted, to prevent the issue with your cutlery drawer overheating.
You have now filed a complaint with the Furniture and Home Improvement Ombudsman.
Next steps
Issues like this can be tricky to resolve, because it has come to "he said, she said". It will be up to the furniture ombudsman to decide what happens next.
When ordering such high-value items, it is always worth double-checking the order confirmation the company sends across. I appreciate your invoice had 200+ items on it, and whilst you probably didn't need to check every single fitting and fixture, the worktop and appliances would have benefited from a double check.
Whilst I don't doubt your recollection of events, it is difficult to prove what happened. But given you had a host of other issues with the process, it is still worth taking the complaint to the ombudsman.
This feature is not intended as financial advice - the aim is to give an overview of the things you should think about. Submit your dilemma or consumer dispute via:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a few seconds ago
- The Sun
Kellogg's brings new cereal to the UK that shoppers say is just like discontinued favourite
KELLOGG's has brought a new cereal to the UK that shoppers have said is just like a discontinued favourite. Shoppers have spotted packs of Kellogg's Smacks on shelves at Morrisons for £2.50. 1 The sweetened puff wheat cereal is already popular in the US but it's now made it across the pond. It's described as a classic crunchy breakfast cereal with a honey-sweet taste. But shoppers have also pointed out that it looks very similar to a popular discontinued cereal. A picture of the new cereal was shared on the Facebook group Snack Reviews and hundreds of people were commenting on it. Lots of commenters said how similar the new product looked to Sugar Puffs, which were discontinued in 2014. "Basically sugar puffs then lol," one person said. Another wrote: "Definitely sugar puffs!!" A third added: "They'll always be sugar puffs to me. They're puffed wheat and sugar." Sugar Puffs, which were made by Quaker Oats, were rebranded as Honey Monster Puffs with a new reformulated recipe. The new recipe had less sugar and more honey than the original Sugar Puffs. Rice Krispies brings back 'most requested' flavor for first time in 20 years – but fans will notice a big switch It came as the Government aimed to crack down on sugar content in foods marketed at children. Sugar Puffs had been around for 60 years before they were rebranded. Discontinued items that have made a comeback Brands have started a trend of bringing back popular discontinued items recently. One that got shoppers buzzing was the comeback of White Malteasers, which had been off shelves for 11 years. Customers can now buy a 30g pack for £1.05, 74g pack for £2.50 or a larger 126g sharing bag for £2.95. Meanwhile snack fans have spotted another chocolatey treat on supermarket shelves that's similar to a discontinued Cadbury product. The new Cadbury Dairy Milk Balls are said to resemble Cadbury Tasters, which first launched in 1996. Plus, the nostalgic alcopop Bacardi Breezer has also made a return to stores after being axed in 2015. The fruity alcopops were once a rite of passage for teenagers having their first alcoholic drinks or going clubbing for the first time. Why are products axed or recipes changed? ANALYSIS by chief consumer reporter James Flanders. Food and drinks makers have been known to tweak their recipes or axe items altogether. They often say that this is down to the changing tastes of customers. There are several reasons why this could be done. For example, government regulation, like the "sugar tax," forces firms to change their recipes. Some manufacturers might choose to tweak ingredients to cut costs. They may opt for a cheaper alternative, especially when costs are rising to keep prices stable. For example, Tango Cherry disappeared from shelves in 2018. It has recently returned after six years away but as a sugar-free version. Fanta removed sweetener from its sugar-free alternative earlier this year. Suntory tweaked the flavour of its flagship Lucozade Original and Orange energy drinks. While the amount of sugar in every bottle remains unchanged, the supplier swapped out the sweetener aspartame for sucralose.
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Construction should be a career that you can build a life on
Re your editorial (The Guardian view on construction workers: the country needs more of them, fast, 13 August), as a bricklayer with decades of experience, I see the skills shortage in the construction industry as the result of years of neglect. The problem is not only attracting new people, but keeping them in the trade once they see the reality of working conditions. Most site bricklayers are self-employed subcontractors. We don't get pensions, holiday pay, or sick pay. If you're ill or injured, you simply don't earn. That insecurity pushes many skilled people out of construction entirely. On top of that, wages have barely moved in years – in fact, the rates many bricklayers receive today are lower than four years ago. Large housebuilders often pay good rates to main contractors, but by the time it filters down to the bricklayer, they can end up with far less. If the UK is serious about meeting its housing targets, we need more than training schemes. We need to make construction a job you can build a life on – fair pay directly to the tradespeople, proper benefits, and conditions that match the skill and physical demands of the work. Until that changes, we'll keep losing good people faster than we can train them, no matter how much money is thrown at OrdPeterlee, County Durham Large construction firms routinely depend on multiple levels of subcontracting, involving an ecosystem of small and medium-sized enterprises that source labour through a myriad of different routes. Those who do the work are often unsure of their own employment status. People working alongside each other frequently have very different terms and conditions, or indeed, no written terms and conditions at all. Career paths do exist, but only in sheltered pockets. The fractured nature of the employment model brings obvious advantages to 'employers' in terms of low overheads. But training is invariably seen as someone else's problem. Many small firms would much prefer to invest in direct employment and apprenticeships, but such investment isn't feasible given the competitive dynamics of the marketplace. This is the end point of the industry's 40-year quest for modernisation. Simple solutions are few and far between. But the first step for policymakers is to recognise the highly fissured nature of the construction employment GreenProfessor of construction management, University of Reading There are plenty of decent tradespeople out there and, of course, some not so good. Yes, we need to bring in more for the future, and I've no problem with them having formal qualifications. But that doesn't make a tradesperson. I got my City & Guilds in carpentry in 1997. As I understand it, once my Construction Skills Certificate Scheme card runs out, it won't be renewed unless I make a significant spend to get an NVQ. I've been in the trade for over 30 years, and I've diverged my skill base significantly past carpentry alone, all learned on the job. Currently, I have no problem getting work, as I'm fairly adept at most building trades. A rush to have only the formally qualified working on site will be counterproductive. As a self-employed tradesperson, if my work isn't to standard, I cannot work. I'm 51, still fit. If Labour is going to achieve its goals, people like me are StringerKing's Lynn, Norfolk Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Housing project paused amid lead pollution fears
A proposed 3,500-home housing development in Gravesham, Kent, has been paused due to concerns over dangerous lead pollution from an adjacent refinery. Britannia Refined Metals (BRM), the refinery owner, claims the site is a "lead pollution hotspot" and warns there is "no safe level for exposure to lead", particularly for children. Developers Northfleet Harbourside dismiss these warnings, arguing the scheme and refinery can coexist and that the project is vital for addressing the national housing crisis on brownfield land. The project, which includes commercial space, a hotel, and a football stadium, was initially granted planning permission but is now under review following a planning inquiry. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government will make a final decision on the controversial development after the inquiry delivers its findings.
