logo
In Australia's housing war, political shift picks newbies over NIMBYs

In Australia's housing war, political shift picks newbies over NIMBYs

Reuters3 days ago
SYDNEY, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Australia's affordable housing push has arrived in the wealthy Sydney suburb of Mosman, where new planning laws now challenge longstanding resistance to development in the leafy area known for mansions and sweeping harbour views.
State authorities in Sydney and Melbourne - Australia's two biggest cities - are stripping some planning powers from suburban councils, including ones like Mosman that have created national headlines over opposition to new housing from older, wealthier constituents.
The broad policy shift comes as political deference to NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) sentiment gives way to demands for more housing from younger voters whose electoral heft now rivals the traditionally powerful baby boomer bloc.
In Mosman, there are fears the reforms will ultimately alter the character of the suburb, which boasts natural beauty, high-end stores and a median house price of over A$5 million ($3.23 million).
"We're surrounded by water with harbour views so there are people who are going to have literally millions of dollars knocked off the value of their property because their view will be blocked," said Simon Menzies, an elected Mosman councillor of 20 years.
The new laws are designed to allow more housing at key transport and commercial hubs and give the New South Wales state government powers to override council objections to large developments.
Similar rules to fast-track three-storey apartment blocks have been introduced in Melbourne's state of Victoria.
Five kilometres from Mosman, a new metro line in the suburb of Crows Nest means the state government has given a 22-storey apartment building the green light, overriding years-long council opposition.
In Mosman, objections from neighbours to one such proposal are already pouring in, but the council said there is little they can do about it.
The government intervention tracks a broader international trend, particularly in high-demand markets like London and California where soaring costs have hampered home ownership for young people.
Sydney's house prices have surged more than 30% over the past five years, outpacing wage growth.
New South Wales Premier Chris Minns warns Sydney, the state's capital, risks becoming "a city with no grandchildren".
It is already the second-most unaffordable city globally after Hong Kong.
"Their narrative is get out of our way. We want to build as many homes as possible to enable young Sydney residents to buy their homes," said Kos Samaras, director at polling firm Redbridge.
"I think the political ballast that was there to protect the interests of homeowners is now gone."
Australia's sprawling cities are among the world's least densely populated and historically built to accommodate suburban aspirations of owning detached houses with large backyards, not apartment living.
That has shifted in recent decades, particularly as waves of immigrants and students settle in high-rises around public transport hubs.
The latest housing push is designed to fill in the "missing middle" - townhouses, terraces and low-rise residential flats, which typically meet opposition from councils.
Research from the Productivity Commission showed industry is only building half as many homes per hour, compared with 30 years ago, hampered in part by approval processes that can stretch more than a decade.
Federal Housing Minister Clare O'Neil said 40 years of state, local and federal government regulations have created an impenetrable "wall of bureaucracy" for anyone trying to build a house.
"I think we've reached a tipping point here where the majority of our population are actually in housing distress themselves or are deeply concerned about the people that they know, especially that younger generation," O'Neil told Reuters. After her party's landslide victory in the May federal election, O'Neil is pledging "bigger and bolder" policies. A productivity roundtable this month presents an opportunity to remove some of those requirements, she added.
The turnaround may have already started.
Building approvals of apartments surged almost 90% in the first half of the year, driven by a 33% jump in New South Wales. Construction jobs jumped 20% in the three months to May and construction starts of higher density homes rose over 20% in the first quarter.
Peter Tulip, chief economist at the Centre for Independent Studies, expects a substantial step-up in construction in New South Wales and Victoria from 2026 onwards.
However, supply will still struggle to meet demand, pushing prices higher. Indeed, national home prices have hit fresh records each month, fuelled by rate cuts and the expectations of more to come.
Justin Simon, chair of housing advocacy group Sydney YIMBY, said Mosman had great amenity and was exactly the sort of place where new housing was needed.
"There is no way an ordinary person, essential workers, cleaners, nurses or anyone else could ever afford to live in Mosman and that is because for decades they have stopped new homes being built and we need to turn that around," he said.
Some Mosman property owners impacted by policy changes are joining forces to sell entire blocks to developers, capitalising on strong demand for higher-density housing in the harbourside suburb.
The first application under the new policy, for example, is a six-storey residential building near the main town centre, comprising 29 dwellings, most of which are the family-sized three-bedroom units Sydney lacks.
Objections cited issues such as traffic, road safety, parking and privacy concerns, public submissions to the council showed.
"These are mainly three-bedroom units, each with double beds, so the total number of eyes that will be looking into this area (my backyard) would be 110," said a neighbor of the development, who has lived in Mosman since 1999 and asked to remain anonymous.
"If they're all occupied, it's 110 eyes looking every time I hang my underwear outside."
While that local backlash could yet create wider pressure for the government, politicians for now are siding with what they see as demographic inevitability.
"Sydney, Wollongong, Newcastle - these cities aren't museums," said Paul Scully, New South Wales planning minister. "They need to grow and evolve and adapt and change in the same way our population changes."
($1 = 1.5482 Australian dollars)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marles insists Australia ‘not supplying weapons to Israel' but critics argue ‘parts of weapons are weapons'
Marles insists Australia ‘not supplying weapons to Israel' but critics argue ‘parts of weapons are weapons'

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Marles insists Australia ‘not supplying weapons to Israel' but critics argue ‘parts of weapons are weapons'

The federal government won't follow Germany and introduce new export restrictions to pressure Israel, with the defence minister, Richard Marles, insisting no weapons are being sent from Australia to aid the killing in Gaza. Marles, the acting prime minister, said on Sunday that Australia was not exporting any weapons for use by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), a contested claim rejected by human rights campaigners and the Greens. 'Let's be clear: we don't supply weapons to Israel,' Marles told ABC TV. 'We've seen a lot of misinformation in relation to what Australia is doing here. The fundamental point is that we are not supplying weapons to Israel, and there is no step that we could take, equivalent to that of Germany, which would have any impact in relation to that.' The comments follow Germany's decision last week to halt exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza. The chancellor, Friedrich Merz, announced the decision on Friday, in response to Benjamin Netanyahu's plans to dramatically expand Israel's Gaza operations, a move condemned by the international community. Marles was asked about Australia exporting armoured steel and, separately, parts for F-35 fighter jets, which Israel previously conceded were used in operations in Gaza. 'We're an F-35 country and we have been that for a couple of decades. That is a multi-lateral arrangement with supply chains that are organised by Lockheed Martin in the United States and have multiple suppliers in respect of all of those supply chains.' David Shoebridge, the Greens' spokesperson on foreign affairs, labelled Labor's statements meaningless. 'Australia is a key part of the F-35 fighter jet program. We are the only place in the world that makes parts like the bomb bay doors and we operate as one of the few regional distribution hubs. 'Two years of hollow talking points from the Albanese government aren't washing with the public any more as we watch a genocide in real time.' Shoebridge argued that, under international law, component parts were considered weapons. 'Watching the defence minister, Richard Marles, refuse to answer basic questions about Australia's export of weapons parts and defence material to Israel is excruciating,' he said in a statement. 'The Australian public knows that the Albanese government is permitting the export of armoured steel, F-35 weapons parts and other critical materials to Israel and wants it to stop.' Shoebridge said if the Albanese government stopped the export of F-35 parts to Israel, their fleet would, in time, be grounded. 'The fact Albanese is choosing not to do that makes us complicit,' he said. Donald Rothwell, a professor of international law at the Australian National University, said Australian exports of component weapon parts to the IDF were 'contributing to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza'. 'Part of the difficulty is that there can be so many component parts of weapons. Some component parts may have been exported to Israel for civilian use but then utilised for weapons,' he said on Sunday. 'The clearer position that Australia could take is that if it diplomatically, legally and politically objects to Israel's occupation of Gaza, then all exports could be suspended for the time being. That would be the clearest way of ensuring that no Australian exports contribute to the Israeli military effort in Gaza.' Rothwell said he 'would not be as decisive as Senator Shoebridge as to his interpretation of international law'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Guardian Australia reported in November that Australia had amended or lapsed at least 16 defence-related export permits to Israel. A spokesperson said all of the permits were approved before the 7 October terror attacks by Hamas and none related to weapons or ammunition. The ABC reported in April that a remote weapon system designed and built by an Australian company was one of dozens of counter-drone technologies tested by Israel this year. The Australian Centre for International Justice, a non-profit legal centre, is among organisations questioning the government's claims on military exports. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said Australia had appropriate sanctions in place against members of Israel's war cabinet and would not publicly discuss other considerations. 'What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest,' he said during a visit to New Zealand. Albanese said the government wanted hostages held by Hamas released and for urgent aid to stop the 'humanitarian catastrophe' unfolding in Gaza. Australia's opposition home affairs spokesman, Andrew Hastie, told Sky that Netanyahu's plan to control Gaza City was 'a very risky proposition' and could add to the humanitarian crisis. 'It would be incredibly difficult for IDF troops to move through and clear. All the advantage would be with Hamas defenders and anyone else who would stand and fight.' The foreign minister, Penny Wong, joined Germany, Italy, New Zealand and the UK in a joint statement on Saturday, stating Israel's plan would make an already perilous situation worse and risked breaching international law. London's high court ruled a month ago that Britain's decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza, was lawful.

Cuddles, cuppas and chemistry: Albanese and Luxon downplay divisions in times of global turmoil
Cuddles, cuppas and chemistry: Albanese and Luxon downplay divisions in times of global turmoil

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Cuddles, cuppas and chemistry: Albanese and Luxon downplay divisions in times of global turmoil

Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese and his New Zealand counterpart, Christopher Luxon, made multiple references to the freezing Queenstown climate during their annual meet-up but the mood was far from frosty. As the evening light dipped behind the jagged peaks surrounding a billionaire's bunker-like facility where the leaders held their bilateral talks at the weekend, Luxon quipped that the outdoor press conference was the coldest he had ever done and it was time for a cup of hot chocolate. Albanese, however, had other ideas. 'We're going in for a cuddle,' he said, giving Luxon a good pat on the back – a reference, perhaps, to their much-talked about embrace earlier in the day. It is the pair's second annual meeting, following Luxon's visit to Canberra last year but the leaders' relationship precedes their time in office, having first met when Luxon was the chief executive of Air New Zealand, and Albanese was Australia's transport minister. 'We've been friends for a long time,' Albanese said. 'We're probably the two leaders of nations that can sit down and talk aviation like two nerds and bore everyone else around the international forums.' Australia is New Zealand's only formal ally and the two countries have a long and close friendship, often walking in lock-step over global issues, defence and trade. However, their meeting came as record numbers of New Zealanders are leaving for Australia in search of better opportunities, while Australia continues to deport people with criminal convictions back to New Zealand under its contentious 501 deportation policy. Those issues – particularly the latter – have been a long-running thorn in the side of the trans-Tasman relationship, but were downplayed by the leaders who chose to focus their attention on being trusted friends, amid major geopolitical upheaval. 'At a time of global uncertainty this bond has never been more important,' Albanese said. Luxon, too, pointed to the certainty and predictability of the trans-Tasman alliance, and 'the knowledge that we have one another's backs'. Commitments to strengthen that bond included cooperating on growing each country's economy, cutting regulatory tape to streamline trans-Tasman business and working closely on defence. The prime ministers also stood together on international issues, including on Israel's latest plans for Gaza, China's expansion in the Pacific and US tariffs. On Saturday, the foreign ministers of both countries – alongside Germany, Italy and the UK – released a joint statement condemning Israel's plan to take over Gaza City. Last month, New Zealand and Australia cosigned the New York Call – a declaration indicating the possible recognition of Palestinian statehood. Neither Luxon nor Albanese would confirm when a declaration of statehood might happen but said Israel's latest plans were 'wrong' and urged the country to rethink its agenda. Both leaders also rejected the idea that possible trade retaliation from the US president, Donald Trump, over recognising Palestinian statehood would affect their positions. Australian goods imported into the US have attracted Trump's baseline 10% tariff, while last week, New Zealand was hit with a surprise 15% tariff. 'We make our own assessments in … our own economic and our security interests,' Luxon said, to which Albanese said: 'Australia has exactly the same position.' Regarding China – the largest trading partner of both countries – the leaders said followed pretty much the same playbook: cooperate where they can and disagree where they must. On a icy Sunday morning in Arrowtown, the prime minsters laid a wreath in remembrance of fallen Anzac soldiers before embarking on a helicopter ride over the region's mountains and glaciers. After another set of goodbye hugs at Queenstown airport, Albanese boarded his 737-8 Boeing business jet just after midday. Following his departure, Luxon told media the pair shared 'good chemistry', and that having a peer support group of other leaders was 'really important'. Asked whether Albanese was 'trolling' him by sporting the yellow scarf of the Wallabies – Australia's national rugby team – Luxon said 'he probably was a bit, yeah'. 'He was probably trolling me a bit with that plane there too but I'll just leave that for another day,' Luxon said, hinting at New Zealand's beleaguered defence force fleet. Some trans-Tasman rivalries will never freeze over.

Awkward moment Anthony Albanese goes in for a traditional Maori greeting before he is snubbed by New Zealand Prime Minister: 'Embarrassing'
Awkward moment Anthony Albanese goes in for a traditional Maori greeting before he is snubbed by New Zealand Prime Minister: 'Embarrassing'

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Awkward moment Anthony Albanese goes in for a traditional Maori greeting before he is snubbed by New Zealand Prime Minister: 'Embarrassing'

Anthony Albanese found himself in an awkward diplomatic moment after attempting a hongi, the traditional Māori greeting of pressing noses, with New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon in Queenstown. The Australian leader had just successfully exchanged hongi with members of the local iwi, but when he moved to greet Luxon in the same way, the Kiwi PM instead reached out for a standard handshake. The moment resulted in mixed responses online. 'Chris Luxon is clutching Albanese like a small child clutches its mother,' one person joked. 'Poor Albanese had no choice. Once Luxon zooms in with his arms outstretched, you're done for,' another said. Some even linked the moment to a recent, highly publicised incident in which Luxon was loudly booed at an ANZ Netball Premiership match. 'Luxon finds an Aussie tourist who wasn't at the netball booing him,' someone said That earlier episode, captured on official broadcast footage, showed sections of the crowd jeering as the Prime Minister walked onto the court to present awards. While many social media users mocked the hug, some New Zealanders sided with the Australian leader. 'This is so embarrassing,' one wrote. 'Could someone from the [New Zealand National Party] have a word with Christopher Luxon? Poor Anthony Albanese didn't deserve this.' 'Albanese had no choice, he was forced into the Luxon Lovefest,' someone else said. The two leaders were in Queenstown for the annual Australia, New Zealand Leaders' Meeting, where they reaffirmed their shared stance on recognising Palestinian statehood, but stopped short of setting a timeline. Both stressed their countries would make decisions 'independent' of each other. 'We make our own assessments in our own economic and security interests,' Luxon said. 'Australia has exactly the same position,' Albanese agreed. 'As a sovereign nation, we make our decisions.' Albanese also outlined Australia's position on the Gaza crisis. 'Australians want to see a ceasefire,' he said. 'They want to see the killing stop. They want to see hostages released. They want to see peace in the region. They don't want conflict brought to Australia either.' Albanese brushed off calls to impose sanctions on Israel for blocking humanitarian aid from entering Gaza, calling the demands a 'slogan'. Speaking in the historic mining settlement of Arrowtown on New Zealand's South Island, the prime minister also repeated his government's call for Israel to abandon its plan to occupy the entirety of the Gaza Strip. 'We called for an immediate ceasefire,' he told reporters on Sunday morning following a meeting with Kiwi counterpart Chris Luxon. 'We called for the release of hostages and we called for the unimpeded entry of aid into Gaza. 'We have a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding there. And the idea that it can just be continued is completely unacceptable.' But the prime minister refused to answer a question about whether Australia would impose further sanctions on Israel as demanded by the Greens and other pro-Palestinian campaigners. 'What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest,' Mr Albanese said. Australia previously imposed sanctions on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, two far-right Israeli ministers in Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition government, who have been accused of inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. It comes as France, the United Kingdom and Canada announced plans to formally recognise a Palestinian state at a United Nations summit next month. The debate is unfolding as the United States, Israel's closest ally, pursues trade negotiations that could see tariffs introduced, including a proposed 15 per cent duty on New Zealand goods.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store