Trump greets Putin in Alaska for Russia-Ukraine talks
US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin greeted each other today at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska — their first in-person encounter since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Video Duration 01 minutes 11 seconds 01:11
Video Duration 02 minutes 06 seconds 02:06
Video Duration 01 minutes 06 seconds 01:06
Video Duration 01 minutes 04 seconds 01:04
Video Duration 03 minutes 00 seconds 03:00
Video Duration 01 minutes 01 seconds 01:01
Video Duration 00 minutes 46 seconds 00:46
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
The Alaska summit was not a ‘new Munich', but it could be a ‘new Yalta'
These days, the Russian army has a hard time scoring any major successes. Its soldiers face a grinding slog in Ukraine, dying by the hundreds, sometimes to advance just a few hundred metres or not at all. On the diplomatic front, however, the situation is different. Russian President Vladimir Putin secured a major diplomatic victory by holding a summit with United States President Donald Trump. At Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, it was all bonhomie. Trump clapped as Putin made his way onto the red carpet for a handshake before Trump escorted him into his presidential limo as the Russian leader smiled like a Cheshire cat. The two came away from their nearly three-hour meeting without much to say. Both spoke of agreement on a host of matters. Putin invited Trump to Moscow, who demurred – for now. Little has leaked thus far on exactly what Putin and Trump discussed. The Russian leader sought to suggest in his remarks to the media that the talks were on his terms, bringing up Russia's security concerns and praising his US counterpart for trying to 'understand the history' of the conflict. According to Russia's ambassador to the US, Alexander Darchiev, apart from Ukraine, there were some concrete bilateral issues discussed. He claimed two major diplomatic questions were raised: 'the return of six Russian diplomatic properties that were de facto confiscated' during former US President Joe Biden's administration and 'the restoration of direct air traffic' between Russia and the US. Trump for his part appeared to drop the demand for a ceasefire in Ukraine – something he had publicly called for before the summit. Instead, he agreed to take the Kremlin's demand for a full settlement of the conflict rather than a ceasefire to Ukraine and its European allies. Later, he posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, that the European Union and Ukraine agreed with him that 'the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement'. Although Trump seemed to take the Russian position on a ceasefire, the worst possible outcome of the summit was still avoided. The meeting did not turn into a 'new Munich', where Trump would appease Putin just like the French and British leaders appeased Adolf Hitler in a meeting in the German city in 1938 by agreeing to a German takeover of part of Czechoslovakia. The US president did not accede to Russian territorial claims. That said, for Putin, the summit was a tactical win because it broadcast to the world that the US president himself was casting off the pariah status the Kremlin had earned for its unilateral invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the subsequent war crimes it has overseen. The Russian president was treated like the leader of a 'great power' – a status he has long been obsessed with returning Russia to – who had to be negotiated with, on his terms. So where does all this leave Ukraine and its European allies? Trump is clearly unwilling to change his position on Ukraine. He admires Putin – his personality and his governing style – immensely. But Brussels, London, and Kyiv cannot give up on him. The truth is that continued US support is indispensable to Ukraine maintaining its defence. Europe has moved to pick up more of the burden of funding since Trump was inaugurated for his second term, but its military capabilities and defence industry supply chains cannot replace those of the US anytime soon, even if they increase investments exponentially. Trump wants peace in name and cares nought about the details. For Kyiv, the detail is its very survival, and for the rest of Europe, Ukraine's fate shapes the potential that it could be the next target of Putin's aggression in his would-be geopolitically rebalanced world. That does not mean that there is no way to turn Trump. There is – Ukraine and Europe can use a page or two out of Putin's playbook in dealing with the US president. Trump clearly likes his ego to be stroked, which is what Putin repeatedly did in his remarks to the media, echoing, for example, Trump's claim that if he had been president in 2022, the war in Ukraine would not have happened. Continuing diplomatic engagement is the way forward, as is seeking to change the frame in which Trump sees the Ukrainian conflict. The US president cares more about the future of US energy exports, US competition with China, its challenge to US economic dominance and the exploitation of the Arctic than he does about Ukraine. It was Trump's choice to host the meeting in Alaska, after all, and his obsession with Greenland – so seemingly strange to European allies of the US – makes far more sense in this context. The key is to persuade the US president that Russia is a threat to Washington's interests in all of these matters. An easing of sanctions could see Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects flood into the market and depress the price for US LNG exports. Putin has reshaped Russia's economy to be dependent on minerals exports to China, fuelling its ability to compete economically thanks to cheap inputs. Putin has also repeatedly sought to push Beijing to be more assertive in economic competition by calling on it to dump the dollar and push new trade and finance frameworks that exclude the US. And Russia is hoping to dominate the Arctic by expanding its Arctic fleet with new nuclear-powered icebreakers and submarines. For Putin, his war in Ukraine has never been just about the dividing lines in the Donbas or his claimed injustices from the Soviet Union's collapse. It is a war to reshape the world. On the other hand, Trump sees the war as a distraction and a drag on his own efforts to reshape the world. Only if Kyiv and the wider West understand Trump's approach could they persuade him what is at stake. They must focus on how Putin hurts American interests and Trump's perception thereof. If they fail to do so, while Alaska may have proven to be no 'new Munich', its legacy could be that of one of a 'new Yalta' in which Europe's future is to be shaped by new exclusive spheres of influence drawn by Moscow and Washington. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump set to meet Ukraine's Zelenskyy after ‘successful' talks with Putin
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Monday will meet US President Donald Trump in Washington to discuss an end to the more than three-year war in Ukraine, hours after Trump's talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska ended without a concrete deal. In a post on his Truth Social platform after holding phone conversations with European Union and NATO leaders, Trump said the talks with Putin 'went very well'. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' Trump's pitch for the peace agreement, analysts say, came after no deal was announced in the Alaska talks. Prior to the meeting, Trump had threatened Moscow to agree to a ceasefire. Al Jazeera's Osama Bin Javaid, reporting from Moscow, said there has been an atmosphere of success in Moscow. 'Trump's remarks on the need for a larger peace agreement fall in line with what Putin has been saying for the last few months,' he said. The Ukrainian leader and his European allies, who have been seeking a ceasefire, welcomed the Trump-Putin talks on Saturday but emphasised the need for a security guarantee for Kyiv. Zelenskyy, who was publicly berated by Trump and his officials during his last Oval Office meeting, said, 'I am grateful for the invitation.' The Ukrainian leader said he had a 'long and substantive conversation with Trump'. 'In my conversation with President Trump, I said that sanctions should be tightened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia evades an honest end to the war,' the Ukrainian leader said. 'Sanctions are an effective tool. We need to reliably and long-term guarantee security with the participation of both Europe and the US,' he also said, adding: 'All issues that are important for Ukraine should be discussed with the participation of Ukraine, and no issue, including territorial ones, can be resolved without Ukraine.' Trilateral meeting In his first public comment after the Alaska talks, Zelenskyy said he supported Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the US, and Russia, adding that Kyiv is 'ready for constructive cooperation'. 'Ukraine reaffirms its readiness to work with maximum effort to achieve peace,' the Ukrainian president posted on X. But Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said on Russian state television on Saturday that a potential trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy has not been raised during the US-Russia discussions. 'The topic has not been touched upon yet,' Ushakov said, according to the Russian state news agency RIA Novosti. Trump rolled out the red carpet on Friday for Putin, who was in the US for the first time in a decade, but he gave little concrete detail afterwards of what was discussed. Trump said in Alaska that 'there's no deal until there's a deal,' after Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' Al Jazeera's Charles Stratford, reporting from Kyiv, said Trump has been heavily criticised by the US media over the meeting in Alaska. 'They are concerned about what has been described as far more of a conciliatory tone by Trump towards Putin, without coming out of that meeting with even a ceasefire,' he said. Stratford said that the eyes are now on the meeting in Washington as Zelenskyy and Trump try to set up a trilateral meeting with Putin. 'If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin,' the US president said. During an interview with Fox News Channel after the talks, Trump insisted that the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy 'to get it done,' but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. Meanwhile, several European leaders on Saturday jointly pledged to continue support for Ukraine and maintain pressure on Russia until the war in Ukraine ends. Europe's stance In a statement, EU leaders, including the French president and German chancellor, outlined key points in stopping the conflict. They said: 'Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity'. Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to the EU and NATO, the statement said. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force.' Al Jazeera's Hashem Ahelbarra, reporting from Brussels, said reaching a ceasefire in Ukraine is the priority of European leaders. 'They believe that there needs to be an immediate ceasefire before reaching a comprehensive deal on the future of Ukraine,' he said. 'Then they seek to provide security guarantees by deploying their own forces to make sure Russians will not violate the terms of that agreement,' our correspondent stressed, adding that European countries reject the notion of changing the borders by force.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
A hundred Hiroshimas
Hind Hassan examines the prospect of a new nuclear arms race, the companies helping to fuel it, and the dangers it poses. Eighty years after the first and only time nuclear weapons have been used – the US bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 – the risk of the unthinkable happening again has never been greater. The world's largest nuclear powers – Russia and the United States – are as close as they've been to conflict since the height of the Cold War. As they upgrade their nuclear capabilities, even talking openly about using them, all signs point to the beginnings of a second nuclear arms race. Only this time, there aren't just two players, but three: China, once a junior member of the nuclear club, is expanding its arsenal faster than any other nation.
