logo
Air India crash: How airline insurance works and why premiums may rise

Air India crash: How airline insurance works and why premiums may rise

India Today13-06-2025
In the aftermath of the catastrophic Air India crash in Ahmedabad, there has been a significant focus on the role of airline insurance in such unfortunate events. The incident is expected to trigger India's costliest aviation insurance claim, with the payout likely to exceed $120 million, people familiar with the matter said, as quoted by The Economic Times.So, what exactly does airline insurance cover, and how long does it take for victims' families and the airline to get the money? Let's break it down in simple words.advertisementWHAT DOES AIRLINE INSURANCE COVER?Airline insurance primarily comprises three main components: physical damage to the aircraft, passenger legal liability, and third-party liability.
According to Evaa Saiwal, Business Head Liability, Cyber, and Speciality Risk at PolicyBazaar for Business, commercial airlines typically invest in comprehensive aviation insurance, which usually includes hull insurance, passenger liability, third-party legal liability, cargo liability, and crew personal accident cover."Hull insurance covers physical damage to the aircraft itself, whether on the ground, during taxiing, or in flight. Liability insurance protects the airline from legal claims arising from bodily injury, death, or property damage caused to third parties, including passengers, airport personnel, or people and property on the ground," she added.Evaa Saiwal further mentioned that hull coverage reimburses the airline, whereas liability coverage benefits the victims or their families, in line with global frameworks like the Montreal Convention.advertisementIn this incident, the hull loss is pegged at around $80 million, mentioned the report. Passenger legal liability, covering injury or death of passengers, and third-party liability, for damage or injury to those on the ground, are also included in the coverage. Such liabilities, especially in the case of high-net-worth passengers as seen in the Air India crash, could push the claim amount significantly higher.HOW ARE AVIATION INSURANCE PREMIUMS AND RISK ASSESSMENTS INFLUENCED BY SUCH ACCIDENTS?Incidents like the recent Air India crash can result in a total loss, meaning the aircraft is beyond repair with no salvageable parts. In such cases, the losses can reach around $130 million, roughly $80 million for the plane and $30-50 million in liabilities.These high-cost claims often lead insurers to reassess risk factors more strictly. Underwriters may tighten criteria, especially focusing on the aircraft's condition, before issuing or renewing coverage.Passenger legal liability covers injuries or fatalities, while baggage loss, including electronics, is also compensated. Additionally, travellers with personal travel insurance may receive extra benefits for emergency medical care and trip disruptions.According to Rakesh Goyal, Director at Probus, "In situations as devastating as the Ahmedabad plane tragedy, passenger insurance is critical in providing financial assistance. It offers compensation to families or survivors in the event of accidental death or injury, based on the specific terms of the coverage. For airlines, such policies are typically mandated under aviation regulations and offer benefits that include accidental death compensation, medical expenses for survivors, and in some cases, even support for repatriation."advertisement"It's one of those protections we hope is never needed, but when something terrible happens, like what happened in Ahmedabad, its necessity becomes undeniable," he added.WHAT IS THE TYPICAL TIMELINE FOR SETTLEMENTS?Settlements for aircraft damage are usually processed relatively quickly. However, claims related to passengers and third parties often take much longer, typically between two to three years or more.This delay is mainly due to legal proceedings, thorough investigations, and the need for proper verification before compensation is issued.However, following the tragic plane crash, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance has simplified its claim process. Nominees or legal heirs can initiate claims with minimal paperwork. In cases where the death certificate isn't immediately available, a hospital or municipal certificate will suffice, along with KYC and bank details of the nominee.WILL AVIATION INSURANCE PREMIUMS RISE AFTER THE AHMEDABAD PLANE CRASH?The impact of such incidents on insurance premiums is considerable. Experts note that underwriters may introduce more stringent parameters when assessing the policy terms, especially concerning the aircraft's condition.Such events affect not just the airlines involved but also have a ripple effect across the global insurance landscape. This crash is poised to push global aviation insurance rates higher, particularly affecting markets like India where loss ratios have been relatively low.Must Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DGCA raps Air India for misusing pilot duty exemptions on unaffected flights
DGCA raps Air India for misusing pilot duty exemptions on unaffected flights

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

DGCA raps Air India for misusing pilot duty exemptions on unaffected flights

DGCA warns Air India on pilot duty violations Advt DGCA has warned Air India against misusing exemptions given for pilot flight duty rules under special circumstances. It had granted an exemption from flight duty time limitation norms so the airline could continue its affected flights between the West and India after Pakistan closed its Air India had reduced the number of cockpit crew from the unaffected Bengaluru-London flight from three to two on two Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has warned Air India against misusing exemptions given for pilot flight duty rules under special Pakistan had closed its airspace to Indian carriers on April 24, 2025, the regulator had granted an exemption from flight duty time limitation (FDTL) norms so that Air India could continue its affected flights between the West and under the pretext of this exemption allowing it to keep pilots flying longer, Air India reduced the number of cockpit crew from the unaffected Bengaluru-London flight - which didn't enter Pakistan airspace - from three to two on two flights.A livid regulator pulled up AI for what a senior official described as "oversmartness". This FDTL exemption ended June 12, the day AI 171 days after the Ahmedabad crash, the DGCA had issued AI a show-cause for operating two Bengaluru-London flights on May 16 and 17 by making pilots fly for longer than the 10 hours allowed as per the FDTL given to AI at that point of August 11, the DGCA told AI that its "response to (that) show-cause notice has been duly examined and found to be unsatisfactory in addressing the regulatory lapses and deficiencies noted".

DGCA issues warning to Air India over unregulated flight timings
DGCA issues warning to Air India over unregulated flight timings

First Post

time5 hours ago

  • First Post

DGCA issues warning to Air India over unregulated flight timings

A regular spot check by the DGCA revealed that AI's Bangalore-London flights on May 16 and 17 exceeded the stipulated time of a maximum of 10 hours under Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) Section 7, Series J, Part III An Air India Airbus A321 aircraft takes off at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad, India, on June 17, 2025. Reuters File The Directorate General of Civil Aviation has issued a warning to Air India over violations of flight time regulations, advising the airline to exercise the highest level of caution in adhering to aviation safety rules. A regular spot check by the DGCA revealed that AI's Bangalore-London flights on May 16 and 17 exceeded the stipulated time of a maximum of 10 hours under Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) Section 7, Series J, Part III. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'During a spot check, it was observed that Air India operated flights AI133 on May 16 and 17, 2025, both of which surpassed the 10-hour maximum flight time prescribed under Para 6.1.3 of the Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) Section 7, Series J, Part III, Issue III dated April 24, 2019," the warning letter issued by DGCA stated. The aviation regulator also pointed out that the airline's Accountable Manager did not ensure adherence to critical operational requirements outlined in Annexure III of the Civil Aviation Requirements (CARs). Based on the above-mentioned complaints, the DGCA issued a Show Cause Notice to Air India on June 20. 'In view of the above, a Show Cause Notice was issued to Air India on 20 June 2025 under the relevant provisions of the Enforcement Policy and Procedures Manual (EPPM) for the aforementioned violations,' it said in a letter. 'The reply submitted by Air India in response to the Show Cause Notice has been duly examined and found to be unsatisfactory in addressing the regulatory lapses and deficiencies noted," the letter further stated. Meanwhile, an Air India spokesperson said, 'Air India receives the DGCA letter with regard to rostering issues on two long-haul flights reported in mid-May that arose due to a different interpretation of a permission that was granted to mitigate the border related airspace closure. This was corrected immediately after the right interpretation was conveyed to us. Air India remains fully compliant with the rules.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

'Unsatisfactory': DGCA Warns Air India Over Breach In Pilots' Flight Duty Timings
'Unsatisfactory': DGCA Warns Air India Over Breach In Pilots' Flight Duty Timings

News18

time6 hours ago

  • News18

'Unsatisfactory': DGCA Warns Air India Over Breach In Pilots' Flight Duty Timings

Last Updated: After examining the Air India's response, DGCA examined and found it "unsatisfactory in addressing the regulatory lapses and deficiencies noted." The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has issued a warning letter to Air India Ltd., cautioning the airline over violations of flight time regulations and advising its management to exercise the highest level of diligence in adhering to aviation safety requirements. The regulator, during a spot check, found that Air India operated Bangalore-London flights (AI133) on May 16 and 17, 2025, each exceeding the stipulated 10-hour maximum flight time under Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) Section 7, Series J, Part III. 'During a spot check, it was observed that Air India operated flights AI133 on May 16 and 17, 2025, both of which surpassed the 10-hour maximum flight time prescribed under Para 6.1.3 of the Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) Section 7, Series J, Part III, Issue III dated April 24, 2019," the warning letter issued by DGCA stated. Additionally, the aviation regulator noted that the airline's Accountable Manager failed to ensure compliance with key operational provisions specified in Annexure III of the CARs. 'Whereas, it has further been noted that the Accountable Manager of M/s Air India Ltd. has failed to ensure compliance with the requirements as specified under Para 1 and Para 2.4 of Annexure III of the CARs, Section 3, Series C, Part II", the letter further stated. Meanwhile, a Show Cause Notice was issued to Air India on June 20, 2025. 'In view of the above, a Show Cause Notice was issued to Air India on 20 June 2025 under the relevant provisions of the Enforcement Policy and Procedures Manual (EPPM) for the aforementioned violations," the DGCA stated in the letter. After examining the airline's response, the regulator examined and found it 'unsatisfactory in addressing the regulatory lapses and deficiencies noted." 'The reply submitted by Air India in response to the Show Cause Notice has been duly examined and found to be unsatisfactory in addressing the regulatory lapses and deficiencies noted," the letter further stated. Issuing a response to the DGCA warning letter issued to Air India, the airline spokesperson in a statement said, 'Air India is in receipt of the DGCA letter with regard to rostering issues on two long- haul flights reported in mid-May that arose due to a different interpretation of a permission that was granted to mitigate the border related airspace closure. This was corrected immediately after the right interpretation was conveyed to us. Air India remains fully compliant with the rules." (With agency inputs) view comments First Published: August 14, 2025, 07:36 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store