Want to plant trees to offset fossil fuels? You'd need all of North and Central America, study finds
Many respected climate scientists and institutions say removing carbon emissions — not just reducing them — is essential to tackling climate change. And trees remove carbon simply by 'breathing.' But crunching the numbers, researchers found that the trees' collective ability to remove carbon through photosynthesis can't stand up to the potential emissions from the fossil fuel reserves of the 200 largest oil, gas and coal fuel companies — there's not enough available land on Earth to feasibly accomplish that.
And even if there were, if those 200 companies had to pay for planting all those trees, it would cost $10.8 trillion, more than their entire combined market valuation of $7.01 trillion. The researchers also determined that the companies would be in the red if they were responsible for the social costs of the carbon in their reserves, which scientists compute around $185 per metric ton of carbon dioxide.
'The general public maybe understand offsetting to be a sort of magic eraser, and that's just not where we're at,' said Nina Friggens, a research fellow at the University of Exeter who co-authored the paper published in Communications Earth & Environment, a Nature Portfolio journal.
Carbon offsetting essentially means investing in tree planting or other environmental projects to attempt to compensate for carbon emissions. Trees are one of the cheapest ways to do this because they naturally suck up planet-warming carbon. Fossil fuel corporations, along with other companies and institutions, have promoted tree-planting as key part of carbon offset programs in recent years.
For example, TotalEnergies, a global energy company, said in a statement that it is 'investing heavily in carbon capture and storage (CCS) and nature-based solutions (NBS) projects.'
To do their calculations, the researchers looked at the 200 largest holders of fossil fuel reserves — the fuel that companies promise shareholders they can extract in the future — and calculated how much carbon dioxide would be released if this fuel is burned. The researchers also focused solely on tree planting because the expense and technological development needed for other forms of carbon capture are still mostly cost-prohibitive.
Forestry expert Éliane Ubalijoro, who was not involved with the research, called the study 'elegant.'
It 'gives people a sense of proportion around carbon,' said Ubalijoro, CEO of CIFOR-ICRAF, an international forestry research center.
But she cautioned against oversimplifying the equation by looking only at carbon capture, noting that tree planting done right can foster food security and biodiversity and protect communities from natural disasters.
The paper effectively makes the point that it's financially impossible to offset enough carbon to compensate for future fossil fuel burning, said Daphne Yin, director of land policy at Carbon180, where her team advocates for U.S. policy support for land-based carbon removal. And the idea that companies would ever be required to account for the downstream emissions from the fossil fuel they extract is a 'fantasy,' she said.
The idea of planting trees is appealing to the public and to politicians because it's tangible — people can literally see the carbon being incorporated into branches and leaves as a tree grows, Friggens said. But she says other methods shouldn't be overlooked — microbes underground store carbon too, but they can't be seen.
And it's a physically and mathematically inescapable fact, illustrated in part by this study, that there's no getting around it — we have to stop emitting carbon, said Jonathan Foley, the executive director of Project Drawdown, who also was not part of the study. Carbon emissions are like an overflowing bathtub, he says: Before you start cleaning up, you have to turn off the water.
'Trees are the sponges and the mops we use to clean up the mess,' he said. 'But if the taps are still running and the water's pouring out over the edges of your bathtub, destroying your bathroom and your home, maybe you've got to learn to turn off the taps too.'
___
Follow Melina Walling on X @MelinaWalling and Bluesky @melinawalling.bsky.social.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
5 days ago
- CTV News
Scientists go deep into the Saguenay fjord to study seafloor mud
Scientists from U.K. and Université Laval gathered in Quebec City to study how and when the muddy seafloor stores carbon. Sarah Plowman reports. A few hours northeast of Quebec City is the Saguenay fjord, a flooded glacial valley that snakes inland from the St. Lawrence River. It's here where scientists from the U.K. and the Université Laval have come to study what lies beneath — the mud at the bottom of the seafloor. Understanding it better could be key to understanding how to mitigate climate change. Ceri Lewis, a professor of marine biology at the University of Exeter and a researcher with the Convex Seascape Survey, explains how when people think about the big parts of the earth system that control carbon in the atmosphere and oceans, they often think of terrestrial ecosystems like rainforests, coral reefs or seagrasses. 'We know that sediment, the mud at the bottom of the seafloor, is also really, really rich in organic carbon, and it's storing this carbon. But we know much less about it because it's so far down, it's so deep, and it's really hard to study,' said Lewis. As the sun rises over the fjord, the researchers climb aboard a boat carrying containers they'll use to hold their samples. Fjord As the sun rises over the fjord, the researchers climb aboard a boat carrying containers they'll use to hold their samples. A sediment grabber is attached to the boat's rear. They'll drop it into the water to the bottom of several basins within the fjord, sometimes going up to 200 metres deep to scoop up samples. Freshwater flows from Lac Saint-Jean and saltwater flows from the St. Lawrence River. The fjord's gradients offer a variety of species. The project is part of the Convex Seascape Survey, a five-year global project looking at how, where and when the ocean's continental shelves and muddy seafloor stores carbon. This study will narrow in on the role the tiny animals that live in seafloor mud play in the process. 'What we're particularly interested in looking at here is the role of the biodiversity. So, there's a number of different types of animals that live in the mud. How they affect these processes. Is it just one or two key species that are kind of doing all of the work, or is it about that community composition that really matters?' Lewis said the Saguenay fjord is a fantastic place to ask this question because of its biodiversity. 'It's full of some really interesting big worms and all sorts of interesting animals in the mud. And so, we're learning a lot about how these different types of marine animals affect these processes. And they're not all doing the same jobs, but we don't know which ones really matter yet,' she said. 'That's what we're trying to find out.' It's not just mud: scientists Martin Solan, a professor of Marine Ecology at the University of Southampton and researcher with the Convex Seascape Survey, notes that when people see seafloor mud, they may just see mud. But within it, there's a diversity of life: worms, sea cucumbers, brittle stars. Solan says within an area the size of a typical coffee table, there may be somewhere between 50 to 150 species, depending on where you are in the world. 'They're extremely diverse systems. They're extremely active. They're very busy. And if you peel apart the mud, as we've done today, you see a network of burrows, of chambers, or mounds and pits,' said Solan, adding they're having effect on things like how elements of living matter are circulated through biogeochemical cycles. Similar to how earthworks rework the soil in a garden to make it healthier, the animals on the seafloor do the same thing. Fjord Within an area the size of a typical coffee table, there may be somewhere between 50 to 150 specie Researchers want to know how that process influences where the carbon goes. Once samples are collected, they're brought to a makeshift lab in Chicoutimi for experimenting. Researchers will put the samples in tanks and then add little fluorescent tracers in sands and add algae, carbon they've labelled and can track, to watch the animals move and measure where that carbon goes in the sediment. 'Is it being locked away? Which is what we would want for climate solutions. Or is it just being used up by the animals in that ecosystem?' said Lewis. 'And by labelling the carbon in the experience, we'll see exactly where it all goes.' Lewis said knowledge gained through their research can help make sure the models used to calculate carbon on a global scale and are used for climate change predictions are accurate. 'Because, at the moment, they don't really look at these processes in the mud, so we are hoping to improve some of that accuracy of those models. But we also want to be able to actually manage the ocean floor and protect these carbon stores that are doing important jobs. And finding protected parts of the ocean for mud is really, really hard at the moment,' she said.
CTV News
09-08-2025
- CTV News
Study suggests coal pollution cannot be contained: NDP
A new study shows former coal mines are impacting the environment even decades after they shut down, prompting calls from the NDP.
CBC
08-08-2025
- CBC
This invasive plant in Lake Simcoe can injure swimmers, experts warn
Experts are sounding the alarm about the spread of an invasive aquatic plant in Lake Simcoe. CBC's Talia Ricci explores how the plant species could affect the environment, recreational activity and, eventually, the economy.
