‘When country faces crises, Constitution keeps us united,' says CJI Gavai, cites BR Ambedkar's reply
CJI Gavai was addressing a function after the inauguration of advocate chambers and multi-level parking at the Allahabad high court.
Also Read: Govt notifies appointment of 3 SC judges day after president Murmu's approval
'When the Constitution was being made and its final draft was presented before the Constituent Assembly, at that time some people used to say that the Constitution is too federal while some used to say that it is too unitary,' PTI news agency quoted CJI Gavai as saying.
"Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar had replied that the Constitution is neither wholly federal nor wholly unitary. But one thing I can tell you is that we have given a Constitution which will keep India united and strong both in times of peace and war," CJI Gavai added.
Also Read: 'Aamchi' vs 'Tyanchi' Mumbai: CJI Gavai explains gap between the two in Supreme Court
He stated that India has been on the path of development after independence due to the Constitution, and compared India to neighbouring countries and their experience of development.
Also Read: CJI Gavai displeased over protocol lapse
"Today we see what is the condition of our neighbouring countries. And India is making a journey towards development after independence. Whenever there has been a crisis in the country, it has remained united and strong. The credit for this should be given to the Constitution," he said.
CJI Gavai, during the gathering, also emphasised that it was the fundamental duty of the government to reached out every last citizen in the country.
"It is our fundamental duty to reach out to the last citizen of this country who needs justice. Be it the legislature, the executive or the judiciary everyone has to reach out to that citizen," the CJI said.
He also stated, 'I have always been saying that the bar and the bench are two sides of the same coin. Unless the bar and the bench work together, the chariot of justice cannot move forward.'
The Chief Justice of India praised the Allahabad high court for being a role model for the country, citing the incident where the judges vacated 12 bungalows for the construction of a complex for lawyers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Aid and advice: on Jammu and Kashmir, LG's Assembly member nominations
The Union Ministry of Home Affairs' assertion to the J&K High Court that the Lieutenant Governor (LG) can nominate five Assembly members without the 'aid and advice' of the elected government overrides democratic accountability. Consequential decisions such as nominating members who have voting rights in an elected assembly must flow from democratic mandate, not administrative discretion. The High Court's constitutional question could not be more direct: do the 2023 amendments to the J&K Reorganisation Act, allowing the LG to nominate five Assembly members 'which have the potential of converting the minority government into a majority government and vice-versa,' violate the Constitution's basic structure? Rather than addressing this, the Ministry delves into legal technicalities. Its submission argues that nominations fall outside the elected government's remit, seemingly invoking the K. Lakshminarayanan vs The Union of India precedent from Puducherry while claiming the 'sanctioned strength' includes elected and nominated members. It even references Section 12 of the 1963 Union Territories Act (voting procedures) as justification for bypassing democratic consultation. When five nominated members could determine government stability in a 119-member Assembly, the issue transcends statutory definitions of 'sanctioned strength'. The real question is whether any legal framework allowing appointed officials to potentially overturn the people's electoral verdict violates the democratic essence of the Constitution. The amendments inserted Sections 15A and 15B into the 2019 Act, allowing the LG to nominate two Kashmiri migrants (including one woman) and one from the Pakistan-occupied J&K community, besides the existing power to nominate two women, if inadequately represented in the elected Assembly. This effectively creates five nominated seats. The High Court's framing of this issue acknowledges the stakes involved: this could 'convert minority government into majority government and vice-versa', potentially subverting the electoral process. This concern is not unsubstantiated — in 2021, three years after Lakshminarayanan, Puducherry saw nominated members and defecting elected MLAs contributing to the collapse of the Congress-led government. Also, J&K's trajectory to Union Territory, without consultation with elected representatives, makes democratic accountability even more crucial. The unfulfilled promise of Statehood restoration, acknowledged by the Supreme Court and despite overwhelming support in J&K, reinforces that current arrangements should strengthen democratic governance. The Ministry's argument that nominations exist 'outside the realm of the business of the elected government' also contradicts evolving Supreme Court jurisprudence. In the Delhi services cases of 2018 and 2023, it ruled that the LG should act on elected governments' aid and advice, with discretionary powers treated as exceptions. Seen in this light, the Ministry's arguments do not hold water.
India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
Can India afford to ignore Pakistan's repeated threats? Experts debate on Gaurav Sawant's show
After Field Marshal Asim Munir, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari and now Pakistan's Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif has threatened India over the Indus waters treaty, which has been held in abeyance since May following the Pahalgam terror attack. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said, "I want to tell the enemy today that if you threaten to hold our water, then keep this in mind that you cannot snatch even one drop of Pakistan.' A day earlier, former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari termed the IWT's suspension an attack on the Indus Valley Civilisation and said the nation would not back down if New Delhi forced it into war. There's a clear pattern to these threats that are emerging from Pakistan. So, can India afford to ignore these repeated Pakistani threats and has US President Donald Trump sacrificed the India-US strategic partnership at the altar of a cryptocurrency deal with Pakistan or to regain a toehold in the region to keep an eye on Iran or is there another game at play here? Watch as experts discuss these and more on the show.
India Today
19 minutes ago
- India Today
Is removal of all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR practical? Experts weigh in
The top focus of this episode of To The Point is the Supreme Court's order mandating the removal of all stray dogs from the streets of the Delhi NCR region to shelters within eight weeks. The directive has generated a significant national debate, with animal rights activists and dog lovers protesting the move, while many residents and officials support it, citing increasing dog menace and a surge in dog bite cases. The controversy raises questions about the feasibility of sheltering an estimated 10 lakh dogs. Meanwhile, Chief Justice of India, BR Gavai, has assured a review of the plea against the order. But, the big question is, is removal of all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR practical? Are stray dogs a menace or are they misunderstood? Watch as panellists share their perspectives on these and more on Preeti Choudhry's show.
