logo
Independent MP to push a lowering of Australia's voting age after UK decision

Independent MP to push a lowering of Australia's voting age after UK decision

Independent MP for Kooyong Monique Ryan has vowed to introduce another bill to parliament pushing for a lowering of Australia's minimum voting age, after the United Kingdom reduced its voting age from 18 to 16.
In the UK, the move would see an additional 1.6 million young people allowed to cast their ballots in the next election, in the biggest electoral reform in more than half a century.
Ms Ryan told the ABC's Afternoon Briefing that she would be supportive of Australia implementing a similar move.
"Around the world, there is a global move to lower the voting age," Ms Ryan said.
"The fact is, in democracies we see that fewer and fewer young people feel they are actively engaged and supported by government and they're turning away from politics and what we want to do is bring them back.
Ms Ryan said that she planned to introduce another private member's bill during the upcoming term of federal parliament, after an initial bill in 2018 failed to pass.
"When the parliamentary committee looked at this in 2018, Labor was supportive of lowering the voting age.
"Where things fell down was whether or not 16- and 17-year-olds should be forced to vote, whether it should be compulsory, or whether it should be voluntary at that age," Ms Ryan said.
"I'll be pushing it because young people in my electorate tell me that it matters to them."
The independent believes that, if the voting age were lowered, an inclusion in the bill that would rescind any potential electoral fine issued against young people who refuse to vote may help gain parliamentary approval.
"If we think 16- and 17-year-olds are fit to vote, that they have the cognitive and emotional maturity to do so … then they should vote," she said.
"The fallback option is that you don't enforce any fines on young people who don't turn up the first time round.
"That would be a reasonable meeting point where we don't put too much pressure on young people, but we give them this universal enfranchisement and treat them as adults."
Young Australians and some politicians are hoping this plan will have a snowball effect in Australia.
Amelia Condon-Cernovs was 15 when she started advocating to lower the voting age with the Foundation for Young Australians.
Now 18, the Canberran campaigner said young people wanted a voice and a chance to be involved in democracy, with the cost of living, education and climate change fuelling the change.
She said that, much like driving a car, young voters should learn the political system bit by bit.
"You don't go from not knowing how to drive to having your full licence," she said.
The voting age has not always been 18 — roughly 50 years ago, it was 21.
In 1973, the federal government moved to lower the age of eligibility amid the Vietnam War.
Political scientist at the Australian National University Jill Sheppard said that change followed a social understanding that if young people could die for their country, they should be able to vote for it.
And at the time, like today, not everyone was happy.
Greens senator Jordon Steele-John introduced a bill to lower the voting age in 2018 and recently said Australians needed to think about who they wanted to influence policy.
"I know who I would trust, out of those two groups.
"We've got around half a million Australians who currently are prevented from having their say about policy decisions that will affect them for the longest."
For the voting age to change, the federal government would need to pass legislation to amend the Commonwealth Electoral Act of 1918.
If Senator Steele-John's bill had passed, he said it would have been compulsory for those 16 or 17 years old to vote.
However, it would have introduced a clause in the Electoral Act to would allow electoral officers to consider waiving a fine if someone 16 or 17 years old did not vote.
Dr Sheppard researches voting behaviour in federal elections and says parties fear lowering the vote will open "Pandora's box".
"Labor probably wouldn't be any worse off if they allowed 16- and 17-year-olds to vote, but that fear of opening Pandora's box is always a worry for parties of government," she said.
"What may happen in this parliament, though, because the Greens have the balance of power in the Senate, is that they put that on the table as a bargaining chip.
Austria, Germany and Brazil have already changed the voting age to 16 and Scotland allows voting at 16 in local elections, although the UK general election is run under UK law.
Dr Sheppard said while compulsory voting was one key difference between the Australian and British electoral systems, she believed the evidence found in other countries would also flow on to Australia.
"It is time for Australia to follow suit. If the UK can do it, so can we," Senator Steele-John said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First tranche of Aussie M1A1 Abrams tanks delivered to Ukraine to bolster fight against Russia
First tranche of Aussie M1A1 Abrams tanks delivered to Ukraine to bolster fight against Russia

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

First tranche of Aussie M1A1 Abrams tanks delivered to Ukraine to bolster fight against Russia

Australia is providing 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks – valued at $245m – to Ukraine to help bolster its war against Russia's illegal invasion. The first tranche of the retired tanks are now in the possession of the Armed Forces of Ukraine after they were shipped from the Port of Geelong. Australia first purchased the fleet of 59 Abrams tanks – which were never deployed into a combat zone – in 2007. The Australian Army has since replaced the fleet with newer M1A2 tanks. Last year, Ukraine expressed interest in taking the M1A1 fleet after Australia refused to donate its retired fleet of Taipan helicopters – which have since been dismantled and buried – due to concerns they would be too complicated to maintain and operate. The current $245m support package involving the M1A1 Abrams fleet is part of the $1.5bn in assistance Australia has provided to the war-torn nation since the start of Russia's conflict in 2022. 'The M1A1 Abrams tanks will make a significant contribution to Ukraine's ongoing fight against Russia's illegal and immoral invasion,' Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles, who met the army personnel who helped deliver the tanks, said. 'Australia remains steadfast in our support for Ukraine and seeing a just and lasting peace.' Ukraine has now taken possession of the majority of these tanks, with delivery of the final tranche to occur in the coming months. Australia is also due to deploy a Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail to Europe to help protect a vital international gateway for assistance to Ukraine. Since 2003, the Australian Defence Force has helped train hundreds of Ukrainian troops as part of the UK-led and based multinational training mission Operation Kudu, which continues today. 'Australia stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Ukraine,' Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. 'These modified M1A1 Abrams tanks will deliver more firepower and more mobility to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. 'They meet a direct request from the Ukrainian government and form part of Australia's unwavering commitment to protect the global rules-based order.' The major update follows Russia handing over the bodies of 1000 slain soldiers to Ukraine, as further peace talks between both countries appeared to break down. Ukraine also agreed to return the bodies of 19 soldiers to Russia as part of the agreement. Earlier in the week, a 'very unhappy' US President Donald Trump set a 50-day deadline for Russia to reach a ceasefire deal with Ukraine, or risk tariffs that could cripple the eastern superpower. Russian President Vladimir Putin has so far rejected calls for a ceasefire. 'The US president's statements are very serious. Some of them are addressed personally to President Putin,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said earlier in the week.

Albanese government pushing forward with taxes ‘nobody voted for'
Albanese government pushing forward with taxes ‘nobody voted for'

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Albanese government pushing forward with taxes ‘nobody voted for'

Liberal MP Tim Wilson says the Labor government is pushing forward with taxes that 'nobody voted for'. Australia's most influential business group have railed against the implementation of a 2035 emission reduction target larger than 65 per cent, stating that the move would impede economic growth and stymie manufacturing. 'Publicly released research shows that Australians didn't go into the last election thinking they would be voting for a family savings tax on unrealised capital gains,' Mr Wilson told Sky News host Steve Price. 'This tax roundtable is only designed to do one thing – which is to float taxes that Labor had not raised before the last election and then put them on the table.'

Jeni O'Dowd: Watching Mark Latham's implosion prompts memories of a one-week fling with the former ALP leader
Jeni O'Dowd: Watching Mark Latham's implosion prompts memories of a one-week fling with the former ALP leader

West Australian

time3 hours ago

  • West Australian

Jeni O'Dowd: Watching Mark Latham's implosion prompts memories of a one-week fling with the former ALP leader

There's a certain poetic justice in watching Mark Latham implode. A man who spent the better part of two decades hurling bile at women, minorities, journalists, teachers - anyone who didn't fit his narrow, angry worldview - is finally being dragged down by the very ugliness he so eagerly weaponised. Once touted as a future prime minister, Latham now cuts a tragic, bitter figure: a political wreck clinging to the outer edges of relevance, lashing out while the world moves on without him. His downfall isn't just deserved. It's long overdue. I know this column risks triggering another Latham spray. But he's always claimed to be a truth-teller, and so am I. Years ago, Latham publicly revealed a brief fling we had decades ago, when we were twenty-somethings, in his much-hyped 2005 memoir, The Latham Diaries. He wrote, 'Cooper and I once had a fling, so it was weird to see her in such a senior role – who would have thought?' I was Jeni Cooper then, and a newspaper editor. And if you can even call a one-week misfire between two single adults a 'fling,' well, sure. (Such a gentleman. Not.) Then, in a Crikey Q&A, he doubled down, claiming he once wrote my weekly newspaper column. That never happened. Not once. It was pure fiction, a weird flex delivered with classic Latham arrogance. Since then, I've followed his career closely. Not out of loyalty, but out of disbelief. I've tried, in vain, to reconcile the idealistic young man who spoke to me so proudly of Gough Whitlam's mentorship - 'a person of outstanding character and capacity,' Whitlam once said - with the wrecking ball of rage he's become. When Latham became Labor leader in 2003, he was seen as the party's great generational hope, a working-class intellectual with policy ideas, raw charisma and a gift for plain speaking. I remember having dinner with him in the city around that time, when I was editor of The Sunday Telegraph, with other senior media figures. While we all headed off in taxis, Latham proudly declared he was walking to the station to catch a train home. That was Mark Latham back then. Principled, grounded, allergic to political polish. What a contrast to the angry figure he is today. Back then, he had the electorate's attention. But behind the scenes, there were already signs of volatility, recklessness and a deepening contempt for anyone who disagreed with him, including his colleagues. Decades ago, when he visited me at my old place on Sydney's lower North Shore, he joked that he shouldn't even be seen in such blue-ribbon Liberal territory, that just being there felt like he was betraying the people of western Sydney. Latham was proud of his roots in Ashcroft, proud to be the working-class kid from Green Valley. He saw himself as the voice of the battlers and a champion for the Labor heartland with a fire in his belly. And now? That fire has burned into nothing but bitterness and bile. Over the past week, the Latham circus has entered its darkest chapter yet. His former partner, Nathalie Matthews, has accused him of sustained emotional, physical, financial and sexual abuse. Latham called the allegations 'comically false and ridiculous.' Then, on cue, he posted this on Twitter: 'Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.' A man accused of severe abuse reached for the most tired, misogynistic trope in the book - and hit send. And if that wasn't enough, Latham also admitted to 'fantastic' sexting from inside the NSW parliamentary chamber. At the same time as colleagues sat just metres away, because, as he told Sydney Radio 2SM, 'If you're sitting there listening to Penny Sharpe droning on, then a woman that looks like Nathalie Matthews sends you a message, which one would you pay attention to?' It was crude. It was contemptuous. It was entirely on brand. He also allegedly photographed female MPs, including Eleni Petinos and Abigail Boyd, during parliamentary proceedings, sharing the images with explicit commentary. For this, he's been referred to the Parliamentary Privileges Committee and faces a censure motion. It just doesn't seem to end. NSW Premier Chris Minns said Latham's behaviour 'would lead to immediate dismissal in any other workplace.' NSW Minister for Water, Housing, and Homelessness Rose Jackson went further, calling him 'a pig' and 'a bigot.' And yet, senior Liberal MP Damien Tudehope said he was 'happy to work with him' to pass workers' compensation amendments, while Liberal leader Mark Speakman declined to distance his party from Latham. This is the problem. Some are treating Latham's behaviour as an inconvenience instead of what it is: serial misconduct that wouldn't be tolerated in any professional setting. It's not as if this is a new development. In 2017, he was dumped by Sky News after questioning the sexuality of a teenage schoolboy and referring to fellow presenters in offensive terms. He's mocked domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty, made sneering attacks on LGBTQ+ students and teachers, and spent years using Twitter like a digital Molotov cocktail, lobbing insults at public servants, journalists and marginalised groups with glee. Expulsion from NSW Parliament is possible but very unlikely. It's rare, complicated and politically fraught. As an Independent, Latham has no party to sack him. And unless something criminal surfaces, he'll likely survive - bruised, but still barking from the crossbench. But just because he can stay, doesn't mean he should. Once, he stood for ideas. Now he stands for nothing but grievance. He claims to speak truth to power, but he can't bear to hear the truth about himself. Maybe it's time he stopped blaming women, the media and the so-called 'woke left' and asked himself one simple question: What the hell happened to me? From where I am sitting, the only thing more tragic than watching his implosion is realising he chose it. Mark Latham should resign. Not because Parliament demands it. But because decency does. Parliament could act. Expulsion is on the table, in theory. But we all know it won't happen. And what does that say? To every woman working in Parliament? To every young person watching from the sidelines? It says power protects itself. That verbal abuse is survivable if you're loud enough. That the rules bend for men like him. And that, more than anything Latham could tweet, should shame us all.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store