Lawmakers introduce controversial bills to regulate harmful chemicals leaked by factories: 'Taxpayers .. will largely shoulder the burden'
According to Oklahoma Voice, these bills target PFAS, synthetic chemicals that don't break down in nature. Manufacturers first created them 80 years ago, and despite knowing about potential health risks by 1961, they kept making them anyway. Scientists now link PFAS to health problems like cancer, liver damage, and reduced fertility.
Oklahoma plans to tackle this through Senate Bills 268 and 271. SB 268 would stop farmers from using sewage-based fertilizer on cropland, a common practice that spreads PFAS into our food supply — over 80% of Oklahoma's wastewater ends up on farm fields. Meanwhile, SB 271 would protect farmers who unknowingly used contaminated fertilizer from getting sued.
Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home?
Majorly
Sometimes
Not really
I don't know enough about them
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
The proposed laws could save money and protect health. Clean drinking water helps prevent medical issues, while protecting farmland preserves food safety. However, cleaning up PFAS costs money — the EPA has estimated that $1.5 billion is needed yearly just to improve water systems.
Some worry these bills don't address the root cause: industrial facilities releasing PFAS into waterways. Others point out potential gaps in farmer support. It's not clear if farmers will receive income replacement if their production drops or if there will be funding to monitor affected farms and families.
Water bills might rise as local governments pay for cleanup. This would hit low-income households hardest through higher costs and increased exposure to contaminated water.
"States and taxpayers didn't cause the contamination, but they will largely shoulder the burden of testing and monitoring, delivering clean water to communities, cleaning up contaminated sites, and covering health care costs," noted the Oklahoma Voice's Mike Altshuler.
But action beats inaction. Oklahoma joins 11 other states that passed PFAS restrictions in 2024, showing growing momentum to protect Americans' health and resources. These bills could help create cleaner water and safer food for Oklahoma families with proper funding and implementation.
The effects of PFAS might be invisible now, but communities can't afford to wait. By supporting smart regulations today, we're investing in healthier soil, cleaner water, and better health for future generations.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge
'I've long understood Maine's leadership, nationally and internationally, on the issue of banning PFAS, banning biosolids, centering farms, and supporting farmers,' Comerford told reporters outside the Maine State House in Augusta Tuesday afternoon. 'I leave with a renewed fire in my belly that in Massachusetts, we have to turn off the tap for PFAS,' the Northampton Democrat added. 'We must follow Maine. There is a saying in Massachusetts, 'Where goes Maine, there goes the nation.' And so in Massachusetts, we must ban PFAS.' Advertisement The US Environmental Protection Agency on its website promotes the land application of sewage sludge, outlining environmental benefits such as 'improved soil health, carbon sequestration, and reduced demand on non-renewable resources like phosphorus.' The EPA says it defines biosolids as sewage sludge that's been treated and meets regulatory standards to be used as fertilizer. Still, PFAS are 'nearly universal' within the chemicals that the EPA detects in wastewater sludge, according to the Maine Morning Star. Advertisement When PFAS enter soil that is used to grow crops, the contamination can be passed on to farmers and consumers, according to Comerford's office, which said that small doses of PFAS are linked to cancer, harm to the reproductive and immune systems, and other diseases. The legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa calls for the creation of a statewide plan for reducing and managing sludge. It also authorizes legal and financial protections for farmers and a relief fund to help farmers who have suffered financial losses 'resulting from standard agricultural practices that may have resulted in the actual or suspected presence of PFAS in soil, water or agricultural products,' according to the bills. 'We want to encourage testing, but we have to do it in a way that people aren't going to be afraid to test,' Arena-DeRosa said. 'Right now, we're dealing with that in Massachusetts because we're worried about the cost, so we have to think about mitigation strategies and the funding that it's going to take.' The bills are awaiting a hearing before the Agricultural and Fisheries Committee. Comerford is vice chair of the panel. During their day trip on Tuesday, the Massachusetts delegation visited a PFAS-impacted farm in Arundel, attended a lunch and 'storytelling session' at the Maine State House, and participated in a roundtable discussion with farmers, advocates, and lawmakers, Comerford's office said. Massachusetts lawmakers on the trip included Reps. Arena-DeRosa, Michelle Ciccolo, Steven Owens, and Senators Comerford and Jamie Eldridge. They were joined by Maine Representatives Bill Pluecker and Lori Gramlich, and Senator Henry Ingwersen. Advertisement Pluecker said he sponsored the landmark legislation in Maine that prohibited applying sludge on farms. 'This toxic contaminant, which knows no bounds regionally, flows downhill. It poisons our water, fish, and drinking water,' he said. 'And what we need to do is stand together as politicians and activists across the states, regionally looking at how we can address this issue and how we can move the issue forward to protect farmers, wherever you may be.' Ingwersen recalled how his work confronting PFAS started in 2016 in his hometown of Arundel, where a dairy farmer discovered his property was contaminated. The farmer had to slaughter cows, pause selling products, and spend thousands of dollars out of pocket to mitigate the issue, he said. 'We know we must keep up the fight here and share what we've learned with anyone looking to do the same,' Ingwersen said. 'So I was really happy to be able to talk to our folks in Massachusetts and hopefully begin relationships we can work together on in their state.' Comerford said she asked Maine lawmakers about the lessons they've learned and about any approaches they would have done differently. 'I do feel like we've benefitted greatly from the wisdom, and the experience, and the knowledge base that Maine has built,' Comerford said. 'We have to think as upstream as we could possibly go, and that is the manufacturers, the chemical companies who make these chemicals and have polluted our rivers and polluted our food systems.' The Massachusetts chapter of the Northeast Organic Farming Association, which supports the legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa, says a relief fund 'will be critical for increasing PFAS testing and protecting farmers' business liability and their health.' Advertisement 'While it's anticipated that some farms will have higher than acceptable levels of PFAS in their soil and/or water, farmers are hesitant to test until they know they'll be protected in case they need to cease production,' NOFA/Mass The legislation is also a priority for environmental advocacy group Clean Water Action. 'Farmers across the nation are learning that the fertilizer they used may have contained high levels of PFAS, and they need our help to identify and remediate PFAS contamination to ensure that our food supply is safe,' Clean Water Action
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOLDSTEIN: Carney's energy minister makes business case for natural gas
Federal Energy and Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson says he 'knows there are buyers' for Canada's liquified natural gas (LNG) globally, quite the change in emphasis from former prime minister Justin Trudeau's argument there was no business case for such projects. 'What I can tell you from the conversations that the prime minister has been having, the minister of foreign affairs has been having, the minister of international trade has been having, the conversations I've been having, our allies are very interest in Canadian LNG,' Hodgson said on Tuesday in an interview on The Vassy Kapelos Show. When asked about competition from the U.S, which is ramping up its LNG export capacity, Hodgson responded: 'Our production is much closer to Asian markets. Our production is much cleaner than the Americans in terms of carbon footprint.' That's a turnaround from previous arguments by Trudeau, as a parade of foreign leaders came to Canada seeking Canadian LNG as an alternative to importing LNG from Russia, in the wake of Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Trudeaus said at the time there was no business case for LNG projects — meaning Canada was (and still is) shipping almost all of its natural gas to the U.S. by pipeline at discount prices — although he was talking about Canada's potential capacity to ship LNG to European markets by tanker from Canada's East Coast. That said, Trudeau was generally unenthusiastic about exporting Canada's natural gas abroad, advocating instead for developing alternative energy sources such as green hydrogen. GUNTER: Trudeau cost Canada a chance to get into global LNG game — Trump and U.S. are reaping the benefit LILLEY: Carney promises new trading relationships, can't handle U.S. Since then, one large-scale export facility — LNG Canada — has been completed in Kitimat, B.C. To be fair, this was approved under the Trudeau government. It contributed $275 million to its completion in 2019, describing the $40-billion project as 'the largest single private sector investment in the history of the country … which will ultimately create over 10,000 jobs, as well as lead to billions of dollars in direct government revenues and hundreds of millions of dollars in construction contracts for Indigenous businesses.' It began shipping LNG by tanker to Asian markets in June, the first project of its kind in North America with direct access to the Pacific Coast. There are six other LNG projects currently in the works — all based in B.C. — and if all of them are completed, Canada could have the capacity to ship 50 million tonnes of LNG abroad eventually. However, for that to happen, Prime Minister Mark Carney's government will have to modify or reverse a number of regulations and laws passed by the Trudeau government. This includes a cap on Canada's annual oil and gas emissions; the Impact Assessment Act, dubbed the 'no pipelines bill' by critics; and Canada's current target of lowering our greenhouse gas emissions to at least 40% below 2005 levels by 2030. (According to the latest government data, Canada's emissions as of 2023 were just 8.5% below 2005 levels and on track to miss the 2030 target.) Before Parliament adjourned in June, the Carney government passed the Building Canada Act to speed up the construction of so-called nation-building projects, but the details of what projects it is considering haven't yet been revealed. Finally, despite Trudeau's lack of enthusiasm for natural gas in favour of greener energy sources, replacing coal-fired electricity with natural gas globally would be one of the world's most effective ways of reducing global emissions, since natural gas burns at half the carbon intensity of coal. RECOMMENDED VIDEO
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Illinois Dems flock to Springfield for Governor's Day at State Fair
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WGN) — Top Democrats worked on their messaging at the Illinois State Fair on Wednesday ahead of the midterm elections. The annual party chairs brunch and fair gathering, dubbed Governor's Day, provided a platform to vent, with U.S. House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries in attendance as the brunch keynote speaker. 'Crashing the economy is something bad. Destroying Medicaid, as you know it, is something bad,' Jeffries said. 'Taking a chainsaw to Social Security is something bad. Raising costs on hard-working American taxpayers is something bad.' Wednesday also served as an opportunity for Illinois Democrats to shine a spotlight on top candidates for U.S. Senate, like Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi, and Congresswoman Robin Kelly. And while the Illinois primary election is seven months away, that didn't stop state Democrats from taking shots over campaign funding. Stratton has pledged not to take corporate PAC money, while Krishnamoorthi and Kelly have received such donations. 'I'm blessed to have tens of thousands of individual donors who have supported me and the reason is simple: they believe in our mission,' Krishnamoorthi said. 'A lot of people who say they don't take corporate money—and I'm talking about some of my colleagues,' Kelly said. 'They don't take corporate money, but they take the money I raise, so it's laundered through me.' Stratton is backed by billionaire Gov. JB Pritzker, who insiders believe will boost the Lt. Governor's campaign coffers down the homestretch. 'I want to make sure that I'm centering the voices of Illinois families and not corporate special interests,' Stratton said. That's a distinction.' Thursday will be Republican Day. While they control the White House and Congress, the Republican Party is currently a super minority struggling to recruit candidates for key races. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
