Shahid Afridis Explosive Comment Triggers India Legends Boycott Of WCL 2025 IND vs PAK Clash
Following the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, which claimed 26 lives, India launched Operation Sindoor, a swift and decisive military response. In the aftermath, while tensions between the two nations were already high, it was Afridi's controversial and inflammatory remarks that seemed to pour salt into national wounds.
Shahid Afridi's Outburst: 'Nalayeq Ho, Nikamme Ho'
Afridi, never one to mince words, launched a scathing attack on the Indian Army during a Pakistani TV appearance. Mocking their capabilities, he questioned how such a tragedy occurred under the watch of '8 lakh soldiers,' calling them 'inefficient and useless.'
The statement instantly went viral, triggering outrage among Indian fans, veterans, and—most notably—the legends slated to represent India at the WCL. His provocative rhetoric didn't stop there. Afridi was later seen leading a celebratory rally in Pakistan after the ceasefire, further enraging Indian sentiment.
India's Response: Pride Over Play
Shikhar Dhawan was the first to take a stand. In a heartfelt message, the India Champions opener announced his withdrawal from the match, citing national emotion and the need to honor those lost in Pahalgam. Soon, Yuvraj Singh, Suresh Raina, Harbhajan Singh, Yusuf Pathan, and Irfan Pathan followed suit.
According to sources close to the team, the players had no intention of making it personal with Afridi—but his comments became symbolic of everything they found unacceptable. The issue wasn't about facing Afridi, but about representing a united front against perceived insensitivity.
With so many high-profile players opting out, organizers were left with no choice but to cancel the marquee fixture, awarding two points to Pakistan.
Afridi Hits Back: "Be Ambassadors, Not Embarrassments"
Never one to stay silent, Shahid Afridi launched a counterattack. He accused the Indian players of mixing politics with sports and called the boycott an 'embarrassment for their country.'
'If they didn't want to play, they should have said so before arriving. They came, practiced, and then walked away. This isn't how professionals behave,' he stated.
Afridi insisted cricket should rise above politics, claiming he would've withdrawn if informed in advance. 'What is Shahid Afridi in front of cricket? Nothing,' he humbly added—though not without aiming another veiled jab at an unnamed Indian player he dubbed a 'bad egg.'
The Bigger Picture: More Than Just One Man
While Afridi's name dominated headlines, Indian players clarified—privately and publicly—that the boycott wasn't just about him. The match represented more than a rivalry; it was a moral choice made in the wake of national tragedy.
This was not simply a refusal to shake hands with a controversial rival. It was a collective stand against a country perceived to be complicit—or at the very least indifferent—toward terror originating from its soil.
What Now for WCL 2025?
Despite the drama, the WCL continues. Pakistan were awarded the points, and tournament co-owner Kamil Khan confirmed that efforts would be made to avoid India-Pakistan clashes in later rounds—unless both teams reach the final.
But this incident has cast a long shadow. The next Indo-Pak encounter, if it happens, may not just be a cricket match—it'll be a litmus test of public sentiment, diplomacy, and personal conviction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
Will Jasprit Bumrah Play The Final Test? Gautam Gambhir Hints At Possible Return For Oval Decider
In a gripping fourth Test at Old Trafford, Team India produced a display of unwavering resilience, salvaging a hard-earned draw that kept their hopes alive in the five-match series against England. While the result itself was dramatic, it was the final session controversy that stole headlines. As England offered the traditional handshake with the match headed towards an inevitable draw, Indian batters Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar chose to carry on — with both nearing well-deserved centuries. The decision raised eyebrows, particularly in the English camp. Skipper Ben Stokes was visibly miffed, his extended hand ignored as the Indian duo opted to script their own milestone moments. The optics triggered a swirl of debate, but India had their reasons — and the results to justify them. Gautam Gambhir Backs India's Call: 'Not Here to Please Anyone' India's head coach Gautam Gambhir didn't mince his words in defending his team's choice to continue batting. 'If someone's batting on 90 and another on 85, don't they deserve their centuries?' Gambhir fired back when asked about the gesture rejection. 'Would England have walked off if their own players were close to milestones? No. Our boys weathered the storm. They earned those tons. We're not here to please anyone.' His comments struck a chord across the cricketing world, with social media praising India's grit and highlighting the significance of personal milestones in the high-pressure cauldron of Test cricket. Jadeja's finesse and Sundar's composure underlined a rare show of batting mettle that symbolized India's new-age resilience. Standout Performances Keep Series Alive for India While India still trail 1-2 in the series, the draw at Old Trafford will feel like a moral victory. The spotlight firmly stayed on Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, whose marathon knocks showcased technical skill, mental toughness, and sheer willpower. Batting over 143 overs to salvage the match, their unbroken stand sent a powerful message to the opposition ahead of the decider at The Oval. Sundar, often underutilized with the bat, rose to the occasion with a fluent hundred, while Jadeja reinforced his reputation as one of India's most dependable Test all-rounders. Their innings ensured that India lived to fight another day, setting up a series finale with the potential to go down in history. Fast Bowling Reinforcements Set to Boost India at The Oval Injuries had forced India to dig deep into their fast-bowling reserves, with Anshul Kamboj stepping in due to setbacks to Arshdeep Singh and Akash Deep. However, Gambhir confirmed that India will head into the fifth Test with a fully fit pace arsenal, including spearhead Jasprit Bumrah. Bumrah, who was initially scheduled to play only three Tests for workload management, might be reconsidered for the Oval clash. 'We haven't had any conversation around the combination yet,' Gambhir said. 'No decision has been made on Bumrah. Ultimately, whoever plays, they will do the job for the country.' With Siraj, Bumrah, and the rest of the pace attack fit and firing, India have the firepower to challenge England's batting one final time this summer. Gambhir Stays Grounded: 'Only Results Matter' Despite the emotional lift from the Old Trafford escape, Gambhir remained focused on the bigger picture. 'We are still 2-1 down in the series. This is the Indian team. Yes, there is inexperience, but this is still the best Indian team right now,' he asserted. 'Hopefully, we can make it 2-2. That's going to be a great achievement.' With momentum shifting and belief running high, India head to The Oval with renewed purpose. The handshake row might dominate headlines, but what truly matters now is whether this spirited Indian unit can script a series-levelling win on English soil.
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
EXPLAINED: Why Ben Stokes Refuses To Shake Hands With Ravindra Jadeja After Manchester Test Draw, Sparks Viral Controversy
The fourth Test between India and England at Old Trafford delivered a gripping finish as Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar batted India out of trouble, steering the team to a dramatic draw and keeping the five-match series alive. What should have ended in mutual admiration, however, turned into a mini storm after England skipper Ben Stokes was seen avoiding a post-match handshake with Jadeja, sparking social media debates and drawing sharp reactions. #INDvsENGTest #INDvsEND — sachin gurjar (@SachinGurj91435) July 27, 2025 India, facing the prospect of an innings defeat, found unlikely saviours in Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar. The duo forged a colossal 203-run partnership for the fifth wicket, batting out nearly two sessions on Day 5 to earn a hard-fought draw. Jadeja (105*) and Sundar (102*) stood tall under immense pressure, showing class, grit, and unyielding determination to deny England a 3-1 lead in the series. The final day began on a shaky note for the visitors. Resuming at 112/2, India lost KL Rahul early in the session. Ben Stokes, once again rising to the occasion, trapped Rahul LBW to break a dangerous 178-run stand with Shubman Gill. The Indian skipper carried on the fight, notching his fourth century of the series and equalling the record for most runs by a captain in a Test series on English soil. His dismissal for 113, edging Jofra Archer behind, tilted the balance in England's favour. But India wasn't done yet. Tensions Boil Over as India Chases Personal Milestones As the final hour approached and the draw appeared inevitable, Ben Stokes extended an offer to shake hands and end the game early. But Jadeja, then on 89, and Sundar, nearing his century, politely declined. England deployed part-time bowlers Harry Brook and Joe Root to expedite proceedings, with Stokes taunting from slip—'You're gonna get a Test hundred against Harry Brook?'—a remark caught on the stump mic. Unfazed, both batters reached their milestones before signalling their readiness to settle for the draw. The Handshake Controversy: Misunderstood or Malicious? Amid the celebrations, a viral video showed Stokes walking away, seemingly refusing to shake hands with Jadeja. Social media lit up with speculation—did the England captain snub his Indian counterpart in frustration? However, context paints a more nuanced picture. Earlier, Stokes had indeed initiated the draw offer and was reportedly the first to acknowledge the end of play. England Cricket's official X handle even shared a photo of Stokes and Jadeja shaking hands, debunking claims of outright disrespect. Yet, post-match insights from Sanjay Manjrekar hinted at visible tension. "Ben was furious. Jadeja tried to shake hands, but Ben ignored him at first. That's when Jadeja, who had been composed all along, showed signs of losing his cool," said Manjrekar during commentary. Stokes Clarifies, Praises Indian Grit Speaking after the game, Stokes explained his decision to deploy part-timers and praised the Indian duo for their effort. 'Once the draw was inevitable, I didn't want to risk my main bowlers. There's massive satisfaction in scoring a hundred not out and saving your team—that's what Jadeja and Sundar did.' Stokes's sportsmanlike statement attempted to cool tensions, but the incident underlined the high-stakes intensity of the Test match.
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
Ravindra Jadeja Shuts Down Ben Stokes Draw Offer, Hits Hundred Amid Handshake Row
In an explosive climax to the fourth Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar staged a heroic stand that not only secured a memorable draw for India but also sparked one of the most talked-about on-field confrontations in recent Test history. England captain Ben Stokes' sarcastic handshake offer and Jadeja's calm but firm refusal lit up social media and cricket circles, becoming a defining moment of a fiercely contested match. 5th TEST | Starts THU, 31st July, 2:30 PM | Streaming on JioHotstar! — Star Sports (@StarSportsIndia) July 27, 2025 As the shadows lengthened on Day 5 at Old Trafford, with India's rear-guard action frustrating the hosts, Stokes approached Jadeja and Sundar with an offer to settle the match as a draw—with both Indian batters nearing centuries and India having all but sealed a result. Jadeja was on 89 and Sundar on 80. Stokes, in a moment that would soon be branded as unsporting by fans, reportedly taunted: 'Do you want to score a hundred against Harry Brook?' To which a smiling but composed Jadeja replied, 'I can't do anything.' Far from the sportsmanship one might expect at that stage, the England captain's tone suggested frustration and bruised ego. Instead of gracefully acknowledging a hard-fought draw, England's camp resorted to symbolic protest—bringing on part-time bowler Harry Brook, who sent down slow, looping deliveries that Jadeja promptly dispatched, one of them going for a six to bring up his third Test century. Jadeja and Sundar's Partnership: A Wall of Resistance While the Stokes incident stole the headlines, the cricket on display by Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar was nothing short of magnificent. Their 203-run stand was a masterclass in composure, technique, and grit—especially after India were rocked at 0/2 and then lost the well-set pair of Shubman Gill and KL Rahul (who had earlier stitched together a 188-run partnership) early on Day 5. On a Day 5 surface that offered inconsistent bounce but little outright menace, the two southpaws took charge, blunting England's attack with steely resolve. Their innings echoed memories of Ashwin and Vihari's Sydney heroics in 2021, with a similar message: India won't back down. Ben Stokes and England Invite Backlash: 'Bazball to Beg-Ball' Stokes' behavior, and England's collective reaction, quickly drew sharp criticism across social media. Hashtags like #BazballToBegBall and phrases like 'bullying tactics' and 'fragile ego' trended online, as fans slammed England for undermining Jadeja and Sundar's effort. 'Imagine if Joe Root was on 99 and the opposition captain offered a draw,' one fan wrote, summing up the general sentiment. Others mocked Stokes' remark as poor leadership, with @Im__Arfan tweeting: 'Such pathetic words from a captain. Jadeja played your main bowlers with ease. The hundred is well-earned.' India's Moral Victory and England's Rare Draw in the Bazball Era Despite England's initial dominance, India's comeback was remarkable—not just statistically but in terms of psychological edge. This marked only the second draw for England in 40 Tests under the Bazball era, the previous one also at Old Trafford during the rain-affected 2023 Ashes. With Rishabh Pant nursing a foot injury and unavailable to bat unless absolutely necessary, India's resolve became even more significant. Jadeja's fluent century and Sundar's maiden Test ton will be remembered as symbols of resilience, and a timely reminder that even in modern cricket's fast-paced age, milestones achieved through patience and pride still matter.
