Unequal Risks: How Age, Race, and Geography Shape America's Leading Causes of Death
A Nation's Biggest Killers Heart disease takes the lead, responsible for more than 21% of all U.S. deaths annually. Cancer follows closely, accounting for 18.5%. Combined, these two causes result in over 1.3 million deaths every year. In third place are accidental injuries, which claim more than 227,000 lives a figure that reflects not only tragic misfortune but also systemic gaps in education and prevention.
How Age Changes the Risk Profile One of the most striking findings in Vicknair's study is how the leading causes of death shift significantly with age. For infants, congenital conditions are the biggest threat. For children aged 1 to 9, accidental injuries dominate, a trend that extends into adolescence, where suicide also becomes a growing concern.
Among adults under 40, accidents and violence, including homicide, are frequent causes of death. But after age 40, the pattern changes drastically: the risks of cancer and heart disease surge. According to Vicknair's data, 45.1% of people over 40 face a significant risk of developing cancer, while 34.8% are at high risk for heart disease. Beyond age 65, the picture broadens to include COVID-19, strokes, and chronic respiratory conditions. Alzheimer's emerges as a dominant cause for those over 80.
Racial Disparities in Mortality The study also highlights profound racial disparities in death statistics. Non-Hispanic white Americans are most affected by heart disease, cancer, and Alzheimer's. For Black Americans, conditions like diabetes and stroke are more common, alongside a disproportionate impact from COVID-19. Hispanic Americans, despite having a higher average life expectancy, are dying from COVID-19 and diabetes at higher rates compared to white Americans. In fact, for every white fatality due to COVID-19, there are approximately 1.6 Hispanic fatalities.
Among Native American and Alaska Native populations, the leading causes of death include accidents, liver disease, and suicide. Alarmingly, suicide rates in these communities rose nearly 20% between 2015 and 2020, compared to a relatively flat national trend.
Geography Matters Location also plays a critical role in health outcomes. Vicknair's research underscores regional health risks, particularly in what's known as the 'Stroke Belt' a cluster of southeastern states with elevated rates of heart disease and stroke. Oklahoma, for instance, leads in heart disease deaths per capita.
States like Kentucky and Louisiana are outliers for cancer incidence, while accidental deaths are more frequent in rural areas like Montana and Wyoming. Respiratory disease is more common in coal-mining states like West Virginia, and chronic liver disease rates are elevated in New Mexico and Arizona. Florida sees a higher rate of Alzheimer's deaths, likely due to its larger elderly population.
The Rise of COVID-19 in Mortality Rankings COVID-19 now ranks as the fourth leading cause of death nationwide, responsible for nearly 6% of total annual deaths. Older adults, people of color, and residents of low-vaccination states remain the most vulnerable. The virus has amplified existing health disparities and remains a significant concern for public health.
Moving Toward Solutions The data brought to light by Vicknair's study doesn't just highlight problems—it suggests paths forward. Public health strategies that emphasize early intervention, vaccination, chronic disease management, and access to healthcare could drastically reduce mortality rates. Education around lifestyle habits, such as exercise, nutrition, and substance use, will also play a critical role in shifting the tide.
As the study makes clear, preventing death isn't just about medicine, it's about understanding who is most at risk and why. Recognizing these patterns is the first step toward building a healthier, more equitable future for all Americans.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The COVID pandemic may have aged your brain. Here's what the science says
The COVID-19 pandemic left an indelible mark on society — and now, new research suggests it may have also prematurely aged our brains by an average of 5.5 months, even among those who never caught the virus. In a study published in Nature Communications on Tuesday, researchers from the University of Nottingham in Britain analyzed brain scans from nearly 1,000 adults taken both before and after the pandemic began. The team investigated whether the global crisis had affected brain health. They used artificial intelligence trained on pre-pandemic data from more than 15,000 healthy participants in the U.K. Biobank to model normal brain aging. When applied to the new scans, the algorithm revealed a clear pattern: People who lived through the pandemic — regardless of infection status — showed signs of accelerated structural brain aging. 'What surprised me most was that even people who hadn't had COVID showed significant increases in brain aging rates,' said lead author Dr. Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad, a researcher at the University of Nottingham, in a paper accompanying the study. 'It really shows how much the experience of the pandemic itself, everything from isolation to uncertainty, may have affected our brain health.' The effects were most pronounced in men, older adults and individuals from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. While only those who had been infected with COVID-19 showed measurable declines in cognitive performance — such as slower thinking and reduced mental flexibility—structural brain changes were observed across the broader population. 'This study reminds us that brain health is shaped not only by illness, but by our everyday environment,' said Dorothee Auer, senior author of the study. The long-term impact of these changes remains unknown, but the researchers say the findings highlight the need to consider the mental and neurological effects of large-scale social disruption. 'Brain health can be influenced by everyday life activities, and major societal disruptions — like those experienced during the pandemic — can leave a mark even in healthy individuals,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. 'This adds to our understanding of public health by reinforcing the importance of considering mental, cognitive and social well-being alongside traditional physical health indicators during future crisis-response planning.'
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Wendy's wins an honor no restaurant wants
The pandemic and its afterburn decimated restaurants. Only one sector has been a bright spot: fast food. Fast-food joints like McDonald's, Chick-fil-A, Wendy's, and Taco Bell are still popular, thanks to convenience and value. We Americans love our fast food, but that convenience comes at a cost not reflected in the price tag. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter When you look at the nutritional data from many of the most popular fast-food chains, what you see is alarming, especially when you consider that 19.7% of children ages 2-19 years in the U.S. are obese. But the problem isn't just calories. Fast food contains fat, sodium, and added sugar that contribute to serious health problems like heart disease and Type 2 diabetes. Those fries, Frostys and bacon-laden burgers are definitely delicious, but a single meal from a fast-food chain often contains more calories than a person needs for a whole day. If you're trying to decide between a handful of your favorite spots, you might want to check out World Atlas' recent comparison of fast-food chains. They found that when it comes to unhealthy menu items, a couple of chains stand out from the rest. In their ranking, World Atlas looked at the nutritional data from nearly a dozen popular menu items. The survey factored in calories, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar. According to the findings, Wendy's is one of the unhealthiest chains in the U.S., but the legacy fast-food chain has plenty of company. Sonic Drive-In, Popeyes, McDonald's, Five Guys, Dairy Queen, and Carl's Jr. are also on the list of the worst for you. While Wendy's has made an effort to use and promote fresh ingredients, like its "Fresh never frozen beef" promise, and offers a variety of green salads prepared daily, its signature sandwich, the Baconator, rings in at more than 900 calories. When packaged with an order of medium fries and a medium Frosty, the tally jumps to than 1,600 calories. Related: McDonald's Snack Wrap causes alarming shortage The fat and sodium levels in this one meal are above daily recommended limits, yet Wendy's marketing embraces indulgence. Slogans like "You know you want it" and "Baconator. Resistance is futile," give off a "We know you can't help yourself" kind of energy. It's hard to beat the quick-service convenience and the fact that the Wendy's Baconator meal is just $12 (where I live in Nevada). A similar meal - bacon cheeseburger, fries, chocolate shake - at a sit-down restaurant like Red Robin will set you back more than $24. The bottom line is that fast-food chains are thriving, even as concerns around Americans' overall health grow. The one thing all the names on the unhealthiest list have in common is fiercely loyal fan bases, and appearing on lists like World Atlas' doesn't appear to hurt business much. Wendy's posted $2.9 billion in sales Q1 2025, down only slightly from the same time in 2024. Quick-service restaurants, including fast food chains, are popular and profiting because they offer value pricing and digital ordering and convenience. Customers also rate fast-food restaurants higher in terms of satisfaction than they do full-service restaurants. The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) 2025 report indicates that customer satisfaction with quick-service restaurants is higher than that of full-service restaurants. It can also be difficult for healthier restaurant chains to compete with the fast service and extended hours offered by national chains. So, even though healthier chains like Sweetgreen and Cava are popular in urban markets, traditional fast-food brands still dominate everywhere else. Turns out we want our food fast and cheap, no matter how many calories are in the bag. Related: McDonald's secures honor no restaurant wants The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Canned Fruit Recall Sparks Nationwide Warning to Customers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. W.W. Industrial Group is recalling Parashore brand pear slices in juice due to fears the product may contain elevated levels of lead and cadmium. Newsweek reached out to the company via phone Wednesday for comment and left a voicemail. Why It Matters Elevated levels of lead and cadmium can cause significant health problems, particularly among infants and children. The recall adds to a growing list of high-profile food safety actions, emphasizing the ongoing importance of vigilant federal oversight and thorough product testing to protect public health. Lead and cadmium are both toxic metals that can enter the food supply from environmental sources, such as contaminated soil or industrial byproducts. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), lead exposure poses particular risks to young children, whose developing brains are highly susceptible to neurotoxic effects. Elevated lead intake in early childhood has been linked to long-term issues affecting learning and behavior. Cadmium contamination can arise from soil composition, industrial activities and certain manufacturing processes. Prolonged exposure to cadmium, especially at levels above the FDA's interim reference level, can affect kidney function and increase the risk of bone demineralization. While it is not possible to completely prevent cadmium from entering the food supply, manufacturers are legally required to minimize and monitor such risks. Numerous recalls have been initiated in 2025 due to the potential for damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the FDA, the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. What To Know In the FDA alert, the recalled sliced pears were distributed throughout grocery outlet stores in California and other locations across the United States. The products were sold in a 15-ounce can with a UPC number of #704817164237. "The specific lot found positive for heavy metals was Lot 3700/01172 6122J, Prod: 02/19/2024, Best by 2/19/2027," the FDA warns. The agency adds that there had been no reported illnesses related to the recall as of Tuesday. What People Are Saying The FDA alert, in part: "The heavy metal contamination was discovered via sampling by the Maryland Department of Health which is part of the FDA Laboratory Flexible Funding Model program. The company has recalled the products and is continuing an investigation to determine cause." What Happens Next Customers who have purchased the recalled pear slices are urged to throw them away or return the product to the original place of purchase for a full refund, the FDA says. People with additional questions can contact W.W. Industrial Group via phone at 516- 676-9188 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. ET weekdays.
