
'Confrontation' in South China Sea as US Ally Challenges Beijing
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A standoff occurred between the Chinese and Philippine coast guards off the Philippine province of Palawan, according to ship-tracking data shared by a maritime analyst on Tuesday.
Newsweek reached out to the Chinese Foreign Ministry and the Philippine coast guard via email for comment outside of office hours.
Why It Matters
Tensions are running high between Beijing and Manila over China's expanding activities within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone, hundreds of miles from Chinese shores. Beijing claims over 80 percent of the South China Sea as its territory, asserting historical rights.
Philippine efforts to challenge Chinese maritime forces, spearheaded by China's large, reinforced-hull coast guard ships, have resulted in clashes at South China Sea flashpoints, raising concerns that a miscalculation could trigger the United States-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty and draw U.S. forces into conflict with China.
A Chinese Coast Guard ship near the Philippine-occupied island of Thitu in the disputed South China Sea on June 3, 2025.
A Chinese Coast Guard ship near the Philippine-occupied island of Thitu in the disputed South China Sea on June 3, 2025.
Ted Aljibe/AFP via Getty Images
What To Know
Tuesday's maritime confrontation occurred when three Chinese coast guard ships challenged a group of Philippine vessels about 60 miles off the westernmost Philippine province of Palawan, Ray Powell, director of the Stanford University-affiliated maritime group SeaLight, wrote on X (formerly Twitter).
That's well within the Philippines' 200-nautical-mile (230-mile) exclusive economic zone, where Manila alone is entitled to fishing and natural resource management rights under international law.
The Philippine contingent—comprised of two coast guard cutters and a civilian patrol vessel from the national fisheries bureau—had escorted what appeared to be a fishing vessel into waters south of Half Moon Shoal, an atoll west of Palawan and on the edge of the contested Spratly Islands archipelago.
🇵🇭🇨🇳MARITIME CONFRONTATION NEAR PALAWAN:
Two #Philippines Coast Guard (BRP Cape San Augustin & BRP Cape Engano) & one fisheries vessel (BRP Lapu Lapu) have escorted a ship ID'd as Panama-flagged Kunimatsu 3 from Puerto Princesa to an area south of Half Moon Shoal, 50-55nm from… pic.twitter.com/6L3JqapbFO — Ray Powell (@GordianKnotRay) June 16, 2025
An illustration shared by Powell depicts a web of ship tracks as Chinese and Philippine vessels maneuvered around each other, in an encounter reminiscent of previous standoffs at other Spratly hotspots, such as Sabina Shoal and Second Thomas Shoal.
In 2016, an international arbitral tribunal in The Hague dismissed China's sweeping claims in the South China Sea. Beijing maintains that the decision is invalid.
What People Are Saying
Chinese analyst Liu Xiaobo, at a recent event hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies: "China's maritime rights protection in the South China Sea is mainly carried out by the coast guard.
"And there are more and more coast guard in the South China Sea, but it's very rare to see the Chinese navy because, to China, using the navy is very to easy to lead into escalation. In China's view, this is another kind of self-restraint."
What Happens Next
Both China and the Philippines are unlikely to budge on the long-running dispute.
-
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House says Trump will push TikTok deadline another 90 days
President Trump will sign another executive order this week extending the deadline for TikTok's parent company to divest the video sharing app, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' Leavitt said in a statement shared with The Hill. 'This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure.' Leavitt's confirmation came just hours after Trump said earlier in the day he would likely extend the divesture deadline to prevent a ban on TikTok from taking effect in the United States. When asked whether he would give the popular video-sharing platform another extension, the president told reporters aboard Air Force One, 'Probably, yeah.' 'Probably have to get China approval, but I think we'll get it,' Trump said as he traveled back from the Group of Seven summit in Canada. 'I think President Xi [Jinping] will ultimately approve it.' The expected order will mark the third extension from Trump since he took office in January. The law requiring TikTok's China-based parent company ByteDance to divest from the platform or face a ban on U.S. networks and app stores was signed by former President Biden last year. The law initially went into effect on Jan. 19 — the day before Trump was sworn into his second term — causing the platform to go dark for a few hours after the Supreme Court upheld the divest-or-ban law. But the platform was quickly brought back online after Trump pledged to issue an executive order once back in office to give the company an extension. The president made good on that promise, giving TikTok's Chinese parent company ByteDance 75 days beyond the initial January deadline to divest form the platform amid national security concerns. The White House finalized a deal on TikTok in early April, but it fell apart when Trump announced sweeping new 'reciprocal' tariffs, including significant import taxes on Chinese goods. The president extended the TikTok deadline by another 75 days, which was set to expire on June 19. Brett Samuels contributed reporting.


Axios
33 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump to delay ban on TikTok again
The youth can rejoice. President Trump will yet again extend the deadline for a ban on TikTok, the White House said Tuesday. Why it matters: The wildly popular video app lives to fight another day. It's so far outlasted the terms of a bipartisan law that would have banned it over national security risks because of its ties to China. That legislation passed last year, which was upheld by the Supreme Court, had required that ByteDance divest TikTok by mid-January or else stop operating in the U.S. Trump has extended the deadline multiple times since he took office in January, most recently until June 19. Driving the news: Trump will sign an additional executive order this week to keep TikTok up and running for another 90 days, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. "As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark," she added. During the extension period, the administration will work "to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," Leavitt, said. Zoom in: Patience on the Hill has been wearing thin as Trump prepares to delay a ban on TikTok for the third time. Each time the White House delays enforcement of the TikTok ban, Republicans' national security concerns are undermined, Axios' Maria Curi reports. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) told reporters on Capitol Hill Tuesday that Congress passed the law "so that the Chinese government no longer has the ability to use TikTok to conduct espionage and propaganda." He added, "It is my hope and expectation that that's exactly what the Trump administration is fighting to achieve. And as long as that happens, I expect Congress will be happy." Cruz noted, "If it doesn't happen, I expect Congress will be very honest." Catch up quick: The app briefly went dark in January after ByteDance failed to divest from TikTok.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Premier Eby says deal to hire Chinese shipyard not 'preferred' but will not interfere
VICTORIA - B.C. Premier David Eby says he shares the concerns of union leaders who have criticized BC Ferries' decision to build four large ferries in China. But Eby says he will not interfere with the company's decision to contract a Chinese shipyard owned by the Communist government to build four new ferries, calling the vessels 'urgently needed' despite the deal not being his 'preferred outcome.' The decision by BC Ferries, a company that operates independently of the provincial government but is wholly owned by it, has drawn widespread criticism from groups including the BC Federation of Labour. It has called BC Ferries' decision a 'colossal mistake' and a 'short-sighted decision' that will send hundreds of millions of dollars out of province and into the pockets of a 'brutal authoritarian regime.' Eby says no Canadian company bid for the contract, adding that B.C. shipyards currently lack the necessary capacity — highlighting the hollowing out of the provincial shipbuilding industry. But Eby, who was speaking for the first time after returning from his trade mission to Asia, says B.C. will be working with the federal government to ensure that the next major vessels for BC Ferries will be built in the province — or at the very least in Canada. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 17, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .