EU review ‘paints grim picture' of Israel's actions in Gaza, Irish premier says
The Taoiseach said the report highlights the restriction of food and medicines into Gaza, which he said 'amounts to the use of starvation as a method of war'.
The EU-Israel Association Agreement is being reviewed after a dozen EU member states backed it last month.
The unpublished report has found that there are 'indications' Israel could be in breach of its human rights obligations under the agreement, according to several media outlets.
Reacting on Saturday, Mr Martin welcomed the 'substantive and important' report on Israel's compliance with its human rights obligations under the EU-Israel deal.
He said Ireland had 'long argued' that clauses on human rights in the EU's international agreement 'have to be respected' and should prompt 'serious consequences' when they are not.
Back in February 2024, Ireland and Spain jointly called for an urgent review of whether Israel had breached its human rights obligations in the trade agreement.
A majority of EU countries did not back the review until last month, prompted by a proposal from The Netherlands.
The shift came amid Israel's months-long blockade of Gaza, which has accelerated fears of a famine. A new Israeli and US-backed aid system has been marred by violence.
Israel's 20-month military campaign in the the Palestinian enclave has killed an estimated 55,000 people and injured thousands more, according to Gaza's health ministry.
Mr Martin said: 'I very much welcome the substantive and important report of the EU's High Representative for Human Rights on Israel's compliance with its human rights obligations under the EU-Israel Association Agreement.
'Bringing together the reports and analysis of serious, credible and reliable sources – including the International Court of Justice, the UN's Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the UN Secretary General's Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict and others – it paints a clear and grim picture of a sustained and deliberate failure by Israel to adhere to its international obligations, especially in Gaza but also in the West Bank.
'It highlights a continued restriction of food, medicines, medical equipment, and other vital supplies into Gaza that amount to collective punishment of the civilian population, that amounts to the use of starvation as a method of war.
'It describes an unprecedented level of killing and injury of civilians in Gaza resulting from indiscriminate attacks without proportion or precaution, as well as attacks on hospitals, forced mass displacements and the killing of journalists. All of this with a persistent lack of accountability.
'In the West Bank, it reports sustained oppression of the Palestinian population, including through state and settler violence, the appropriation of land, and the use of detention as a form of collective punishment.'
He added: 'We will now work with partners to follow up on this important report with concrete steps, and I will be discussing it with my colleagues in the European Council when we meet next week.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US reportedly moving B-2 bombers to Guam as Trump considers Iran strikes
The United States is moving B-2 bombers to the Pacific island of Guam, two US officials told Reuters on Saturday, as Donald Trump weighs whether the United States should take part in Israel's strikes against Iran. It was unclear whether the bomber deployment is tied to Middle East tensions. The B-2 can be equipped to carry America's 30,000lb GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, designed to destroy targets deep underground. That is the weapon that experts say could be used to strike Iran's nuclear program, including Fordow. The officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, declined to disclose any further details. One official said no forward orders had been given yet to move the bombers beyond Guam. They did not say how many B-2 bombers are being moved. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Experts and officials are closely watching to see whether the B-2 bombers will move forward to a US-British military base on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia. Experts say that Diego Garcia is in an ideal position to operate in the Middle East. The United States had B-2 bombers on Diego Garcia up until last month, when they were replaced with B-52 bombers. Israel said on Saturday it had killed a veteran Iranian commander during attacks by both sides in the more than week-long air war, while Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear program while under threat. Israel says Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, while Iran says its atomic program is only for peaceful purposes. Trump has said he would take up to two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time 'to see whether or not people come to their senses,' he said. Reuters was first to report this week the movement of a large number of tanker aircraft to Europe and other military assets to the Middle East, including the deployment of more fighter jets. An aircraft carrier in the Indo-Pacific is also heading to the Middle East.
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hermer is wrong: international law permits Britain to strike against Iran
Israel's recent strikes against military and nuclear targets in Iran – more rapid, efficient and successful than anyone could have imagined – have been an unparalleled game changer in the Middle East. In the words of Germany's Chancellor Merz, Israel is doing the 'dirty work' of striking Iran 'for all of us', acting in resolute defence of the free world against this existential threat. Israel's actions are also potentially creating the circumstances in which the Iranian people may finally free themselves from more than four decades of the most vicious extremist oppression. It is remarkable, one may think, that in these circumstances the predominant discussion of the legal analysis of these developments could have been so resolutely incorrect. As reported in these pages, the UK Attorney General Lord Hermer KC has advised the Government that it may be complicit in an illegal war if it supports a strike on Iran, but apparently drew a distinction regarding 'defensive' support of Israel. Prof Richard Ekins KC and Policy Exchange have pointed out the curious self-contradictory nature of the position: 'It seems very odd that it is lawful to use 'defensive' force by, for example shooting down a missile heading for Tel Aviv, but unlawful to use 'defensive' force to destroy Iranian missile batteries in Iran.' Hermer's advice on the matter seems to fall into this now recognisable pattern of real international law being unceremoniously thrown out of the window by activist lawyers pushing their political agenda and worldview. This is pretty basic. The right to self-defence in international law is inherent, recognised as such in Article 51 of the UN Charter. It is an exception to the general prohibition on the use of force. It is one of the most fundamental norms. Likewise, the doctrine of defence of third parties permits other states to use force to defend another state that is under armed attack. There is debate about the extent to which an appeal by the attacked state is required, but it is hard to imagine the UK assisting Israel without being so requested. The most critical feature of this Iran-Israel war, however, which appears to have been generally glossed over, is its ongoing nature. This is not a new phenomenon. The international armed conflict between these two states has been decades long. The turning point in Iran-Israel relations was the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran. The two states had previously enjoyed a close working relationship as major allies and trading partners. The proclamation 'Death to Israel ' was issued by Ayatollah Khomeini just before the 1979 revolution. After he seized power, this became the policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which has waged its decades-long proxy war against Israel, primarily through the cultivation, support and direction of internationally proscribed terrorist organisations Hezbollah and Hamas. Through these terror armies on Israel's northern and southern borders, and with the more recent inclusion of the Houthis in Yemen, Iran has diligently pursued its annihilistic war aims. The public threats by Tehran to eliminate Israel are a central tenet of Iran's foreign policy and are backed up by a clock in central Tehran, counting down to the date of Israel's destruction as prophesied by the Ayatollah. In the past year, this escalated to direct missile barrages against Israeli civilians. On April 13 2024, Iran launched its first direct attack on Israel, sending around 170 drones, 30 cruise missiles, and 120 ballistic missiles towards Israel, in what was called the most significant attempted drone attack in history. On October 1 2024, Iran launched 200 ballistic missiles at Israel, killing one Israeli civilian and one Palestinian civilian, as well as causing major damage to Israeli homes. These developments, together with the alleged airstrike by Israel on Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officers near the Iranian Embassy complex in Damascus, Syria, and the elimination of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran last July, are all part and parcel of the ongoing international armed conflict. The existence of this ongoing armed conflict shifts the analysis from the law governing the resort to force – jus ad bellum – to the law governing the conduct of warfare – jus in bello. That is the appropriate lens through which to assess Israel's actions, and its compliance with the key principles governing the conduct of warfare: necessity, distinction, proportionality and precaution. As in other aspects of Israel's armed conflict against Iranian proxies, the targeting of military objectives, based on proportionality assessments and accompanied by precautions that strive to reduce civilian casualties and collateral damage, indicate strict adherence to these rules. The precision and discrimination with which they are conducted remain unprecedented in the history of armed conflict and in many respects exceed the requirements of international humanitarian law – as noted by a letter to the UN Security Council by Israeli foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar last week. The focus of Operation 'Rising Lion' is prompted by the latest critical developments in Iran's covert nuclear weapons programme. This includes the June 12 declaration by the IAEA that Iran was in breach of non-proliferation obligations, which immediately preceded the strikes. The apparent failure by Hermer and others to properly analyse this development in the context of the decades-long international armed conflict is truly inexplicable. It smacks of politics trumping law, where pseudo legal arguments are being advanced to support an agenda that is anti-Israel, anti-Western and fundamentally counter to the UK's national interest.
NBC News
20 minutes ago
- NBC News
Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil returns home to New York area
Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University student released after more than three months in ICE detention, arrived in the New York metropolitan area on Saturday. Immigration authorities had arrested Khalil, 30, in March at the university housing complex where he lived in New York City. He was quickly transported thousands of miles away to a detention center in Louisiana, where he spent the last few months. His unprecedented detention has sparked national outrage. Further fueling the controversy, Khalil's American wife gave birth to the couple's first son in April while he remained behind bars. Upon his release in Louisiana on Friday, Khalil addressed reporters briefly, saying he was excited to return to New York City and see his family. 'Although justice prevailed,' he said upon his release, 'it's long, very long overdue. And this shouldn't have taken three months.' 'Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this,' he added. 'That doesn't mean that there is a right person for this. There's no right person who should be detained for actually protesting a genocide, for protesting their university, Columbia University.' Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin on Friday denounced the judicial order freeing Khalil and the judge who issued it. 'This is yet another example of how out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security,' McLaughlin said in a statement. 'Their conduct not only denies the result of the 2024 election, it also does great harm to our constitutional system by undermining public confidence in the courts.' The Trump administration claimed it had the authority to detain and deport the pro-Palestinian student activist, arguing that his presence in the U.S. threatened national security. Another charge against Khalil alleges that he omitted details about his work history and membership in organizations on his permanent residency application. The government cited an obscure provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 that gives Secretary of State Marco Rubio authority to 'personally determine' whether a foreign national can remain in the U.S. on national security grounds. An NBC News review of more than 100 pages of court filings found that prosecutors relied on unverified tabloid reports and anecdotal claims, raising doubts about the strength of their case for deporting Khalil. Less than 10 minutes after Khalil, who has no criminal history, was released from the detention center in Jena, Louisiana, the Trump administration filed a notice of appeal. Khalil helped lead student protests over the war in Gaza and negotiations with university officials at Columbia last year. The protests at the Ivy League school gripped national headlines for weeks and inspired similar demonstrations at universities around the world. Some Jewish students at universities across the U.S. reported antisemitic incidents as the protest movement gained traction. Khalil was the first of several foreign academics apprehended by immigration authorities in the first months of Trump's second term. Tufts University student Rümeysa Öztürk, a doctoral candidate from Turkey, was arrested outside her home in Somerville, Massachusetts, by immigration authorities on March 25. Viral street footage of her arrest showed Department of Homeland Security officials dressed in plain clothes surrounding Öztürk, grabbing her by the wrists and escorting her into an unmarked vehicle. Mohsen Mahdawi, a 34-year-old graduate student at Columbia who was born in the West Bank, was apprehended by immigration authorities during his naturalization interview in Vermont. Federal judges also ordered the release of both Öztürk and Mahdawi in recent weeks. Other notable cases include a Georgetown University professor who was detained by ICE and later released after a judicial order, and a Brown University professor who was deported to Lebanon.
