WH Smith locked in legal battle over unsold vapes
TG Jones is facing a court battle over its contract with NPB Brands after it sent back boxes of unsold disposable vapes following the countrywide ban.
NPB Brands and TG Jones are in dispute over the terms of their contract. A court hearing is expected to take place next week.
TG Jones is the new name of WH Smith's high street stores after WH Smith sold off its estate to focus on airport and rail shops, which are still called WH Smith.
The legal tussle comes after the Government last month banned shops from being able to sell single-use vapes both online and in stores.
Traders that continue to sell them risk a fine of £200, followed by an unlimited fine or jail time for repeat offending.
The ban is part of a push to stop children buying disposable vapes, which have become popular thanks to their various fruit flavours.
Around 7pc of 11 to 17-year-olds vape regularly or occasionally, up from 4.1pc in 2020. Almost one in five of children in that age bracket admit to having tried vaping.
Figures from the World Health Organisation have suggested that the proportion of 11-year-olds who vape is significantly higher in England compared to countries including Italy, Sweden, Germany and Spain.
Announcing the ban last year, Andrew Gwynne, a former junior health minister, said the step would 'reduce the appeal of vapes to children and keep them out of the hands of vulnerable young people'.
From June, retailers have only been able to sell reusable vapes.
Ministers have said the ban will also stop the 'avalanche' of rubbish generated from disposable vapes – which are not refillable and are unable to be recharged.
Typically people have thrown them away with their general waste in black bins or littered. Even when they are recycled they need to be taken apart by hand.
The legal tussle over its supplier contract comes as the TG Jones brand starts to appear above high street stores, with the new name replacing WH Smith.
It follows the purchase of WH Smith's high street stores by Modella Capital earlier this year.
Modella said the TG Jones name 'feels like a worthy successor' to WH Smith.
A spokesman for the company said earlier this year: 'Jones carries the same sense of family and reflects these stores being at the heart of everyone's high street.'
NPB Brands declined to comment. A spokesman for TG Jones said: 'As a matter of policy we would never comment on a commercial dispute between ourselves and a supplier.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
30 minutes ago
- The Sun
Chelsea face being BANNED from playing Delap, Joao Pedro and Gittens in the Champions League after £27m fine
CHELSEA could be banned from fielding Liam Delap, Joao Pedro and other summer signings in next season's Champions League. The Blues have already splashed out more than £160m on Delap, Pedro, Brazilian youngster Willian Estevao and more arrivals, with Jamie Gittens also joining today from Borussia Dortmund in a deal worth £52m. 3 3 3 But if Chelsea are unable to balance the books by selling or loaning out players in the remainder of the window, the terms of their Uefa punishment for breaking financial rules will prevent them registering them all for the Champions League. That is why homegrown defender Trevoh Chalobah is very likely to be sold this summer. Yet even a £40m fee for Chalobah would not be enough to cover the costs of all the new recruits. Uefa last week fined Chelsea a total of £27m, with a potential £52m more to come, for breaching regulations on football earnings and squad cost controls. As part of the settlement, the Blues also accepted they could not add players to the 25-man A list for Uefa competitions without the annual cost of those players being covered by savings from removing existing members of the list. The annual cost of a player is calculated by adding his wages to the amortisation value of his transfer fee. For example Delap has joined Chelsea from Ipswich for a fee of £30m on a six-year contract. But Uefa regulations say clubs have to calculate the amortisation over a five-year period. Therefore, the amortisation cost of Delap next season will be £30m divided by five - £6m. If the striker is on wages of £100,000 a week, that is £5.2m a year, making the total Delap cost £11.2m. Chelsea CONFIRM transfer of Jamie Gittens as £52m Borussia Dortmund star becomes seventh addition of the summer Should Chelsea want just him to play in the Champions League, they would have to find more than £11.2m in savings from players they wanted to take off the list. The value of an outgoing player is calculated by adding their wages to any profit on their sale. That is why Chalobah is particularly vulnerable to being sold. As a product of the Chelsea academy, his value on the books is zero so any fee received would be pure profit. That was the case when Chelsea sold Mason Mount and Conor Gallagher in the last two summers. A £40m fee for Chalobah, plus the saving in wages, would cover the costs related to Delap, £60m signing Joao Pedro and some others - but not all incomings this summer. If Chelsea wanted to sell a player like goalkeeper Robert Sanchez, however, the maths is different. Sanchez arrived from Brighton for £25m two years ago. Amortisation for each of those two years is £5m (£25m divided by 5) making a cost of £10m. Sanchez's value on the books is now £15m (£25m minus the £10m amortisation) so Chelsea would need to sell him for more than that to bank a profit, on top of the saving in wages. Of the 25 players on Chelsea's A list for the knockout stages of the Europa Conference League, the only big earner to leave so far is on-loan Jadon Sancho. The Blues are believed to have paid half of Sancho's £300,000 per week wages from his Manchester United contract - £150,000 a week.. Chelsea paid £5m to get out of an obligation to buy the winger. Sancho's departure will save them £7.8m in wages, but it's still not enough to cover the likely £11.2m cost of Delap. Noni Madueke is now reported to have agreed personal terms with Arsenal, which would free up more funds for the Blues.
The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
Wetherspoons confirms return of ‘mouthwatering' menu item that was quietly axed from pubs across UK
WETHERSPOONS has confirmed that a hugely popular menu item is finally back on menus nationwide — months after it mysteriously vanished from pubs across the UK. For weeks, customers were left scratching their heads as the dish quietly disappeared, with no official explanation. Now, the mystery has been solved — the £6.49 meal, which comes with 10 crispy chicken breast bites, golden chips, and a choice of dipping sauces, had been marked as 'temporarily unavailable' on digital and printed menus since around April. Its quiet disappearance left punters puzzled, with many turning to social media to express their frustration and confusion. One fan took to Reddit to vent: 'It has been over one month without the chicken bites on the menu and I physically can't do this. Where have they gone? 'My beautiful, mouthwatering, crisped bites, that even the heavens have blessed with an angel's touch, where have you gone. "I suffer with agony and mourn every second without you in my Spoons pub.' Another joked: 'Whatever it is give me a waiver to sign and give me those chicken bites.' Some customers said the dish still appeared on their local menus but was never actually in stock, leading to even more confusion. Now, Wetherspoon has confirmed that chicken bites have made a full return. A JD Wetherspoon spokesperson said: 'Chicken bites are now available in all Wetherspoon pubs.' The pub chain didn't give a reason for the disappearance, but fans are simply relieved to see the cult favourite back in action. Inside Wetherspoons huge new pub - it's a hidden gem 'off the beaten track' and has a major pricing difference Since the return was confirmed, customers have taken to X (formerly Twitter) to share their joy. One wrote: 'I am delighted to confirm that the iconic Wetherspoon chicken breast bites are back. Goodness knows what that was all about. "On the downside, I just ordered the last portion in the Brit, Plymouth, so don't rush down.' Another said: 'I love you, Wetherspoon chicken bites.' Others joked that their weekly pub routine is 'finally complete again.' The chicken bites have become a go-to option for customers looking for a quick and tasty bite — especially as part of Wetherspoon's value-for-money deals. The return comes as part of a broader menu refresh, with several other fan favourites also making a comeback. Other dishes back on the menu Customers have also spotted the return of other missing items, including salt and pepper squid, Southern-fried chicken strips, and the vegetarian roasted vegetable lasagne — all of which had been quietly dropped over the last year. Some breakfast classics are also back, such as the large breakfast wrap and black pudding, which had been removed during previous menu cuts. The return of these items has been welcomed by regulars who were left disappointed when their go-to orders disappeared without warning. But not everything's coming back Despite the excitement around returning items, Wetherspoon has confirmed that some dishes are gone for good. On May 14, steaks, mixed grills, and gammon were officially removed from the menu and will not be making a return. The move sparked a wave of backlash from long-time Spoons lovers who saw the grill range as a staple part of the menu. JD Wetherspoon said the decision was part of a 'streamlining' of its food offering to focus on more popular and faster-serving dishes. While the loss of the grill range has been a blow to some, the return of chicken bites and other customer favourites has helped soften the disappointment. 2
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Brad Pitt demands to depose ex Angelina Jolie under oath in nasty fight over French winery Château Miraval
BRAD Pitt has demanded that his ex-wife Angelina Jolie be deposed under oath in their nasty fight over their French winery, Château Miraval. The U.S. Sun can exclusively reveal in court documents filed this week, Brad's team has asked the court to compel Angelina's company, Nouvel LLC, to be questioned in their ongoing legal battle over the vineyard and estate. 5 5 According to Brad's filing, Nouvel has objected to being deposed, calling the topic of the inquiry "overbroad, unduly burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Brad, 61, alleged that Angelina, 50, was open to a third-party sale of Miraval as early as March of 2021. "On March 30, 2021, a lawyer for Stoli Group contacted Jolie's California-based divorce lawyer to inquire whether she would be interested in selling her stake in Miraval, Brad alleged in one recent filing," his attorney wrote. The F1 star also claimed that while he and his team believed they were negotiating with Angelina by way of Nouvel to purchase her 50 percent stake in the company, she was "secretly" negotiating with Stoli. "Throughout May 2021, while Jolie was still purporting to negotiate with Pitt and Mark Perrin [Brad's partner in Miraval], Stoli and Jolie continued to negotiate in secret." The actor alleged his ex-wife's "transactional counsel even provided 'detailed feedback' to Stoli and its negotiators, including [fellow defendant, Russian businessman, Alexey Oliynik, whose deposition is also being sought] regarding what it would take for Stoli to beat Pitt's offer." Brad then claimed that by the end of May 2021, "Stoli and Jolie had arrived at a ballpark price of $65 million for the deal—a price that was kept secret from Pitt, and which, in the wake of the private judge's ruling finding Jolie not credible, she never gave him the opportunity to match." The sale of Miraval is at the crux of the fight between Brad and Angelina over the French vineyard and estate. Brad is claiming that Nouvel is Angelina's "alter ego," as she used the company as a shell to circumvent contractual restrictions. In the motion, he says that in deposing Nouvel, he is seeking testimony about Nouvel and Tenute del Mondo's initial investments in Miraval. Tenute del Mondo is a Netherlands private limited company, who is also named as a defendant in Brad's lawsuit. He is also seeking information about the entities' "subsequent financial contributions to the home and winery at the heart of this dispute." Brad is also interested in the 10 percent transfer from his own company Mondo Bongo to Nouvel of shares in Quimicum, as well as the restrictions on transfers of sales in the agreement in the Quimicum Articles and the Transfer Restrictions. In a separate case, in a Luxembourg court, a judge has put the 10% of shares in question into an escrow account while the parties work out the legality behind Brad's one-euro sale to Angelina, which made their ownership of the vineyard go from 60/40 Brad to 50/50 between them. In the Luxembourg case, Brad is alleging Angelina never actually paid him the one euro for the 10% shares and therefore the sale should be voided. HOW MIRAVAL CAME TO BE The couple purchased the estate in 2011 for an estimated $60 million with Brad claiming it was to be passed down to their children. The property, which includes a 35-room manor and extensive vineyard, is said to now be worth around $500 million. He has claimed he was the driving force behind the success of the winery, spending both his time and money on the endeavor early on. In 2016, the couple split but both continued to maintain their stake in the company, until 2021 when Angelina told Brad she wanted out of the business. She reportedly said Brad used the company's money to fund his personal pursuits. Angelina and Brad almost came to an agreement for him to be able to purchase the company, however the pair locked horns after Brad proposed a nondisparagement agreement in connection with the deal. As The U.S. Sun previously revealed, Angelina argued Brad wanted her to sign an NDA to cover up "years of abuse." Brad argued Angelina's issue was actually that she already had a deal lined up with Stoli Group. Stoli is owned and controlled by Russian billionaire, Yuri Shefler, and its subsidiary Tenute del Mondo. Brad sued Angelina over the Stoli deal in 2022 saying she had sold Miraval without his approval, and argued that without that, the sale was invalid. He was seeking at least $67 million in his suit. Jolie's company, Nouvel, filed a $250 million countersuit against Brad. Stoli accused the actor of misusing company assets on vanity projects, allegations he denied. Angelina has yet to respond to Brad's recent filings. 5 5
