Indiana's war on 'useless' degrees hurts all students
A new state law threatens the existence of an overwhelming number of degrees. Public universities are cutting or consolidating about 20% of the degree options available in Indiana.
This troublesome legislation limits access to the types of degrees and majors Hoosiers are able to pursue. Gov. Mike Braun said these changes will help students make wiser decisions about degrees that will lead to better career prospects. Bachelor's degree programs are safe if they produce an average of 15 graduates over a three-year period. The threshold is seven for master's degrees.
In Indiana, it now seems like a degree is only as good as its potential to land you a high-paying corporate job. Career-readiness and professional development are undoubtedly important aspects of a college education, but they aren't the only types of growth and learning that matter.
Mia Behringer, a rising senior at Indiana University-Bloomington, rejects the notion that the only goal of a college degree is to find a job.
"Higher education is more than looking for a way to make money," Behringer said. "You go to school to expand on your lifelong learning."
Behringer, who majors in art history and environmental sustainability, wasn't surprised when her art history degree was targeted. But the Ph.D program for art history at IU has been impacted by the legislation, too.
Hicks: Indiana's college crisis has nothing to do with woke campuses or high costs
'It would have been nice to be able to have the option to go to higher education in my home state, but that's just kind of disheartening to see that cut off,' Behringer said. 'My plans now are to probably go study in Spain. I'd like to continue and probably do something abroad after kind of seeing the attack on academic freedom in the United States. And we don't really hold importance in sustainability programs or art history programs, and I can feel that.'
The cuts make it increasingly difficult for humanities students to pursue higher education in their fields, overlooking academic careers that require these specialized programs.
"To equate education with job readiness and making money is misguided," recent IU graduate Lilly Luse said. "The market will always change."
Luse graduated this year from IU with degrees in comparative literature and film studies. The comparative literature major is on track to be suspended and merged due to the legislation.
Luse hopes to use their degree to become a professor of cinema studies and plans on pursuing higher education to reach that goal. They find that pursuing a less popular degree has its perks, including smaller class sizes, more attention from teachers and increased collaboration with other students.
Opinion: Indiana should cap out-of-state student enrollment to solve brain drain
The success of a particular degree should not exclusively be defined by how many graduates it produces. Some advanced degrees are meant for academics and professionals within a field of study that might be far more niche than others.
'If we lose critical thinking skills, we're going to fall victim to certain messages,' Luse said.
Luse is right. Stifling academic freedom restricts freedom of thought — part of a broader anti-intellectual trend Indiana lawmakers have embraced.
'People are so afraid to have challenging conversations about things like stifling queer life in Indiana (or) like the book bans,' Luse said. "We're going back to these really outdated modes of thinking that certain things are to be feared or not to be talked about."
Opinion: Indiana should cap out-of-state student enrollment to solve brain drain
Indiana is continuing down a path that diminishes the role and impact of a college education and learning as a whole, putting not just students, but all Hoosiers, at risk.
This legislation claims to prepare students for the workforce, and it's clear that academia doesn't make the cut. There is always value in learning something new. Exposure to new perspectives and ideas helps us become well-rounded people.
Learning for the sake of learning is important, too.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
4 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
What are President Trump's approval ratings? See what Indiana thinks of his performance
President Donald Trump's approval ratings nationally are in the red, but in about half of the states, including Indiana, more people approve than disapprove of his job performance. While Trump's approval rating nationally remains historically low, a look at state-by-state survey results show a more complicated picture. Here is what we know: Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states, according to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters. The number of states who approve of Trump is unchanged from July's update. Morning Consult found that Trump is most popular in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance, and least popular in Vermont, where 64% disapprove. His approval is net negative in two states with gubernatorial races this fall: New Jersey and Virginia, according to Morning Consult. In Texas, 53% of voters approve of Trump's performance while 44% disapprove. In California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to counter changes in Texas' redistricting plan, 41% approve of Trump's job peformance while 56% disapprove. California is Trump's seventh worst rating among the states, according to Morning Consult. According to Morning Consult, 51% of Hoosiers approve of Trump while 45% disapprove. Despite recent "No Kings" and "Good Trouble" protests, Indiana is one of the 27 states where Trump's approval ratings are more positive than not. Story continues after photo gallery. RealClearPolitics Poll Average shows Trump's approval rating dipping throughout the first few weeks of July before rising toward the end of the month. Aggregated polls by the New York Times show a similar trend. As of Jan. 27, Trump had a +6.2 percentage point approval rating, but as of March 13, that flipped to slightly negative, the RealClearPolitics graphics show. His approval rating fell lowest on April 29 around Trump's 100-day mark to 7.2 percentage points. It came close to that low again on July 22 and 23 at -7.1 percentage points, as the controversy over Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted pedophile, carried into its third week. As of Aug. 12 Trump's average approval rating margin, according to RealClearPolitics, is -5.4 percentage points. The approval margin according to the New York Times aggregator on Aug. 12 is -8 percentage points. A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in July of his first years in office — both as the 45th and 47th presidents — are lower than those of any other modern president at the same time in their administrations. In a Gallup poll conducted from July 7-21, 37% approved of Trump's job performance. Here's how that compares to other presidents in July of their first year of their term, according to Gallup:
Indianapolis Star
13 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana Democrats' 2011 walkout backfired, led to GOP gains
'Surreal' is the only way to describe a gaggle of Hoosier reporters gathering around a speakerphone to record a gruff voice beaming in from Illinois. But that's what happened in 2011, when Indiana House Democrats staged a walkout to block a variety of bills. The memories of those peculiar media availabilities with Rep. Pat Bauer, D-South Bend, came flooding back when I heard Texas Democrats had also fled the state — this time to block a mid-cycle redistricting. The nearly six-week Hoosier walkout likely led to a GOP supermajority and has had lasting negative impacts to this day. House Democrats left Indiana on Feb. 22, 2011, for a Comfort Suites in Urbana, Illinois. The caucus was fighting several anti-union bills, though a host of other issues also played a role, including state-funded vouchers for private schools. Their absence meant the House couldn't put together a quorum to conduct business. Dozens of bills died on the calendar during the walkout. The absent members were fined tens of thousands of dollars, but they held off right-to-work legislation for a year and got other, smaller concessions. Was it worth it? Definitely not. The Texas fiasco is happening on a much bigger stage and centers on one issue that is relatively simple to explain to voters: should Texas Republicans redraw congressional districts early — instead of after the 2030 census — to create more GOP seats and help the party hold a narrow U.S. House margin? Given the higher profile and tighter focus, the impact of the Texas Democrats' walkout could be more effective. Indiana lawmakers might face a similar situation soon as pressure mounts from President Donald Trump's administration for other red states to redistrict early. But Democrats won't have the option of a walkout this time. That's because the GOP controls the House 70-30 and the Senate 40-10. It takes a quorum of 67 and 33 to conduct business, respectively, which means Republicans don't need Democrats for a quorum or to pass a bill. Indiana Republicans have a big decision to make. They have to weigh public transparency and fiscal prudence in deciding whether to redistrict in a special session. Gov. Mike Braun, in particular, has spent months preaching financial discipline — resulting in state layoffs as well as cuts to benefits and services for Hoosiers. The decision to call a special session is ultimately up to Braun, but legislative leaders would have to be on board to avoid embarrassment. The GOP would need to find a cogent message on why the move is necessary. After all, Indiana's population has increased minimally, about 1.5%, since 2021, so there simply aren't large migration and demographic changes to adjust for. What's left is purely partisan politics. And it's hard for me to to believe that the GOP leaders here would move forward with a special, superfluous session that could cost upwards of $200,000 just for that.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
'Utterly chilling': IU professor sanctioned over Indiana's intellectual diversity law
Indiana University has sanctioned an outspoken professor at its Bloomington campus after finding an anonymous complaint about his classroom conduct had merit — likely making him the first professor to be punished under Indiana's new intellectual diversity law enacted last year. However, Germanic studies professor Ben Robinson told IndyStar that he believes the university did not conduct an investigation to uphold its sanctions. And considering some odd circumstances in his case, he said, he's concerned the university is making an example out of him. "There's no reference to any sort of discovery process whatsoever," he said. "It was clearly a hastily and thoughtlessly written, anonymous complaint in a reporting system that had no consequences. ... It was elevated into an SEA 202 complaint." IU policy on reviewing such complaints states the university will conduct a investigation if a preliminary review found the complaint had merit. It's unclear if this step was taken before Robinson was sanctioned. The complaint lodged against Robinson is one of at least 14 grievances investigated in the state so far. It's unclear whether disciplinary action has been taken in most of those cases. Under Senate Enrolled Act 202, a professor must embrace free expression and "intellectual diversity," while not lecturing about political views unrelated to their field. The law requires those qualities to be considered during tenure review and creates a mechanism for students to report professors. After a "thorough review," Rick Van Kooten, executive dean of IU's College of Arts and Sciences, found the complaint reflected that the professor conflated "personal life experiences, academic scholarship and pedagogical practice" in violation of SEA 202, according to the five-page disciplinary letter. "This blurring of roles compromises the integrity of the classroom environment and risks confusing or alienating students," the letter reads. "While this is a matter of degree, it serves as a formal warning to Prof. Robinson to exercise greater care in ensuring that personal experiences and opinions do not unduly influence his pedagogy." IU spokesperson Mark Bode said the university does not comment on personnel matters. He did not respond to an IndyStar question about whether it conducted an investigation. The complaint against Professor Ben Robinson The complaint against Robinson was filed last year and cited classroom comments he made about the university restricting free speech rights, times he's been arrested while protesting, and his views regarding the state of Israel. "He has used class time to say that the university is restricting people's free speech. He has talked about being arrested during class time several times," the complaint reads. "He talks negatively about the state of Israel and describes the war in untrue and unfair ways." Robinson has been a vocal critic of the IU administration, including its now-struck-down expressive activities policy, and was arrested during the Bloomington campus' Palestine solidarity encampment in spring 2024. He has also been the target of external "watchdog" groups seeking to publicize and condemn political activities of faculty. The professor said he plans to fight the sanction. According to the letter, he can request a campus Faculty Board of Review to investigate whether university officials have infringed on his right to academic freedom. The complaint isn't valid, Robinson asserts, both because of its anonymity and its origin. According to IU policy, a SEA 202 complaint will only be considered if it is submitted by a student or university employee; the policy does not specify protocol for anonymous complaints. In his letter, Van Kooten said the complainant was "very likely a student" in Robinson's class. Also, the complaint was not initially submitted to the student reporting system intended for "intellectual diversity" concerns. Instead, it was sent to an informal remediating body, which cannot investigate or discipline, and the university escalated the complaint to the Office of Civil Rights Compliance, which can. "It was surprising that the dean felt that a reporting mechanism that says there's no investigations can just be passed off to someone else, namely him, to conduct the investigation," Robinson said. In the letter, Van Kooten said the complaint submission was "somewhat unusual," but it would be "irresponsible" for the university to ignore the report. Additional sanctions could lead to firing In the disciplinary letter, Van Kooten appeared to be concerned with the complaint's claim that Robinson frequently mentioned university criticisms and his personal experiences. He acknowledged that Robinson's class "addresses matters such as free speech, education, authority, state violence, and genocide" in the curriculum. "However, referencing these experiences 'several' or 'numerous' times risks shifting the focus away from the academic content and toward personal political narratives," Van Kooten writes. "When such references become excessive, they may inadvertently allow personal ideology to overshadow the intended learning objectives and compromise the neutrality expected in the classroom." The sanction does not result in immediate punishment. However, the written warning was added to Robinson's permanent personnel file, meaning it will be considered in future faculty reviews. Additional sanctions could subject Robinson to probation, suspension, termination or a host of possible penalties related to promotions, tenure or salary, according to IU code. Faculty fought legislature's passage of 202 When the bill was passed in 2024, faculty across the state rebuked it as an infringement on academic freedom and warned of a mass chilling effect on free speech and lecturing on divisive topics. News of his sanction is "utterly, utterly chilling" of his and his colleague's academic freedom and free speech rights, Robinson said, especially during a time when faculty may feel compelled to speak out. He specifically cited genocide in the Israel-Gaza conflict and state-mandated degree cuts at state universities. Receiving another sanction would put his livelihood at risk, Robinson said, and he has lost sleep figuring out how to navigate the process. He said that though he is in a vulnerable position, he hopes to continue to drive conversation about these policies and laws. "The urgency of not caving, the urgency of sticking to one's rights is even greater, because the consequences go well beyond the individual," he said. The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Have a story to tell? Reach Cate Charron by email at ccharron@ on X at @CateCharron or Signal at @ This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: IU sanctions professor over Indiana's intellectual diversity law Solve the daily Crossword
