Government will not be hurried on school guidance after gender ruling
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said it was important the right information was provided to schools, as she accused shadow education secretary Laura Trott of 'shameless opportunism' in asking why ministers had not published it.
Draft guidance for schools and colleges on how best to support pupils has been on hold since Labour entered Government. It was published by the Conservative government in December 2023, with a consultation ending in March last year.
The Education Secretary has got the draft guidance for schools on gender questioning on her desk. The final Cass report was a year ago. If she is serious about protecting women and girls, why hasn't she already published the guidance? Shadow education secretary Laura Trott
Ms Phillipson said guidance would be issued later this year.
Speaking at education questions in the House of Commons on Monday, Conservative shadow minister Ms Trott said: 'Despite the Education Secretary's best attempts to rewrite history, on this side of the House we didn't need a court to tell us biological sex was real.
'The Education Secretary has got the draft guidance for schools on gender questioning on her desk. The final Cass report was a year ago. If she is serious about protecting women and girls, why hasn't she already published the guidance?'
The draft guidance from 2023 said parents 'should not be excluded' from decisions taken by a school or college relating to requests for a child to 'socially transition', such as wishes to change names, pronouns and clothing.
Conservative shadow education secretary Laura Trott was speaking at education questions in the House of Commons (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
The draft guidance said schools and colleges should make parents aware if their child requests a change – except in the 'very rare situation' where parental involvement may raise a 'significant risk of harm' to the child.
It added that schools 'must always protect single-sex spaces' with regard to toilets, showers and changing rooms.
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling, teaching unions said they were 'concerned' about the implications for their pupils. One union, the NASUWT, passed an emergency motion at its conference days after the judgment to warn against introducing 'knee-jerk policy changes'.
Ms Phillipson said she was serious about protecting the rights of women and girls, and pointed to her work running a women's refuge to help people 'fleeing some of the most unimaginable abuse that anyone could ever see'.
The party opposite published guidance a matter of months before the general election in draft form, it is right that we take this issue seriously, that we get it right. We don't need this shameless opportunism, this is children's well-being Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson
She added: 'This is a sensitive area. We are talking about children's well-being, often very vulnerable children experiencing distress. Whilst I recognise the important need to provide clarity for school leaders, and the guidance that they do need, we have to get this right.
'I would just to say to her, that it was only a matter of months before the general election that the party opposite published draft guidance for consultation.
'It is right that we take stock following the full and final review from Dr Cass, which we accept and should be the basis of how we take things forward.'
Ms Trott asked if Ms Phillipson would apologise to women with 'gender-critical' views. She said: 'She's more concerned about listening to student union activists than women. Will the Education Secretary now apologise to these gender-critical women who were forced to spend eye-watering sums on legal fees, fighting for their rights, due to her actions?'
Campaigners for For Women Scotland celebrate outside the Supreme Court in London (Lucy North/PA)
Ms Phillipson said: 'From that question, I don't think you would really know who was in government for the last 14 years. They had ample opportunity to clarify the position, and actually the ruling of the Supreme Court was that Labour's 2010 Equality Act was the basis for the judgment that confirmed that biological sex should be before the provision of single-sex services.'
She added: 'They were also clear that everyone within our country deserves to be treated with dignity and respect, and that trans people continue to receive protection within the law.
'The party opposite published guidance a matter of months before the general election in draft form, it is right that we take this issue seriously, that we get it right. We don't need this shameless opportunism, this is children's well-being.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
Councils in England will put strict requirements in place before 'socially necessary' routes can be changed or cancelled, the department said. This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools. The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday. This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on. 'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments. 'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.' Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport. 'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed. 'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.' Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'. He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating. 'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground. 'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'
Pembrokeshire Herald
32 minutes ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
Paul Miller survives no-confidence vote over Welsh-medium education comments
PEMBROKESHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL'S deputy leader, Cllr Paul Miller, has survived a vote of no-confidence brought over controversial remarks about Welsh-medium education. Survived: Cllr Paul Miller At a special meeting held on Monday (June 2), councillors voted 28 against, 16 in favour, and 11 abstained, rejecting the motion tabled by the council's Independent Political Group. The motion followed comments made by Cllr Miller at a Cabinet meeting in April and again at the Education Overview and Scrutiny Committee in May, where he stated that 'mums he spoke to in Neyland didn't give a toss' whether their children were taught in Welsh or English, suggesting that some parents chose Ysgol Caer Elen for its facilities rather than its language policy. Calls for accountability Introducing the motion, Cllr Huw Murphy said the remarks were 'unacceptable in 2025' and risked undermining equality in the delivery of Welsh-medium education. He criticised Cllr Miller for proposing to gather data from parents on their language choices, despite being told that such a move fell outside the remit of the school admissions code. He added that the Deputy Leader had ignored advice from senior officers, the Welsh Language Commissioner, and even his own party's former First Minister, Mark Drakeford. Cabinet shift and apology In response, Cllr Miller said he was repeating what had been told to him by local parents and insisted he had not intended to offend. He admitted his wording had been clumsy and apologised for any upset caused. The Deputy Leader also pointed to a revised Cabinet decision made at an extraordinary meeting on May 21, which broadened the proposed parental survey to include all schools and all languages, rather than focusing solely on Welsh-medium settings. Cllr Miller maintained that the initial motion had been mischaracterised and accused political opponents of seeking to 'sow division' over a non-issue. Mixed reactions from councillors Council Chair Cllr Delme Harries reminded members that enabling choice in education was a core responsibility and stressed the need for respectful dialogue. He said: 'How we respond to being incorrect is important. The Welsh language is a living language and deserves our respect.' Some councillors, including Conservative Cllr Aled Thomas and Plaid Cymru's Cllr Michael Williams, acknowledged that the comments had been ill-judged but stopped short of supporting a motion of no-confidence. Others, including Cllr Jamie Adams and former Leader Cllr John Davies, said senior councillors must use discretion when amplifying public opinions. Conservative Group Leader Cllr Di Clements said the Cabinet had already changed course and called the motion unnecessary, citing the £2,000 cost of holding the extraordinary meeting. 'That money would be better spent filling the black hole in the local authority's finances,' she said. Public response and political tension The incident has sparked wider debate about the promotion of Welsh-medium education, with strong reactions on both sides. Prominent journalist Hefin Wyn criticised the council's leadership for downplaying the issue and called the remarks an affront to the principle of language equality. His comments are due to be published in full in Friday's edition of The Pembrokeshire Herald. The council's revised position means parents of all school applicants may now be asked why they choose a particular setting. The final shape and cost of this data-gathering exercise have yet to be confirmed.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cooper clashes with Reeves over spending cuts
Yvette Cooper is battling Rachel Reeves for more money with just a week left before the Treasury unveils new departmental budgets for the rest of the decade. The Home Office is understood to be one of the few departments that has not settled negotiations with the Treasury before the spending review concludes on June 11. Ms Cooper, the Home Secretary, had her hand strengthened when six police chiefs publicly warned that Labour promises could be missed without more money. Labour promised at last summer's general election to halve knife crime, reduce violence against women and girls and recruit 13,000 extra police officers, all of which need investment to deliver. Angela Rayner, the Communities Secretary, is understood to be another Cabinet minister who is taking their talks with the Chancellor down to the wire. She has been attempting to guarantee a significant funding boost for building social housing and is responsible for making sure councils are given enough money to deliver key services. Unprotected departments, for which the Government has made no specific spending promises, including the Home Office and the Communities, are facing real-terms cuts in their spending in the latter years of this decade. Overall day-to-day departmental spending will grow by 1.2 per cent annually in real terms in the financial years ahead but much of the increase will be taken up by the NHS, defence and schools budgets. Ms Reeves will attempt to frame the announcements as showing that Labour is focused on investing in the country's security, health and economy in every part of the country. Treasury insiders are pointing back to the £40 billion tax increase announced last autumn to counter Left-wing criticism that hard choices are not being made to protect public spending. But much of the money was front-loaded into the 2024-25 and 2025-26 financial years, with spending rises set at much less generous levels for the three following financial years. The Chancellor's allies are making clear that there will be no tax changes announced next week, with any such decisions held off until the Budget in the autumn. Similarly, there will be no change to overall public spending levels – what is known as the spending 'envelope' – when Ms Reeves unveils the spending review conclusions. Instead, Cabinet ministers for weeks have been ordered to find savings in what Whitehall insiders admit is a tough set of negotiations with costs being closely scrutinised. Sir Keir Starmer has complicated calculations by announcing a part-reversal of the abolition of the universal winter fuel payment, which saw around 10 million pensioners lose the payments of up to £300 last year. The details of how many pensioners will get the payments this coming winter could come next week, the Prime Minister appeared to indicate in a BBC Radio 4 interview on Monday. One idea being scrutinised is to restore the payments for all pensioners and then claw equivalent money back from only the richest via the tax system. That would be a simpler solution than changing the threshold – currently set at around £11,500 a year – above which pensioners do not get the payment. But it would also see most of the £1.5 billion original saving being lost, meaning an alternative source of funds must be found. The spending review is not expected to announce new details for increasing defence spending from 2.5 per cent of GDP a year to 3 per cent. Sir Keir calls the target an 'ambition' and says it will be delivered in the next parliament, meaning after the next general election expected in 2029 if Labour is re-elected. He has faced mounting pressure over failing to name the year this will be delivered. But, with the specifics of how to hit 2.5 per cent only recently outlined, Treasury insiders insist detailed planning on when and how to reach 3 per cent is not coming next week. Six of Britain's police chiefs including Sir Mark Rowley, the commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, and Serena Kennedy, the chief constable of Merseyside Police, went public last week calling on the Treasury to properly fund the Home Office. They wrote in The Times that it was 'the most important moment in decades for the government to choose to back policing' and warned that their ability to 'secure outcomes for victims is at risk' without 'substantial investments'.
